Skip to main content
Log in

Detection of incidental vertebral fractures on routine lateral chest radiographs

Valutazione delle fratture vertebrali osteoporotiche sul radiogramma laterale del torace

  • Chest Radiology/Radiologia Toracica
  • Published:
La radiologia medica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study sought to assess the usefulness of routine lateral chest radiographs for detecting unrecognised vertebral compression fractures.

Materials and methods

We prospectively selected outpatients without symptoms or risk factors for osteoporosis who underwent chest radiography for different clinical indications. Two independent reviewers with different levels of experience assessed the radiographs for vertebral deformities and graded them as mild, moderate and severe according to the semiquantitative Genant Index. The kappa statistic was used to evaluate interobserver agreement and verify the reproducibility of this method. The prevalence of vertebral fractures observed was compared with that recorded in the official radiology reports.

Results

Our study involved 145 patients (73 men, 72 women; age range 50–86 years, mean age 67.5). Clinically relevant vertebral fractures were seen in 18/145 patients (12.4%). These were moderate in 13 patients and severe in five, and single in 12 patients and multiple in six. Interobserver agreement was very high (κ=0.9). Only 11% of these fractures were recorded in the official reports.

Conclusions

Lateral chest radiographs could be effective for assessing previously unknown vertebral compression fractures in individuals without clinical evidence or risk factors for osteoporosis.

Riassunto

Obiettivo

Verificare l’utilità del radiogramma laterale del torace eseguito per altre indicazioni nella identificazione di fratture vertebrali osteoporotiche non note.

Materiali e metodi

Abbiamo prospetticamente selezionato i pazienti ambulatoriali senza sintomi né fattori di rischio per osteoporosi sottoposti ad esame radiografico del torace per varie indicazioni. Due radiologi con differenti livelli di esperienza hanno separatamente ricercato le anomalie vertebrali presenti in tali pazienti e le hanno classificate in lievi, moderate e severe secondo l’indice semiquantitativo di Genant. Abbiamo usato il k statistico per valutare la variabilità interosservatore e verificare la riproducibilità del metodo. Abbiamo paragonato la prevalenza delle fratture vertebrali osservata con quella delle fratture menzionate nei referti ufficiali.

Risultati

La nostra popolazione risulta composta da 145 pazienti (73 M, 72 F; range di età 50–86 anni, età media 67,5 anni). Diciotto pazienti (18/145=12,4%) presentavano fratture vertebrali clinicamente rilevanti: moderate 13 pazienti, severe 5; fratture singole in 12 pazienti, multiple in 6. La concordanza tra i due esaminatori e stata molto elevata (κ=0,9). Solo l’11% di tali fratture era stata riportata nei referti ufficiali.

Conclusioni

Il radiogramma toracico laterale può rappresentare un vantaggioso sistema per identificare le fratture vertebrali osteoporotiche non note in una popolazione asintomatica e senza fattori di rischio per osteoporosi.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References/Bibliografia

  1. Poole KES, Compston JE (2006) Osteoporosis and its management. BMJ 333:1251–1256

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cummings SR, Melton LJ (2002) Epidemiology and outcomes of osteoporotic fractures. Lancet 359:1761–1767

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Klotzbuecher CM, Ross PD, Landsman PB et al (2000) Patients with prior fractures have an increased risk of future fractures: a summary of the literature and statistical synthesis. J Bone Miner Res 15:721–739

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kroth PJ, Murray MD, McDonald CJ (2004) Undertreatment of osteoporosis in women, based on detection of vertebral compression fractures on chest radiography. Am J Geriatric Pharmacother 2:112–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mui LW, Haramati LB, Alterman DD et al (2003) Evaluation of vertebral fractures on lateral chest radiographs of inner-city post-menopausal women. Calcif Tissue Int 73:550–554

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Siris ES, Chen YT, Abbott TA et al (2004) Bone mineral density thresholds for pharmacological intervention to prevent fractures. Arch Intern Med 164:1108–1112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kanis JA (2002) Diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk. Lancet 359:1929–1935

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. World Health Organization Study Group (1984) Assessment of fracture risk and its application to postmenopausal osteoporosis. World Health Organ Teach Ser 843

  9. Wagner S, Stäbler A, Sittek H et al (2005) Diagnosis of osteoporosis: visual assessment on conventional versus digital radiographs. Osteoporos Int 16:1815–1822

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ross PD, Davis JW, Epstein RS et al (1991) Pre-existing fractures and bone mass predict vertebral fracture incidence in women. Ann Intern Med 114:919–923

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ross PD, Genant HK, Davis JW et al (1993) Predicting vertebral fracture incidence from prevalent fractures and bone density among non-black osteoporotic women. Osteoporos Int 3:120–126

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. National Osteoporosis Foundation (1999) Phyisician’s guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis: National Osteoporosis Foundation, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chassang M, Grimaud A, Cucchi JM et al (2007) Can low-dose computed tomographic scan of the spine replace conventional radiography? An evaluation based on imaging myelomas, bone metastases, and fractures from osteoporosis. Clinical Imaging 31:225–227

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim N, Rowe BH, Raymond G et al (2004) Underreporting of vertebral fractures on routine chest radiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182:297–300

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Gelbach SH, Bigelow C, Heimisdottir M et al (2000) Recognition of vertebral fractures in a clinical setting. Osteoporos Int 11:577–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Majumdar SR, Kim N, Colman I et al (2005) Incidental vertebral fractures discovered with chest radiography in the emergency department: prevalence, recognition and osteoporosis management in a cohort of elderly patients. Arch Intern Med 165:905–909

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Genant HK, Wu CY, Van Kuijk C et al (1993) Vertebral fractures assessment using a semiquantitative technique. J Bone Min Res 8:1137–1148

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Damilakis J, Maris TG, Karantanas AH (2007) An update on the assessment of osteoporosis using radiologic techniques. Eur Radiol 17:1591–1602

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Grados F, Roux C, de Vernejoul MC et al (2001) Comparison of four morphometric definitions and a semiquantitative consensus reading for assessing prevalent vertebral fractures. Osteoporos Int 12:716–722

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Morris CA, Carrino JA, Lang P et al (2006) Incidental vertebral fractures on chest radiographs. Recognition, documentation and treatment. J Gen Intern Med 21:352–356

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. Cataldi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cataldi, V., Laporta, T., Sverzellati, N. et al. Detection of incidental vertebral fractures on routine lateral chest radiographs. Radiol med 113, 968–977 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-008-0294-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-008-0294-1

Keywords

Parole chiave

Navigation