Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Spectrum of collateral findings in multislice CT coronary angiography

Spettro dei reperti collaterali in TC multistrato delle coronarie

  • Cardiac Radiology Cardioradiologia
  • Published:
La radiologia medica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of the study was to investigate the prevalence of the noncardiac collateral findings during multislice computed tomography coronary angiography (MSCT-CA).

Materials and methods

Six hundred and seventy patients undergoing MSCT-CA with 16-slice and 64-slice CT scanners for suspected atherosclerotic disease of the coronary arteries were retrospectively reviewed. All data sets obtained with a large field of view (FOV) were analysed by two radiologists using standard mediastinal and lung window settings. Collateral findings were divided according to clinical importance into nonsignificant, remarkable and compulsory to be investigated.

Results

Eighty-five percent of patients revealed coronary artery disease (CAD). Only 138/670 (20.6%) were without any additional finding. An additional 1,234 findings were recorded: nonsignificant 332 (26.9%), mild 821 (66.53%), compulsory for study 81 (6.56%). A total of 81 patients (12.08%) had significant noncardiac pathology requiring clinical or radiological follow-up. Among these, newly discovered pathologies were revealed in two patients (2.46%).

Conclusions

A significant number of noncardiac findings might have been missed in MSCT-CA scans; the appropriate approach should be as a team trained in cardiology and radiology.

Riassunto

Obiettivo

Scopo dello studio è valutare la prevalenza dei reperti collaterali non cardiaci durante l’esecuzione di angiografia coronaria mediante TC multistrato (AC-TCMS).

Materiali e metodi

Sono stati valutati retrospettivamente seicento e settanta pazienti sottoposti ad AC-TCMS con apparecchio a 16 e 64 strati per sospetta coronaropatia. Due radiologi hanno valutato separatamente tutti i datasets ottenuti con un ampio campo di vista utilizzando le finestre di vista mediastinica e polmonare. I reperti collaterali identificati sono stati divisi a seconda dell’importanza clinica in non significativi, significativi e in obbligo di ulteriori accertamenti.

Risultati

Nell’85% dei pazienti è stata riscontrata una malattia aterosclerotica delle arterie coronarie. Solamente 138/670 (20,6%) dei pazienti è risultata priva di reperti collaterali. Sono stati riscontrati 1234 rilievi accessori, divisi in 332 (26,9%) non significativi, 821 (66,53%) significativi e 81 (6,56%) in obbligo di ulteriori accertamenti. In 81 (12,08%) sono state riscontrate patologie che hanno comportato ulteriori accertamenti o un follow-up radiologico. In 2 di questi pazienti l’esame ha permesso di diagnosticare due neoplasie (2,46%).

Conclusioni

Un numero significativo di reperti accessori potrebbe essere stato perso nella lettura delle angiografic coronariche mediante TCMS. L’approccio appropriato dovrebbe prevedere la lettura degli esami da parte di un team esperto in Cardiologia e Radiologia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References/Bibliografia

  1. Nieman K, Oudkerk M, Rensing BJ et al (2001) Coronary angiography with multi-slice computed tomography. Lancet 357:599–603

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cademartiri F, Nieman K, Mollet N et al (2003) Non-invasive 16-row spiral multislice computed tomography coronary angiography after one year of experience. Ital Heart J Suppl 4:587–593

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cademartiri F, Runza G, Marano R et al (2005) Diagnostic accuracy of 16-row multislice CT angiography in the evaluation of coronary segments. Radiol Med 109:91–97

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Pugliese F, Mollet NR, Runza G et al (2006) Diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive 64-slice CT coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris. Eur Radiol 16:575–582

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. de Feyter P, Mollet N, Nieman K et al (2004) Noninvasive visualisation of coronary atherosclerosis with multislice computed tomography. Cardiovasc Radiat Med 5:49–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Achenbach S, Moselewski F, Ropers D et al (2004) Detection of calcified and noncalcified coronary atherosclerotic plaque by contrast-enhanced, submillimeter multidetector spiral computed tomography: a segment-based comparison with intravascular ultrasound. Circulation 109:14–17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, Nieman K et al (2004) Multislice spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris. J Am Coll Cardiol 43:2265–2270

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ropers D, Baum U, Pohle K et al (2003) Detection of coronary artery stenoses with thin-slice multi-detector row spiral computed tomography and multiplanar reconstruction. Circulation 107:664–666

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cademartiri F, Runza G, Luccichenti G et al (2006) Coronary artery anomalies: incidence, pathophysiology, clinical relevance and role of diagnostic imaging. Radiol Med 111:376–391

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lessick J, Mutlak D, Rispler S et al (2005) Comparison of multidetector computed tomography versus echocardiography for assessing regional left ventricular function. Am J Cardiol 96:1011–1015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim RJ (2006) Diagnostic testing. J Am Coll Cardiol 47 [Suppl 11]:D23–D27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. White CS, Kuo D, Kelemen M et al (2005) Chest pain evaluation in the emergency department: can MDCT provide a comprehensive evaluation? AJR Am J Roentgenol 185:533–540

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Horton KM, Post WS, Blumenthal RS, Fishman EK (2002) Prevalence of significant noncardiac findings on electron-beam computed tomography coronary artery calcium screening examinations. Circulation 106:532–534

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Georgiou D, Budoff MJ, Kaufer E et al (2001) Screening patients with chest pain in the emergency department using electron beam tomography: a follow-up study. J Am Coll Cardiol 38:105–110

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Schragin JG, Weissfeld JL, Edmundowicz D et al (2004) Non-cardiac findings on coronary electron beam computed tomography scanning. J Thorac Imaging 19:82–86

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Onuma Y, Tanabe K, Nakazawa G et al (2006) Noncardiac findings in cardiac imaging with multidetector computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 48:402–406

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hunold P, Schmermund A, Seibel RM et al (2001) Prevalence and clinical significance of accidental findings in electron-beam tomographic scans for coronary artery calcification. Eur Heart J 22:1748–1758

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Rumberger JA. (2006) Noncardiac abnormalities in diagnostic cardiac computed tomography: within normal limits or we never looked! J Am Coll Cardiol 48:407–408

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Cademartiri.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cademartiri, F., Malagò, R., Belgrano, M. et al. Spectrum of collateral findings in multislice CT coronary angiography. Radiol med 112, 937–948 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-007-0194-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-007-0194-9

Key words

Parole chiave

Navigation