Skip to main content
Log in

How Planting Density Affects Number and Yield of Potato Minitubers in a Commercial Glasshouse Production System

  • Published:
Potato Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Commercial potato minituber production systems aim at high tuber numbers per plant. This study investigated by which mechanisms planting density (25.0, 62.5 and 145.8 plants/m2) of in vitro derived plantlets affected minituber yield and minituber number per plantlet. Lowering planting density resulted in a slower increase in soil cover by the leaves and reduced the accumulated intercepted radiation (AIR). It initially also reduced light use efficiency (LUE) and harvest index, and thus tuber weights per m2. At the commercial harvest 10 weeks after planting (WAP), LUE tended to be higher at lower densities. This compensated for the lower AIR and led to only slightly lower tuber yields. Lowering planting density increased tuber numbers per (planted) plantlet in all grades. It improved plantlet survival and increased stem numbers per plant. However, fewer stolons were produced per stem, whereas stolon numbers per plant were not affected. At lower densities, more tubers were initiated per stolon and the balance between initiation and later resorption of tubers was more favourable. Early interplant competition was thought to reduce the number of tubers initiated at higher densities, whereas later-occurring interplant competition resulted in a large fraction of the initiated tubers being resorbed at intermediate planting densities. At low planting densities, the high number of tubers initiated was also retained. Shortening of the production period could be considered at higher planting densities, because tuber number in the commercial grade > 9 mm did not increase any more after 6 WAP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AIR:

Accumulated intercepted radiation

CV:

Cultivar

DMC:

Dry matter concentration

DW:

Dry weight

FW:

Fresh weight

HI:

Harvest index

LUE:

Light use efficiency

PAR:

Photosynthetically active radiation

PD:

Planting density

WAP:

Weeks after planting

References

  • Abdulnour J, Roy G, Desjardins Y (2003) Effect of supplemental lighting, substrate (potting mix) volume and plant densities on potato minituber production during winter greenhouse culture in Quebec. Acta Hortic 619:53–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Fonseka HD, Asanuma K, Kusutani A, Ghosh AK, Ueda K (1996) Growth and yield of potato cultivars in spring cropping I. Plant morphology, growth, assimilate partitioning and yield under two planting densities. Jpn J Crop Sci 65:269–276

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grigoriadou K, Leventakis N (1999) Large scale commercial production of potato minitubers, using in vitro techniques. Potato Res 42:607–610 doi:10.1007/BF02358178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haverkort AJ, van de Waart M, Bodlaender KBA (1990) Interrelationships of the number of initial sprouts, stems, stolons and tubers per potato plant. Potato Res 33:269–274 doi:10.1007/BF02358456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haverkort AJ, Uenk D, Veroude H, van de Maart M (1991) Relationships between ground cover, intercepted solar radiation, leaf area index and infrared reflectance of potato crops. Potato Res 34(1):113–121 doi:10.1007/BF02358105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones ED (1988) A current assessment of in vitro culture and other rapid multiplication methods in North America and Europe. Am Potato J 65:209–220 doi:10.1007/BF02854453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karafyllidis DI, Georgakis DN, Stavropoulos NI, Vezyroglou IA, Nianiou EX (1997) Effect of planting density and size of potato minitubers on their yielding capacity. Acta Hortic 462:943–949

    Google Scholar 

  • Khurana SC, McLaren JS (1982) The influence of leaf area, light interception and season on potato growth and yield. Potato Res 25:329–342 doi:10.1007/BF02357290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lommen WJM (1993) Post-harvest characteristics of potato minitubers with different fresh weights and from different harvests. II. Losses during storage. Potato Res 36:273–282 doi:10.1007/BF02361793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lommen WJM, Struik PC (1992a) Influence of a single non-destructive harvest on potato plantlets grown for minituber production. Neth J Agric Sci 40:21–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Lommen WJM, Struik PC (1992b) Production of potato minitubers by repeated harvesting: Plant productivity and initiation, growth and resorption of tubers. Neth J Agric Sci 40:342–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Lommen WJM, Struik PC (1992c) Production of potato minitubers by repeated harvesting: Effects of crop husbandry on yield parameters. Potato Res 35:419–432 doi:10.1007/BF02357598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lommen WJM, Struik PC (1994) Field performance of potato minitubers with different fresh weights and conventional seed tubers: crop establishment and yield formation. Potato Res 37:301–313 doi:10.1007/BF02360523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lommen WJM, Struik PC (1995) Field performance of potato minitubers with different fresh weights and conventional seed tubers: Multiplication factors and progeny yield variation. Potato Res 38:159–169 doi:10.1007/BF02357929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzen JH, Ewing EE (1990) Changes in tuberization and assimilate partitioning in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) during the first 18 days of photoperiod treatment. Ann Bot (Lond) 66:457–464

    Google Scholar 

  • Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473–497 doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien PJ, Firman DM, Allen EJ (1998) Effects of shading and seed tuber spacing on initiation and number of tubers in potato crops (Solanum tuberosum). J Agric Sci 130:431–449 doi:10.1017/S0021859698005541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pruski K (2007) The canon of potato science: 22. In vitro multiplication through nodal cuttings. Potato Res 50:293–296 doi:10.1007/s11540-008-9050-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pruski K, Astatkie T, Duplessis P, Lewis T, Nowak J, Struik PC (2003) Use of jasmonate for conditioning of potato plantlets and microtubers in greenhouse production of minitubers. Am J Potato Res 80:183–193

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rex BL, Russel WA, Wolfe HR (1987) The effect of spacing of seed pieces on yield, quality and economic value for processing of Shepody potato in Manitaba. Am Potato J 64:177–189 doi:10.1007/BF02853461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy RD, Machado VS, Alam SMM, Ali A (1995) Greenhouse production of potato (Solanum tuberosum L. cv. Désirée) seed tubers using in vitro plantlets and rooted cuttings in large propagation beds. Potato Res 38:61–68 doi:10.1007/BF02358070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seabrook JEA, Percy JE, Douglass LK, Tai GCC (1995) Photoperiod in vitro affects subsequent yield of greenhouse-grown potato tubers. Am Potato J 72:365–373 doi:10.1007/BF02849333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sipos J, Nowak J, Hicks G (1988) Effect of daminozide on survival, growth and yield of micropropagated potatoes. Am Potato J 65:353–364 doi:10.1007/BF02853531

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Struik PC (2007) The canon of potato science: 25. Minitubers. Potato Res 50:305–308 doi:10.1007/s11540-008-9051-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Struik PC, Lommen WJM (1990) Production, storage and use of micro- and minitubers. In: Proceedings 11th Triennial Conference of the European Association for Potato Research, Edinburgh, pp 122−133

  • Tadesse Mehari (2007) The canon of potato science: 23. Transplants. Potato Res 50:297–299 doi:10.1007/s11540-008-9078-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tadesse Mehari, Lommen WJM, Struik PC (2001) Effects of nitrogen pre-treatment of transplants from in vitro produced potato plantlets on transplant growth and yield in the field. Neth J Agric Sci 49:67–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton MK, Knutson WK (1986) Effect of transplant container volume and growing season length on field performance of micropropagated potatoes. Am Potato J 63:399–410 doi:10.1007/BF02854103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Zaag DE (1990) The implications of micropropagation for the future of seed production systems in Europe. In: Proceedings 11th Triennial Conference of the European Association for Potato Research, Edinburgh, pp 28−45

  • Wiersema SG (1986) A method of producing seed tubers from true potato seed. Potato Res 29:225–237 doi:10.1007/BF02357653

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank NAK-AGRO Emmeloord for the possibility to carry out this research under commercial conditions and their permission to publish the results. Special thanks go to T. Stolte and T. Meulendijks for their cooperation and ideas.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. J. M. Lommen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van der Veeken, A.J.H., Lommen, W.J.M. How Planting Density Affects Number and Yield of Potato Minitubers in a Commercial Glasshouse Production System. Potato Res. 52, 105–119 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11540-008-9124-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11540-008-9124-z

Keywords

Navigation