Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Exploring the Impacts of Safety Culture on Immigrants’ Vulnerability in Non-motorized Crashes: A Cross-sectional Study

  • Published:
Journal of Urban Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pedestrians and cyclists are a vulnerable group of road users. Immigrants are disproportionally represented in pedestrian and cyclist crashes. We postulate that the mismatch in safety culture between countries of their origin and the USA contribute to their vulnerability in pedestrian and cyclist crashes. Over time, the differences may disappear and immigrants’ traffic behavior gravitates toward those of native-borns. We describe this process as safety assimilation. Using the pedestrian and cyclist crash database in New York City between 2001 and 2003, we examined the effects of foreign-born population, their countries of origin, and time of entry into the USA on census tract-level pedestrian and cyclist crashes. We find that neighborhoods with a higher concentration of immigrants, especially those from Latin America, Eastern Europe, and Asia, have more crashes. Our results also exhibit a pattern of the hypothesized safety assimilation process. The study suggests a higher level of vulnerability of immigrants to pedestrian and cyclist crashes. We propose that targeted policies and programs need to be developed for immigrants of different countries of origin.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 2.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Some studies use crash rate, i.e., number of crashes per population as the dependent variable. This specification indirectly assumes a linear relationship between number of crashes and population size, which may not be necessarily true. Instead, we use the number of crashes as the dependent variable—and control the impact from population by having daytime population density and its quadratic term as independent variables in the regression models.

  2. The US Census 2000 divided Europe into four parts: northern, western, southern, and eastern. The eastern part used by Census appears to comprise that section commonly referred to as “Eastern Europe.” We refer to the other three parts as “the rest of Europe.”

  3. These variables were selected to minimize multiple correlations among them. Only those with variance inflation factor less than 10 were chosen.

  4. We tested running regression models separately using pedestrian-only crashes and cyclist-only crashes. The estimates are similar to each other, thus we combined pedestrian crashes and cyclist crashes together in a single dependent variable.

  5. This variable is included in the model to distinguish between “minority” effect and “immigrant” effect. The latter is what we are interested in the paper.

References

  1. NHTSA. Traffic Safety Facts: Bicyclists and Other Cyclists (2008 Data). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  2. NHTSA. Traffic Safety Facts: Pedestrians (2008 Data). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  3. NHTSA. 2008 Traffic Safety Facts Data Summary Booklet. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Surface transportation policy project (STPP). Mean Streets. 2002. http://www.transact.org/PDFs/ms2002/MeanStreets2002.pdf. Accessed June 2009.

  5. Segal UA, Elliott D, Mayadas NS. Immigration Worldwide: Policies, Practices, and Trends. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Passel JS, Cohn DV. U.S. Population Projections: 2005–2050. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cox S, Cox T. The structure of employee attitudes to safety: a European example. Work Stress. 1991; 5(2): 93–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fairley M. 2009 Traffic Safety Culture Index. Washington, DC: AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hedlund J. Improving Traffic Safety Culture in the United States: the journey forward; summary and synthesis. Washington, DC: AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Williams AF, Haworth N. Overcoming barriers to creating a well-functioning safety culture: a comparison of Australia and the United States. In: Improving Traffic Safety Culture in the United States. Washington, DC: AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  11. CRTAS. China Road Traffic Accidents Statistics. Beijing, China: Traffic Administration Bureau of China, State Security Ministry; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  12. CRTAS. China Road Traffic Accidents Statistics. Beijing, China: Traffic Administration Bureau of China State Security Ministry; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  13. PSIAA. Pedestrian Safety Initiatives for Asian Americans. Paper presented at: Conference on Well-Beings of Asian Americans; May 12th, 2006; Baruch College, NY.

  14. Pucher J, Dijkstra L. Promoting safe walking and cycling to improve public health: lessons from the Netherlands and Germany. Am J Public Health. 2003; 93(9): 1509–1516.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kim WD, Palmisano PA. Racial differences in childhood hospitalized pedestrian injuries. Pediatr Emerg Care. 1992; 8(4): 221–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Braddock M, Lapidus G, Gregorio D, Kapp M, Banco L. Population, income, and ecological correlates of child pedestrian injury. Pediatrics. 1991; 88(6): 1242–1247.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Rivara FP, Barber M. Demographic analysis of childhood pedestrian injuries. Pediatrics. 1985; 76(3): 375–381.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lawson SD, Edwards PJ. The involvement of ethnic minorities in road accidents: data from three studies of young pedestrian casualties. Traffic Eng Contr. 1991; 32: 12–19.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Dobsona A, Smith N, McFadden M, Walker M, Hollingworth S. In Australia are people born in other countries at higher risk of road trauma than locally born people? Accid Anal Prev. 2004; 36: 375–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Demetriades D, Gkiokas G, Velmahos GC, Brown C, Murray J, Noguchi T. Alcohol and illicit drugs in traumatic deaths: prevalence and association with type and severity of injuries. J Am Coll Surg. 2004; 199(5): 687–692.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. LaScala EA. Demographic and environmental correlates of pedestrian injury collisions: a spatial analysis. Accident Analysis and Prevention. 2000; 32: 651–658.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ryb G, Dischinger PC, Kufera JA, Soderstrom CA. Social, behavioral and driving characteristics of injured pedestrians: a comparison with other unintentional trauma patients. Accid Anal Prev. 2007; 39: 313–318.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. White D, Raeside R, Barker D. Road Accidents and Children Living in Disadvantaged Areas: A Literature Review. Saughton House, Scotland: The Scottish Executive Central Research Unit; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Cottrill CD, Thakuriah P. Evaluating pedestrian crashes in areas with high low-income or minority populations. Accid Anal Prev. 2010; 42(6): 1718–1728.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Steinbach R, Green J, Edwards P, Grundy C. ‘Race’ or place? Explaining ethnic variations in childhood pedestrian injury rates in London. Health Place. 2010; 16: 34–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Smart M. US immigrants and bicycling: two-wheeled in Autopia. Transport Pol. 2010; 17: 153–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Blumenberg E. Moving in and moving around: immigrants, travel behavior, and implications for transport policy. Transportation Letters Int J Transportation Res. 2009; 1: 169–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Blumenberg E, Shiki K. Transportation Assimilation: Immigrants, Race and Ethnicity, and Mode Choice. Paper presented at: 86th Annual Conference of the Transportation Research Board, CD-ROM; 2007; Washington, DC.

  29. Myers D. Changes over time in transportation mode for journey to work: effects of aging and immigration. In: Decennial Census Data for Transportation Planning: Case Studies and Strategies for 2000. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Purvis C. Commuting Patterns of Immigrants. CTPP 2000 Status Report. Washington, DC: US Department of Transportation, Bureau of Transportation Statistics; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ramet SP. Eastern Europe: Politics, Culture, and Society Since 1939. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  32. U.S. Census Bureau. US Census 2000 Summary File 1 & 3. 2000. http://www.census.gov/. Accessed July 2008.

  33. New York City Department of City Planning. BYTES of the BIG APPLE™. 2005. http://www.nyc.gov/html/dcp/html/bytes/applbyte.shtml. Accessed July 2008.

  34. Pucher J, Buehler R. Making cycling irresistible: lessons from the Netherlands, Denmark and Germany. Transp Rev. 2008; 28: 495–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. City of New York. The New York City Bicycle Survey. 2007. http://www.nyc.gov/html/dcp/pdf/transportation/bike_survey.pdf. Accessed June 2009.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cynthia Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, C., Lin, H. & Loo, B.P. Exploring the Impacts of Safety Culture on Immigrants’ Vulnerability in Non-motorized Crashes: A Cross-sectional Study. J Urban Health 89, 138–152 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-011-9629-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-011-9629-7

Keywords

Navigation