Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Towards determining soft tissue properties for modelling spine surgery: current progress and challenges

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Current complication rates for adolescent scoliosis surgery necessitate the development of better surgical planning tools to improve outcomes. Here we present our approach to developing finite element models of the thoracolumbar spine for deformity surgery simulation, with patient-specific model anatomy based on low-dose pre-operative computed tomography scans. In a first step towards defining patient-specific tissue properties, an initial ‘benchmark’ set of properties were used to simulate a clinically performed pre-operative spinal flexibility assessment, the fulcrum bending radiograph. Clinical data for ten patients were compared with the simulated results for this assessment and in cases where these data differed by more than 10%, soft tissue properties for the costo-vertebral joint (CVJt) were altered to achieve better agreement. Results from these analyses showed that changing the CVJt stiffness resulted in acceptable agreement between clinical and simulated flexibility in two of the six cases. In light of these results and those of our previous studies in this area, it is suggested that spinal flexibility in the fulcrum bending test is not governed by any single soft tissue structure acting in isolation. More detailed biomechanical characterisation of the fulcrum bending test is required to provide better data for determination of patient-specific soft tissue properties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Asher M, Burton DC (2006) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: natural history and long term treatment effects. Scoliosis 1:2

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aubin CE, Petit Y, Stokes IA et al (2003) Biomechanical modeling of posterior instrumentation of the scoliotic spine. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 6:27–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bjornstrup J (1996) Estimation of human body segment parameters—statistical analysis of results from prior investigations. Technical report ISSN 0906-6233, Laboratory of Image Analysis, Institute of Electronic Systems, Aalborg University, Denmark

  4. Brasiliense LBC, Lazaro BCR, Reyes PM et al (2011) Biomechanical contribution of the rib cage to thoracic stability. Spine 36(26):E1686–E1693

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cann CE (1988) Quantitative ct for determination of bone mineral density: a review. Radiology 166:509–522

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chazal J, Tanguy A, Bourges M et al (1985) Biomechanical properties of spinal ligaments and a histological study of the supraspinal ligament in traction. J Biomech 18:167–176

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cheung KM, Luk KD (1997) Prediction of correction of scoliosis with use of the fulcrum bending radiograph. J Bone Jt Surg Am 79:1144–1150

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cobb RJ (1948) Outline for study of scoliosis. In: American academy of orthopaedic surgeons, instructional course lectures. CV Mosby, St Louis, pp 261–275

  9. Cunningham H, Little JP, Pearcy MJ et al (2007) The effect of soft tissue properties on overall biomechanical response of a human lumbar motion segment: a preliminary finite element study. In: Brebbia CA (ed) Modelling in medicine and biology VII, with transactions on biomedicine and health. WIT Press, Southampton, pp 93–102

  10. Dumas R, Aissaoui R, Mitton D et al (2005) Personalized body segment parameters from biplanar low-dose radiography. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 52:1756–1763

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Erdmann WS (1997) Geometric and inertial data of the trunk in adult males. J Biomech 30:679–688

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hawes MC, O’Brien JP (2008) A century of spine surgery: what can patients expect? Disabil Rehabil 30:808–817

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kumaresan S, Yoganandan N, Pintar FA et al (1999) Finite element modeling of the cervical spine: role of intervertebral disc under axial and eccentric loads. Med Eng Phys 21:689–700

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lemosse D, Le Rue O, Diop A et al (1998) Characterization of the mechanical behaviour parameters of the costo-vertebral joint. Eur Spine J 7:16–23

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Little JP (2004) Finite element modelling of anular lesions in the lumbar intervertebral disc. Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane

    Google Scholar 

  16. Little JP, Adam C (2011) Patient-specific computational biomechanics for simulating adolescent scoliosis surgery: predicted vs clinical correction for a preliminary series of six patients. Int J Numer Methods Biomed Eng 27:347–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Little JP, Adam CJ (2009) The effect of soft tissue properties on spinal flexibility in scoliosis: biomechanical simulation of fulcrum bending. Spine 34:E76–E82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Little JP, Adam CJ (2011) Effects of surgical joint destabilization on load sharing between ligamentous structures in the thoracic spine: a finite element investigation. Clin Biomech 26(9):895–903

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Little JP, de Visser H, Pearcy MJ et al (2008) Are coupled rotations in the lumbar spine largely due to the osseo-ligamentous anatomy?—a modeling study. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 11:95–103

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Little JP, Pearcy MJ, Pettet GJ (2007) Parametric equations to represent the profile of the human intervertebral disc in the transverse plane. Med Biol Eng Comput 45:939–945

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lu YM, Hutton WC, Gharpuray VM (1996) Do bending, twisting, and diurnal fluid changes in the disc affect the propensity to prolapse? A viscoelastic finite element model. Spine 21:2570–2579

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Nachemson A (1960) Lumbar intradiscal pressure: experimental studies on post-mortem material. Acta Orthop Scand 43

  23. Nolte LP, Panjabi M, Oxland T (1990) Biomechanical properties of lumbar spinal ligaments. In: Heimke G, Soltesz U, Lee AJC (eds) Clinical implant materials. Elsevier Science Publishing, Amsterdam, pp 663–668

  24. Oda I, Abumi K, Cunningham BW et al (2002) An in vitro human cadaveric study investigating the biomechanical properties of the thoracic spine. Spine 27:E64–E70

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Oda I, Abumi K, Lu D et al (1996) Biomechanical role of the posterior elements, costovertebral joints, and rib cage in the stability of the thoracic spine. Spine 21:1423–1429

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Vrtovec T, Pernus F, Likar B (2009) A review of methods for quantitative evaluation of spinal curvature. Eur Spine J 18:593–607

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Watkins RT, Watkins R 3rd, Williams L et al (2005) Stability provided by the sternum and rib cage in the thoracic spine. Spine 30:1283–1286

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Weinstein S, Dolan L, Cheng J et al (2008) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Lancet 371:1527–1537

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Weiss HR, Goodall D (2008) Rate of complications in scoliosis surgery—a systematic review of the pub med literature. Scoliosis 3:9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Paediatric Spine Research Group, Queensland University of Technology, GPO Box 2434, Brisbane, QLD, 4001, Australia

    J. Paige Little & Clayton Adam

Authors
  1. J. Paige Little
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Clayton Adam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Paige Little.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Little, J.P., Adam, C. Towards determining soft tissue properties for modelling spine surgery: current progress and challenges. Med Biol Eng Comput 50, 199–209 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-011-0848-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-011-0848-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation