Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Online Data Collection From Gamblers: Methodological Issues

  • Published:
International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper outlines the advantages and disadvantages of using the Internet to collect data from gamblers, predominantly online gamblers. Drawing from experience of a number of studies carried out online by the authors and by reviewing the available literature, the authors discuss the main issues concerning data collected using computers and the Internet. The paper examines a number of areas including; recruiting and utilising participants, validity, suitable methods of data collection (i.e., questionnaire studies, online tests, participant observation, online interviews) and ethical issues. It is concluded that online research methods can be a useful way of examining the psychosocial aspects of online gambling and in some cases even traditional gambling activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For a good detailed example of online participant observation, albeit in a non-gambling environment, see Suler’s (1996) study of The Palace discussion group.

References

  • Ashworth, J., Doyle, N., & Howat, N. (2000). Under 16s and the National Lottery: Tracking Survey July 2000, BMRB International Ltd. London: The National Lottery Commission: Located at: http://www.natlotcomm.gov.uk/uploadedFiles/trackingsurvey.pdf.

  • Bampton, R., & Cowton, C. J. (2002). The e-interview. Forum: Qualitative Social Research [Online Journal], 3(2). Available at http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs/fqs-eng.htm [Date accessed: 08/27/2003].

  • Barak, A., & English, N. (2002). Prospects and limitations of psychological testing on the Internet. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 19, 65–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruckman, A. S. (1993). Gender swapping on the internet. Paper presented at The Internet Society (INET ‘93) in San Fransisco, California.

  • Campbell, K. A., Rohlman, D. S., Storzbach, D., Binder, L. M., Anger, W. K., Kovera, C. A., et al. (1999). Test–retest reliability of psychological and neurobehavioral tests self-administered by computer. Assessment, 6, 21–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chappell, D., Eatough, V. E., Davies, M. N. O., & Griffiths, M. D. (2006). EverQuest—It’s just a computer game right? An interpretative phenomenological analysis of online gaming addiction. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 4, 205–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiLalla, D. L. (1996). Computerized administration of the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire. Assessment, 3, 365–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, M. D. (2000). Does Internet and computer “addiction” exist? Some case study evidence. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 3, 211–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, M. D., & Davies, M. N. O. (2002). Excessive online gaming: Implications for education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18, 379–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, M. D., Davies, M. N. O., & Chappell, D. (2003). Breaking the stereotype: The case of online gaming. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 6, 81–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, M. D., Davies, M. N. O., & Chappell, D. (2004a). Demographic factors and playing variables in online computer gaming. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 7, 479–487.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, M. D., Davies, M. N. O., & Chappell, D. (2004b). Online computer gaming: A comparison of adolescent and adult gamers. Journal of Adolescence, 27, 87–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, R., & Derevensky, J. L. (1998). Adolescent gambling behaviour: A prevalence study and examination of the correlates associated with problem gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 14, 319–345.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holge-Hazelton, B. (2002). The Internet: A new field for qualitative inquiry. Forum: Qualitative Social Research [Online Journal], 3(2). Available at http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs/fqs-eng.htm [Date accessed: 08/12/2003].

  • Howard, G. S. (1994). Why do people say nasty things about self-reports? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 399–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. (1970). The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology: An Introduction to Phenomenology. Translated by David Carr. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

  • Kiesler, S., Siegal, J., & McGuire, T. W. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39, 1123–1134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladd, G. T., & Petry, N. M. (2002). Disordered gambling among university based medical and dental patients: A focus on internet gambling. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 16, 76–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Newell, R. (1993). Questionnaires. In N. Gilbert (Ed.), Researching Social Life (pp. 96–97). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuman, G., & Baydoun, R. (1998). Computerization of paper-and-pencil tests: When are they equivalent? Applied Psychological Measurement, 22, 71–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell, R (2001). Be somebody else but be yourself at all times: Degrees of identity deception in chatrooms. Located at: http://www.once.uclan.ac.uk/print/deception_print.htm [Date accessed 06/01/04].

  • Parke, A., Griffiths, M., & Parke, J. (2005). Can playing poker be good for you? Poker as a transferable skill. Journal of Gambling Issues, 14. Available at http://www.camh.net/egambling/issue14/jgi_14_parke.html.

  • Suler, J. (1996). One of us: Participant observation research at the palace http://www.rider.edu/~suler/psycyber/partobs.html [Date accessed 06/07/05].

  • Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23, 3–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, R. T. A., & Griffiths, M. D. (1998). The acquisition, development and maintenance of lottery and scratchcard gambling in adolescence. Journal of Adolescence, 21, 265–273.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, R. T. A., & Griffiths, M. D. (2004). Adolescent lottery and scratchcard players: Do their attitudes influence their gambling behaviour? Journal of Adolescence, 27, 467–475.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, R. T. A., Griffiths, M. D., Chappell, D., & Davies, M. N. O. (2004). The structural characteristics of video games: A psycho-structural analysis. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 7, 1–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. International Gaming Research Unit (IGRU), Division of Psychology, Nottingham Trent University, Burton Street, Nottingham, NG1 4BU, UK

    Richard T. A. Wood & Mark D. Griffiths

Authors
  1. Richard T. A. Wood
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mark D. Griffiths
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark D. Griffiths.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wood, R.T.A., Griffiths, M.D. Online Data Collection From Gamblers: Methodological Issues. Int J Ment Health Addiction 5, 151–163 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-007-9055-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-007-9055-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation