Skip to main content
Log in

Solving topology optimization problems by the Guide-Weight method

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Finding a good solution method for topology optimization problems is always paid attention to by the research field because they are subject to the large number of the design variables and to the complexity that occurs because the objective and constraint functions are usually implicit with respect to design variables. Guide-Weight method, proposed first by Chen in 1980s, was effectively and successfully used in antenna structures’ optimization. This paper makes some improvement to it so that it possesses the characteristics of both the optimality criteria methods and the mathematical programming methods. When the Guide-Weight method is applied into topology optimization, it works very well with unified and simple form, wide availability and fast convergence. The algorithm of the Guide-Weight method and the improvement on it are described; two formulations of topology optimization solved by the Guide-Weight method combining with SIMP method are presented; subsequently, three numerical examples are provided, and comparison of the Guide-Weight method with other methods is made.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bendsoe M P, Kikuchi N. Generating optimal topologies in structural design using homogenization method. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 1988, 71(2): 197–224

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Grujicic M, Arakere G, Pisu P, Ayalew B, Seyr N, Erdmann M, Holzleitner J. Etc. Application of topology, size and shape optimization methods in polymer metal hybrid structural lightweight engineering. Multidiscipline Modeling in Materials and Structures, 2008, 4(4): 305–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bendsoe M P, Sigmund O. Topology Optimization: Theory, Methods and Applications. Springer Berlin, 2003

    Google Scholar 

  4. Eschenauer H A, Olhoff N. Topology optimization of continuum structure: a review. Applied Mechanics Reviews, 2001, 54(4): 331–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sigmund O. Manufacturing tolerant topology optimization. Acta Mechanica Sinica, 2009, 25(2): 227–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Xie Y M, Steven G P. A Simple evolutionary procedure for structural optimization. Computers & Structures, 1993, 49(5): 885–896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bendsoe M P, Sigmund O. Material interpolation schemes in topology optimization. Archive of Applied Mechanics, 1999, 69(9–10): 635–654

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rozvany G I N. A critical review of established methods of structural topology optimization. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2009, 37(3): 217–237

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Sui Y K, Yang D Q. etc. Uniform ICM theory and method on optimization of structural topology for skeleton and continuum structures. Chinease Journal of Computational Mechanics, 2000, 17(1): 28–33

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Peng X R, Sui Y K. Topological optimization of continuum structure with static and displacement and frenquency constraints by ICM method. Chinease Journal of Computational Mechanics, 2006, 23(4): 391–396

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rozvany G I N, Zhou M. The COC algorithm, part I: cross-section optimization or sizing. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 1991, 89(1–3): 281–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rozvany G I N, Zhou M. The COC algorithm, part II: topological, geometrical and generalized shape optimization. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 1991, 89(1–3): 309–336

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zhou M, Rozvany G I N. DCOC: an optimality criteria method for large systems part I: theory. Structural Optimization, 1992, 5(1–2): 12–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhou M, Rozvany G I N. DCOC: an optimality criteria method for large systems part II: algorithm. Structural Optimization, 1992, 6(3): 250–262

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schmit L A Jr, Farshi B. Some approximation concepts for structural synthesis. AIAA Journal, 1974, 12(5): 692–699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Barthelemy JFM, Haftka RT. Approximation concepts for optimum structural design-a review. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 1993, 5(3)

  17. Fleury C. A unified approach to structural weight minimization. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 1979, 20(1): 17–38

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Chen S, Ye S A. Guide-Weight criterion method for the optimal design of antenna structures. Engineering Optimization, 1986, 10(3): 199–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chen S. Some modern design methods of precise and complex structures (In Chinese). Press of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Beijing, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  20. Chen S. Analysis, Synthesis and Optimization of Engineering Structural Systems (In Chinese). China Science Culture Publishing House, Hongkong, 2008

    Google Scholar 

  21. Beckers M. Topology optimization using a dual method with discrete variables. Structural Optimization, 1999, 17(1): 14–24

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Jog C S. A dual algorithm for the topology optimization of nonlinear elastic structures. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2009, 77(4): 502–517

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Hammer V B, Olhoff N. Topology optimization of continuum structures subjected to pressure loading. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2000, 19(2): 85–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Levy R. Fixed point theory and structural optimization. Engineering Optimization, 1991, 17(4): 251–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Svanberg K. The method of moving asymptotes-a new method for structural optimization. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 1987, 24(2): 359–373

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Bruyneel M, Duysinx P, Fleury C. A family of MMA approximations for structural optimization. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization., 2002, 24(4): 263–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Duysinx P. Layout optimization: a mathematical programming approach. Danish Center for Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, DCAMM Report No. 540 (March 1997)

  28. Chang H. Research of auto-solving Guide-Weight functions and develop of auto-optimization software SOGA1 (In Chinese). University of Guangxi, Guangxi China, 2008

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xinjun Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, X., Li, Z., Wang, L. et al. Solving topology optimization problems by the Guide-Weight method. Front. Mech. Eng. 6, 136–150 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-010-0126-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-010-0126-6

Keywords

Navigation