Skip to main content
Log in

Spatial expansion and potential of construction land use in the Yangtze River Delta

  • Published:
Journal of Geographical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Based on remote sensing data of the Yangtze River Delta (YRD) in the years of 1991, 2001 and 2008, the paper built an index system of land use potential restraint factors in YRD, according to geological condition, terrain condition, water area, natural reserve area and basic farmland, and evaluated construction land potential based on the platform of GIS spatial analysis model. The results showed that: (1) the construction land increased rapidly since 1991 and reached 24,951.21 km2 in 2008, or 21.27% of the total area. Among all the cities in the YRD, Shanghai took the greatest percentage, followed by Jiangsu and Zhejiang. Spatially, areas where government departments are located became the growth center of construction land. Prefecture-level cities were the fastest growth region and the changing trend showed circle layered characteristics and significant increase with Shanghai and Suzhou as the core. (2) The higher the quality of construction land potentials (CLP), the smaller the number of CLP units. High sensitive area accounted for the largest percentage (40.14%) among all types of constraint regions and this was followed by medium sensitive region (31.53%) of the whole region. (3) The comprehensive CLP in the YRD was 24,989.65 km2, or 21.76% of the total YRD. The land use potential showed spatial distribution imbalance. CLP of Zhejiang was obviously larger than that of Jiangsu. CLP was insufficient in regional central city. Moreover, CLP in the YRD formed a circle layered spatial pattern that increasingly expanded centered in prefecture-level cities. Low potential area expanded from north to south. High potential area was mainly located in south YRD. Areas with zero potential in the YRD formed a northwest-southeast “Y-shaped” spatial pattern in north Hangzhou Bay. (4) CLP per capita in YRD was 0.045 ha/person and also unevenly distributed. Some 25.57% of the study units at county level nearly had no construction land and 8.24% of the units had CLP per capita below the national average level. CLP per capita in less than 25% of the county-level units was larger than the YRD average level, which were mainly located in Zhejiang. Therefore, research on the construction potential area in YRD was favorable for analysis of the development status and potential space of this region under the background of rapid urbanization and industrialization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Deng F F, Huang Y, 2004. Uneven land reform and urban sprawl in China: The case of Beijing. Progress in Planning, 61: 211–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan Jie, 2007. The scientific foundation of Major Function Oriented Zoning in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 62(4): 515–531. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee C L, Huang S L, Chan S L, 2008. Biophysical and system approaches for simulating land-use change. Landscape and Urban Planning, 86: 187–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Xia, Yeh A G O, 2004. Analyzing spatial restructuring of land use patterns in a fast growing region using remote sensing and GIS. Landscape and Urban Planning, 69: 335–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang Liuke, Chang Jiang, Wu Cifang et al., 2002. A study on land system innovations in the construction of small towns in China. Chinese Geographical Science, 12(1): 81–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin Jian, Li Yao, 2007. Study on land consolidation potential of rural residential area in Beijing. China Land Science, (1): 59–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Yong, Lv Xiaojian, Qin Xiaosheng et al., 2007. An integrated GIS-based analysis system for land-use management of lake areas in urban fringe. Landscape and Urban Planning, 82: 233–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod C J, Moller H, 2006. Intensification and diversification of New Zealand agriculture since 1960: An evaluation of current indicators of land use change. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 115: 201–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quan B, Zhu H, Romkens M J, 2007. Land suitability assessment and land use change in Fujian Province, China. Pedosphere, 17: 493–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasul G, Thapa G B, Zoebisch M A, 2004. Determinants of land-use changes in the Chittagong Hill tracts of Bangladesh. Applied Geography, 24: 217–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su Changhong, Fu Bojie, Lu Yihe et al., 2011. Land use change and anthropogenic driving forces: A case study in Yanhe River Basin. Chinese Geographical Science, 21(5): 587–599. (in Chinese)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tu Xiaosong, Pu Lijie, 2008. Spatio-temporal pattern of land use change and its eco-environmental response in Suzhou-Wuxi-Changzhou Region. Geographical Research, 27(3): 584–594. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tzanopoulos J, Vogiatzakis I N, 2011. Processes and patterns of landscape change on a small Aegean island: The case of Sifnos, Greece. Landscape and Urban Planning, 99: 58–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Hongrui, Gao Yuanyuan, Liu Qiong et al., 2010. Land use allocation based on interval multi-objective linear programming model: A case study of Pi County in Sichuan Province. Chinese Geographical Science, 20(2): 176–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Zhenbo, Fang Chuanglin, Xu Jian’gang et al., 2012. Study on spatial development division of Huaihe River Basin. Geographical Research, 31(8): 1387–1398. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Zhenbo, Fang Chuanglin, Cheng Shaowen et al., 2013. Evolution of coordination degree of eco-economic system and early-warning in rapid urbanization region of Yangtze River Delta. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 23(1): 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu Yuling, Qu Futian, 2007. Mechanism of intensive urban land use in China: Theoretical and practical study. Resources Science, 29(6): 106–112. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu Yingmei, Su Yufang, Zhang Lei, 2006. Economic structure transformation and land use change of the Changjiang River Basin. Chinese Geographical Science, 16(4): 289–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Yong, Tang Qing, Fan Jie et al., 2011. Assessing construction land potential and its spatial pattern in China. Landscape and Urban Planning, 103(2): 207–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeh A G O, Li X, 1998. Sustainable land development model for rapid growth areas using GIS. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 12: 169–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Xiaorui, Fang Chuanglin, Wang Zhenbo et al., 2013. Urban construction land suitability evaluation based on improved multi-criteria evaluation based on GIS (MCE-GIS): Case of new Hefei City, China. Chinese Geographical Science, 23(6): 740–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zong Yueguang, Wang Rong, Wang Chenggang et al., 2007. Ecological suitability assessment on land use based on potential-constrain approach: The case of urbanized areas in Dalian city, China. Geographical Research, 26(6): 1117–1127. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chuanglin Fang.

Additional information

Foundation: National Natural Youth Science Foundation of China, No.41201168

Author: Wang Zhenbo (1980–), PhD, specialized in regional and urban planning.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Z., Fang, C. & Zhang, X. Spatial expansion and potential of construction land use in the Yangtze River Delta. J. Geogr. Sci. 25, 851–864 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-015-1206-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-015-1206-7

Keywords

Navigation