Skip to main content
Log in

Urban construction land suitability evaluation based on improved multi-criteria evaluation based on GIS (MCE-GIS): Case of New Hefei City, China

  • Published:
Chinese Geographical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Urban construction land suitability evaluation (UCLSE) is a complex system engineering and the basis for rational use of the limited urban land resources in China. It has an important practical value on urban construction land use planning and management from the angle of methodology. As a widely used technique, traditional multi-criteria evaluation based on GIS (MCE-GIS), is not suitable for UCLSE. This study develops an improved MCE-GIS method which could be more suitable for UCLSE based on urban complex ecological system theory and the summary of the shortcomings of traditional MCE-GIS. The improvements include three aspects: a composite evaluation index system rather than natural indexes alone, an index weight calculated by using fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method rather than the common AHP method, and the integrated overlay rule, which includes selecting the minimum value, weighted linear combination (WLC) and simple summation. The main advantage of this improved technique is that it can make UCLSE more comprehensive, more operational and more reasonable. It can provide a scientific basis for decision making in the planning and management of urban construction land use. The improved MCE-GIS system has been adopted in the New Hefei City, Anhui Province, China. Based on the results of UCLSE in New Hefei, three functional areas including construction-appropriate areas, construction-restricted areas and construction-forbidden areas could be worked out, in which 36.90% of the total study area could be developed as urban construction land and the remaining 63.10% should be protected as reserves land or as ecological land. Furthermore, the results can provide scientific decision support for spatial planning and eco-environment protection in New Hefei.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Banai R, 1993. Fuzziness in geographic information systems: Contributions from the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 7(4): 315–329. doi: 10.1080/02693799308901964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brail R, Klosterman R, 2001. Planning Support Systems: Integrating Geographic Information Systems, Models, and Visualization Tools. Redlands: ESRI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrough P, McDonnell R A, 1998. Principles of Geographical Information Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao Yongqing, Tang Fanghua, 2005. Systems Engineering and Information Technology of Urban Planning. Beijing: China Railway Publishing House. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Carver S J, 1991. Integrating multi-criteria evaluation with geographical information systems. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 5(3): 321–339. doi: 10.1080/02693799108927858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Gangqiang, Li Xun, Xu Xueqiang, 2008. Spatial agglomeration and evolution of urban population in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 63(10): 1045–1054. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins M G., Steiner F R, Rushman M J, 2001. Land-use suitability analysis in the United States: historical development and promising technological achievements. Environmental Management, 28(5): 611–621. doi: 10.1007/s002670010247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan Jie, Sun Wei, Zhou Kan et al., 2012. Major function oriented zone: New method of spatial regulation for reshaping regional development pattern in China. Chinese Geographical Science, 22(2): 196–209. doi: 10.1007/s11769-012-0528-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher P, 2000. Fuzzy modeling. In: Openshaw S et al. (eds.). Geo-Computation. London: Taylor and Francis, 161–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • He Dan, Jin Fengjun, Zhou Jing, 2011. Urban construction land suitability evaluation in resource-based cities: Taking the Grand Canal Ecologic and Economic Area as an example. Geographical Research, 30(4): 655–666. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu Yecui, Liu Yansui, Deng Xusheng, 2004. Relativity analysis on land use and land cover change and optimal allocation of land resources. Progress in Geography, 23(2): 51–57. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jankowski P, 1995. Integrating Geographical information system and multi-criteria decision making methods. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 9(3): 251–273. doi: 10.1080/02693799508902036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang H, Eastman J R, 2000. Application of fuzzy measures in multi-criteria evaluation in GIS. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 14(2): 173–184. doi: 10.1080/136588100240903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang Yifan, Deng Gang, Lu Dongai, 2011. Land suitability assessment in alpine and canyon area based on GIS: a case study of Lancang county of Yunnan Province. Science of Surveying and Mapping, 36(1): 155–157. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin Dongxiao, 2006. Some thoughts over land control. City Planning Review, 30(2): 34–38. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Joerin F, Theriault M, Musy A, 2001. Using GIS and outranking multi-criteria analysis for land use suitability assessment. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 15(2): 153–174. doi: 10.1080/13658810051030487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krzanowski R, Raper J, 2001. Spatial Evolutionary Modeling. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Yeh A G., 2000. Modeling sustainable urban development by the integration of constrained cellular automata and GIS. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 14(2): 131–152. doi: 10.1080/136588100240886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li You, Wang Yanglin, Peng Jian et al., 2010. Assessment of urban land suitability for construction in view of landscape ecology: A case study of Dandong city. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 30(8): 2141–2150. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Zhi, Li Guoping, 2008. An empirical study of China’s urban expansion factors. Tongji University Journal (Social Science Section), 19(6): 30–34. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ligtenberg A, Bregt A K, Van lammeren R, 2001. Multi- actor-based land use modeling: spatial planning using agents. Landscape and Urban Planning, 56(1): 21–33. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00162-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malczewski J, 1999. Multi-criteria GIS and Decision Analysis. London: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malczewski J, 2004. GIS-based land-use suitability analysis: A critical overview. Progress in Planning, (62): 3–65. doi: 10.1016/j.progress.2003.09.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McHarg I L, 1969. Design with Nature. New York: Natural History Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Openshaw S, Abrahart R J, 2000. Geo-Computation. London: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira J M C, Duckstein L, 1993. A multiple criteria decision-making approach to GIS-based land suitability evaluation. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 7(5): 407–424. doi: 10.1080/02693799308901971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qu Yanbo, Zhang Fengrong, Du Suqin et al., 2010. Assessment method for ecological and economic suitability of urban construction land in Pinggu District, Beijing. China Land Science, 24(12): 21–27. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty T L, 1980. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistical Bureau of Anhui, 2011. Anhui Statistical Yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistical Bureau of Hefei, 2011. Hefei Statistical Yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinitz C, Parker P, Jordan L, 1976. Hand-drawn overlays: Their history and prospective uses. Landscape Architect, 66(5): 444–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart T J, Janssen R, van Herwijnen M, 2003. A genetic algorithm approach to multi objective land use planning. Computers and Operations Research, 31(14): 2293–2313. doi: 10.1016/S0305-0548(03)00188-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan Minghong, Lu Changhe, 2005. Urban land expansion and farmland loss in China. Journal of Natural Resources, 20(1): 52–58. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Thill J C. 1999. Multicriteria Decision-making and Analysis: A Geographic Information Sciences Approach. New York: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Quan, Xu Jiangang, Xu Wenwen, 2005. A GIS approach to the urban land suitability evaluation. Progress in Geophysics, 20(3): 877–880. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Rusong, Hu Dan, Li Feng et al., 2010. Complex Ecological Management of the Regional Urban Development. Beijing: China Meteorological Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Yan, Song Zhenbai, Wu Peilin, 2008. Land suitability evaluation of high and new technology industry based on BP network. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 15(4): 248–250. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu Zeshui, 2001. Algorithm for priority of fuzzy complementary judgment matrix. Journal of Systems Engineering, 16(4): 311–314. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ye Jiaan, Song Xiaodong, Niu Xinyi et al., 2006. Geographical Information and Planning Support System. Beijing: Science Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin Haiwei, Xu Jiangang, Chen Changyong et al., 2006. GIS-based ecological sensitivity analysis in the east of Wujiang city. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 26(1): 64–69. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh L A, 1965. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3): 338–353. doi: 10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Xiaorui, Zhou Guoyan, 2009. Land suitability evaluation in master plan of development zone. Modern Urban Research, (12): 57–61. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou J, Civco D L, 1996. Using Genetic learning neural networks for spatial decision making in GIS. Photogram metric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 62(11): 1287–1295. doi: 0099-1112/96/6211-1287

    Google Scholar 

  • Zong Yueguang, Wang Rong, Wang Chenggang et al., 2007. Ecological suitability assessment on land use based on potential-constrain approach: the case of urbanized areas in Dalian city, China. Geographical Research, 26(6): 1117–1125. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zong Yueguang, Zhang Xiaorui, He Jinliao et al., 2011. Spatial Planning Decision Support Technology and Its Applications. Beijing: Science Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chuanglin Fang.

Additional information

Foundation item: Under the auspices of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41201168), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 2013HGXJ0207)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, X., Fang, C., Wang, Z. et al. Urban construction land suitability evaluation based on improved multi-criteria evaluation based on GIS (MCE-GIS): Case of New Hefei City, China. Chin. Geogr. Sci. 23, 740–753 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-013-0609-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-013-0609-6

Keywords

Navigation