Abstract
This paper reevaluated the disadvantages of existing observational methods using both theoretical and laboratory consolidation settlement–time (S–t) relationships. Two observational methods that account for the effect of sampling range were developed by using the Taylor model as a substitute for Terzaghi’s solution. The significance of the sampling range effect in predicting the end of consolidation settlement (S100) and the consolidation coefficient (cv) was verified through application to the above S–t data. The further application of the proposed methods to three case records with some prerequisites produced slightly higher S100 and lower cv values compared with two routine methods and indicated that the back-analyzed S–t curves correlated excellently with the in situ monitored curves. The latter finding may support the hypothesis that the in situ consolidation settlement curves are the family of laboratory consolidation settlement curves. In this case, consolidation-based prediction was applicable to such in situ consolidation settlement, thereby suggesting that both in situ and laboratory consolidation settlement curves behave with an identical cv value as verified in a homogeneous clay deposit. The above approach was also confirmed to be applicable to prolonged yet incompletely measured settlement data.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adachi K, Todo H (1979) A case study on settlement of soft clay in Penang. In: Proceedings, 6th Asian regional conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, (vol 1, pp 117–120). Singapore
Asaoka A (1978) Observational procedure of settlement prediction. Soils Found 18(4):87–101. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.18.4_87
Balasubramaniam AS, Brenner P (1981) Consolidation and settlement of soft clay, soft clay engineering. In: Brand EW, Brenner RP (eds), Developments in geotechnical engineering 20, (Ch. 7, pp 481–527). Elsevier, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Chang YCE (1981) Long-term consolidation beneath the test fills at Väsby. Sweden Report No. 13, Swedish Geotechnical Institute, Linköping
Chung SG, Kweon HJ (2021) Prediction of radial consolidation settlement with consideration of sampling range effect: updated observational methods. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng, ASCE 147(12):04021151. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002704
Chung SG, Kweon HJ (2022) Prediction of three-dimensional consolidation settlement: observational method and its applicability”. Int J Geomech 23(3):04022308. https://doi.org/10.1061/IJGNAI/GMENG-7918
Chung SG, Kweon HJ, Jang WY (2014) Observational method for field performance of prefabricated vertical drains. Geotext Geomembr 42(4):405–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2014.06.005
Chung SG, Park TR, Kweon HJ (2019) Full-match method to determine the coefficient of vertical consolidation from incremental loading consolidation tests. Geotech Test J 43(4):918–936. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ20180326
Dhowian AW, Erol AO, Sultan S (1987) Settlement predictions in complex Sabkha soil profiles. Bulletin of the intl. Assoc Eng Geol 36:11–21
Eden WJ, Poorooshasb HB (1968) Settlement observations at Kars bridge. Can Geotech J 5(1):28–45. https://doi.org/10.1139/t68-003
Eriksson U, Hansbo S, Torstenson BA (2000) Soil improvement at Stockholm-Arianda airport. Ground Improvement 4:73–80. https://doi.org/10.1680/grim.2000.4.2.73
Guo W, Chu J (2017) New observational method for prediction of one-dimensional consolidation settlement. Géotechnique 67(6):516–522. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.16.P.089
Hansbo S (2015) Experience of consolidation process from test areas with and without vertical drains. In: Indraratna B, Chu J, Rujikiatkamjorn C, (eds) Ground improvement case histories, (Chapter 2, pp 33–82), Butterworth-Heinemann. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100192-9.00002-8.
Hiep H, Chung SG (2018) Back-analysis of geotechnical parameters on PVD-improved ground in mekong delta. Geotext Geomembr 46(4):402–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2018.03.005
Kabbaj M, Tavenas F, Leroueil S (1988) In situ and laboratory stress-strain relations”. Géotechnique 38(1):83–100. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1988.38.1.83
Leroueil S, Samson L, Bozozuk M (1983) Laboratory and field determination of preconsolidation pressures at Gloucester. Can Geotech J 20(3):477–490. https://doi.org/10.1139/t83-056
Magnan JP, Deroy JM (1980) Analyse graphiique des tassements observés sous les ouvrages. Bullettin de Liaison des Laboratoires des Ponts et Chaussées, No 109:45–52
Mesri G, Choi YK (1985) Settlement analysis of embankments on soft clays. J Geotech Eng Div ASCE 111(4):441–464. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1985)111:4(441)
Mesri G, Choi YK (1985b) The uniqueness of the end-of-primary (EOP) void ratio-effective stress relationship. In: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, (vol 2, pp 587–590). Balkema, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Samson L, Garneau R (1973) Settlement performance of two embankments on deep compressible soils. Can Geotech J 10(2):211–226. https://doi.org/10.1139/t73-020
Sivaram B, Swainee PK (1977) A computational method for consolidation coefficient. Soils Found 17(2):48–52. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.17.2_48
Stark TD, Williamson T, Fowler J, Pezza D, Gibbons Y (1999) Prefabricated vertical-drain test section in Craney island dredged material management area. J Perform Constr Facil 13(1):8–16. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(1999)13:1(8)
Suklje L (1957) The analysis of the consolidation process by the isotache method. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, (vol 1, pp 200–206). London
Taylor DW (1942) Research on consolidation of clays. No. 82, Dept. of Civil and Sanitary Eng., Mass. Inst. of Technology, Cambridge, Mass., 147 p
Taylor DW (1948) Fundamentals of soil mechanics. John Wiley & Sons, New York, p 700
Terzaghi K (1925) Erdbaumechanik. Franz Deuticke, Vienna
Watabe Y, Leroueil S (2015) Modeling and implementation of the isotache concept for long-term consolidation behavior. Int J Geomech 15(5):A4014006. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000270
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Korea Science and Engineering Foundation (KOSEF) Research Program grant funded by the Korean government (MEST) (NRF-2020R1I1A3074225).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix I: Application of the curve fit method in microsoft excel solver
Appendix I: Application of the curve fit method in microsoft excel solver
For convenience, Eq. (13) can be divided into the following equations:
Three basic conditions are provided for the application of the curve fit method in Microsoft Excel Solver as follows: (i) S100 values obtained using Eqs. (20) and (21) are identical; (ii) Eq. (20) is used when S/S100 < 0.6 (or t < 0.287/χ) and Eq. (21) is used when S/S100 ≥ 0.6 (or t ≥ 0.287/χ); and (iii) the iteration continues until an iterated initial value of S100,i identical to a predicted S100 is obtained. S100 is finally determined.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Chung, S.G., Kweon, H.J. & Chung, C.G. Back-analysis of one-dimensional consolidation settlement. Acta Geotech. 19, 239–254 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-023-01964-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-023-01964-8