Skip to main content
Log in

Back-analysis of one-dimensional consolidation settlement

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Acta Geotechnica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reevaluated the disadvantages of existing observational methods using both theoretical and laboratory consolidation settlement–time (S–t) relationships. Two observational methods that account for the effect of sampling range were developed by using the Taylor model as a substitute for Terzaghi’s solution. The significance of the sampling range effect in predicting the end of consolidation settlement (S100) and the consolidation coefficient (cv) was verified through application to the above S–t data. The further application of the proposed methods to three case records with some prerequisites produced slightly higher S100 and lower cv values compared with two routine methods and indicated that the back-analyzed S–t curves correlated excellently with the in situ monitored curves. The latter finding may support the hypothesis that the in situ consolidation settlement curves are the family of laboratory consolidation settlement curves. In this case, consolidation-based prediction was applicable to such in situ consolidation settlement, thereby suggesting that both in situ and laboratory consolidation settlement curves behave with an identical cv value as verified in a homogeneous clay deposit. The above approach was also confirmed to be applicable to prolonged yet incompletely measured settlement data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adachi K, Todo H (1979) A case study on settlement of soft clay in Penang. In: Proceedings, 6th Asian regional conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, (vol 1, pp 117–120). Singapore

  2. Asaoka A (1978) Observational procedure of settlement prediction. Soils Found 18(4):87–101. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.18.4_87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Balasubramaniam AS, Brenner P (1981) Consolidation and settlement of soft clay, soft clay engineering. In: Brand EW, Brenner RP (eds), Developments in geotechnical engineering 20, (Ch. 7, pp 481–527). Elsevier, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

  4. Chang YCE (1981) Long-term consolidation beneath the test fills at Väsby. Sweden Report No. 13, Swedish Geotechnical Institute, Linköping

  5. Chung SG, Kweon HJ (2021) Prediction of radial consolidation settlement with consideration of sampling range effect: updated observational methods. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng, ASCE 147(12):04021151. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chung SG, Kweon HJ (2022) Prediction of three-dimensional consolidation settlement: observational method and its applicability”. Int J Geomech 23(3):04022308. https://doi.org/10.1061/IJGNAI/GMENG-7918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chung SG, Kweon HJ, Jang WY (2014) Observational method for field performance of prefabricated vertical drains. Geotext Geomembr 42(4):405–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2014.06.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chung SG, Park TR, Kweon HJ (2019) Full-match method to determine the coefficient of vertical consolidation from incremental loading consolidation tests. Geotech Test J 43(4):918–936. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ20180326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dhowian AW, Erol AO, Sultan S (1987) Settlement predictions in complex Sabkha soil profiles. Bulletin of the intl. Assoc Eng Geol 36:11–21

    Google Scholar 

  10. Eden WJ, Poorooshasb HB (1968) Settlement observations at Kars bridge. Can Geotech J 5(1):28–45. https://doi.org/10.1139/t68-003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Eriksson U, Hansbo S, Torstenson BA (2000) Soil improvement at Stockholm-Arianda airport. Ground Improvement 4:73–80. https://doi.org/10.1680/grim.2000.4.2.73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Guo W, Chu J (2017) New observational method for prediction of one-dimensional consolidation settlement. Géotechnique 67(6):516–522. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.16.P.089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hansbo S (2015) Experience of consolidation process from test areas with and without vertical drains. In: Indraratna B, Chu J, Rujikiatkamjorn C, (eds) Ground improvement case histories, (Chapter 2, pp 33–82), Butterworth-Heinemann. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100192-9.00002-8.

  14. Hiep H, Chung SG (2018) Back-analysis of geotechnical parameters on PVD-improved ground in mekong delta. Geotext Geomembr 46(4):402–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2018.03.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kabbaj M, Tavenas F, Leroueil S (1988) In situ and laboratory stress-strain relations”. Géotechnique 38(1):83–100. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1988.38.1.83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Leroueil S, Samson L, Bozozuk M (1983) Laboratory and field determination of preconsolidation pressures at Gloucester. Can Geotech J 20(3):477–490. https://doi.org/10.1139/t83-056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Magnan JP, Deroy JM (1980) Analyse graphiique des tassements observés sous les ouvrages. Bullettin de Liaison des Laboratoires des Ponts et Chaussées, No 109:45–52

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mesri G, Choi YK (1985) Settlement analysis of embankments on soft clays. J Geotech Eng Div ASCE 111(4):441–464. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1985)111:4(441)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mesri G, Choi YK (1985b) The uniqueness of the end-of-primary (EOP) void ratio-effective stress relationship. In: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, (vol 2, pp 587–590). Balkema, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

  20. Samson L, Garneau R (1973) Settlement performance of two embankments on deep compressible soils. Can Geotech J 10(2):211–226. https://doi.org/10.1139/t73-020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sivaram B, Swainee PK (1977) A computational method for consolidation coefficient. Soils Found 17(2):48–52. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.17.2_48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Stark TD, Williamson T, Fowler J, Pezza D, Gibbons Y (1999) Prefabricated vertical-drain test section in Craney island dredged material management area. J Perform Constr Facil 13(1):8–16. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(1999)13:1(8)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Suklje L (1957) The analysis of the consolidation process by the isotache method. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, (vol 1, pp 200–206). London

  24. Taylor DW (1942) Research on consolidation of clays. No. 82, Dept. of Civil and Sanitary Eng., Mass. Inst. of Technology, Cambridge, Mass., 147 p

  25. Taylor DW (1948) Fundamentals of soil mechanics. John Wiley & Sons, New York, p 700

    Google Scholar 

  26. Terzaghi K (1925) Erdbaumechanik. Franz Deuticke, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  27. Watabe Y, Leroueil S (2015) Modeling and implementation of the isotache concept for long-term consolidation behavior. Int J Geomech 15(5):A4014006. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000270

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Korea Science and Engineering Foundation (KOSEF) Research Program grant funded by the Korean government (MEST) (NRF-2020R1I1A3074225).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. G. Chung.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix I: Application of the curve fit method in microsoft excel solver

Appendix I: Application of the curve fit method in microsoft excel solver

For convenience, Eq. (13) can be divided into the following equations:

$$S = S_{100} \sqrt {\frac{4\chi t}{\pi }} \quad {\text{for}}\;0 < t < 0.{287/}\chi$$
(20)
$$S = S_{100} \left[ {1 - 10^{{\left\{ {\frac{{ - \left( {\chi t + 0.0851} \right)}}{0.933}} \right\}}} } \right]\quad {\text{for}}\;0.{287/}\chi \le t < \infty$$
(21)

Three basic conditions are provided for the application of the curve fit method in Microsoft Excel Solver as follows: (i) S100 values obtained using Eqs. (20) and (21) are identical; (ii) Eq. (20) is used when S/S100 < 0.6 (or t < 0.287/χ) and Eq. (21) is used when S/S100 ≥ 0.6 (or t ≥ 0.287/χ); and (iii) the iteration continues until an iterated initial value of S100,i identical to a predicted S100 is obtained. S100 is finally determined.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chung, S.G., Kweon, H.J. & Chung, C.G. Back-analysis of one-dimensional consolidation settlement. Acta Geotech. 19, 239–254 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-023-01964-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-023-01964-8

Keyword

Navigation