Abstract
This paper presents a simplified procedure for the evaluation of the free-field consolidation settlement induced by liquefaction, using the results of 1D site response analysis in effective stress and a simplified approach based on empirical chart. The excess pore water pressures induced by the seismic action are generated by both a simple stress-based model implemented on a non-linear dynamic analysis and a simplified relationship between the safety factor against liquefaction and the excess pore pressure. The post-cyclic settlement is finally calculated on the obtained distribution of excess pore water pressure along the soil column. The proposed method has been used to estimate the consolidation settlements in a centrifuge test and in well-documented case histories of widespread liquefaction: Treasure Island and Marina District after the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake. The results have been compared to the measured settlements and to the values obtained by previous studies. It is shown that the proposed approach leads to a much more accurate estimate of the post-liquefaction consolidation settlement, with just a little increase of the calculation effort.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adamidis O, Madabhushi GSP (2016) Post-liquefaction reconsolidation of sand. Proc R Soc A 472:20150745. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2015.0745
Bennett MJ (1990) Ground deformation and liquefaction of soil in the Marina District. Effects of the Loma Prieta earthquake on the marina district San Francisco, California. USGS open-file Report 90-253
Bennett MJ (1998) Sand boils and settlement on Treasure Island after the earthquake. The Loma Prieta, California, Earthquake of October 17, 1989—Liquefaction. USGS survey professional paper 1551-B
Boatwright J, Seekins LC, Fumal TE, Liu H, Mueller CS (1992) Ground-motion amplification. The Loma Prieta, California, Earthquake of October 17, 1989—Marina District. USGS survey professional paper 1551-F
Bonilla MG (1992) Geologic and historical factors affecting earthquake damage. The Loma Prieta, California, Earthquake of October 17, 1989—Marina District. USGS survey professional paper 1551-F
Boulanger RW, Idriss IM (2014) CPT and SPT liquefaction triggering procedures. Report No UCD/GCM-14/01, University of California at Davis, California
Bray JD, Macedo J (2017) Simplified procedure for estimating liquefaction-induced building settlement. In Proceedings of the 19th international conference on soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering, Seul, Korea, pp 102–118
Brinkgreve RBJ, Kumarswamy S, Engin E, Swolfs WM, Zampich L, Ragi Manoj N (2019) PLAXIS 2D reference manual 2019. Retrieved from PLAXIS Website: https://www.plaxis.com/support/manuals/plaxis-2d-manuals/
Chian SC, Tokimatsu K, Madabhushi SPG (2014) Soil liquefaction-induced uplift of underground structures: physical and numerical modelling. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 140(10):04014057. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001159
Chiaradonna A, Flora A (2019) Personal communication
Chiaradonna A, Tropeano G, d’Onofrio A, Silvestri F (2016) A simplified method for pore pressure buildup prediction: from laboratory cyclic tests to the 1D soil response analysis in effective stress conditions. In: Italian conference of researchers in geotechnical engineering, CNRIG, Bologna, Procedia Engineering, vol 158, pp 302–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.446
Chiaradonna A, Tropeano G, d’Onofrio A, Silvestri F (2018) Development of a simplified model for pore water pressure build-up induced by cyclic loading. Bull Earthq Eng 16(9):3627–3652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0354-4
Chiaradonna A, Tropeano G, d’Onofrio A, Silvestri F (2019) Interpreting the deformation phenomena of a Levee damaged during the 2012 Emilia Earthquake. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 124:389–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.04.039
Chiaradonna A, Flora A, d’Onofrio A, Bilotta E, Silvestri F (2017) Una procedura semplificata per la stima del cedimento di consolidazione post-sismico. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of Researchers in Geotechnics, Matera, 5–7 July 2017. Universosud Editor ISBN: 978-88-994-430-0 (in Italian)
Cubrinovski M, Rhodes A, Ntritsos N, van Ballegooy S (2018) System response of liquefiable deposits. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 1:11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.05.013
Graizer V (2011) Treasure Island geotechnical array—case study for site response analysis. In Proceedings of the 4th IASPEI/IAEE international symposium: effects of surface geology on seismic motion, University of California Santa Barbara, California
Hardin BO, Black WL (1969) Closure to vibration modulus of normally consolidated clays. J Soil Mech Found Div 95(SM6):1531–1537
Hicher PY, El Hosri MS, Homsi M (1987) Cyclic properties of soils within a large range of strain amplitude. In: Cakmak AS (ed) Soil dynamics and liquefaction. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Hoque E, Tatsuoka F (2004) Effects of stress ratio on small-strain stiffness during triaxial shearing. Geotechnique 54(7):429–439
Ishihara K, Yoshimine M (1992) Evaluation of settlements in sand deposits following liquefaction during earthquakes. Soils Found 32(1):173–188
ITASCA Consulting Group Inc (2016) FLAC 8.0—fast Lagrangian analysis of Continua. Minneapolis, MN
Iwasaki T, Arakawa T, Tokida K (1984) Simplified procedures for assessing soil liquefaction during earthquakes. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 3(1):49–58
Jabary RN, Madabhushi SPG (2015) Tuned mass damper effects on the response of multi-storied structures observed in geotechnical centrifuge tests. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 77:373–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.06.013
Kulhawy FH, Mayne PW (1990) Manual on estimating soil properties for foundation design. Report EL-6800. Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, 306 p. www.epri.com
Luque R, Bray JD (2017) Dynamic analyses of two buildings founded on liquefiable soils during the Canterbury earthquake sequence. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001736
Marcuson WF III, Hynes ME, Franklin AG (1990) Evaluation and use of residual strength in seismic safety analysis of embankments. Earthq Spectra 6(3):529–572
Matasovic N, Vucetic M (1993) Cyclic characterization of liquefiable sands. J Geotech Eng ASCE 119(11):1805–1822
Meyerhof GG, Fellenius BH (1985) Canadian foundation engineering manual, 2nd edn. Canadian Geotechnical Society, Richmond
Mitrani H (2006) Liquefaction remediation techniques for existing buildings. Ph.D. dissertation, Cambridge University, Cambridge
Pass DG (1994) Soil characterization of the soil of the deep accelerometer site at Treasure Island, San Francisco, California. Master Degree Thesis, University of New Hampshire
Phillips C, Hashash YMA (2009) Damping formulation for non linear 1D site response analyses. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 29(7):1143–1158
Ramirez J, Barrero AR, Chen L, Dashti S, Ghofrani A, Taiebat M, Arduino P (2018) Site response in a layered liquefiable deposit: evaluation of different numerical tools and methodologies with centrifuge experimental results. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 1:11. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001947
Robertson PK, Cabal (Robertson) KL (2015) Guide to cone penetration testing for geotechnical engineering. Gregg Drilling & Testing Inc, Signal Hill
Rollins KM, McHood MD (1991) Comparison of computed and measured liquefaction-induced settlements in the Marina District, San Francisco. The Loma Prieta, California, Earthquake of October 17, 1989—Liquefaction. USGS survey professional paper 1551-B
Santisi d’Avila MP, Lenti L, Semblat JF (2012) Modelling strong seismic motion: 3D loading path vs wavefield polarization. GJI 190:1607–1624
Santisi d’Avila MP, Semblat JF, Lenti L (2013) Strong ground motion in the 2011 Tohoku Earthquake: a one-directional three-component modeling. Bull Seismol Soc Am 103(2B):1394–1410
Seed HB, Idriss IM (1970) Soil moduli and damping factors for dynamic response analysis. Report No EERC 70-10, University of California, Berkeley, California
Seed HB, Idriss IM (1971) Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential. J Soil Mech Found Div ASCE 97(SM9):1249–1273
Sun JI, Golesorkhi R, Seed HB (1988) Dynamic moduli and damping ratios for cohesive soils. Report No UCB/EERC-88/15. University of California at Berkeley
Tokimatsu K, Seed HB (1987) Evaluation of settlements in sands due to earthquake shaking. J Geotech Eng ASCE 113(8):861–878
Tropeano G, Chiaradonna A, d’Onofrio A, Silvestri F (2016) An innovative computer code for 1D seismic response analysis including shear strength of soils. Géotechnique 66(2):95–105. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.SIP.15.P.017
Tropeano G, Chiaradonna A, d’Onofrio A, Silvestri F (2019) Numerical model for non-linear coupled analysis on seismic response of liquefiable soils. Comput Geotech 105:211–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2018.09.008
Zhang G, Robertson PK, Brachman RWI (2002) Estimating liquefaction-induced ground settlements from CPT for level ground. Can Geotech J 39:1168–1180
Acknowledgements
This work was carried out as part of the European project Horizon 2020—Assessment and Mitigation of liquefaction potential across Europe: A holistic approach to protect structures infrastructures for improved resilience to earthquake—induced liquefaction disasters—“LIQUEFACT” (Grant Agreement No 700748). The Authors wish to thank Professor Alessandro Flora, WP4 team leader within LIQUEFACT project, for the fruitful discussions and suggestions and Dr Orestis Adamidis from ETH Zurich for providing data of the OA3 centrifuge test carried out at the Schofield Centre in Cambridge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chiaradonna, A., d’Onofrio, A. & Bilotta, E. Assessment of post-liquefaction consolidation settlement. Bull Earthquake Eng 17, 5825–5848 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00695-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00695-0