Skip to main content
Log in

EMG oscillator model-based energy kernel method for characterizing muscle intrinsic property under isometric contraction

  • Article
  • Biophysics
  • Published:
Chinese Science Bulletin

Abstract

This paper presents a new method for estimating the isometric contraction force and the characterization of muscle’s intrinsic property. The method, called the energy kernel method, starts with converting the electromyography (EMG) signal into planar phase portraits, on which the elliptic distribution of the state points is named as the energy kernel, while that formed by the noise signal is called the noise kernel. Based on such stochastic features of the phase portraits, we approximate the EMG signal within a rectangular window as a harmonic oscillator (EMG oscillator). The study establishes the relationship between the energy of control signal (EMG) and that of output signal (force/power), and a characteristic energy is proposed to estimate the muscle force. On the other hand, the natural frequencies of the noise and the EMG signal can be attained with the energy kernel and noise kernel. In this way, the direct signal–noise recognition and separation can be accomplished. The results show that the representativeness of the characteristic energy toward the force is satisfactory, and the method is very robust since it combines the advantages of both RMS and MPF. Moreover, the natural frequency of the EMG oscillator is not governed by the MU firing rate of a specific muscle, indicating that this frequency correlates with the intrinsic property of muscle. The physical meanings of the model provide new insights into the understanding of EMG.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Staudenmann D, Roeleveld K, Stegeman DF et al (2010) Methodological aspects of SEMG recordings for force estimation: a tutorial and review. J Electromyopr Kinesiol 20:375–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bigland-Ritchie B, Donovan EF, Roussos CS (1981) Conduction velocity and EMG power spectrum changes in fatigue of sustained maximal efforts. J Appl Physiol 51:1300–1305

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mannion AF, Connolly B, Wood K et al (1997) The use of surface EMG power spectral analysis in the evaluation of back muscle function. J Rehabil Res Dev 34:427–439

    Google Scholar 

  4. Komi PV, Tesch P (1979) EMG frequency spectrum, muscle structure, and fatigue during dynamic contractions in man. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 42:41–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Güler NF, Koçer S (2005) Classification of EMG signals using PCA and FFT. J Med Syst 29:241–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Talebinejad M, Chan ADC, Miri A et al (2009) Fractal analysis of surface electromyography signals: a novel power spectrum-based method. J Electromyopr Kinesiol 19:840–850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Christie A, Inglis G, Kamen G (2009) Relationships between surface EMG variables and motor unit firing rates. Eur J Appl Physiol 107:177–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Qi L, Wakeling JM, Green A et al (2011) Spectral properties of electromyographic and mechanomyographic signals during isometric ramp and step contractions in biceps brachii. J Electromyopr Kinesiol 21:128–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gabor D (1946) Theory of communication. J Inst Electr Eng 93:429–457

    Google Scholar 

  10. Claasen T, Mecklenbrauker W (1980) The Wigner distribution: a tool for time-frequency analysis. Part I: continuous-time signals. Phylips J Res 35:217–250

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wang G, Wang ZZ, Chen WT et al (2006) Classification of surface EMG signals using optimal wavelet packet method based on Davies–Bouldin criterion. Med Biol Eng Comput 44:865–872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Michele GD, Sello S, Garboncini MC et al (2003) Cross-correlation time-frequency analysis for multiple EMG signals in Parkinson’s disease: a wavelet approach. Med Eng Phys 25:361–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang QJ, Luo ZZ, Ye M (2005) Based on power spectrum and RBF neural network to classify surface electromyography (in Chinese). Mech Electr Eng Mag 22:35–38

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kukolj D, Levi E (2003) Identification of complex systems based on neural and Takagi–Sugeno fuzzy model. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B 34:272–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Vineet G, Srikanth S, Narender PR (1997) Fractal analysis of surface EMG signals from the biceps. Int J Med Inform 45:185–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Holobar A, Zazula D (2007) Multi-channel blind source separation using convolution kernel compensation. IEEE Trans Signal Proc 8:4487–4496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Azzerboni B, Finocchio G, Ipsale M et al (2002) A new approach to detection of muscle activation by independent component analysis and wavelet transform. Comput Sci 2486:109–116

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nair SS, French RM, Laroche D et al (2010) The application of machine learning algorithms to the analysis of electromyographic patterns from arthritic patients. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 18:174–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Levi JH, Erik JS, Kevin BE et al (2010) Multiple binary classifications via linear discriminant analysis for improved controllability of a powered prosthesis. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 18:49–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yin YH, Guo Z, Chen X et al (2012) Studies on biomechanics of skeletal muscle based on the working mechanism of myosin motors: an overview. Chin Sci Bull 57:2794–2805

    Google Scholar 

  21. Guo Z, Fan YJ, Zhang JJ, et al. (2012) A new 4 M model-based human-machine interface for lower extremity exoskeleton robot. In: The 5th international conference on intelligent robotics and applications, Montreal. Springer, Berlin, pp 123–130

  22. Gabriel DA, Christie A, Inglis JG et al (2011) Experimental and modeling investigation of surface EMG spike analysis. Med Eng Phys 33:427–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Merletti R, Conte LL, Avignone E et al (1999) Modeling of surface myoelectric signals. Part I: model implementation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 46:810–820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Day SJ, Hulliger M (2001) Experimental simulation of cat electromyogram: evidence for algebraic summation of motor-unit action-potential trains. J Neurophysiol 86:2144–2158

    Google Scholar 

  25. Yang JH, Yang HN, Zhou P et al (1999) Study on automatic decomposition of EMG signals with overlapping MUAP waveform (in Chinese). Chin J Biomed Eng 18:82–88

    Google Scholar 

  26. McComas AJ, Mrozek K, Gardner-Medwin D et al (1968) Electrical properties of muscle fibre membranes in man. J Neurol Neurosurg Phychiatry 31:434–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Yin YH, Chen X (2012) Bioelectrochemical control mechanism with variable-frequency regulation for skeletal muscle contraction—Biomechanics of skeletal muscle based on the working mechanism of myosin motors (II). Sci China Technol Sci 55:2115–2125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kesar T, Chou LW, Binder-Macleod SA (2008) Effects of stimulation frequency versus pulse duration modulation on muscle fatigue. J Electromyopr Kinesiol 18:662–671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Yin YH, Fan YJ, Xu LD (2012) EMG & EPP-integrated human-machine interface between the paralyzed and rehabilitation exoskeleton. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 16:542–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Yin YH, Fan YJ, Guo Z (2011) sEMG-based neuro-fuzzy controller for a parallel ankle exoskeleton with proprioception. Int J Robot Autom 26:450–460

    Google Scholar 

  31. Fan YJ, Yin YH (2012) Differentiated time-frequency characteristics based real-time human-machine interface for lower extremity rehabilitation exoskeleton robot. In: The 5th international conference on intelligent robotics and applications, Montreal. Springer, Berlin, pp 31–40

  32. Zhou S, Lawson DL, Morrison WE (1995) Electromechanical delay in isometric muscle contractions evoked by voluntary, reflex and electrical stimulation. Eur J Appl Physiol 70:138–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Rasmussen J, Damsgaard M, Voigt M (2001) Muscle recruitment by the min/max criterion-a comparative numerical study. J Biomech 34:409–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhou QX, Chen YH, Ma C et al (2011) Evaluation of upper limb muscle fatigue based on surface electromyography. Sci China Life Sci 54:939–944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Lowery MM, Stoykov NS, Dewald JPA et al (2004) Volume conduction in an anatomically based surface EMG model. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 51:2138–2147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ren Q, Zhao YP, Yue JC et al (2006) Biological application of multi-component nanowires in hybrid devices powered by F1-ATPase motors. Biomed Microdevices 8:201–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Guo Z, Yin YH (2012) A dynamic model of skeletal muscle based on collective behavior of myosin motors—Biomechanics of skeletal muscle based on working mechanism of myosin motors (I). Sci China Technol Sci 55:1589–1595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Chen X, Yin YH (2012) A dynamical system-Markov model for active postsynaptic responses of muscle spindle afferent nerve. Chin Sci Bull 58:603–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (2011CB013203), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61375098, 61075101), and the Science and Technology Intercrossing Research Foundation of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (LG2011ZD106).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuehong Yin.

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, X., Yin, Y. & Fan, Y. EMG oscillator model-based energy kernel method for characterizing muscle intrinsic property under isometric contraction. Chin. Sci. Bull. 59, 1556–1567 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-014-0147-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-014-0147-3

Keywords

Navigation