Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Classification of EMG Signals Using PCA and FFT

  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, the fast Fourier transform (FFT) analysis was applied to EMG signals recorded from ulnar nerves of 59 patients to interpret data. The data of the patients were diagnosed by the neurologists as 19 patients were normal, 20 patients had neuropathy and 20 patients had myopathy. The amount of FFT coefficients had been reduced by using principal components analysis (PCA). This would facilitate calculation and storage of EMG data. PCA coefficients were applied to multilayer perceptron (MLP) and support vector machine (SVM) and both classified systems of performance values were computed. Consequently, the results show that SVM has high anticipation level in the diagnosis of neuromuscular disorders. It is proved that its test performance is high compared with MLP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kumaravel, N., and Kavitha, V., Automatic diagnosis of neuromuscular disease using neural network. Biomed. Sci. Instrum. 90:245–250, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Butchal, F., An Introduction to EMG, Copenhagen, Gyldendal, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Frize, M., Ennett, M., Stevenson, M., and Trigg, C. E., Clinical decision support for intensive care unit using ANN. Med. Eng. Phys. 23:217–222, 52001.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Savelberg, H. H., and Herzog, W., Prediction of dynamic tendon forces from electromyographic signals: An artificial neural network approach. J. Neurosci. Methods 30:65–74, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pattichis, C. S., Schofield, I. S., and Fawcett, P., A morphological analysis of the macro motor unit potential. Med. Eng. Phys. 21(10):673–679, 1999.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nussbaum, M. A., Chaffin, D. B., and Martin, B. J., A back-propagation neural network model of lumbar muscle recruitment during moderate static exertions. J. Biomech. 28(9):1015–1024, 1995.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bigland-Ritchie, B., Donovan, E. F., and Roussos, C. S., Conduction velocity and EMG power spectrum changes in fatigue of sustained maximal efforts. J. Appl. Physiol. 51(5):1300–1305, 1981.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Blinowska, A., Verroust, J., and Cannet, G., The determination of motor unit characteristics from the low frequency electromyographic power spectra. Electromyogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 19:281–290, 1979.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hiraiwa, A., Shimohara, K., and Tokunaga, Y., EMG pattern analysis and classification by neural network and application to prosthetic forearm control. IEEE Int. Joint Conf. Neural Netw., Singapore 1214–1219, 1991.

  10. Farry, K. A., and Walker, I. D., Myoelectric teleoperation of a complex robotic hand. IEEE Trans. Robotics Aut. 12(5):775–788, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sarbadhikari, S. N., A neural network confirms that physical exercise reverses EEG changes in depressed rats. Med. Eng. Phys. 17(18):579–582, 1995.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Perez, M. A., and, Nussbaum, M. A., Principal components analysis as an evaluation and classification tool for lower torso sEMG data. J. Biomech. 36:1225–1229, 2003.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pfeiffer, G., and Kunze, K., Discriminant classification of motor unit potentials (MUPs) successfully separates neurogenic and myopathic conditions. A comparison of multi- and univariate diagnostical algorithms for MUP analysis. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 97:191–207, 1995.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Vapnik, V. N., Statistical Learning Theory, Wiley Series on Adaptive and Learning Systems for Signal Processing, Communications and Control, Wiley, New York, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hearst, M. A., Dumais, S. T., Osman, E., Platt, J., and Scholkopf, B., Support vector machines. IEEE Intell. Syst. 13(4):18–28, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Millet-Roig, J., Ventura-Galiano, R., Chorro-Gasco, F. J., and Cebrian, A., Support vector machine for arrhythmia discrimination with wavelet transform-based feature selection. IEEE Comput. Cardiol. 407–410, 2000.

  17. Bishop, C. M., Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition, Oxford University Press, 1995.

  18. Fredric, M. H., and Ivıca, K., Principles of Neurocomputing for Science and Engineering, McGraw-Hill, New York, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cortes, C., and Vapnik, V., Support Vector Machines, Machine Learning, 1995.

  20. Pricipe, J. C., Neil, R. E., and Lefebvre, W. C., Neural and Adaptive Systems Fundementals Through Simulations, John Wiley & Sons, 2000.

  21. Hanley, J. A., and McNeil, B. J., The meaning and use of the area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 143:29–36, 1982.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Fuglsang-Frederiksen, A., and Ronager, J., EMG power spectrum, turns-amplitude analysis and motor unit potential duration in neuromuscular disorders. J. Neurol. Sci. 97(1) 81–91, 1990.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nihal Fatma Güler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Güler, N.F., Koçer, S. Classification of EMG Signals Using PCA and FFT. J Med Syst 29, 241–250 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-005-5184-7

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-005-5184-7

Key words

Navigation