Abstract
Many QTL mapping methods have been developed in the past two decades. Statistically, the best method should have a high detection power but a low false discovery rate (FDR). Power and FDR cannot be derived theoretically for most QTL mapping methods, but they can be properly evaluated using computer simulations. In this paper, we used four genetic models (two for independent loci and two for linked loci) to illustrate power and FDR estimation for interval mapping (IM) and inclusive composite interval mapping (ICIM). For each model, we simulated 1000 populations each of 200 doubled haploids. A support interval (SI) was first defined to indicate to which predefined QTL the significant QTL belonged. Power was calculated by counting the number of simulation runs with significant peaks higher than the logarithm of odds (LOD) threshold in the SI. Quantitative trait loci not identified in any SIs were viewed as false positives. The FDR is the rate at which QTLs are identified as significant when they are actually non-significant. Simulation results allowed us to estimate power and FDR of IM and ICIM for two independent and two linkage genetic models. Our estimates allowed us to readily compare the efficiencies of different statistical methods for QTL mapping, including the ability to separate linkage, under a wide range of genetic models. We used IM and ICIM as examples of how to estimate power and FDR, but the principles shown in this paper can be used for power analysis and comparison of any other QTL mapping methods, especially those based on interval tests.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Lander E S, Botstein D. Mapping Mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps. Genetics, 1989, 121: 185–199
Haley C S, Knott S A. A simple regression method for mapping quantitative loci in line crosses using flanking markers. Heredity, 1992, 69: 315–324
Martinez O, Curnow R N. Estimating the locations and the sizes of the effects of quantitative trait loci using flanking markers. Theor Appl Genet, 1992, 85: 480–488
Zeng Z B. Precision mapping of quantitative trait loci. Genetics, 1994, 136: 1457–1468
Li H, Ye G, Wang J. A modified algorithm for the improvement of composite interval mapping. Genetics, 2007, 175: 361–374
Zhang L, Li H, Li Z, et al. Interactions between markers can be caused by the dominance effect of QTL. Genetics, 2008, 180: 1177–1190
Wang J. Inclusive composite interval mapping of quantitative trait genes. Acta Agron Sin, 2009, 35: 239–245
Li H, Hearne S, Bänziger M, et al. Statistical properties of QTL linkage mapping in biparental genetic populations. Heredity, 2010, 105: 257–267
Li H, Ribaut J M, Li Z, et al. Inclusive composite interval mapping (ICIM) for digenic epistasis of quantitative traits in biparental populations. Theor Appl Genet, 2008, 116: 243–260
Li H, Bradbury P, Ersoz E, et al. Joint QTL linkage mapping for multiple-cross mating design sharing one common parent. PLoS ONE, 2011, 6: e17573
Li H, Zhang L, Wang J. Analysis and answers to frequently asked questions in quantitative trait locus mapping (in Chinese). Acta Agron Sin, 2010, 36: 918–931
Wright A J, Mowers R P. Multiple regression for molecular-marker, quantitative trait data from large F2 populations. Theor Appl Genet, 1994, 89: 305–331
Whittaker J C, Thompson R, Visscher P M. On the mapping of QTL by regression of phenotype on marker-type. Heredity, 1996, 77: 23–32
Doerge R W, Zeng Z B, Weir B S. Statistical issues in the search for genes affecting quantitative traits in experimental populations. Statist Sci, 1997, 12: 195–219
Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Series B, 1995, 57: 289–300
Mayer M, Liu Y, Freyer G. A simulation study on the accuracy of position and effect estimates of linked QTL and their asymptotic standard deviations using multiple interval mapping in an F2 scheme. Genet Sel Evol, 2004, 36: 455–479
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com
Rights and permissions
This article is published under an open access license. Please check the 'Copyright Information' section either on this page or in the PDF for details of this license and what re-use is permitted. If your intended use exceeds what is permitted by the license or if you are unable to locate the licence and re-use information, please contact the Rights and Permissions team.
About this article
Cite this article
Li, H., Zhang, L. & Wang, J. Estimation of statistical power and false discovery rate of QTL mapping methods through computer simulation. Chin. Sci. Bull. 57, 2701–2710 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-012-5239-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-012-5239-3