Abstract
We tested whether the processes of exploration and exploitation can be explicitly distinguished as plants grow and develop within a habitat using two stoloniferous clonal herbs, Hydrocotyle sibthorpioides (Umbelliferae) and Potentilla anserina (Rosaceae). Ramets were planted in four circular trays differing in diameter. One replicate from each diameter-group was sampled at intervals corresponding to plant coverage of the trays, and plant biomass allocation to leaves, stolons, and roots and internode length were quantified. For both species, at early sampling times (when the smallest trays were full), total plant biomass and ramet number were larger in the smaller trays than in the larger trays. However, this trend was reversed for plants collected at later times. For H. sibthorpioides, leaf mass ratios (leaf mass to total plant mass) were significantly greater, but stolon mass ratios (stolon mass to total plant mass) were less in the small trays than in the larger ones, particularly during the early stages of the experiment. Similarly, for P. anserina, leaf mass ratios decreased in the smaller trays but increased in the larger ones as the experiment progressed. Root mass ratios showed contrasting pattern to leaf mass ratios for both species; stolon mass ratios were significantly smaller in the smaller trays than in the larger ones, although there were no obvious patterns during the course of the experiment. In addition, for both species, internode length was shorter but the number of ramets was greater in the smaller trays at early sampling times. We conclude that plants invest greater biomass in resource-exploring organs (stolons) than in resource-exploiting organs (leaves or roots) as they initially establish in a habitat. The relatively lower plant productivity in the largest trays at early sampling times presumably reflects the cost of exploration prior to resource exploitation and utilization.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Silvertown J, Gordon D M. A framework for plant behavior. Annu Rev Ecol Syst, 1989, 20: 349–366
De Kroon H, Hutchings M J. Morphological plasticity in clonal plants: The foraging concept reconsidered. J Ecol, 1995, 83: 143–152
Trewavas A. Green plants as intelligent organisms. Trends Plant Sci, 2005, 10: 413–419
Trewavas A. What is plant behavior? Plant Cell Environ, 2009, 32: 606–616
McNickle G G, Cassady S, Clair C, et al. Focusing the metaphor: Plant root foraging behaviour. Trends Ecol Evol, 2009, 24: 419–426
Hutchings M J, De Kroon H. Foraging in plants: The role of morphological plasticity in resource acquisition. Adv Ecol Res, 1994, 25: 159–238
Sutherland W J, Stillman R A. The foraging tactics of plants. Oikos, 1988, 52: 239–244
Campbell B D, Grime J P, Mackey J M L. A trade-off between scale and precision in resource foraging. Oecologia, 1991, 87: 532–538
Birch C P D, Hutchings M J. Exploitation of patchily distributed soil resources by the clonal herb Glechoma hederacea. J Ecol, 1994, 82: 653–664
Hutchings M J, Wijesinghe D K. Patchy habitats, division of labour and growth dividends in clonal plants. Tree, 1997, 12: 390–394
De Kroon H, Mommer L. Root foraging theory put to the test. Trends Ecol Evol, 2006, 2: 113–116
Stuefer J F. Potentials and limitations of current concepts in the study of clonal plants responses to environmental heterogeneity. Vegetatio, 1996, 127: 55–70
Oborny B, Cain M L. Models of spatial spread and foraging in clonal plants. In: de Kroon H, van Groenendael J, eds. The Ecology and Evolution of Clonal Plants. Leiden: Backhuys Publication, 1997. 115–127
Slade A J, Hutchings M J. Clonal integration and plasticity in foraging behavior in Glechoma hederacea. J Ecol, 1987, 75: 1023–1036
Slade A J, Hutchings M J. The effects of light-intensity on foraging in the clonal herb Glechoma hederacea. J Ecol, 1987, 75: 639–650
Evans J P, Cain M L. A spatially explicit test of foraging behavior in a clonal plant. Ecology, 1995, 76: 1147–1155
Dong M, During H J, Werger M J A. Root and shoot plasticity of the stoloniferous herb Ajuga reptans L. planted in a heterogeneous environment. Flora, 2002, 197: 37–46
Hutchings M J, Wijesinghe D K. Performance of a clonal species in patchy environments: Effects of environmental context on yield at local and whole-plant scales. Evol Ecol, 2008, 22: 313–324
Schenk H J, Callaway R M, Mahall B E. Spatial root segregation: Are plants territorial? Adv Ecol Res, 1999, 28: 145–180
MacArthur R H, Pianka E R. On optimal use of a patchy environment. Am Nat, 1966, 100: 603–609
Charnov E L. Optimal foraging, marginal value theorem. Theor Popul Biol, 1976, 9: 129–136
Danchin É, Girladeau L A. Cézilly F. Behavioral Ecology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008
Schmid B, Bazzaz F A. Clonal integration and population-structure in perennials: Effects of severing rhizome connections. Ecology, 1987, 68: 2016–2022
De Kroon H, Stuefer J F, Dong M, et al. On plastic and non-plastic variation in clonal plant morphology and its ecological significance. Folia Geobot Phytotaxon, 1994, 29: 123–138
Slade A J, Hutchings M J. The effects of nutrient availability on foraging in the clonal herb Glechoma hederacea. J Ecol, 1987, 75: 95–112
Wijesinghe D K, Hutchings M J. The effects of spatial scale of environmental heterogeneity on the growth of a clonal plant: An experimental study with Glechoma hederacea. J Ecol, 1997, 85: 17–28
Alpert P, Simms E L. Relative advantages of plasticity and fixity in different environments: When is it good for a plant to adjust? Evol Ecol, 2002, 16: 285–297
StatSoft Inc. STATISTICA for Windows. StatSoft, Inc, Tulsa, Okla. 2000
Hunt R, Cornelissen J H C. Components of relative growth rate and their interrelations in 59 temperate plant species. New Phytol, 1997, 135: 395–417
Villar R, Veneklaas E J, Jordano P, et al. Relative growth rate and biomass allocation in 20 Aegilops (Poaceae) species. New Phytol, 1998, 140: 425–437
Enquist B J, Niklas K J. Global allocation rules for patterns of biomass partitioning in seed plants. Science, 2002, 295: 1517–1520
Niklas K J, Enquist B J. Canonical rules for plant organ biomass partitioning and annual allocation. Am J Bot, 2002, 89: 812–819
Brenner E D, Stahlberg R, Mancuso S, et al. Plant neurobiology: An integrated view of plant signaling. Trends Plant Sci, 2006, 11: 413–419
Karban R. Plant behaviour and communication. Ecol Lett, 2008, 11: 727–739
Semchenko M, Zobel K, Heinemeyer A, et al. Foraging for space and avoidance of physical obstructions by plant roots: Mechanism and the influence of habitat productivity. New Phytol, 2008, 179: 1162–1170
Den Dubbelden K C, Oosterbeek B. The availability of external support affects allocation patterns and morphology of herbaceous climbing plants. Funct Ecol, 1995, 9: 628–634
Den Dubbelden K C, Verburg R W. Inherent allocation patterns and potential growth rates of herbaceous climbing plants. Plant Soil, 1996, 184: 341–347
Braam J. In touch: Plant responses to mechanical stimuli. New Phytol, 2005, 165: 373–389
Mcconnaughay K D M, Bazzaz F A. Is physical space a soil resource. Ecology, 1991, 72: 94–103
Mcconnaughay K D M, Bazzaz F A. The occupation and fragmentation of space: Consequences of neighboring shoots. Funct Ecol, 1992, 6: 711–718
Wijesinghe D K, Handel S N. Advantages of clonal growth in heterogeneous habitats: An experiment with Potentilla simplex. J Ecol, 1994, 82: 495–502
Bell G, Lechowicz M J. Spatial heterogeneity at small scales and how plants respond to it. In: Caldwell M M, Pearcy R W, eds. Exploitation of Environmental Heterogeneity by Plants. New York: Academic, 1994. 391–411
De Kroon H, Visser E J, Huber H, et al. A modular concept of plant foraging behavior: The interplay between local responses and systemic control. Plant Cell Environ, 2009, 32: 704–712
Gersani M, Brown J S, O’Brien E E, et al. Tragedy of the commons as a result of root competition. J Ecol, 2001, 89: 660–669
Maina G G, Brown J S, Gersani M. Intra-plant versus inter-plant root competition in beans: Avoidance, resource matching or tragedy of the commons. Plant Ecol, 2002, 160: 235–247
Gruntman M, Novoplansky A. Physiologically mediated self/non-self discrimination in roots. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2004, 101: 3863–3867
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
This article is published under an open access license. Please check the 'Copyright Information' section either on this page or in the PDF for details of this license and what re-use is permitted. If your intended use exceeds what is permitted by the license or if you are unable to locate the licence and re-use information, please contact the Rights and Permissions team.
About this article
Cite this article
Peng, Y., Niklas, K.J. & Sun, S. Do plants explore habitats before exploiting them? An explicit test using two stoloniferous herbs. Chin. Sci. Bull. 57, 2425–2432 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-012-4983-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-012-4983-8