Skip to main content
Log in

Physicochemical properties and potential health effects of nanoparticles from pulverized coal combustion

  • Articles/Environmental Science & Technology
  • Published:
Chinese Science Bulletin

Abstract

Nanoparticles are thought to induce more severe health impacts than larger particles. The nanoparticles from coal-fired boilers are classified into three size fractions with a 13-stage low pressure impactor. Their physicochemical properties are characterized by the high-resolution field emission scanning electron microscope and X-ray fluorescence spectrometer (XRF). The results show that coal-derived nanoparticles mainly consist of individual primary particles of 20–150 nm and their aggregates. Inorganic nanoparticles primarily contain ash-forming elements and their aggregates have a dense structure. Organic nanoparticles are dominated by the element carbon and their aggregates have a loose structure. Nanoparticles from the same boiler have a similar composition and are primarily composed of sulfur, refractory elements and alkali/alkaline elements. Some transition and heavy metals are also detected. For different boilers, greater differences are observed in the production of the nanoparticles and their composition, possibly due to the use of low-NO x burners. Coal-derived nanoparticles have a small size, large specific surface area and complicated chemical composition, and thus are potentially more harmful to human health.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Biswas P, Chang Y W. Nanoparticles and the environment. J Air Wast Man, 2005, 55(6): 708–746

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hirano S, Nitta H, Moriguchi Y, et al. Nanoparticles in emissions and atmospheric environment: now and future. J Nanopart Res, 2003, 5(3): 311–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Oberdörster G, Stone V, Donaldson K. Toxicology of nanoparticles: a historical perspective. Nanotoxicology, 2007, 1(1): 2–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Donaldson K, Tran C L, Jimenez L A, et al. Combustion-derived nanoparticles: a review of their toxicology following inhalation exposure. Part Fibre Toxicol, 2005, 2: 10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Inoue K-I, Takano H, Yanagisawa R, et al. Effects of inhaled nanoparticles on acute lung injury induced by lipopolysaccharide in mice. Toxicol, 2007, 238(2–3): 99–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Oberdörster G, Oberdorster E, Oberdorster J. Nanotoxicology: an emerging discipline evolving from studies of ultrafine particles. Env iron Health Perspect. 2005, 113: 823–839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen L C, Lam H F, Kim E J, et al. Pulmonary effects of ultrafine coal fly ash inhaled by guinea pigs. J Toxicol Environ Health, 1990, 29: 169–184

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chen Y, Shah N, Huggins F E, et al. Transmission electron microscopy investigation of ultrafine coal fly ash particles. Environ Sci Technol, 2005, 39: 1144–1151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen Y, Shah N, Huggins F E, et al. Characterization of ultrafine coal fly ash particles by energy-filtered TEM. J Microsc, 2005, 217(3): 225–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Linak W P, Yoo J I, Wasson S J, et al. Ultrafine ash aerosols from coal combustion: characterization and health effects. P Combust Inst, 2007, 31: 1929–1937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chang M C O, Chow J C, Watson J G, et al. Measurement of ultrafine particle size distributions from coal-, oil-, and gas-fired stationary combustion sources. J Air Waste Manage, 2004, 54(12): 1494–1505

    Google Scholar 

  12. Yu D, Xu M, Yao H, et al. Effective identification of the three particle modes generated during pulverized coal combustion. Chin Sci Bull, 2008, 53(10): 1593–1602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lighty J S, Veranth J M, Sarofim A F. Combustion aerosols: factors governing their size and composition and implications to human health. J Air Waste Manage, 2000, 50(9): 1565–1618

    Google Scholar 

  14. Quann R J, Sarofim A F. Vaporization of refractory oxides during pulverized coal combustion. P Combust Inst, 1982, 19(1): 1429–1440

    Google Scholar 

  15. Flagan R C, Taylor D D. Laboratory studies of submicron particles from coal combustion. P Combust Inst, 1981, 18(1): 1227–1237

    Google Scholar 

  16. Neville M, Quann R J, Haynes B S, et al. Vaporization and condensation of mineral matter during pulverized coal combustion. P Combust Inst, 1981, 18(1): 1267–1274

    Google Scholar 

  17. Helble J J, Sarofim A F. Factors determining the primary particle size of flame-generated inorganic aerosols. J Colloid Interface Sci, 1989, 128(2): 348–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Helble J, Neville M, Sarofim A F. Aggregate formation from vaporized ash during pulverized coal combustion. Prog Energ Combust, 1988, 21(1): 411–417

    Google Scholar 

  19. Veranth J M, Fletcher T H, Pershing D W, et al. Measurement of soot and char in pulverized coal fly ash. Fuel, 2000, 79(9): 1067–1075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kennedy I M. Models of soot formation and oxidation. Prog Energ Combust, 1997, 23(2): 95–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tree D R, Svensson K I. Soot processes in compression ignition engines. Prog Energ Combust, 2007, 33(3): 272–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kauppinen E I, Pakkanen T A. Coal combustion aerosols: a field study. Environ Sci Technol, 1990, 24(12): 1811–1818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang L, Ninomiya Y, Yamashita T. Formation of submicron particulate matter (PM1) during coal combustion and influence of reaction temperature. Fuel, 2006, 85(10–11): 1446–1457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lee C M, Davis K A, Heap M P, et al. Modeling the vaporization of ash constituents in a coal-fired boiler. P Combust Inst, 2000, 28(2): 2375–2382

    Google Scholar 

  25. Senior C L, Flagan R C. Synthetic chars for the study of ash vaporization. P Combust Inst, 1985, 20(1): 921–929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Taylor D D, Flagan R C. Influence of combustor operation on fine particles from coal combustion. Aerosol Sci Tech, 1982, 1(1): 103–117

    Google Scholar 

  27. McElroy M W, Carr R C, Ensor D S, et al. Size distribution of fine particles from coal combustion. Science, 1982, 215(4528): 13–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. BéruBé K, Balharry D, Sexton K, et al. Combustion-derived nanoparticles: mechanisms of pulmonary toxicity. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol, 2007, 34(10): 1044–1050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wilson M R, Lightbody J H, Donaldson K, et al. Interactions between ultrafine particles and transition metals in vivo and in vitro. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol, 2002, 184(3): 172–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Li N, Sioutas C, Cho A, et al. Ultrafine particulate pollutants induce oxidative stress and mitochondrial damage. Environ Health Perspect, 2003, 111: 455–460

    Google Scholar 

  31. Prahalad A K, Inmon J, Dailey L A, et al. Air pollution particles mediated oxidative DNA base damage in a cell free system and in human airway epithelial cells in relation to particulate metal content and bioreactivity. Chem Res Toxicol, 2001, 14(7): 879–887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Risom L, Miller P, Loft S. Oxidative stress-induced DNA damage by particulate air pollution. Mutat Res, 2005, 592(1–2): 119–137

    Google Scholar 

  33. Pope C A, Dockery D W. Epidemiology of particle effects. In: Holgate S T, Samet J M, Koren H S, Maynard R L eds. Air Pollution and Health. London: Academic Press, 1999. 673–705

    Google Scholar 

  34. Komarnisky L A, Christopherson R J, Basu T K. Sulfur: its clinical and toxicologic aspects. Nutrition, 2003, 19(1): 54–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Amdur M O. Health effects of air pollutants: sulfuric acid, the old and the new. Environ Health Perspect, 1989, 81: 109–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Amdur M O, Chen L C. Furnace-generated acid aerosols: speciation and pulmonary effects. Environ Health Perspect, 1989, 79: 147–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Fernandez A, Wendt J O L, Witten M L. Health effects engineering of coal and biomass combustion particulates: influence of zinc, sulfur and process changes on potential lung injury from inhaled ash. Fuel, 2005, 84(10): 1320–1327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Aruoma O I. Free radicals, oxidative stress, and antioxidants in human health and disease. J Am Oil Chem Soc, 1998, 75(2): 199–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Morawska L, Zhang J. Combustion sources of particles. 1. Health relevance and source signatures. Chemosphere, 2002, 49(9): 1045–1058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Barfknecht T R. Toxicology of soot. Prog Energ Combust, 1983, 9(3): 199–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Su W H, Zhang Q P, Song W Z, et al. Problems of soot pollution and environmental effects in northern China. Aerosol Sci Tech, 1989, 10(2): 231–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Zhou Y M, Zhong C Y, Kennedy I M, et al. Oxidative stress and NFkappaB activation in the lungs of rats: a synergistic interaction between soot and iron particles. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol, 2003, 190: 157–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to DunXi Yu or MingHou Xu.

Additional information

Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 50721005, 50706013 and 50720145604)

About this article

Cite this article

Yu, D., Xu, M., Yao, H. et al. Physicochemical properties and potential health effects of nanoparticles from pulverized coal combustion. Chin. Sci. Bull. 54, 1243–1250 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-008-0582-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-008-0582-0

Keywords

Navigation