Skip to main content
Log in

Information theory in nonlinear error growth dynamics and its application to predictability: Taking the Lorenz system as an example

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Science China Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In nonlinear error growth dynamics, the initial error cannot be accurately determined, and the forecast error, which is also uncertain, can be considered to be a random variable. Entropy in information theory is a natural measure of the uncertainty of a random variable associated with a probability distribution. This paper effectively combines statistical information theory and nonlinear error growth dynamics, and introduces some fundamental concepts of entropy in information theory for nonlinear error growth dynamics. Entropy based on nonlinear error can be divided into time entropy and space entropy, which are used to estimate the predictabilities of the whole dynamical system and each of its variables. This is not only applicable for investigating the dependence between any two variables of a multivariable system, but also for measuring the influence of each variable on the predictability of the whole system. Taking the Lorenz system as an example, the entropy of nonlinear error is applied to estimate predictability. The time and space entropies are used to investigate the spatial distribution of predictability of the whole Lorenz system. The results show that when moving around two chaotic attractors or near the edge of system space, a Lorenz system with lower sensitivity to the initial field behaves with higher predictability and a longer predictability limit. The example analysis of predictability of the Lorenz system demonstrates that the predictability estimated by the entropy of nonlinear error is feasible and effective, especially for estimation of predictability of the whole system. This provides a theoretical foundation for further work in estimating real atmospheric multivariable joint predictability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lorenz E N. Deterministic nonperiodic flow. J Atmos Sci, 1963, 20: 130–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chervin R M, Schneider S H. On determining the statistical significance of climate experiments with general circulation models. J Atmos Sci, 1976, 33: 405–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Shukla J, Gutzler D S. Interannual variability and predictability of 500mb geopotential heights over the northern hemisphere. Mon Weather Rev, 1983, 111: 1273–1279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Leung L Y, North G R. Information theory and climate prediction. J Clim, 1990, 3: 5–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. DelSole T. Predictability and information theory. Part I: Measure of predictability. J Atmos Sci, 2004, 61: 2425–2440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Schneider T, Griffies S M. A conceptual framework for predictability studies. J Clim, 1999, 12: 3133–3155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Anderson J L, Stern W F. Evaluating the potential predictive utility of ensemble forecasts. J Clim, 1996, 9: 260–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yang X Q, Anderson J L, Stern W F. Reproducible forced modes in AGCM ensemble integration and potential predictability of atmospheric seasonal variations in the extratropics. J Clim, 1998, 11: 2942–2959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sardeshmukh P D, Compo G P, Penland C. Changes of probability associated with El Niño. J Clim, 2000, 13: 4268–4286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Li J P, Ding R Q, Chen B H. Review and prospect on the predictability study of the atmosphere. Review and Prospects of the Developments of Atmosphere Science in Early 21st Century. Beijing: China Meteorological Press, 2006. 96–103

    Google Scholar 

  11. Li J P, Zeng Q C, Chou J F. Computational uncertainty principle in nonlinear ordinary differential equations I: Numerical results. Sci China Ser E-Technol Sci, 2000, 43: 449–460

    Google Scholar 

  12. Li J P, Zeng Q C, Chou J F. Computational uncertainty principle in nonlinear ordinary differential equations II: Theoretical analysis. Sci China Ser E-Technol Sci, 2000, 44: 55–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mu M, Duan W S, Wang J C. The predictability problems in numerical weather and climate prediction. Adv Atmos Sci, 2002, 19: 191–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mu M, Duan W S, Wang B. Conditional nonlinear optimal perturbation and its applications. Nonlinear Process Geophys, 2003, 10: 493–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mu M, Duan W S. A new approach to studying ENSO predictability: conditional nonlinear optimal perturbation. Chin Sci Bull, 2003, 48: 1045–1047

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mu M, Duan W, Wang Q, et al. An extension of conditional nonlinear optimal perturbation approach and its applications. Nonlinear Process Geophys, 2010, 12: 211–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Duan W S, Mu M. Conditional nonlinear optimal perturbation: Applications to stability, sensitivity, and predictability. Sci China Ser D-Earth Sci, 2009, 52: 883–906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mu M, Duan W S. Conditional nonlinear optimal perturbation and its application to the studies of weather and climate predictability. Chin Sci Bull, 2005, 50: 2401–2407

    Google Scholar 

  19. Duan W S, Mu M. Applications of nonlinear optimization method to numerical studies of atmospheric and oceanic sciences. Appl Math Mech, 2005, 26: 636–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yu Y, Duan W, Xu H, et al. Dynamics of nonlinear error growth and season-dependent predictability of El Niño events in the Zebiak-Cane model. Q J R Meteorol Soc, 2009, 135: 2146–2160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yu Y, Mu M, Duan W. Does model parameter error cause a significant “Spring Predictability Barrier” for El Niño events in the Zebiak-Cane Model? J Clim, 2012, 25: 1263–1277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Duan W, Chao W. The ’spring predictability barrier’ for ENSO predictions and its possible mechanism: Results from a fully coupled model. Int J Climatol, 2012, doi: 10.1002/joc.351

  23. Chen B H, Li J P, Ding R Q. Nonlinear local Lyapunov exponent and atmospheric predictability research. Sci China Ser D-Earth Sci, 2006, 49: 11430–11436

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ding R Q, Li J P. Nonlinear finite-time Lyapunov exponent and predictability. Phys Lett A, 2007, 364: 396–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ding R Q, Li J P. Nonlinear error dynamics and predictability study (in Chinese). Chin J Atmos Sci, 2007, 31: 571–576

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ding R Q, Li J P. Comparison of the influences of initial error and model parameter error on the predictability of numerical forecast (in Chinese). Chin J Geophys, 2008, 51: 1007–1012

    Google Scholar 

  27. Li J P, Ding R Q. Studies of predictability of single variable from multi-dimensional chaotic dynamical system (in Chinese). Chin J Atmos Sci, 2009, 33: 551–556

    Google Scholar 

  28. Li J P, Ding R Q. Temporal-spatial distribution of predictability limit of short-term climate (in Chinese). Chin J Atmos Sci, 2008, 32: 975–986

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ding R Q, Li J P. Applicaition of nonlinear error growth dynamics in studies of atmospheric predictability (in Chinese). Acta Meteor Sin, 2009, 67: 241–249

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ding R Q, Li J P. The temporal-spatial distributions of weather predictability of different variables (in Chinese). Acta Meteorol Sin, 2009, 67: 343–354

    Google Scholar 

  31. Li J P, Ding R Q. Tempeoral-spatial distribution of atmospheric predictability limit by local dynamical analogs. Mon Weather Rev, 2011, 139: 3265–3283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ding R Q, Li J P. Comparisons of two ensemble mean methods in measuring the average error growth and the predictability. Acta Meteorol Sin, 2011, 25: 395–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Cover T M, Thomas J A. Elements of Information Theory. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley, 2006. 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kleeman R. Measuring dynamical prediction utility using relative entropy. J Atmos Sci, 2002, 59: 2057–2072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Roulston M, Smith L. Evaluating probabilistic forecasts using information theory. Mon Weather Rev, 2002, 130: 1653–1660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Abramov R, Majda A, Kleeman R. Information theory and predictability for low-frequency variability. J Atmos Sci, 2005, 62: 65–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. DelSole T. Predictability and information theory. Part II: Imperfect Forecast. J Atmos Sci, 2005, 61: 3368–3381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Tang Y, Lin H, Derome J, et al. A predictability measure applied to seasonal predictions of the Arctic Oscillation. J Clim, 2007, 20: 4733–4750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. DelSole T, Tippett M K. Predictability: Recent insights from information theory. Rev Geophys, 2007, 45: RG4002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Zhang J G, Liu X R. Information entropy analysis on nonuniformity of prediction distribution in time-space. I: Basic concept and data analysis (in Chinese). Adv Water Sci, 2000, 11: 133–137

    Google Scholar 

  41. Zhang J G, Liu X R. Information entropy analysis on nonuniformity of prediction distribution in time-space. II: Model evaluation and application (in Chinese). Adv Water Sci, 2000, 11: 138–143

    Google Scholar 

  42. Zhang J G. Information entropy study on precipitation distribution in time and space (in Chinese). Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Nanjing: Hohai University, 2004. 49–102

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to LiFeng Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, A., Zhang, L., Wang, Q. et al. Information theory in nonlinear error growth dynamics and its application to predictability: Taking the Lorenz system as an example. Sci. China Earth Sci. 56, 1413–1421 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-012-4506-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-012-4506-0

Keywords

Navigation