Abstract
It is generally believed that physical heterogeneity in common resource or evolutionary restraint can sufficiently prevent direct conflict between host and symbionts in mutualism systems. Our data on fig/fig wasp reciprocal mutualism (Ficus racemosa), however, show that structural barriers of female flowers or genetic constraints of pollinators previously hypothesized exist, but cannot sufficiently maintain the mutualism stability. The results show that a positive relationship between seed and wasp production could be maintained in warm season, which might be because of density dependence restraint among foundresses and their low oviposition and pollination efficiency, keeping common resource (female flowers) utilization unsaturated. Whilst, a negative correlation between wasp offspring and viable seed production was also observed in cold season, which might be that the increased oviposition and pollination efficiency maximized the common resource utilization. The fitness trade-off between fig and pollinator wasps is greatly affected by environmental or ecological variations. The local stability might result from temporal low exploitation efficiency of pollinators together with interference competition among pollinators. We suggest that host repression through the active regulation of bract closure, which can create interference competition among the foundresses and prevent extra more foundresses sequential entry in fruit cavities, would help the figs avoiding the cost of over-exploitation. This essentially takes the same role as sanctioning of cheating or competitive behaviors.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Anstett MC, Hossaert-McKey M, Kjellberg F. Figs and fig pollinators: evolutionary conflicts in a coevoled mutualism. Trends Ecol Evol, 1997, 12: 94–99
Herre EA, West SA. Conflict of interest in a mutualism: documenting the elusive fig wasp-seed trade-off. Proc R Soc B, 1997, 264: 1501–1507
Herre EA, Knowlton N, Mueller UG, Rehner SA. The evolution of mutualisms: exploring the paths between conflict and cooperation. Trends Ecol Evol, 1999, 14: 49–53
Bronstein JL. The costs of mutualism. Am Zool, 2001, 41: 825–839
Hoeksema JD, Schwartz MW. Expanding comparative-advantage biological market models: contingency of mutualism on partner’s resource requirements and acquisition trade-offs. Proc R Soc B, 2003, 270: 913–919
Janzen DH. How to be a fig. Annu Rev Ecol Syst, 1979, 10: 13–51
Wiebes J. Co-evolution of figs and their insect pollinators.Annu. Rev Ecol Syst, 1979, 10: 1–12
Murray M. Figs (Ficus spp.) and fig wasps (Chalcidoidea, Agaonidae): hypotheses for an ancient symbiosis. Biol J Linn Soc, 1985, 26: 69–81
Grafen A, Godfray H. Vicarious selection explains some paradoxes in dioecious fig-pollinator systems. Proc R Soc B, 1991, 245: 73–76
Bronstein JL. Mutualism, antagonism, and the fig-pollinator interaction. Ecology, 1988, 69: 1298–1302
Nefdt RJ, Compton SG. Regulation of seed and pollinator production in the fig-fig wasp mutualism. J Anim Ecol, 1996, 170–182
Kathuria P, Ganeshaiah K, Uma Shaanker, Vasudeva R. Is there dimorphism for style lengths in monoecious figs? Curr Sci India, 1995, 68: 1047–1049
Anstett MC. Unbeatable strategy, constraint and coevolution, or how to resolve evolutionary conflicts: the case of the fig/wasp mutualism. Oikos, 2001, 95: 476–484
West SA, Herre EA. The ecology of the New World fig-parasitizing wasps Idarnes and implications for the evolution of the fig-pollinator mutualism. Proc R Soc B, 1994b, 258: 67–72
Wang RW, Yang JX, Yang DR. Seasonal changes in the trade-off among fig-supported wasps and viable seeds in figs and their evolutionary implications. J Integr Plant Biol, 2005a, 47: 144–152
Wang RW, Sun BF. Seasonal change in the structure of fig-wasp community and its implication for conservation. Symbiosis, 2009, 47: 77–83
Anstett MC. Unbeatable strategy, constraint and coevolution, or how to resolve evolutionary conflicts: the case of the fig/wasp mutualism. Oikos, 2001, 95: 476–484
Compton S, Nefdt R. The figs and fig wasps of Ficus burtt-davyi. Mitt Inst Allg Bot Hamburg, 1990, 23: 441–450
Jousselin E, Hossaert-Mckey M, Vernet D, Kjellberg F. Egg deposition patterns of fig pollinating wasps: implications for studies on the stability of the mutualism. Ecol Entomol, 2001, 26: 602–608
Dunn DW, Jansen-González S, Cook JM, Yu DW, Pereira RAS. Measuring the discrepancy between fecundity and lifetime reproductive success in a pollinating fig wasp. Entomol Exp Appl, 2011, 140: 218–225
Bronstein JL, Hossaert-McKey M. Variation in reproductive success within a subtropical fig/pollinator mutualism. J Biogeogr, 1996, 23: 433–446
Wang RW, Sun BF, Zheng Q, Shi L, Zhu LX. Asymmetric interaction and indeterminate fitness correlation between cooperative partners in the fig-fig wasp mutualism. J R Soc Interface, 2011, 8: 1487–1496
Kerdelhue C, Rossi JP, Rasplus JY. Comparative community ecology studies on old world figs and fig wasps. Ecology, 2000, 81: 2832–2849
Corner EJH. Check-list of Ficus in Asia and Australasia with keys to identification. Gard Bull Singap, 1965, 21: 1–186
Wang RW, Yang CY, Zhao GF, Yang JX. Fragmentation effects on diversity of wasp community and its impact on fig/fig wasp interaction in Ficus racemosa. L J Integr Plant Biol, 2005, 47: 20–26
Yang DR, Zhao TZ, Wang RW, Zhang GM, Song QS. Study on pollination ecology of fig wasp (Ceratosolen sp.) in the tropical rainforest of Xishuangbanna, China. Zool Res, 2001, 22: 125–130
Zhang FP, Peng YQ, Compton SG, Yang DR. Floral Characteristics of Ficus curtipes and the oviposition behavior of its pollinator fig wasp. Ann Entomol Soc Am, 2009, 102: 556–559
Dunn DW, Yu DW, Ridley J, Cook JM. Longevity, early emergence and body size in a pollinating fig wasp—implications for stability in a fig-pollinator mutualism. J Anim Ecol, 2008, 77: 927–935
Wang RW, Ridley J, Sun BF, Zheng Q, Dunn DW, Cook J, Shi L, Zhang YP, Douglas WY. Interference competition and high temperatures reduce the virulence of fig wasps and stabilize a fig-wasp mutualism. PLoS One, 2009, 4: e7802
Wang RW, Sun BF, Zheng Q. Diffusive coevolution and mutualism maintenance mechanisms in a fig-fig wasp system. Ecology, 2010, 91: 1308–1316
Wang RW, Dun DW, Sun BF. Discriminative sanction in fig-fig wasp mutualism. Ecology, 2014, 95: 1384–1393
Galil J, Eisikowitch D. Studies on mutualistic symbiosis between syconia and sycophilous wasps in monoecious figs. New Phytol, 1971, 70: 773–787
Axelrod R, Hamilton WD. The evolution of cooperation. Science, 1981, 211: 1390–1396
Pellmyr O, Huth CJ. Evolutionary stability of mutualism between yuccas and yucca moths. Nature, 1994, 372: 257–260
Pellmyr O, Leebens-Mack J. Reversal of mutualism as a mechanism for adaptive radiation in yucca moths. Am Nat, 2000, 156: S62–76
West SA, Pen I, Griffin AS. Cooperation and competition between relatives. Science, 2002b, 296: 72–75
Bronstein J. Seed predators as mutualists: ecology and evolution of the fig/pollinator interaction. Insect-Plant Interact, 1992, 4: 1–44
Hoeksema JD, Bruna EM. Pursuing the big questions about interspecific mutualism: a review of theoretical approaches. Oecologia, 2000, 125: 321–330
Yu DW, Ridley J, Jousselin E, Herre EA, Compton SG, Cook JM, Moore JC, Weiblen GD. Oviposition strategies, host coercion and the stable exploitation of figs by wasps. Proc R Soc B, 2004, 271: 1185–1195
West SA, Herre EA. The ecology of the New World fig-parasitizing wasps Idarnes and implications for the evolution of the fig-pollinator mutualism. Proc R Soc B, 1994a, 258: 67–72
Wang RW, Shi L, Ai SM, Zheng Q. Trade-off between reciprocal mutualists: local resource availability-oriented interaction in fig/fig wasp mutualism. J Anim Ecol, 2008, 77: 616–623
Morris WF, Wilson WG, Bronstein JL, Ness JH. Environmental forcing and the competitive dynamics of a guild of cactus-tending ant mutualists. Ecology, 2005, 86: 3190–3199
Ness J, Morris W, Bronstein J. Integrating quality and quantity of mutualistic service to contrast ant species protecting Ferocactus wislizeni. Ecology, 2006, 87: 912–921
Piculell B, Hoeksema J, Thompson J. Interactions of biotic and abiotic environmental factors in an ectomycorrhizal symbiosis, and the potential for selection mosaics. BMC, 2008, 6: 23
Wang RW, Yang JX, Yang DR. Seasonal changes in the trade-off among fig-supported wasps and viable seeds in figs and their evolutionary implications. J Integr Plant Biol, 2005c, 47: 144–152
Herre EA. Coevolution of reproductive characteristics in 12 species of New World figs and their pollinator wasps. Experientia, 1989, 45: 637–647
Khadari B, Gibernau M, Anstett MC, Kjellberg F, Hossaert-McKey M. When figs wait for pollinators: the length of fig receptivity. Am J Bot, 1995, 992–999
Anstett MC, Kjellberg F, Bronstein JL. Waiting for wasps: consequences for the pollination dynamics of Ficus pertusa L. J Biogeogr, 1996, 23: 459–466
Liu C, Yang DR, Compton SG, Peng YQ. Larger fig wasps are more careful about which figs to enter—with good reason. PLoS One, 2013, 8: e74117
Clutton-Brock T. Breeding together: kin selection and mutualism in cooperative vertebrates. Science, 2002, 296: 69–72
Clutton-Brock TH, Parker GA. Punishment in animal societies. Nature, 1995, 373: 209–216
Frank SA. Mutual policing and repression of competition in the evolution of cooperative groups. Nature, 1995, 377: 520–522
Kiers ET, Rousseau RA, West SA, Denison RF. Host sanctions and the legume-rhizobium mutualism. Nature, 2003, 425: 78–81
Jander KC, Herre EA, Simms EL. Precision of host sanctions in the fig tree-fig wasp mutualism: consequences for uncooperative symbionts. Ecol Lett, 2012, 15: 1362–1369
Queller DC. Does population viscosity promote kin selection? Trends Ecol Evol, 1992, 7: 322–324
Taylor P. Altruism in viscous populations-an inclusive fitness model. Evol Ecol, 1992, 6: 352–356
Wilson DS, Pollock G, Dugatkin LA. Can altruism evolve in purely viscous populations? Evol Ecol, 1992, 6: 331–341
Queller DC. Genetic relatedness in viscous populations. Evol Ecol, 1994, 8: 70–73
Morris WF, Bronstein JL, Wilson WG. Three-way coexistence in obligate mutualist-exploiter interactions: the potential role of competition. Am Nat, 2003, 161: 860–875
Yang CY, Wang RW, Zhao GF, Yang DR. Diet of non-pollinator wasp and its impact on the fig-pollinator wasp mutualism. Zool Res, 2005, 26: 379–385
Bronstein JL. Conditional outcomes in mutualistic interactions. Trends Ecol Evol, 1994, 9: 214–217
West S, Kiers ET, Pen I, Denison R. Sanctions and mutualism stability: when should less beneficial mutualists be tolerated? J Evol Biol, 2002a, 15: 830–837
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This article is published with open access at link.springer.com
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, R., Wen, X., Chen, C. et al. Spatial heterogeneity and host repression in fig-fig wasp mutualism. Sci. China Life Sci. 58, 492–500 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-015-4848-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-015-4848-x