Abstract
EFL learners in Taiwan have a low-level communication ability because many learners are still not provided opportunities to use language for genuine communication in classrooms and receive insufficient language input due to the environment. This study examines the use of digital board game language learning set in a task-collaborative platform, digital learning playground, designed for classroom learning. This study investigates whether communicative skills and intrinsic motivation could be improved by seeing relevant context and receiving adequate practice through gaming. Ninety-six high school Taiwanese students (n = 96), who were randomly assigned to an ordinary instruction group, a board game language-learning group, or a digital board game language-learning group, engaged in a 50-min English class. Analysis of covariance was used for comparing learning performance through a speaking test between the three groups. A modified intrinsic motivation inventory was conducted to assess learners’ perceptions of learning experience and an interview was held for details. The quantitative data presents a higher learning performance for the instruction set at digital learning playground. The qualitative data confirms computerized simulation adapted from board game entails context-relevant immersion, encouraging communication and efficient game instruction management for EFL language learning.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allwright, R. (1976). Language learning through communicative practice. ELT Document, 76(3), 2–14.
Alofs, T., Theune, M., & Swartjes, I. (2011). A Tabletop Board Game Interface for Multi-User Interaction with a Storytelling System. In Proceedings of The Fourth International ICST Conference on Intelligent Technologies for Interactive Entertainment (INTETAIN 2011) (pp. 123–128).
Bransford, J. D., Franks, J. J., Vye, N. J., & Sharwood, R. D. (1989). New approaches to instruction: Because wisdom can’t be told. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 470–497). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Brookes, S., & Moseley, A. (2012). Authentic contextual games for learning. In N. Whitton & A. Moseley (Eds.), Using games to enhance learning and teaching: A beginner’s guide (pp. 92–107). New York: Routledge.
Brown, D. H. (2007). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (3rd ed.). White Plains: Pearson Education.
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42. Retrieved from JSTOR.
Bullard, N. (1990). Briefing and debriefing. In D. Crookall & R. L. Oxford (Eds.), Simulation, gaming, and language learning (pp. 55–66). New York: Newbury House Publishers.
Carraher, T. N., Carraher, D. W., & Schliemann, A. D. (1985). Mathematics in the streets and in schools. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 3, 21–29.
Chen, K. C., Wu, C. J., & Chen, G. D. (2011). A digital board game based learning system for authentic learning. In Proceedings of the eleventh international conference on advance learning technologies, ICALT 2011, Athens, Georgia (pp. 25–99), July 6–8, 2011. Athens, GA: IEEE Computer Society.
Collins, A., & Brown, J. S. (1988). The computer as a tool for learning through reflection. In H. Mandel & A. Lesgold (Eds.), Learning issues for intelligent tutoring systems (pp. 1–18). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Cummings, M. G., & Genzel, R. B. (1990). Simulation/game design and adaptation. In D. Crookall & R. L. Oxford (Eds.), Simulation, gaming, and language learning (pp. 67–73). New York: Newbury House Publishers.
Cummins, J. (1992). Language proficiency, bilingualism, and academic achievement. In P. Richard-Amato & M. Snow (Eds.), The multicultural classroom: Readings for content area teachers (pp. 16–25). White Plains: Longman.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Publishing Co.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Facilitating optional motivation and psychological well-being across life’s domain. Canada Psychology, 49, 14–23.
Duffy, T. M., & Jonassen, D. H. (1992). Constructivism: New implications for instructional technology. In T. M. Duffy & D. H. Jonassen (Eds.), Constructivism and the technology of instruction: A conversation (pp. 1–16). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Elkind, D. (2007). The power of play: Learning what comes naturally. New York: Da Capo Press.
Garcia-Carbonell, A., Rising, B., Montero, B., & Watts, F. (2001). Simulation/gaming and the acquisition of communicative competence in another language. Simulation & Gaming, 32(4), 481–491.
Gee, J. P. (2004). Situated language and learning: A critique of traditional schooling. London: Routledge.
Herrington, A. J. (1997). Authentic learning in interactive multimedia environments. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Edith Cowan University, Perth.
Herrington, J., Reeves, T. C., & Oliver, R. (2010). A guide to authentic e-learning. New York: Routledge.
Higgins, J. J., & Morgenstern, D. (1990). Simulation on computers: Element and examples. In D. Crookall & R. L. Oxford (Eds.), Simulation, gaming, and language learning (pp. 183–197). New York: Newbury House Publishers.
Hinebaugh, J. P. (2009). A board game education. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Education.
Hirsch, E. D, Jr. (2011). Beyond comprehension: We have yet to adopt a common core curriculum. American Educator, 34(4), 30–36.
Horner, D., & McGinley, K. (1990). Running simulation/games: A step-by-step guide. In D. Crookall & R. L. Oxford (Eds.), Simulation, gaming, and language learning (pp. 33–47). New York: Newbury House Publishers.
Hwang, G. J., Wu, P. H., & Chen, C. C. (2012). An online game approach for improving students’ learning performance in web-based problem-solving activities. Computers & Education, 59(4), 1246–1256.
Jones, K. (1982). Simulations in language learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergaman.
Krashen, S. (1985). The Input hypothesis: Issues and implications. London: Longman.
Liu, T.-Y., & Chu, Y.-L. (2010). Using ubiquitous games in an English listening and speaking course: Impact on learning outcomes and motivation. Computer & Education, 55(2), 630–643.
Mayer, B., & Harris, C. (2010). Libraries got game. Chicago: American Library Association.
Miller, G. A., & Gildea, P. M. (1987). How children learn words. Scientific American, 257(3), 86–99.
Moseley, A. (2012). Assessment and games. In N. Whitton & A. Moseley (Eds.), Using games to enhance learning and teaching: A beginner’s guide (pp. 124–137). New York: Routledge.
Moseley, A., & Jones, R. (2012). Mapping games to curricula. In N. Whitton & A. Moseley (Eds.), Using games to enhance learning and teaching: A beginner’s guide (pp. 109–123). New York: Routledge.
Ramani, G. B., Siegler, R. D., & Hitti, A. (2012). Taking it to the classroom: Number board games as a small group learning activity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 661–672.
Resnick, L. (1987). The 1987 presidential address: Learning in school and out. Educational Researcher, 16(9), 13–20. Retrieved from JSTOR.
Shanklin, S. B., & Ehlen, C. R. (2007). Using the Monopoly board game as an in-class economic simulation in the Introductory Financial Accounting course. Journal of College Learning and Teaching, 4(11), 65–72.
Skahan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
South African Qualifications Authority. (2000). The national qualifications framework and curriculum development. Pretoria: SAQA Publication.
Squire, K.D. (2005). Changing the game: What happens when video games enter the classroom?. Innovate, 1(6). Retrieved from: http://www.innovateonline.info. Accessed 6 Nov 2008.
Squire, K. (2008). Open-end video games: A model for developing learning for the interactive age. In K. Salen (Ed.), The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation series on digital media and learning (pp. 167–198). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Squire, K., & Durga, S. (2009). Productive games: The case for historiographic game play. In R. Ferdig (Ed.), Handbook of Research on effective electronic gaming in education (pp. 200–218). Hershey: Information Science Reference.
Taiwan National PISA center. (2009). Taiwan PISA 2009 short report. Tainan: Taiwan National PISA center at National University of Tainan.
Waston, D. R., & Sharrock, W. W. (1990). Realities in simulation gaming. In D. Crookall & R. L. Oxford (Eds.), Simulation, gaming, and language learning (pp. 231–245). New York: Newbury House Publishers.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wu, CJ., Chen, GD. & Huang, CW. Using digital board games for genuine communication in EFL classrooms. Education Tech Research Dev 62, 209–226 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-013-9329-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-013-9329-y