Skip to main content

The Computer as a Tool for Learning Through Reflection

  • Chapter
Learning Issues for Intelligent Tutoring Systems

Part of the book series: Cognitive Science ((COGNITIVE SCIEN))

Abstract

A unique aspect of computers is that they not only represent process but also naturally keep track of the actions used to carry out a given task, so that the process with its trace can become an object of study in its own right. One effect of this can be seen vividly in the sciences, where computers and computational languages have improved our ability to develop and test process theories of complex natural phenomena. Before powerful computers became readily available as scientific tools, process models were expressed in mathematical languages, such as differential equations— languages primarily effective in capturing a static “snapshot” of a process. Computation provided formal languages that are more flexible than mathematics but just as precise. In part because computation is itself dynamic, it provides an ideal medium for representing and testing richer, more varied, and more detailed theories of process. The use of this medium for process modeling has radically changed the nature of many current theories in both the physical and social sciences. Particularly in the arena of the cognitive sciences, computational techniques have proved to be powerful tools for both experimental and theoretical investigations of the mind.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson, J. R., Boyle, C. F., & Reiser, B. J. (1985). Intelligent tutoring systems. Science, 228, 456–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. R., Boyle, C. F., Farrell, R., & Reiser, B. J. (1984). Cognitive principles in the design of computer tutors. In Proceedings of the sixth annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2–19). Boulder: University of Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bereiter, C., & Bird, M. (1985). Use of thinking aloud in identification and teaching of reading comprehension strategies. Cognition & Instruction, 2, 131–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1985). Cognitive coping stategies and the problem of “inert knowledge”. In S. F. Chipman, J. W. Segal, & R. Glaser (Eds.), Thinking and learning skills (Vol. 2). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. L. (1978). Knowing when, where, and how to remember: A problem of metacognition. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 77–165). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S. (1985). Process versus product: A perspective on tools for communal and informal electronic learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 1, 179–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bundy, A. (1983). The computer modeling of mathematical reasoning. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A. (1986). Teaching reading and writing with personal computers. In J. Orasanu (Ed.), A decade of reading research: Implications for practice (pp. 171–187). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A., & Smith, E. E. (1982). Teaching the process of reading comprehension. In D. K. Detterman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), How much and how can intelligence be increased? (pp. 173–185). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flower, L. S., & Hayes, J. R. (1980). The dynamics of composing: Making plans and juggling constraints. In L. W. Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 31–50). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and monitoring activites. Cognition & Instruction, 1, 117–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Collins, A., Brown, J.S. (1988). The Computer as a Tool for Learning Through Reflection. In: Mandl, H., Lesgold, A. (eds) Learning Issues for Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Cognitive Science. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-6350-7_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-6350-7_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-96616-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-6350-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics