Abstract
Problem solving likely involves at least two broad stages, problem space representation and then problem solution (Newell and Simon, Human problem solving, 1972). The metric centrality that Freeman (Social Networks 1:215–239, 1978) implemented in social network analysis is offered here as a potential measure of both. This development research study applied centrality measures to reanalyze existing concept maps from a recent investigation (Engelmann and Hesse, Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 5:299–319, 2010). Participants (N = 120) were randomly assigned to interdependent (i.e. hidden profiles) or non-interdependent conditions to work online in triads using CmapTools software to create a concept map in order to solve a problem scenario. The centrality values of these group-created concept maps agreed with the common relations count analysis used in that investigation and allowed for additional comparisons as well as analysis by multidimensional scaling. Specifically, the interdependent triad maps resembled the fully explicated problem space, while the non-interdependent triad maps mainly resembled the problem solution. The results demonstrate that centrality is a useful measure of knowledge structure contained in these team concept map artifacts that allows researchers to infer problem representation start and goal state transitions during problem solving.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bavelas, A. (1948). A mathematical model for group structures. Human Organization, 7, 16–30.
Chi, M. T. H., & Glaser, R. (1985). Problem solving ability. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Human abilities: An information processing approach (pp. 227–250). New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
Clariana (2005). Utilizing concept maps and other approaches for acquiring, eliciting, representing, and comparing structural knowledge. A presentation at the Educational Technology Research Unit, University of Oulu, Finland. http://www.personal.psu.edu/faculty/r/b/rbc4/edtech_monday.ppt. Accessed 17 April 2013.
Clariana, (2010). Deriving group knowledge structure from semantic maps and from essays. In D. Ifenthaler, P. Pirnay-Dummer, & N. M. Seel (Eds.), Computer-based diagnostics and systematic analysis of knowledge (pp. 117–130). New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-5662-0_7.
Clariana, Draper, D., & Land, S.M. (2011). An automated measure of group knowledge structure convergence. A presentation at the Annual Meeting of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Jacksonville, FL. http://www.personal.psu.edu/rbc4/AECT_2011.pdf. Accessed 17 April 2013.
Dörner, D. (1987). On the difficulties people have in dealing with complexity. In J. Rasmussen, K. Duncker, & J. Leplat (Eds.), New technology and human error (pp. 97–109). Chichester: Wiley. doi:10.1177/104687818001100108.
Dörner, D. (1996). The logic of failure: Recognizing and avoiding error in complex situations. Reading: Merloyd Lawerence Books.
Engelmann, & Hesse, F. W. (2010). How digital concept maps about collaborators’ knowledge and information influence computer-supported collaborative problem solving. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5, 299–319. doi:10.1007/s11412-010-9089-1.
Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, J. (1980). Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, 87(3), 215–251. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.87.3.215.
Eseryel, D., Ge, X., Ifenthaler, D., & Law, V. (2011a). Dynamic modeling as a cognitive regulation scaffold for developing complex problem-solving skills in an educational massively multiplayer online game environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 45(3), 265–286. doi:10.2190/EC.45.3.a.
Eseryel, D., Ifenthaler, D., & Ge, X. (2011b). Alternative assessment strategies for complex problem solving in game-based learning environments. In D. Ifenthaler, P. Kinshuk, D. Isaias, G. Sampson, & J. M. Spector (Eds.), Multiple perspectives on problem solving and learning in the digital age (pp. 159–178). New York: Springer.
Freeman, L. C. (1978). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1, 215–239. doi:10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7.
Funke, J. (1991). Solving complex problems: Exploration and control of complex systems. In R. J. Sternberg & P. A. Frensch (Eds.), Complex problem solving: Principles and mechanisms (pp. 185–222). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Funke, J. (2003). Problemlösendes Denken. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
Funke, J. (2012). Complex problem solving. In N. M. Seel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning (pp. 682–685). New York: Springer.
Gijbels, D., Dochy, F., Van den Bossche, P., & Segers, M. (2005). Effects of problem-based learning: A meta-analysis from the angle of assessment. Review of Educational Research, 75, 27–61. doi:10.3102/00346543075001027.
Giljers, H., Saab, N., Van Joolingen, W. R., De Jong, T., & Van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M. (2009). Interaction between tool and talk: How instruction and tools support consensus building in collaborative inquiry-learning environments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(3), 252–267. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2008.00302.x.
Haiyue, J., & Yoong, W.K. (2010). A network analysis of concept maps of triangle concepts. In L. Sparrow, B. Kissane, & C. Hurst (Eds.), Shaping the future of mathematics education: Proceedings of the 33rd annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australia (MERGA). Fremantle, Australia, July 2010. http://www.merga.net.au/documents/MERGA33_Haiyue&Wong.pdf. Accessed 17 April 2013.
Harper, M. E., Hoeft, R. M., Evans, A. W., III, & Jentsch, F. (2004). Practically scoring concept maps for the assessment of trainee’s knowledge structures. Paper presented at the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 48th Annual Meeting in the Proceedings for the Human factors and Ergonomics Society, New Orleans, Illinois: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. doi:10.1177/154193120404802219.
Hay, D. B., & Kinchin, I. M. (2006). Using concept maps to reveal conceptual typologies. Education and Training, 48, 127–142. doi:10.1108/00400910610651764.
Hong, N. S. (1998). The relationship between well-structured and ill-structured problem solving in multimedia simulation. Unpublished Dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University. http://www.cet.edu/pdf/structure.pdf. Accessed 17 April 2013.
Ifenthaler, D. (2010). Relational, structural, and semantic analysis of graphical representations and concept maps. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58, 81–97. doi:10.1007/s11423-008-9087-4.
Ifenthaler, D. (2012). Determining the effectiveness of prompts for self-regulated learning in problem-solving scenarios. Educational Technology and Society, 15, 38–52.
Jonassen, D. H. (2011). Learning to solve problems: a handbook for designing problem-solving learning environments. New York: Taylor and Francis. doi:210-D/2011-01.
Jonassen, D. H., Beissner, K., & Yacci, M. (1993). Structural knowledge: techniques for representing, conveying, and acquiring structural knowledge. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Keller, T., Gerjets, P., Scheiter, K., & Garsoffky, B. (2006). Information visualizations for knowledge acquisition: the impact of dimensionality and color coding. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 43–65. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2011.03.031.
Kim, M. K. (2012). Cross-validation study of methods and technologies to assess mental models in a complex problem solving situation. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 703–717. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2005.01.006.
Kinchin, I. M., Hay, D. B., & Adams, A. (2000). How a qualitative approach to concept map analysis can be used to aid learning by illustrating patterns of conceptual development. Educational Research, 42, 43–57. doi:10.1080/001318800363908.
Mayer, R. (1992). Thinking, problem solving, cognition (2nd ed.). New York: W H Freeman and Company.
McKeown, J. O. (2008). Using annotated concept map assessments as predictors of performance and understanding of complex problems for teacher technology integration. Doctoral dissertation, Florida State University. http://diginole.lib.fsu.edu/. Accessed 17 April 2013.
Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Pirnay-Dummer, P., & Ifenthaler, D. (2010). Automated knowledge visualization and assessment. In D. Ifenthaler, P. Pirnay-Dummer, & N. M. Seel (Eds.), Computer-based diagnostics and systematic analysis of knowledge (pp. 77–115). New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-5662-0_6.
Sarmiento-Klapper, J. W. (2009). The sequential co-construction of the joint problem space. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Studying virtual math teams (pp. 83–98). New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-0228-3_6.
Spector, J. M. (2010). Mental representations and their analysis: An epistemological perspective. In D. Ifenthaler, P. Pirnay-Dummer, & N. M. Seel (Eds.), Computer-Based Diagnostics and Systematic Analysis of Knowledge (pp. 27–40). New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-5662-0_7.
Wegner, D. M. (1995). A computer network model of human transactive memory. Social Cognition, 13(3), 319–339. doi:10.1521/soco.1995.13.3.319.
Wouters, P., van der Spek, E. D., & van Oostendorp, H. (2011). Measuring learning in serious games: a case study with structural assessment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59, 741–763. doi:10.1007/s11423-010-9183-0.
Yin, Y., Vanides, J., Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Ayala, C. C., & Shavelson, R. J. (2005). A comparison of two construct-a-concept-map science assessments: created linking phrases and selected linking phrases. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 166–184. doi:10.1002/tea.20049.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Clariana, R.B., Engelmann, T. & Yu, W. Using centrality of concept maps as a measure of problem space states in computer-supported collaborative problem solving. Education Tech Research Dev 61, 423–442 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-013-9293-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-013-9293-6