Skip to main content
Log in

Abstract

This paper explores the emergence of joint problem solving in online environments where the participants work together but at different times and from different places. Collaborations of this sort have been referred to as loosely coupled collaborations. The focus is on venue which is the virtual substitute for physical copresence under these conditions. Venue is fundamentally a social construct. It functions to “localize” participation dynamics, communication and register, the creation and sharing of domain objects, and situation-dependent knowledge. Within venue, the reflective parts of joint problem solving become more prominent. Within venue, small teams of students align their views, coordinate their efforts, share their understanding and work, and jointly problem solve.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alterman, R., & Gunnarsson, B. (2013). The blogosphere as representational space, Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning. International Society of the Learning Sciences.

  • Alterman, R., & Larusson, J. (2010). Aggregation in the blogosphere, Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of the Learning Sciences on ZZZ-Volume 2 (pp. 294–295). International Society of the Learning Sciences.

  • Alterman, R., & Larusson, J.A. (2013). Participation and common knowledge in a case study of student blogging. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 8(2), 149–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, R.G., & Wright, H.F. (1954). Midwest and its children: The psychological ecology of an American town. Row, Peterson and Company.

  • Barron, B. (2003). When smart groups fail. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(3), 307–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A.L., Ash, D., Rutherford, M., Nakagawa, K., Gordon, A., & Campione, J.C. (1993). Distributed expertise in the classroom. Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations, 188–228.

  • Cameron, D., & Anderson, T. (2006). Comparing weblogs to threaded discussion tools in online educational contexts. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(11), 3–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cesareni, D., Cacciamani, S., & Fujita, N. (2016). Role taking and knowledge building in a blended university course. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 11(1), 9–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H., & Brennan, S. (1991). Grounding in communication. Perspectives on socially shared cognition, 127–149.

  • Clark, H., & Marshall, C. (2002). Definite reference and mutual knowledge. In Josh, A., Webber, B., & Sag, I. (Eds.), Elements of Discourse Understanding (pp. 10–63). Cambridge University Press.

  • Cress, U. (2013). Mass collaboration and learning. Handbook of design in educational technology, 416–424.

  • Cress, U., & Kimmerle, J. (2008). A systemic and cognitive view on collaborative knowledge building with wikis. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3(2), 105–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng, L., & Yuen, A.H. (2011). Towards a framework for educational affordances of blogs. Computers & Education, 56(2), 441–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by collaborative learning?. In Dillenbourg, P. (Ed.), Collaborative Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches. Advances in Learning and Instruction Series (pp. 1–19). Elsevier Science.

  • Dillenbourg, P., Lemaignan, S., Sangin, M., Nova, N., & Molinari, G. (2016). The symmetry of partner modelling. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 11(2), 227–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillenbourg, P., & Traum, D. (2006). Sharing solutions: Persistence and a samples of questions that were considered follow in multimodal collaborative problem solving. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(1), 121–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillenbourg, P., Traum, D., & Schneider, D. (1996). Grounding in multi-modal task-oriented collaboration, Proceedings of the European Conference on AI in Education (pp. 401–407).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellison, N., & Wu, Y. (2008). Blogging in the classroom: A preliminary exploration of student attitudes and impact on comprehension. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 17(1), 99–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forte, A., & Bruckman, A. (2007). Constructing text:: Wiki as a toolkit for (collaborative?) learning, Proceedings of the 2007 International Symposium on Wikis (pp. 31–42). NY, USA: ACM New York.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H. (1994). Studies in ethnomethodology. Polity Press.

  • Goffman, E. (1963). Behavior in public place. Glencoe: the free press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1964). The neglected situation. American Anthropologist, 66 (6_PART2), 133–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, C. (2007). Participation, stance and affect in the organization of activities. Discourse & Society, 18(1), 53–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, S., Roseman, M., Webster, D., & Bohnet, R. (1992). Issues and experiences designing and implementing two group drawing tools, Proceedings of the 25th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1992, (Vol. 4 pp. 139–150). IEEE.

  • Gunnarsson, B.L., & Alterman, R. (2013). Understanding promotions in a case study of student blogging, Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 57–65). ACM.

  • Gunnarsson, B.L., & Alterman, R. (2014). Peer promotions as a method to identify quality content. Journal of Learning Analytics, 1(2), 126–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, S., & Dourish, P. (1996). Re-place-ing space: The roles of place and space in collaborative systems, Proceedings of the 1996 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 67–76). ACM.

  • Harrison, S., & Tatar, D. (2008). Places: People, events, loci–the relation of semantic frames in the construction of place. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 17(2-3), 97–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hymes, D. (1964). Introduction: Toward ethnographies of communication. American Anthropologist, 1– 34.

  • Impressionism (2016). Impressionism — Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. [Online; accessed 29-September-2016].

  • Järvelä, S., & Hadwin, A.F. (2013). New frontiers: Regulating learning in cscl. Educational Psychologist, 48(1), 25–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. The Journal of the learning sciences, 4(1), 39–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimmerle, J., Moskaliuk, J., & Cress, U. (2011). Using wikis for learning and knowledge building: Results of an experimental study. Educational Technology & Society, 14(4), 138–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruger, R., Carpendale, S., Scott, S.D., & Greenberg, S. (2004). Roles of orientation in tabletop collaboration: Comprehension, coordination and communication. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 13(5-6), 501–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larusson, J., & Alterman, R. (2009). Wikis to support the collaborative part of collaborative learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4(4), 371–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Harvard university press.

  • Lave, J. (1988). Cognition and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, B. (2001). Mutual knowledge, background knowledge and shared beliefs: Their roles in establishing common ground. Journal of Pragmatics, 33(1), 21–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lessig, L. (2008). Remix: Making art and commerce thrive in the hybrid economy. Penguin.

  • Mercier, E.M., Higgins, S.E., & Da Costa, L. (2014). Different leaders: Emergent organizational and intellectual leadership in childrens collaborative learning groups. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 9(4), 397–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moskaliuk, J., Kimmerle, J., & Cress, U. (2009). Wiki-supported learning and knowledge building: Effects of incongruity between knowledge and information. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(6), 549–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moskaliuk, J., Kimmerle, J., & Cress, U. (2012). Collaborative knowledge building with wikis: The impact of redundancy and polarity. Computers & Education, 58 (4), 1049–1057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, K. (2001). Defining and differentiating copresence, social presence and presence as transportation, Presence 2001 Conference (pp. 1–23). Philadelphia, PA: Citeseer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oravec, J. (2002). Bookmarking the World: Weblog Applications in Education. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 45(7), 616–621.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roschelle, J. (1992). Learning by collaborating: Convergent conceptual change. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(3), 235–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S. D. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In Computer supported collaborative learning, pages 69–97. Springer.

  • Sawyer, R.K. (2013). Qualitative methodologies for studying small groups. The international handbook of collaborative learning, 126–148.

  • Schegloff, E. (1992). Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation. American Journal of Sociology, 1295–1345.

  • Schneider, B., & Pea, R. (2013). Real-time mutual gaze perception enhances collaborative learning and collaboration quality. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 8(4), 375–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, S.D., Carpendale, M.S.T., & Inkpen, K.M. (2004). Territoriality in collaborative tabletop workspaces, Proceedings of the 2004 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 294–303). ACM.

  • Shirky, C. (2008). Here comes everybody: The power of organizing without organizations. penguin.com.

  • Shweder, R. A. (1990). Cultural psychology – what is it?. In Stigler, J. W., Shweder, R. A., & Herdt, G. E. (Eds.), Cultural psychology: Essays on comparative human development (pp. 1–43). Cambridge University Press.

  • Sim, J., & Hew, K. (2010). The use of weblogs in higher education settings: A review of empirical research. Educational Research Review, 5(2), 151–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soller, A. (2001). Supporting social interaction in an intelligent collaborative learning system. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education (IJAIED), 12, 40–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, G. (2006). Group cognition: Computer support for building collaborative knowledge. MIT Press.

  • Stahl, G. (2009). Studying Virtual Math Teams: Explorations of Group Cognition Vol. 11. Springer Verlag.

  • Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., & Suthers, D. (2006). Computer-supported collaborative learning. In Sawyer, R. (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

  • Stahl, G., Zhou, N., Cakir, M., & Sarmiento-Klapper, J. (2011). Seeing what we mean: Co-experiencing a shared virtual world, Proceedings of the 2011 Connecting Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning to Policy and Practice: CSCL 2011 Conference, Vol. 1.

  • Suchman, L., & Trigg, R. (1991). Understanding practice: Video as a medium for reflection and design. Design at work: Cooperative design of computer systems, 65–89.

  • Suthers, D. (2006). Technology affordances for intersubjective meaning making: A research agenda for cscl. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(3), 315–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suthers, D., Dwyer, N., Medina, R., & Vatrapu, R. (2010). A framework for conceptualizing, representing, and analyzing distributed interaction. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5(1), 5–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, J. (1991). Findings from observational studies of collaborative work. International Journal of Man-machine studies, 34(2), 143–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teasley, S., & Roschelle, J. (1993). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. Computers as cognitive tools, 229–258.

  • Ten Have, P. (2007). Doing conversation analysis. Sage.

  • Wainfan, L., & Davis, P.K. (2004). Challenges in virtual collaboration: Videoconferencing, audioconferencing, and computer-mediated communications. Rand Corporation.

  • Wertsch, J. (1991). Voices of the Mind: A Sociocultural Approach to Mediated Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Whittaker, S., Brennan, S., & Clark, H. (1991). Co-ordinating activity: An analysis of interaction in computer-supported co-operative work, Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: Reaching Through Technology (pp. 361–367). ACM.

  • Williams, J., & Jacobs, J. (2004). Exploring the use of blogs as learning spaces in the higher education sector. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 20(2), 232–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeh, Y. -C. (2010). Analyzing online behaviors, roles, and learning communities via online discussions. Educational Technology & Society, 13(1), 1.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard Alterman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alterman, R., Harsch, K. A more reflective form of joint problem solving. Intern. J. Comput.-Support. Collab. Learn 12, 9–33 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-017-9250-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-017-9250-1

Keywords

Navigation