Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Phosphorus forms in soil solution and leachate of contrasting soil profiles and their implications for P mobility

  • Soils, Sec 1 • Soil Organic Matter Dynamics and Nutrient Cycling • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Soils and Sediments Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Policy changes to reduce the transport of phosphorus (P) from agricultural land have triggered research in many parts of the world to improve understanding of processes controlling P mobility so that P management practices can be designed to limit losses to waterways. Previous studies on soils from cropping land in the Mediterranean-type climate of south-west Western Australia suggested that dissolved unreactive P (DURP) comprises a large proportion of extractable soil P, but the implications of these findings for P mobility in soil solution were not examined.

Materials and methods

Intact columns of three contrasting soil profiles (sand, loam, loamy sand) from cropping land of the south coast region of Western Australia were leached to examine P forms in leachate (bottom of 20 cm columns) and extracted soil solution (5, 10 and 15 cm depths) after application of three P rates (0, 20 and 40 kg P/ha). Leachate and soil solutions were analyzed for total dissolved P (TDP0.45 μm and 0.2 μm) and dissolved reactive P (DRP0.45 μm and 0.2 μm). Dissolved unreactive P (DURP0.45 μm and 0.2 μm) was calculated by difference.

Results and discussion

Initial high P concentrations in leachate were followed by a sharp decrease with successive leaching events at high P rates (sand > loamy sand > loam), suggesting that macropore flow dominated in early leaching followed by matrix flow which favours P sorption by soil. The major fraction of P in leachate and soil solution even after the application of KH2PO4-P was DURP. The leachate (0.45 μm pores) and soil solution (0.2 μm pores) both had similar predominance of DURP fraction, although the proportion of DURP0.2 μm in soil solution was less than in leachate. The difference suggests that a significant proportion of the DURP fraction was fine colloidal material in 0.2–0.45 um size class, but its composition remains unknown.

Conclusions

The predominance of DURP in leachate and soil solution was the most striking finding of relevance to P mobilization on intact columns of sand, loamy sand and loam soils. Phosphorus sorbed on the surfaces of the colloidal particles and occluded P within the colloids may account for some of the calculated DURP fraction. Determination of the composition of DURP in soil solution collected might provide useful insights for P mobility since this more effectively excluded particulate P than the <0.45 μm filtrate used for leachate analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alloush GA, Boyerb DG, Beleskyb DP, Halvorson JJ (2003) Phosphorus mobility in a karst landscape under pasture grazing system. Agronomie 23:593–600

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Alva AK (2006) Sustainable nutrient management in sandy soils-fate and transport of nutrients from animal manure verses inorganic sources. J Sust Agri 28:139–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson H, Bergstrom L, Djodjic F, Ulen B, Kirchmann H (2013) Topsoil and subsoil properties influence phosphorus leaching from four agricultural soils. J Environ Qual 42:455–463

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beckett R, Chittleborough DJ (1994) Properties of colloids and their significance in the pollutant transport in soils and ground water. Report for Land and Water Resources Research and Development Corporation, R & D Project UM03, Australia, 30th April 1994

  • Bell RW, Reuter DJ, Scott B, Sparrow L, Strong W, Chen W (2013) Soil phosphorus—crop response calibration relationships and criteria for winter cereal crops grown in Australia. Crop Pasture Sci 64:480–498

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bolland MDA, Yeates JS, Clarke MF (1995) Effect of fertilizer type, sampling depth, and years on Colwell soil test phosphorus for phosphorus leaching soils. Fert Res 44:177–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burkitt LL, Moody PW, Gourley CJP, Hannah MC (2002) A simple phosphorus buffering index for Australian soils. Aus J Soil Res 40:497–513

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chardon WJ, Oenema O, del Castilho P, Vriesema R, Japenga J, Blaauw D (1997) Organic phosphorus in solutions and leachates from soils treated with animal slurry. J Env Qual 26:372–378

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Colwell JD (1963) The estimation of phosphorus fertilizer requirements of wheat in southern New South Wales by soil analysis. Aus J Exp Agri Anim Husb 6:105–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Correll DL (1998) The role of phosphorus in the eutrophication of receiving waters: a review. J Environ Qual 27:261–266

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cox JW, Kirkby CA, Chittleborough DJ, Smythe LJ, Fleming NK (2000) Mobility of phosphorus through intact soil columns collected from the Adelaide Hills, South Australia. Aus J Soil Res 38:973–990

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Djodjic F (2001) Displacement of phosphorus in structured soils. PhD Thesis, Department of Environmental Conservation, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden

  • Djodjic F, Borling K, Bergstrom L (2004) Phosphorus leaching in relation to soil type and soil phosphorus content. J Env Qual 33:678–684

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Doolette AL, Smernik RJ, Dougherty WJ (2011) Quantitative assessment of phosphorus forms in some Australian soils. Soil Res 49:152–165

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gee GW, Bauder JW (1986) Particle size analysis. In: Klute A (ed) Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1. American Society of Agronomy: Madison, Wisconsin. Agronomy Monograph 9:383-411

  • Gillman GP (1979) A proposed method for the measurement of exchange properties of highly weathered soils. Aus J Soil Res 17:129–139

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hannapel RJ, Fuller WH, Bosma S, Bullock JS (1964) Phosphorus movement in a calcareous soil: 1. Predominance of organic forms of phosphorus in phosphorus movement. Soil Sci 97:350–357

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haygarth PM, Hepworth L, Jarvis SC (1998) Forms of phosphorus transfer in hydrological pathways from soil under grazed grassland. Eur J Soil Sci 49:65–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haygarth PM, Sharpley AN (2000) Terminology for phosphorus transfer. J Environ Qual 29:10–15

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hazelton P, Murphy B (2007) interpreting soil test results: what do all the numbers mean? (CSIRO: Collingwood VIC, Australia), pp 59-90

  • Hodgkin EP, Birch PB, Black RE, Humphries RB (1980) The Peel-Harvey Estuarine system study (1976-80). (Department of Conservation and Environment: Perth), Report No. 9

  • Jarvis NJ (2007) A review of non-equilibrium water flow and solute transport in soil macropores: principles, controlling factors and consequences for water quality. Eur J Soil Sci 58:523–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jury WA, Fluhler H (1991) Transport of chemicals through soil: mechanisms, model and field applications. Adv Agron 47:141–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirchmann H (1991) Properties and classification of soils of the Swedish long term fertility experiment-1. Sites at Fors and Kungsangen. Acta Agri Scand 41:227–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lilienfein J, Qualls RG, Uselman SM, Bridgham SD (2004) Adsorption of dissolved organic and inorganic phosphorus in soils of a weathering chronosequence. Soil Sci Soc Am J 68:620–628

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Makris KC, Grove JH, Matocha CJ (2006) Colloid-mediated vertical phosphorus transport in a waste-amended soil. Geoderma 136:174–183

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall TJ, Holmes JW, Rose CW (1996) Soil Physics. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McArthur WM (2004) Reference soils of south-western Australia. Australian Soil Science Society, Perth, WA

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie N, Coughlan K, Cresswell H (2002) Soil physical measurement and interpretation for land evaluation. In: Pore Space and Water Retention: Bulk Density and Pore Space. CSIRO publ.: Collingwood, Victoria, Australia, pp 36–37

  • McKergow LA, Weaver DM, Prosser IP, Grayson RB, Reed AEG (2003) Before and after riparian management: sediment and nutrient exports from a small agricultural catchment, Western Australia. J Hydrol 270:253–272

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Menzies NW, Guppy C (2000) In situ soil solution extraction with polyacrylonitrile hollow fibers. Comm Soil Sci Plant Anal 31:1875–1886

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy J, Riley JP (1962) A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Analy Chim Acta 27:31–36

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy PNC (2007) Lime and cow slurry application temporarily increases organic phosphorus mobility in an acid soil. Eur J Soil Sci 58:794–801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozanne PG, Kirton DJ, Shaw TC (1961) The loss of P from sandy soils. Aus J Agri Res 12:409–423

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peltovuori T (2007) Sorption of phosphorus in field moist and air dried samples from four weakly developed cultivated soil profiles. Eur J Soil Sci 58:8–17

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pracilio G, Asseng S, Cook SE, Hodgson G, Wong MTF, Adams ML, Hatton TJ (2003) Estimating spatially variable deep drainage across a central-eastern wheatbelt catchment, Western Australia. Aus J Agri Res 54:789–802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rayment GE, Higginson FR (1992) Australian laboratory handbook of soil and water chemical methods. Inkata Press, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Ron Vaz MD, Edwards AC, Shand CA, Cresser MS (1993) Phosphorus fractions in soil solution: influence of soil acidity and fertiliser additions. Plant Soil 148:175–183

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shand CA, Smith S, Edwards AC, Fraser AR (2000) Distribution of phosphorus in particulate colloidal and molecular-sized fractions of soil solution. Water Res 34(4):1278–1284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma RS (2009) Soil and landscape factors affecting phosphorus loss from the Fitzgerald River catchment in south west of Western Australia, PhD Thesis, Murdoch University, Perth, WA

  • Tennant D, Scholtz G, Dixon J, Purdie B (1992) Physical and chemical characteristics of duplex soils and their distribution in the south-west of Western Australia. Aus J Exp Agri 32:827–843

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Toor GS, Condron LM, Di HJ, Cameron KC, Cade-Menum BJ (2003) Characterization of organic phosphorus in leachate from a grassland soil. Soil Bio Biochem 35:1317–1323

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Turner BL, Haygarth PM (2001) Phosphorus solublization in rewetted soils. Nature 411:258

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walkley A, Black IA (1934) An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci 37:29–38

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver DM, Wong MTF (2011) Scope to improve phosphorus (P) management and balance efficiency of crop and pasture soils with contrasting P status and buffering indices. Plant Soil 349:37–54

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver DM, Pen LJ, Reed AEG (1994) Modifying the phosphorus cycle to achieve management objectives in the Oyster Harbour catchment. Water 21:28–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong MTF, Asseng S, Zhang H (2006) A flexible approach to managing variability in grain yield and nitrate leaching at within-field to farm scales. Precision Agric 7:405–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the Grain Research and Development Corporation (GRDC) under its Nutrient Management Initiative. We are grateful to the Fitzgerald River Catchment Demonstration Initiative for support at field sites.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard W. Bell.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Leo Condron

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sharma, R., Bell, R.W. & Wong, M.T.F. Phosphorus forms in soil solution and leachate of contrasting soil profiles and their implications for P mobility. J Soils Sediments 15, 854–862 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-014-1057-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-014-1057-3

Keywords

Navigation