Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Speciation of heavy metals in garden soils: evidences from selective and sequential chemical leaching

  • SOILS, SEC 2 • GLOBAL CHANGE, ENVIRON RISK ASSESS, SUSTAINABLE LAND USE • RESEARCH ARTICLE
  • Published:
Journal of Soils and Sediments Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Gardening (especially food growing) in urban areas is becoming popular, but urban soils are often very contaminated for historical reasons. There is lack of sufficient information as to the bioavailability of soil heavy metals to plants and human in urban environments. This study examines the relative leachability of Cr, Ni, As, Cd, Zn, and Pb for soils with varying characteristics. The speciation and mobility of these metals can be qualitatively inferred from the leaching experiments. The goal is to use the data to shed some light on their bioavailability to plant and human, as well as the basis for soil remediation.

Materials and methods

Selective and sequential chemical leaching methods were both used to evaluate the speciation of Cr, Ni, As, Cd, Zn, and Pb in soil samples collected from New York City residential and community gardens. The sequential leaching experiment followed a standard BCR four-step procedure, while selective leaching involved seven different chemical extractants.

Results and discussion

The results from selective and sequential leaching methods are consistent. In general, very little of the heavy metals were found in the easily soluble or exchangeable fractions. Larger fractions of Cd and Zn can be leached out than other metals. Lead appears predominantly in the organic or carbonate fractions, of which ∼30–60% is in the easily soluble organic fraction. Most As cannot be leached out by any of the extractants used, but it could have been complicated by the ineffective dissolution of oxides by ammonium hydroxylamine. Ni and Cr were mostly in the residual fractions but some released in the oxidizable fractions. Therefore, the leachability of metals follow the order Cd/Zn > Pb > Ni/Cr.

Conclusions

Despite of the controversy and inaccuracy surrounding chemical leaching methods for the speciation of metals, chemical leaching data provide important, general, and easy-to-access information on the mobility of heavy metals in soils, which in turn relates to their potential bioavailability to plant uptake and human health risk. Such data can be used to guide risk assessment of different metals and develop effective remediation strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bassuk NL (1986) Reducing lead uptake in lettuce. Hortsci 21(4):993–995

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Biasioli FM, Ajmone-Marsan F (2008) Availability and bioaccessibility of metals in fine particles of urban soils. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 55:21–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng Z-Q, Shaw R (2009) Heavy Metal Contamination in New York City Garden Soils. In: Abstract presented at the 5th International conference on Soils of Urban, Industrial, Traffic, Mining, and Military Areas. New York, pp 30–31

  • Culligan CN, Yong RN, Gibbs BF (2001) Remediation technologies for metal-contaminated soils and groundwater: an evaluation. Eng Geol 60:193–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham SD, Berti WR (1997) Phytoextraction or in-place inactivation: Technical, economic and regulatory considerations of soil lead issue. In: Iskandar IK, Hardy SE, Chang AC, Pierzynski GM (eds) Proceedings of extended abstracts from the fourth international conference on the biogeochemistry of trace elements

  • Davidson CM, Hursthouse AS, Tognarelli DM, Ure AM, Urquhart GJ (2004) Should acid ammonium oxalate replace hydroxylammonium chloride in step 2 of the revised BCR sequential extraction protocol for soil and sediment. Anal Chim Acta 5058(2):193–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Amore JJ, Al-Abed SR, Scheckel KG, Ryan JA (2005) Methods for speciation of metals in soils: a review. J Environ Qual 34:1707–1745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denys S, Caboche J, Tack K, Delalain P (2007) Bioaccessibility of lead in high carbonate soils. J Environ Sci Health A 42:1331–1339

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Echevarria G, Morel JL, Fardeau JC, Leclerc-Cessac E (1998) Assessment of phytoavailability of nickel in soils. J Environ Qual 27:1064–1070

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (1997) BCR Information Reference Materials

  • Gerard E, Echevarria G, Sterckeman T, Morel JL (2001) Cadmium availability to three plant species varying in Cd accumulation pattern. J Environ Qual 29:1117–1123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez A, Giraldez I, Sanchez-Rodas D, Morales E (2000) Selectivity assessment of a sequential extraction procedure for metal mobility characterization using model phases. Talanta 52:545–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gworek B (1992) Lead inactivation in soils by zeolites. Plant Soil 143:71–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamon R, Lorenz S, Holm PE, Christensen TH, McGrath SP (1995) Changes in trace metal species and other components of the rhizosphere during growth of radish. Plant Cell Environ 18:749–756

    Google Scholar 

  • Hough RL, Breward N, Young SD, Crout NMJ, Tye AM, Moir AM, Thorton I (2004) Assessing potential risk of heavy metal exposure from consumption of home-produced vegetables by urban populations. Environ Health Perspect 112(2):215–221

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huang JW, Chen J, Serti WR, Cunningham SO (1997) Phytoremediation of lead-contaminated soils: role of synthetic chelates in triggering lead hyperaccumulation in plants. In: Iskandar IK, Hardy SE, Chang AC, Pierzynski GM (eds) Proceedings of extended abstracts from the fourth international conference on the biogeochemistry of trace elements

  • International Network for Acid Prevention (2002) Diffusive Gradients in Thin-films (DGT) A technique for determining bioavailable metal concentrations. Available at http://www.inap.com.au/public_downloads/ Research_Projects/Diffusive_Gradients_in_Thin-films.pdf

  • Joksi AS, Katz SA, Horvat M, Radmila MR (2005) Comparison of single and sequential extraction procedures for assessing metal leaching from dredged coastal sediments. Water Air Soil Pollut 162(1–4):265–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan O, Yaman M (2009) Selective and sequential extraction of lead in soil samples and plant parts taken from a serpentine and copper mining area. Atom Spectr 30(1):1–9

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumpiene JK, Lagerkvist A, Maurice C (2008) Stabilization of As, Cr, Cu, Pb and Zn in soil using amendments—a review. Waste Manage 28:215–225

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Larner BL, Seen AJ, Townsend AT (2006) Comparative study of optimized BCR sequential extraction scheme and acid leaching of elements in the certified reference material NIST 2711. Anal Chim Acta 556:444–449

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee SH, Lee JS, Choi YJ, Kim JG (2009) In situ stabilization of cadmium-, lead-, and zinc-contaminated soil using various amendments. Chemosphere 77:1069–1075

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ljung K, Oomen A, Duits M, Selinus O, Berglund M (2007) Bioaccessibility of metals in urban playground soils. J Environ Sci Health A 42:1241–1250

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Madrid F, Biasioli M, Ajmone-Marsan F (2008) Availability and bioaccessibility of metals in fine particles of some urban soils. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 55:21–32

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maiz I, Esnaola V, Millan E (1997) Evaluation of heavy metal availability in contaminated soils by a short sequential extraction procedure. Sci Total Environ 206:107–115

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mench MJ, Didier VL, Laffler M, Gomez A, Masson P (1994) A mimicked in-situ remediation study of metal-contaminated soils with emphasis on Cd and Pb. J Environ Qual 23:58–63

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mielke HW, Reagan PL (1998) Soil is an important pathway of human lead exposure. Environ Health Perspect 106(1):217–229

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mielke HW, Gonzales CR, Smith MK, Mielke PW (1999) The urban environment and children’s health: soil as an integrator of lead, zinc, and cadmium in New Orleans, Louisiana, USA. Environ Res 81:117–129

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nirel PV, Morel FM (1990) Technical note: pitfalls of sequential extractions. Water Res 24:1055–1056

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Querol X, Alastueya A, Morenoa N, Alvarez-Ayusob E, Garcı́a-Sánchezb A, Camaa J, Ayoraa C, Simónc M (2006) Immobilization of heavy metals in polluted soils by the addition of zeolitic material synthesized from coal fly ash. Chemosphere 62(2):171–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao CRM, Sahuquillo A, Sanchez JFL (2008) A review of the different methods applied in environmental geochemistry for single and sequential extraction of trace metals in soils and related materials. Water Air Soil Pollut 189:291–333

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rebedea I, Lepp NW (1995) The use of synthetic zeolites to reduce plant metal uptake and phytotoxicity in two polluted soils. Environ Geochem Health 16:81–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross SM (1994) Toxic metals in soil-plant systems. John Wiley and Sons, New York

  • Scheckel KG, Impellitteri CA, Ryan JA, McEvoy T (2003) Assessment of a sequential extraction procedure for perturbed lead contaminated samples with and without phosphorus amendments. Environ Sci Technol 37:1892–1898

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sinaj S, Dubois A, Frossard E (2004) Soil isotopically exchangeable zinc: a comparison between e and L values. Plant Soil 261:17–28

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland RA, Tack FMG (2003) Fractionation of Cu, Pb and Zn in certified reference soils SRM 2710 and SRM 2711 using the optimized BCR sequential extraction procedure. Advan in Environ Res 8:37–50

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • US EPA, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response (1996) Superfund Soil Screening Guidance: Quick Reference Fact Sheet, EPA/540/F–95/041

  • Wang HH, Li LQ, Wu XM, Pan GX (2006) Distribution of Cu and Pb in particle size fractions of urban soils from different city zones of Nanjing, China. J Environ Sci 18(3):482–487

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wenzel WW, Kirchbaumer N, Prohaska T, Stingeder G, Lombic E, Adriano DC (2001) Arsenic fractionation in soils using an improved sequential extraction procedure. Anal Chim Acta 436:309–323

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We want to thank the numerous gardeners who sent their soil samples in for screening of heavy metal contents. Public attention to our soil screen program was also assisted by The New York Times and CBS Evening News. Discussions with scientists and educators from the Brooklyn Botanic Garden have contributed to our understanding of the urban soils and plant uptake of metals. Comments and suggestions from Prof. Jean Louis Morel and two anonymous reviewers were very helpful in improving this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhongqi Cheng.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Jean Louis Morel

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Electronic supplementary material

(DOC 514 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cheng, Z., Lee, L., Dayan, S. et al. Speciation of heavy metals in garden soils: evidences from selective and sequential chemical leaching. J Soils Sediments 11, 628–638 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-011-0351-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-011-0351-6

Keywords

Navigation