Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effect of SDBS–Tween 80 mixed surfactants on the distribution of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soil–water system

  • SOILS, SEC 3 • REMEDIATION AND MANAGEMENT OF CONTAMINATED OR DREDGED LANDS • RESEARCH ARTICLE
  • Published:
Journal of Soils and Sediments Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Enhancing desorption of hydrophobic organic contaminants from soils is a promising approach for the effective remediation of soils contaminated with organic compounds. The desorption efficiency of chemical reagent, such as surfactant, should be evaluated. In this study, the effect of mixed anionic–nonionic surfactants sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate (SDBS)–Tween 80 on the distribution of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soil–water system was evaluated.

Materials and methods

Batch desorption experiments were employed to evaluate the distribution of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and surfactants in soil–water system. PAHs and SDBS were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography, Tween 80 by spectrophotometry, and total organic carbon with a carbon analyzer.

Results and discussion

Sorption of PAHs to soil was increased at low surfactant concentration due to the effective partition phase on soil formed by sorbed surfactants. The mixture of anionic and nonionic surfactants decreased the sorption of surfactants to soil, increasing the effective surfactant concentration in solution and thus decreasing the sorption of PAHs on soil. Anionic–nonionic mixed surfactant showed better performance on desorption of PAHs from soil than single surfactant. The greatest desorption efficiency was achieved with low proportions of SDBS (SDBS/Tween80 = 1:9).

Conclusions

SDBS–Tween 80 mixed surfactant showed the highest desorption rate with low proportion of SDBS, which indicated that the addition of relative low amount of anionic surfactant could significantly promote the desorption efficiency of PAHs by nonionic surfactants. Results obtained from this study did provide useful information in surfactant-enhanced remediation of soil and subsurface contaminated by hydrophobic organic compounds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahel M, Conrad T, Giger W (1987) Persistent organic chemicals in sewage effluents. 3. Determinations of nonylphenoxy carboxylic acids by high-resolution gas chromatography/mass spectrometry and high-performance liquid chromatography. Environ Sci Technol 21:697–703

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd SA, Lee JF, Mortland MM (1988) Attenuating organic contaminant mobility by soil modification. Nature 333:345–347

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen B, Zhu L (2001) Partition of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons on organobentonites from water. J Environ Sci 13:129–136

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chiou CT, Peters LJ, Freed VH (1979) A physical concept of soil–water equilibria for nonionic organic compounds. Science 206:831–832

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Deitsch JJ, Smith JA (1995) Effect of Triton X-100 on the rate of trichloroethene desorption from soil to water. Environ Sci Technol 29:1069–1080

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Deshpande S, Shiau BJ, Wade D, Sabatini DA, Harwell JH (1999) Surfactant selection for enhancing ex situ soil washing. Water Res 33:351–360

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards DA, Luthy RG, Liu Z (1991) Solubilization of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in micellar nonionic surfactant solutions. Environ Sci Technol 25:127–133

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karickhoff SW, Brown DS, Scott TA (1979) Sorption of hydrophobic pollutants on natural sediments. Water Res 13:241–248

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kile DE, Chiou CT (1989) Water solubility enhancements of DDT and trichlorobenzene by some surfactants below and above the critical micelle concentration. Environ Sci Technol 23:832–838

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee JF, Liao PM, Kuo CC, Yang HT, Chiou CT (2000) Influence of a nonionic surfactant (Triton X-100) on contaminant distribution between water and several soil solids. J Colloid Interf Sci 229:445–452

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee SY, Kim SJ, Chung SY, Jeong CH (2004) Sorption of hydrophobic organic compounds onto organoclays. Chemosphere 55:781–785

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee M, Kang H, Do W (2005) Application of nonionic surfactant-enhanced in situ flushing to a diesel contaminated site. Water Res 39:139–146

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mathur S, Moudgil BM (1998) Mechanisms of nonionic polymer adsorption on oxide surfaces. Miner Metall Proc 15:24–28

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paria S (2008) Surfactant-enhanced remediation of organic contaminated soil and water. Adv Colloid Interfac Sci 138:24–58

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paria S, Yuet PK (2006) Effects of chain length and electrolyte on the adsorption of n-alkylpyridinium bromide surfactants at sand–water interfaces. Ind Eng Chem Res 45:712–718

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rouse JD, Sabatini DA, Harwell JH (1993) Minimizing surfactant losses using twin-head anionic surfactants in subsurface remediation. Environ Sci Technol 27:2072–2078

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rudel RA, Melly SJ, Geno PW, Sun G, Brody JG (1998) Identification of alkylphenols and other estrogenic phenolic compounds in wastewater, septage and groundwater on Cape Cod, Massachusetts. Environ Sci Technol 32:861–869

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sale T, Pitts M (1989) Chemically enhanced in situ soil washing. Proceedings of the Conference on Petroleum Hydrocarbons and Organic Chemical in Ground Water: Prevention, Detection and Restoration, 487, Houston. Dublin, Ohio, National Water Well Association

  • Stellner KL, Scamehorn JF (1989) Hardness tolerance of anionic surfactant solutions. 1. Anionic surfactant with added monovalent electrolyte. Langmuir 5:70–77

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thibaut A, Misselyn-Bauduin A, Grandjean J, Broze G, Jérôme R (2000) Adsorption of an aqueous mixture of surfactants on silica. Langmuir 16:9192–9198

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • West CC, Harwell JH (1992) Surfactants and subsurface remediation. Environ Sci Technol 26:2324–2330

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xu J, Yuan X, Dai S (2006) Effect of surfactants on desorption of aldicarb from spiked soil. Chemosphere 62:1630–1635

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang K, Zhu L, Zhao B (2005) Minimizing losses of nonionic and anionic surfactants to a montmorillonite saturated with calcium using their mixtures. J Colloid Interf Sci 291:59–66

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang K, Zhu L, Xing B (2006) Enhanced soil washing of phenanthrene by mixed solutions of TX100 and SDBS. Environ Sci Technol 40:4274–4280

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang K, Zhu L, Xing B (2007) Sorption of sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate by montmorillonite. Environ Pollut 145:571–576

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yeom IT, Ghosh MM, Coxd C (1996) Kinetic aspects of surfactant solubilization of soil-bound polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Environ Sci Technol 30:1589–1595

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao B, Zhu L, Yang K (2006) Solubilization of DNAPLs by mixed surfactant: reduction in partitioning losses of nonionic surfactant. Chemosphere 62:772–779

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng Z, Obbard JP (2002) Evaluation of an elevated non-ionic surfactant critical micelle concentration in a soil/aqueous system. Water Res 36:2667–2672

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou W, Zhu L (2007a) Efficiency of surfactant-enhanced desorption for contaminated soils depending on the component characteristics of soil–surfactant–PAHs system. Environ Pollut 147:66–73

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou W, Zhu L (2007b) Enhanced desorption of phenanthrene from contaminated soil using anionic/nonionic mixed surfactant. Environ Pollut 147:350–357

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu L, Feng S (2003) Synergistic solubilization of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by mixed anionic–nonionic surfactants. Chemosphere 53:459–467

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu L, Chen B, Tao S, Chiou CT (2003) Interactions of organic contaminants with mineral-adsorbed surfactants. Environ Sci Technol 37:4001–4006

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the National Natural Science Foundation of China (20737002, 20890110, 40973067) and the Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University (IRT0536) for financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Environmental Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310028, China

    Ming Zhang & Lizhong Zhu

  2. Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Organic Pollution Process and Control, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310028, China

    Lizhong Zhu

Authors
  1. Ming Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lizhong Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lizhong Zhu.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Jean-Paul Schwitzguébel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, M., Zhu, L. Effect of SDBS–Tween 80 mixed surfactants on the distribution of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soil–water system. J Soils Sediments 10, 1123–1130 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-010-0215-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-010-0215-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation