Abstract
Purpose
Currently, the reduction of weight in automotive is a very important topic in order to lower the air pollution. In this context, the purpose of the present paper was to analyze a real case study through a comparison of the environmental sustainability between a conventional steel crossbeam for light commercial vehicles and an innovative lightweight aluminum one.
Methods
For both scenarios, a cradle-to-grave life cycle assessment methodology and a sensitivity analysis has been used through the study of the following phases: mineral extraction, component manufacturing, use on vehicle, and end of life. In particular, many primary data and a complete vehicle model simulation with three different European driving cycles have been used in order to reach the highest possible level of accuracy during the analysis.
Results and discussion
Regarding the manufacturing phase, the aluminum component’s production gave the highest impact because of the high energy required in the mineral reduction. Anyway, this stage of the analysis had a low effect on the entire LCA, because the benefit of weight reduction during vehicle use showed a strongly higher contribution. The urban driving cycle had the most relevant impact, as a consequence of the frequent start and stop operations and the longest time with engine at idle speed, while the extra-urban cycle is the less demanding due to its higher average speed and no start and stop.
Conclusions
In conclusion, the present research demonstrated the environmental importance of the lightweight for an actual case study in the commercial vehicles field.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bakemeyer H (2008) Operating the die casting machine. NADCA
Baptista P, Ribau J, Bravo J, Silva C, Adcock P, Kells A (2011) Fuel cell hybrid taxi life cycle analysis. Energy Policy 39(9):4683–4691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.06.064
Bertram M, Buxmann K, Furrer P (2009) Analysis of greenhouse gas emissions related to aluminium transport applications. Int J Life Cycle Assess 14(S1):62–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-008-0058-0
Boland CS, De Kleine R, Keoleian GA et al (2015) Life cycle impacts of natural fiber composites for automotive applications: effects of renewable energy content and Lightweighting. J Ind Ecol 20:179–189
Buxmann K, Furrer P, Gerber J et al (2006) Aluminium recycling in Europe. Eur Alum Assoc 52
Cecchel S, Chindamo D, Turrini E, Carnevale C, Cornacchia G, Gadola M, Panvini A, Volta M, Ferrario D, Golimbioschi R (2018) Impact of reduced mass of light commercial vehicles on fuel consumption, CO2 emissions, air quality, and socio-economic costs. STOTEN 613-614:409–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.081
Cecchel S, Cornacchia G, Panvini A (2016) Cradle-to-gate impact assessment of a high pressure die casting safety relevant automotive component. J Miner Mater 68(9):2443–2448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-016-2046-3
Cecchel S, Ferrario D (2016) Numerical and experimental analysis of a high pressure die casting aluminum suspension cross beam for light commercial vehicles. La metallurgia italiana 6:41–44 http://www.aimnet.it/la_metallurgia_italiana/2016/giugno/Cecchel.pdf
Cheah Lynette W (2010) Cars on a diet: the material and energy impacts of passenger vehicle weight reduction in the U.S (PhD thesis MIT)
Chindamo D, Economou JT, Gadola M, Knowles K (2014a) A neurofuzzy-controlled power management strategy for a series hybrid electric vehicle. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part D J Automob Eng 228(9):1034–1050. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954407014522777
Chindamo D, Gadola M, Romano M (2014b) Simulation tool for optimization and performance prediction of a generic hybrid electric series powertrain. Int J Automot Technol 15(1):135–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-014-0015-9
Commission E (2012) Commission decision on a method for the collection of premiums for excess CO2 emissions from new passenger cars pursuant to regulation (EC) 443/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council. Off J Eur Union, pp:71–72
Dalquist S, Gutowski T (2006) Life cycle analysis of conventional manufacturing techniques-die casting
Dalquist S, Gutowski T (2004) Life cycle analysis of conventional manufacturing techniques: sand casting. Asme 2004:13–19. https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2004-62599
Das S (2000) The life-cycle impacts of aluminum body-in-white automotive material. JOM 52:41–44
Das S (2014) Life cycle energy and environmental assessment of aluminum-intensive vehicle design. SAE Int J Mater Manf 7(3):588–595. https://doi.org/10.4271/2014-01-1004
Das S, Graziano D, Upadhyayula VKK et al (2016) Vehicle lightweighting energy use impacts in U.S. light-duty vehicle fleet. Sustain. Mater Technol 8:5–13
Du J, Han W, Peng Y (2010) Life cycle greenhouse gases, energy and cost assessment of automobiles using magnesium from Chinese Pidgeon process. J Clean Prod 18(2):112–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.08.013
Duflou JR, De Moor J, Verpoest I, Dewulf W (2009) Environmental impact analysis of composite use in car manufacturing. CIRP Ann-Manuf Technol 58(1):9–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2009.03.077
European Aluminium Association (2013) Environmental profile report for the European aluminium industry—life cycle inventory dada for aluminium production and tranformation processes in Europe 78
Frischknecht R, Jungbluth N, Althaus HJ, Doka G, Dones R, Heck T, Hellweg S, Hischier R, Nemecek T, Rebitzer G, Spielmann M (2005) The ecoinvent database: overview and methodological framework. Int J Life Cycle Assess 10(1):3–9. https://doi.org/10.1065/lca2004.10.181.1
Goedkoop M, Heijungs R, Huijbregts M et al (2009) ReCiPe 2008. Potentials:1–44
Gunasegaram DR, Tharumarajah A (2009) Impacts of high-pressure diecasting process parameters on greenhouse gas emissions. Metall Mater Trans B Process Metall Mater Process Sci 40(4):605–614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-009-9249-8
Hakamada M, Furuta T, Chino Y, Chen Y, Kusuda H, Mabuchi M (2007) Life cycle inventory study on magnesium alloy substitution in vehicles. Energy 32(8):1352–1360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2006.10.020
Helms H, Lambrecht U (2007) The potential contribution of light-weighting to reduce transport energy consumption. Int J Life Cycle Assess 12:58–64
Hirsch J (2004) Automotive trends in aluminium—the European perspective. Mater. Forum 28:15–23
International Standards Organization (2007) EN ISO 14040:2006—Environmental management—life cycle assessment—principles and framework
Kasai J (1999) Life cycle assessment, evaluation method for sustainable development. JSAE Rev 20(3):387–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0389-4304(99)00013-2
Kelly JC, Sullivan JL, Burnham A, Elgowainy A (2015) Impacts of vehicle weight reduction via material substitution on life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions. Environ Sci Technol 49(20):12535–12542. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b03192
Keoleian GA, Sullivan JL (2012) Materials challenges and opportunities for enhancing the sustainability of automobiles. MRS Bull 37(04):365–373. https://doi.org/10.1557/mrs.2012.52
Kim HJ, Keoleian GA, Skerlos SJ (2011) Very good-economic assessment of greenhouse gas emissions reduction by vehicle lightweighting using aluminum and high-strength steel. J Ind Ecol 15(1):64–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2010.00288.x
Kim HJ, McMillan C, Keoleian GA, Skerlos SJ (2010a) Greenhouse gas emissions payback for lightweighted vehicles using aluminum and high-strength steel. J Ind Ecol 14(6):929–946. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2010.00283.x
Kim HJ, McMillan C, Keoleian GA, Skerlos SJ (2010b) Greenhouse gas emissions payback for lightweighted vehicles using aluminum and high-strength steel. J Ind Ecol 14(6):929–946. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2010.00283.x
Kim HC, Wallington TJ (2013) Life-cycle energy and greenhouse gas emission benefits of lightweighting in automobiles: review and harmonization. Environ Sci Technol 47(12):6089–6097. https://doi.org/10.1021/es3042115
Koffler C, Rohde-Brandenburger K (2009) On the calculation of fuel savings through lightweight design in automotive life cycle assessments. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:128
Maclean HL, Lave LB (2003) Life cycle assessment of automobile/fuel options. Environ Sci Technol 37(23):5445–5452. https://doi.org/10.1021/es034574q
Martino P (2017) Automotive lightweighting materials: current trends and future scenarios, 4th international conference, ‘Advanced Materials and Technologies for Transport’, 27–28 February 2014 Torino
McKinsey & Company, February 2012. Lightweight, Heavy Impact
Modaresi R, Pauliuk S, Lovik AN, Muller DB (2014) Global carbon benefits of material substitution in passenger cars until 2050 and the impact on the steel and aluminum industries. Environ Sci Technol 48(18):10776–10784. https://doi.org/10.1021/es502930w
Parashar N, Mittal RK (2004) Elements of manufacturing processes. PHI Learning Pvt, Ltd
Puri P, Compston P, Pantano V (2009) Life cycle assessment of Australian automotive door skins. Int J Life Cycle Assess 14(5):420–428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-009-0103-7
Raugei M, Morrey D, Hutchinson A, Winfield P (2015) A coherent life cycle assessment of a range of lightweighting strategies for compact vehicles. J Clean Prod 108:1168–1176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.100
Ribeiro C, Ferreira JV, Partidário P (2007) Life cycle assessment of a multi-material car component. Int J Life Cycle Assess 12(5):336–345. https://doi.org/10.1065/lca2006.12.304
Singh R (2013) Development of an automated system for sustainability analysis of die-casting part at the design stage. Int J Multi Disciplinary Eng Bus Manag 1:21–27
Weccard EN (2012) Future scenarios for the derivation of material requirements—the automobile interior 2030. University of Twente thesis
Wohlecker R, Johannaber M, Espig M (2007) Determination of weight elasticity of fuel economy for ICE, hybrid and fuel cell vehicles. SAE Technical Paper 2007-01-0343 doi:https://doi.org/10.4271/2007-01-0343
World Steel Association (2010) Life cycle inventory data for steel products. 2013:15
Wötzel K, Wirth R, Flake M (1999) Life cycle studies on hemp fibre reinforced components and ABS for automotive parts. Die Angew Makromol Chemie 272(1):121–127. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1522-9505(19991201)272:1%3C121::AID-APMC121%3E3.0.CO;2-T
Acknowledgements
The component object of the study has been developed by Streparava SpA. The authors are grateful to Streparava SpA and Mr. Antonio Gandellini for the support in providing data.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Wulf-Peter Schmidt
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cecchel, S., Chindamo, D., Collotta, M. et al. Lightweighting in light commercial vehicles: cradle-to-grave life cycle assessment of a safety-relevant component. Int J Life Cycle Assess 23, 2043–2054 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-017-1433-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-017-1433-5