Skip to main content
Log in

Life cycle assessment of cellulose packaging materials production: folding box board and kraftliner paper

  • WOOD AND OTHER RENEWABLE RESOURCES
  • Published:
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Many companies around the world have been challenged to make their products in a more sustainable way in the last decade in order to minimize their environmental impacts. Klabin, the largest producer, exporter, and recycler of paper in Brazil, has made great efforts to exchange old for new and more efficient equipment to produce cellulose packaging materials. The objective of this study was to measure the benefits of modernization of its plant located in the southern region of the country for manufacturing carrier board/folding box board (CB/FBB) and kraftliner paper (KP).

Methods

The goal established was analyzed through a cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment methodology.

Results and discussion

The modernization carried out has led to several improvements such as the reductions measured by the functional units of 1,000 kg of CB/FBB and 1,000 kg of KP, respectively, of energy consumption (21 and 3 %), water (8.5 % for CB/FBB only), wood (6.6 and 7.2 %), and land use (6.9 and 7.1 %). The environmental impact categories (according to CML 2001) that have suffered greater reductions are human toxicity (68 and 69 %), abiotic depletion (59 and 28 %), and global warming potential (51 and 9 %) for the same reference units.

Conclusions

The results achieved clearly show the importance of renewing industrial plant in order to achieve better environmental performance and also provide a historical inventory perspective for the company to establish future targets for improvement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AF&PA-American Forest & Paper Association (2012) Sustainability report. AF&PA, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • BSI-British Standards Institution (2011) PAS2050: specification for the assessment of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of goods and services. BSI, London

    Google Scholar 

  • CEPI-Confederation of European Paper Industries (2011) Sustainability report 2011. CEPI, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Coltro L, Castilho G, Garcia EEC (2003) Life cycle inventory for electric energy system in Brazil. Int J Life Cycle Assess 8:290–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui Z, Yannan H, Hong J, Ismail ZZ (2011) Life cycle assessment of coated white board: a case study in China. J Clean Pro 19:1506–1512

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Datamark–Market Intelligence Brazil (2011) Materiais por valor. http://www.datamark.com.br. Accessed 31 May 31 2013

  • ENVIRON International Corporation (2012) Life cycle assessment of deinked and virgin pulp. http://images.nationalgeographic.com. Accessed 30 May 2013

  • European Comission (2013) Best available techniques (BAT) reference document for the production of pulp, paper and board, Joint Researcher Centre, IPPC Bureau (of the Commission’s Joint Research Centre) Final draft July 2013

  • FEFCO-European Federation of Corrugated Board Manufacturers (2010) In the past 3 years, the corrugated board sector reduced its carbon footprint by 11.7 %. 2010. http://www.fefco.org. Accessed 30 May 30 2013

  • Francis DW, Towers MT, Browne TC (2002) Energy cost reduction in the pulp and paper industry –an energy benchmarking perspective. Paprican-Pulp and Paper Research Institute of Canada, Montreal

    Google Scholar 

  • Goedkoop M, Spriensma R (2001) The eco-indicator 99-a damage oriented method for life cycle impact assessment. Methodology report. Third edition 22-6-2001. PRé Consultants B.V., Amersfoort, The Netherlands

  • Guinée JB, Gorrée M, Heijungs R, Huppes G, Kleijn R, Koning A, van Oers L, Wegener Sleeswijk A, Suh S, Udo de Haes HA, Bruijn H de, Duin R van, Huijbregts MAJ (2002) Handbook on life cycle assessment. Operational guide to the ISO standards. I: LCA in perspective. IIa: guide. IIb: operational annex. III: scientific background. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

  • International Organization for Standardization (2006a) ISO 14040: environmental management–life cycle assessment–principles and framework. ISO, Geneve

    Google Scholar 

  • International Organization for Standardization (2006b) ISO 14044: environmental management—life cycle assessment—requirements and guidelines. ISO, Geneve

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC-Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Climate Change-Synthesis Report (2007) Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. IPCC, Geneve

  • Lopes E, Dias A, Arroja L, Capela I, Pereira F (2003) Application of life cycle assessment to the Portuguese pulp and paper industry. J Clean Prod 11:51–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manda BMK, Blok K, Patel MK (2012) Innovations in papermaking: an LCA of printing and writing paper from conventional and high yield pulp. Sci Total Environ 439:307–320

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mourad AL, Silva HL, Nogueira JCB (2012) Carton for beverage: a decade of process efficiency improvements enhancing its environmental profile. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17:176–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pro Carton-Association of European Cartonboard and Carton Manufacturers (2012) Types of cartonboard. Pro Carton. http://www.procarton.com, Accessed 31 May 31 2013

  • Pro Carton-Association of European Cartonboard and Carton Manufacturers (2013) Cartonboard packaging: a resource and carbon efficient packaging solution. Pro Carton. http://www.procarton.com, Accessed 31 May 31 2013

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Klabin S/A for providing data and valuable discussions for this work. Authors are also grateful for financial support of this company and to Fapesp who financed the first LCA study for CETEA in 1998.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Lúcia Mourad.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Zbigniew Stanislaw Klos

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mourad, A.L., da Silva, H.L.G. & Nogueira, J.C.B. Life cycle assessment of cellulose packaging materials production: folding box board and kraftliner paper. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19, 968–976 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-013-0690-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-013-0690-1

Keywords

Navigation