Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The critical review of life cycle assessment studies according to ISO 14040 and 14044

Origin, purpose and practical performance

  • PROMOTION OF YOUNG SCIENTISTS IN LCA
  • Published:
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purposes

The revision of the ISO LCA (life cycle assessment) standards in October 2006 brought some changes of the critical review process compared to the older series ISO 14040–43 (1997, 1998, 2000a, b). Furthermore, the importance of LCA has grown rapidly in recent years, but this growth was not accompanied by a corresponding increase of knowledge about the voluntary and obligatory review processes. It is the intention of this paper to analyse the relevant standards and to present some personal experiences in conducting critical reviews.

Results and discussion

A peer review for LCA studies was first proposed in the Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) guidelines “A Code of Practice” (1993). The ISO standard 14040 (1997) took up this proposition and described three types of “Critical review” which are optional in general, but mandatory “for LCA studies used to make a comparative assertion that is disclosed to the public”. This strong prescription was reinforced in the revised standards ISO 14040 and 14044 (2006a, b) and even stricter, unambiguous formulations were added to the text. In addition, the minimum number of experts in a “review by interested parties” is now three (including the chair). Large panels with more than four experts are rare, but do occur occasionally.

Recommendations

Out of personal experience, I strongly support the interactive (accompanying) mode of conducting the critical review process (ISO also allows the “a posteriori” mode). I also suggest the removal of some inconsistencies during the next update of the standards. No major changes are recommended, however, since ISO 14040 + 14044 has become the reference standard for several other international standards based on the life cycle concept.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

References

  • Clauzade C, Osset P, Hugrel C, Chappert A, Durande M, Palluau M (2010) Life cycle assessment of nine recovery methods for end-of-life tyres. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:883–892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (EC) (2010a) ILCD Handbook: Review schemes for Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). Joint Research Centre—Institute for Environment and Sustainability. http://www.jrc.europa.eu

  • European Commission (EC) (2010b) ILCD Handbook: Reviewer qualification for Life Cycle Inventory data sets. Joint Research Centre—Institute for Environment and Sustainability. http://www.jrc.europa.eu

  • Fava JA, Denison R, Jones B, Curran MA, Vigon B, Selke S, Barnum J (eds) (1991) SETAC Workshop report: A technical framework for life cycle assessments. August 18–23 1990, Smugglers Notch, Vermont. SETAC, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Fava J, Consoli FJ, Denison R, Dickson K, Mohin T, Vigon B (eds) (1993) Conceptual framework for life-cycle impact analysis. Workshop Report. SETAC and SETAC Foundation for Environ Education. Sandestin, Florida, February 1–7, 1992. SETAC, Pensacola (Fl.)

  • Fava J, Pomper S (1997) Life-cycle critical review! Does it work? Implementing a critical review process as a key element of the aluminium beverage container LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 2:144–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finkbeiner M, Inaba A, Tan RBH, Christiansen K, Klüppel H-J (2006) The new international standards for Life Cycle Assessment: ISO 14040 and ISO 14044. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11:80–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frischknecht R (2004) Transparency in LCA—a heretical request? (Editorial). Int J Life Cycle Assess 9:211–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Standard Organization (ISO) (1997) Environmental management—Life cycle assessment: Principles and framework. ISO 14040, Geneva

  • International Standard Organization (ISO) (1998) Environmental management—Life cycle assessment: Goal and scope definition and inventory analysis. ISO 14041, Geneva

  • International Standard Organisation (ISO) (2000a) Environmental management—Life cycle assessment: Life cycle impact assessment. ISO 14042, Geneva

  • International Standard Organisation (ISO) (2000b) Environmental management—Life cycle assessment: Interpretation. ISO 14043, Geneva

  • International Standard Organisation (ISO) (2006a) Environmental management—Life cycle assessment: Principles and framework. ISO14040, Geneva

  • International Standard Organisation (ISO) (2006b) Environmental management—Life cycle assessment: Requirements and Guidelines. ISO14044, Geneva

  • Klöpffer W (1997) Peer (expert) review according to SETAC and ISO 1440. Theory and practice. Int J Life Cycle Assess 2:183–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klöpffer W (2000) Praktische Erfahrungen mit Critical-Review-Prozessen. In: Stiftung Arbeit und Umwelt (eds) Ökobilanzen & Produktverantwortung. Dokumentation. ISBN 3-89384-041-9. Hannover, pp 37–42

  • Klöpffer W (2005) The critical review process according to ISO 14040-43: an analysis of the standards and experiences gained in their application. Int J Life Cycle Assess 10:98–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klöpffer W (2006) The role of SETAC in the development of LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11(Special Issue 1):116–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klöpffer W (2007) Publishing scientific articles with special reference to LCA and related topics. Int J Life Cycle Assess 12:71–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klöpffer W (2009) Experiences with the critical review process of aluminium LCI data. Int J Life Cycle Assess 14(Special Issue 1):45–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klöpffer W, Grießhammer R, Sundström G (1995) Overview of the scientific peer review of the European life cycle inventory for surfactant production. Tenside Surfact Det 32:378–383

    Google Scholar 

  • Klöpffer W, Sundström G, Grießhammer R (1996) The peer reviewing process—a case study: European life cycle inventory for surfactant production. Int J Life Cycle Assess 1:113–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lecouls H (1999) ISO 14043: Environmental management • life cycle assessment • life cycle interpretation. Int J Life Cycle Assess 4:245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lecouls H, Klöpffer W (2010) Note on the critical review of the study “Life Cycle Assessment for the different used tyres recycling methods” prepared for Aliapur by Ecobilan. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:893–895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsmann M (1997) ISO 14040—The first project. With a foreword by Merkel A. Int J Life Cycle Assess 2:121–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsmann M (2000) The ISO 14040 family. Int J Life Cycle Assess 5:317–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) (1993) Guidelines for Life-Cycle Assessment: A “Code of Practice”. From the SETAC Workshop held at Sesimbra, Portugal, 31 March–3 April 1993. Edition 1, Brussels and Pensacola, FL

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. LCA Consult & Review, Am Dachsberg 56E, 60435, Frankfurt am Main, Germany

    Walter Klöpffer

Authors
  1. Walter Klöpffer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Walter Klöpffer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Klöpffer, W. The critical review of life cycle assessment studies according to ISO 14040 and 14044. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17, 1087–1093 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-012-0426-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-012-0426-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation