Experiences with the critical review process of aluminium LCI data

Abstract

Background, aim, and scope

This paper summarises the critical review process according to ISO 14040/44 performed for the European Aluminium Association (EAA), Brussels. Scope of the review was a life cycle inventory (LCI) project, aiming at providing the life cycle assessment (LCA) community with reliable generic data relevant for the European aluminium market, including the production of aluminium ingot either from primary aluminium or from recycled aluminium and the fabrication of semi-finished products, i.e. sheet, foil or extrusion fabrication from aluminium ingots.

Main features

Critical reviewing according to ISO 14040 and 14044, although described formally in the standards, evolved essentially via ‘learning by doing’. This special review has been conducted as a critical review by one external expert. Since no comparative assertions are to be expected from the results obtained, a critical review according to the panel method (at least three reviewers) was deemed not to be necessary. The review process was interactive and took about a year (March 2007 to April 2008). The full review report is printed in full length at the end of the published LCI data report.

Results

The report continues the tradition of the former reports but offers new aspects. The main change refers to the use of new software for data handling (GaBi 4.0 replacing the formerly used LCA-2 based on BUWAL data), including generic data for ancillary processes and inputs for the energy model. The LCI results, therefore, cannot be compared exactly with the data of the previous reports. There is no disconnection, however, so that trends can be observed and discussed with some precaution. The main trend with respect to energy and emissions is one of slow but steady improvement. A main methodological improvement with regard to the former projects is the new energy model, especially with regard to imported primary aluminium.

Discussion

There was some discussion about the term ‘waste’ when it is put outside the system boundary together with the resulting emissions. According to the author’s opinion, there are at least three types of waste: (1) waste to be reused or recycled—this waste stays within the technosphere and, thus, within the system boundaries of a typical LCA; (2) waste to be collected and removed legally by incineration, controlled landfilling or composting—this waste stays within the technosphere, too; only the emissions of the waste removal processes (CO₂, CH₄, organic contaminants to ground water, leached metal ions to ground water, etc.) escape into the environment if not collected properly; (3) waste thrown away, e.g. by littering, illegal dumping, burning, etc.; this waste ends up in the environment if not collected. There was a time when solid waste in LCA (if landfilled) was considered as an ‘emission into soil’. This is only true for illegal, uncontrolled land filling. Controlled landfilling is a kind of process and belongs to the technosphere as long as it is controlled. EAA envisages to include appropriate data in future updates (incineration is already included).

Conclusions

According to ISO 14040, “The critical review process shall ensure that: the methods used to carry out the LCA are consistent with the international Standard; the methods used to carry out the LCA are scientifically and technically valid, the data used are appropriate and reasonable in relation to the goal of the study; the interpretations reflect the limitations identified and the goal of the study; the study report is transparent and consistent.” These five points can be confirmed with a few restrictions. With regard to the first item, consistency with ISO 14040/44, there is a formal lack of a section ‘interpretation’. It was also discussed that the study is not a full LCA, but the standard allows for LCI studies. As such, the study conforms to ISO. The methods used in data collection and modelling are described clearly and correspond to the state of the art. They should be published and become standard for generic data collection.

Perspectives

It is assumed and recommended that the process of continuous improvement (both technological and relating to data collection and modelling) will continue in the following years. However, since raw aluminium production is faced with thermodynamic limits, it is proposed to rethink the whole aluminium system, which is based on a century-old technology and to conceive bold new routes, especially aiming at a further increase of renewable energy use and further improving recycling in countries with deficient waste collecting systems. The use of heavy fuel oil in alumina production should be discouraged.