Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Life cycle assessment of integrated circuit packaging technologies

  • SIMPLIFIED LCA
  • Published:
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background, aim and scope

Nanostructured polymer particles are produced to be used in ball grid array (BGA) and chip scale packaging (CSP). The technology could replace conventional BGA and CSP metal balls, and the hypothesis is that the shift could be eco-efficient as polymer core particles increase the reliability. For the first time, these particles are environmentally evaluated.

Materials and methods

The change in GWP100 and Eco-Indicator’99 (H) scores when replacing traditional component packaging, here quad flat pack to BGA/CSP, was explored both on component and printed circuit board assembly (PCBA) level. This was followed by comparisons between BGA packages using different types of metal-plated monodispersed polymer particle (MPP) balls and conventional balls, respectively.

Results and discussion

For BGAs, the silicon (Si) die dominates CO2e emissions, but for Eco-Indicator’99(H), solder balls are not negligible. Excluding the Si die and component assembly, the LFBGA-84 to WCSP-64 would reduce CO2e by about 98% and Eco-Indicator’99 (H) by about 90%. Overall, for BGA–256 using same size balls, gold-plated MPP technology decreases the Eco-Indicator’99(H) score by about 25% compared to Pb-based or Pb-free balls. Gold production dominated GWP100 and Eco-Indicator’99 (H) for the gold-plated MPP. Each microsystem is unique, and new environmental impact estimations must be done for the sub-structures of each electronic device. Screening process-sum life cycle assessment (LCA) gives similar understanding of impacts as resource productivity methods. Even though the metal mass per ball is greatly reduced, it is a weak indicator of environmental impacts which are driven by each material’s specific environmental characteristics.

Conclusions

The ball share of the BGA-256 GWP100 and Eco-Indicator’99 (H) score is small, and the BGA/CSP producers can marginally improve the environmental performance by focusing on the balls. On a comparable IC packaging basis, the introduction of WCSP packaging technology implies a significant environmental footprint reduction. On PCBA level, the contribution of BGA balls is negligible. Results for metal-plated MPP BGA balls suggest that gold usage is the key environmental performance indicator of interest.

Recommendations and perspectives

Even though WCSP clearly reduces the component level impacts, the PCBA (board) level impact could increase as the CSP miniaturisation is paralleled with more PWB layers. This effect should be included in further system expansions. For LCA, in general, update of all LCIA methods, which include ozone depletion, with the latest results for dinitrogen monoxide is needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alcatel-Lucent (2008) Lifecycle assessments of telecom products—process and results. Tom Okrasinski at iNEMI Sept. 22

  • Andersson C (2007) Reliability, fatigue, and mechanical characterisation of lead-free solders for electronic packaging applications. Ph. D. thesis, Chalmers University of Technology. Gothenburg, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrae ASG (2009) Global life-cycle impact assessment of material shifts: the example of a Pb-free electronics industry. Springer UK, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrae ASG, Andersen O (2010) Life cycle assessments of consumer electronics—are they consistent? Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:827–836

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd SB, Horvath A, Dornfeld D (2009) Life-cycle energy demand and global warming potential of computational logic. Environ Sci Technol 43:7303–7309

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cao L, Li S, Lai Z et al (2005) Formulation and characterization of anisotropic conductive adhesive paste for microelectronics packaging applications. J Electron Mater 34:1420–1427

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Confidential source (2010) Confidential bill of materials for ADSL products

  • Eckelman M (2011) Modeling the energy and environmental impacts of large-scale material systems. PhD Thesis, Yale University, CT

  • Ecoinvent DB (2009) Electroplating Nickel I

  • European Commission (2005) MEEuP Methdology report. 95

  • He JY, Zhang ZL, Kristiansen H (2007) Mechanical properties of nanostructured polymer particles for anisotropic conductive adhesives. Int J Mater Res 98:389–392

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • He JY, Zhang ZL, Midttun M et al (2008) Size effect on mechanical properties of micron-sized PS–DVB polymer particles. Polymer 49:38–392

    Google Scholar 

  • Helling RK, Russell DA (2009) Use of life cycle assessment to characterize the environmental impacts of polyol production options. Green Chem 11:380–389

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Joyce T, Okrasinski TA, Schaeffer W (2010) Estimating the carbon footprint of telecommunications products: a heuristic approach. J Mech Design 132. doi:10.1115/1.4002143

  • Liu J, Tolvgard A, Malmodin J, Lai Z (1999) A reliable and environmentally friendly packaging technology—flip chip joining using anisotropically conductive adhesive. IEEE Trans Comp. Packag Manufact Technol 22:186–190

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu CH, Lin SJ, Lewis C (2010) Life cycle assessment of DRAM in Taiwan’s semiconductor industry. J Clean Prod 18:419–425

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Luo Y, Wirojanagud P, Caudill RJ (2001) Comparison of major environmental performance metrics and their application to typical electronic products. Proc Sec Int Symp Environ Conscious Design Inverse Manufact, 11–15 Dec., Tokyo, Japan, pp 94–99

  • Microelectronics and Computer Technology Corporation (1993) Environmental consciousness: a strategic competitiveness issue for the electronics and computer industry. The Microelectronics and Computer Technology Corporation, Austin, TX

    Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz I, Gazulla C, Bala A et al (2009) LCA and ecodesign in the toy industry: case study of a teddy bear incorporating electric and electronic components. Int J Life Cycle Assess 14:64–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nissen NF (2001) Entwicklung eines ökologischen Bewertungsmodell zur Beurteilung elektronischer Systeme. Ph.D. thesis, Technischen Univärsitet, Berlin, Germany, p 116

  • NXP Semiconductor (2010) Chemical content of LH7A400N0G000B5

  • OKI (2009a) List of ingredient substances in product ML67Q4060-1NNNTBZG3A (TQFP-64)

  • OKI (2009b) List of ingredient substances in product ML67Q4060-1NNNLAZG3A (LFBGA-84)

  • OKI (2009c) List of ingredient substances in product ML67Q4060-1NNNHAZG3A (WCSP-64)

  • Personal Communication (2009) Jung-Hoon Chun, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

  • PRe’ Consultants BV (2005) LCA comparison of alternative soldering techniques

  • Ravishankara AR, Daniel JS, Portmann RW (2009) Nitrous oxide (N2O): the dominant ozone-depleting substance emitted in the 21st century. Science 326:123–125

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Toshiba (2010) Environment—Environmental product design—resource saving design-reduction of residual materials on printed circuit boards

  • Whalley D, Kristiansen H (2008) Development and application of polymer particles for “green electronics”. Proc of Progress in Eco-Electronics. Warzaw, Poland, pp 61–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams WH (1996) Production of uniform bronze powders by the uniform droplet spray process. B.Sc. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

    Google Scholar 

  • Xilinx (2007) 100% Material Declaration Data Sheet BG560

  • Yu F, Xia Z, Guo F (2008) Effects of rare-earth addition on properties and microstructure of lead-free solder balls. J Electron Mater 37:975–981

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Walter Goetz (ROHM Semiconductor GmbH), Prof. Jung–Hoon Chun (Massachusetts Institute of Technology), and Yoko for figures.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Huawei Technologies Sweden AB, P.O. Box 54, 16494, Kista, Sweden

    Anders S. G. Andrae

  2. Western Norway Research Institute, P.O. Box 163, 6851, Sogndal, Norway

    Otto Andersen

Authors
  1. Anders S. G. Andrae
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Otto Andersen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anders S. G. Andrae.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Andrae, A.S.G., Andersen, O. Life cycle assessment of integrated circuit packaging technologies. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16, 258–267 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-011-0260-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-011-0260-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation