Skip to main content
Log in

The Impact of Economic Development on Political Interest Across Social Classes in China: Turning the Chinese Dream into a Chinese Reality?

  • RESEARCH ARTICLE
  • Published:
Journal of Chinese Political Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Modernization theory has been instrumental to our understanding of the conditions necessary for a democratic transition. Proponents suggest a link between economic development and political development where the former leads to a stronger middle class with a greater interest in politics, potentially resulting in demands on the regime for concessions. Recent findings, however, suggest modernization theory is incomplete. On the one hand, the working class may play a crucial role in the regime concession-demanding process. On the other hand, recent empirical evidence suggests that both classes are politically apathetic and simply do not engage the regime for change. This study investigates this relationship between economic development and political development by answering the question of how economic development has impacted interest in politics across the social classes in China. I use ordered logistical regression to test hypotheses derived from these propositions. The results have important implications for understanding the relationship between economic development and political development in China and the popular support for the CCP to turn the Chinese dream into a Chinese reality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Other studies provide indirect insight into the potential impact of economic development on political interest. For instance, Dickson [6] and Chen and Dickson [3] investigated the CCP’s efforts to coopt the middle class entrepreneurs, the beneficiaries of economic development, and found evidence that these efforts were successful. Perhaps it is reasonable to conclude that these coopted entrepreneurs are unlikely sources of democratic change in China. In another study, Schubert and Ahlers [19] investigated the participation of villagers in local Chinese elections in purposively selected provinces based on levels of economic development and found that these elections actually strengthen CCP legitimacy at the expense of democratic change.

  2. The 1995 wave of the WVS did not have any observations on the dependent variable; this wave was therefore excluded from the analysis.

  3. This survey does have a subjective measure for social class where respondents are asked to state the social class they belong. Such a question is not a reasonable measure for social class in the context of this study and the problems are further exacerbated by the role ideology likely plays in the perception of Chinese social class. It is therefore highly unlikely that the meanings assigned to social class by the Chinese respondents in this survey even come close to the meanings useful for this scholarly endeavor.

  4. Given the statistically significant findings on age for 2000 and 2005, it is clear those from the Mao period are more politically interested than those from the wealth accumulation period. However, a question that may arise is whether those enculturated with the Maoist ideology have greater political interest than those simply born during the Mao period but enculturated later on, during the turbulent 1980s, a period defined by protests for democratic change. In other words, is the relationship between political interest and age linear as the findings in this study suggest or more curvilinear where those who were politically active during the 1980s actually hold political attitudes similar to, or perhaps greater than, those of the Mao period? Perhaps it is prudent to investigate this relationship so I conducted a subsequent regression analysis by employing discrete dummy variables to represent different age groups: those born before 1950 who were most likely to develop their political attitudes during the Mao period; those born between 1950 and 1960 who were likely to develop their political interest in the latter years of the Mao period, the Deng period and likely expressed their political interest in the 1980s; those born between 1961 and 1971 who were likely part of the1990s when political interest was discouraged and interest in wealth accumulation was encouraged; and those born after 1971 who were most likely more interested in wealth at the expense of political interest. The findings support the conclusions drawn in this study in that those enculturated during the Mao period maintained greater political interest than successive groups: In 2005, while both those born before 1950 and those born between 1950 and 1960 were statistically significant, the odds ratio for the former was much higher; in 2000, only those born before 1950 demonstrated statistically significant political interest.

References

  1. Almond, Gabriel, and Sidney Verba. 1989. The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Andersen, R., and T. Fetner. 2008. Economic inequality and intolerance: Attitudes toward homosexuality in 35 democracies. American Journal of Political Science 52: 942–958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen, J., and B.J. Dickson. 2010. Allies of the state: China’s private entrepreneurs and democratic change. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chen, Jie, and Lu. Chunlong. 2011. Democratization and the middle Class in China: The middle class’s attitudes toward democracy. Political Research Quarterly 64(3): 705–719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, J., and Y. Zhong. 1999. Mass political interest (or apathy) in urban China. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 32: 281–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dickson, B.J. 2008. Wealth into power: The Communist Party’s embrace of China’s private sector. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Hout, Michael, Jeff Manza, and Clem Brooks. 1999. Classes, unions, and the realignment of US presidential voting, 1952–1992. In The end of class politics: Class voting in comparative context, ed. Geoffrey Evans, 83–96. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Lake, Ronald La. Due, and Robert Huckfeldt. 1998. Social capital, social networks, and political participation. Political Psychology Special Issue: Psychological Approaches to Social Capital 19(3): 567–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee, C.K., and E. Friedman. 2009. The labor movement. Journal of Democracy 20(3): 21–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lipset, S.M. 1959. Some social requisites of democracy: Economic development and political legitimacy. American Political Science Review 53(1): 69–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Moore, B. 1966. Social origins of dictatorship and democracy: Lord and peasant in the making of the modern world. Boston: Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nathan, Andrew J., and Tianjian Shi. 1993. Cultural requisites for democracy in China: Findings from a survey. Daedalus 122: 95–123.

    Google Scholar 

  13. O’Brien, K.J., and L. Li. 2005. Popular contention and its impact in rural China. Comparative Political Studies 38(3): 235–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Owen, D.A. 2013. The impact of economic development on political development in authoritarian states: An initial study of political interest in Chinese provinces. Asian Politics and Policy 5(2): 211–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Putnam, Robert D. 1994. Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pye, Lucian W. 1992. The spirit of Chinese politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Przeworski, A., and F. Limongi. 1997. Modernization: Theories and facts. World Politics 49(2): 155–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rueschemeyer, D., E.H. Stephens, and J.D. Stephens. 1992. Capitalist development and democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schubert, G., and A.L. Ahlers. 2012. Participation and empowerment at the grassroots: Chinese village elections in perspective. Lanham: Lexington Books Press.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Scott, J. 1977. The moral economy of the peasant: Rebellion and subsistence in Southeast Asia. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Shi, Tianjian. 1999. Mass political behavior in Beijing. In The paradox of China's post-Mao economic reform, ed. Merle Goldman and Roderick MacFarquhar, 145–169. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Shi, T. 2000. Cultural values and democracy in the People’s Republic of China. The China Quarterly 162: 540–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sundhaussen, U. 1991. Democracy and the middle classes: Reflections on political development. Australian Journal of Politics and History 37: 100–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tong, Y. 2011. Morality, benevolence, and responsibility: Regime legitimacy in China from past to the present. Journal of Chinese Political Science 16: 141–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Townsend, J.R. 1967. Political participation in communist China. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Verba, Sidney, and Norman H. Nie. 1972. Participation in America: Political democracy and social equality. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wang, Z. 2014. The Chinese dream: Concept and context. Journal of Chinese Political Science 19: 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. White, T. 1992. Reforming the countryside. Current History 91(566): 273–277.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Wolfinger, Raymond E., and Stephen J. Rosenstone. 1980. Who votes? New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Zhong, Y. 2004. Political culture and participation in the Chinese countryside: Some empirical evidence. PS: Political Science and Politics 37(3): 445–453.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Zhong, Y., and J. Kim. 2005. Political interest in rural Southern Jiangsu Province in China. Journal of Chinese Political Science 10(2): 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhong, Y., J. Chen, and J. Scheb. 1998. Mass political culture in Beijing: Findings from two public opinion surveys. Asian Survey 38(8): 763–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhu, J., S. Zhao, and H. Li. 1990. Public political consciousness in China. Asian Survey 30(10): 992–1006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

A previous version of this article was presented at the 2012 annual meeting of the Midwest Conference on Asian Affairs. The author would like to express a sincere thanks to the following individuals for their helpful comments: Jing Chen, Apinya Owen, Frederick Solt, David Wilson and the anonymous reviewers. All errors remain the responsibility of the author.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David A. Owen.

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

Descriptive Statistics

1990 WVS

Variable

Mean

Std. deviation

Minimum

Maximum

Observations

Age

37.78

12.97

18

74

847

Beijing

0.10

0.30

0

1

847

Civil society

0.05

0.21

0

1

847

Confidence in government

0.73

0.44

0

1

847

Democratic support

Education

6.98

2.62

0

10

847

Efficacy

7.05

2.12

1

10

847

Female

0.40

0.49

0

1

847

Income

3.24

1.69

1

10

847

Income inequality

7.94

2.29

1

10

847

Interest in politics

2.94

0.82

1

4

847

Internet

Life satisfaction

7.27

2.08

1

10

847

Manager

0.35

0.48

0

1

847

Manual working class

0.32

0.47

0

1

847

Media * education

Nationalism

0.95

0.22

0

1

847

Newspaper * education

Party membership

0.38

0.49

0

1

847

Professional

0.11

0.32

0

1

847

Radio and TV * education

Routine non-manual labor

0.21

0.41

0

1

847

Social capital

0.60

0.49

0

1

847

Tradition

Voluntary organize—environment

0.01

0.10

0

1

847

Voluntary organize—labor

0.02

0.14

0

1

847

Voluntary organize—profession

0.27

0.44

0

1

847

Voluntary organize—religious

0.01

0.11

0

1

847

2000 WVS

Variable

Mean

Std. deviation

Minimum

Maximum

Observations

Age

39.60

10.91

19

65

684

Beijing

0.02

0.15

0

1

684

Civil society

0.03

0.18

0

1

684

Confidence in government

2.36

0.54

1

3

684

Democratic support

Education

4.60

1.71

2

9

684

Efficacy

7.31

2.49

1

10

684

Female

0.45

0.50

0

1

684

Income

5.90

1.99

1

11

684

Income inequality

6.39

3.15

1

10

684

Interest in politics

2.92

0.88

1

4

684

Internet

Life satisfaction

6.57

2.44

1

10

684

Manager

0.07

0.25

0

1

684

Manual working class

0.82

0.38

0

1

684

Media * education

18.54

9.83

2

45

684

Nationalism

0.98

0.15

0

1

684

Newspaper * education

Party membership

0.09

0.29

0

1

684

Professional

0.09

0.28

0

1

684

Radio and TV * education

Routine non-manual labor

0.02

0.15

0

1

684

Social capital

0.55

0.50

0

1

684

Tradition

Voluntary organize—environment

0.01

0.12

0

1

684

Voluntary organize—labor

0.07

0.25

0

1

684

Voluntary organize—profession

0.01

0.10

0

1

684

Voluntary organize—religious

0.03

0.18

0

1

684

2005 WVS

Variable

Mean

Std. deviation

Minimum

Maximum

Observations

Age

45.25

12.99

18

70

1876

Beijing

0.03

0.18

0

1

1876

Civil society

0.16

0.36

0

1

1860

Confidence in government

3.32

0.64

1

4

1757

Democratic support

8.54

1.73

1

10

1458

Education

4.16

2.59

1

9

1851

Efficacy

7.23

2.35

1

10

1722

Female

0.54

0.50

0

1

1876

Income

3.93

1.87

1

10

1496

Income inequality

5.77

3.12

1

10

1560

Interest in politics

2.80

1.00

1

4

1654

Internet

0.10

0.30

0

1

1857

Life satisfaction

6.76

2.41

1

10

1825

Manager

0.09

0.28

0

1

1817

Manual working class

0.83

0.38

0

1

1817

Media * education

Nationalism

0.87

0.34

0

1

1632

Newspaper * education

1.32

2.67

0

9

1835

Party membership

0.12

0.33

0

1

1862

Professional

0.07

0.25

0

1

1817

Radio and TV * education

3.35

2.94

0

9

1845

Routine non-manual labor

0.02

0.15

0

1

1817

Social capital

0.52

0.50

0

1

1748

Tradition

4.23

1.51

1

6

1792

Voluntary organize—environment

0.10

0.30

0

1

1854

Voluntary organize—labor

0.13

0.34

0

1

1854

Voluntary organize—profession

0.06

0.25

0

1

1852

Voluntary organize—religious

0.10

0.30

0

1

1852

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Owen, D.A. The Impact of Economic Development on Political Interest Across Social Classes in China: Turning the Chinese Dream into a Chinese Reality?. J OF CHIN POLIT SCI 20, 185–202 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-015-9345-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-015-9345-3

Keywords

Navigation