Skip to main content
Log in

A review of current construct measurement in entrepreneurship

  • Published:
International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Construct measurement practices lay at the foundation of empirical research. They are central considerations for entrepreneurship researchers and for consumers of entrepreneurship-related research findings. Yet, little is known about the extent to which entrepreneurship researchers currently take into account these considerations. In this study, we assess the current state of measurement practices in entrepreneurship by content analyzing recent empirical research published in several leading journals. Our findings indicate that, in general, extant research relies far too heavily on measures that do not allow for the assessment of reliability. We offer important implications and provide ways to help surmount these challenges.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boyd, B. K., Gove, S., & Hitt, M. A. (2005a). Construct measurement in strategic management research: Illusion or reality? Strategic Management Journal, 36, 239–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, B. K., Gove, S., & Hitt, M. A. (2005b). Consequences of measurement problems in strategic management research: The case of Ahimud and Lev. Strategic Management Journal, 36, 367–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busenitz, L. W. (1996). Research on entrepreneurial alertness: Sampling, measurement, and theoretical issues. Journal of Small Business Management, 34, 35–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busenitz, L. W., West, G. P., III, Shepherd, D., Nelson, T., Chandler, G. N., & Zacharakis, A. (2003). Entrepreneurship research in emergence: Past trends and future directions. Journal of Management, 29, 285–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, G. N., & Lyon, D. W. (2001). Issues of research design and construct measurement in entrepreneurship research: The past decade. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25, 101–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Power Analysis. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, A. (2007). Learning asymmetries and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(1), 97–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cote, J., & Buckley, R. (1987). Estimating trait, method, and error variance: Generalizing across 70 construct validation studies. Journal of Marketing Research, 14, 315–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coviello, N., & Jones, M. (2004). Methodological issues in international entrepreneurship research. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(4), 485–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crook, T. R., Bratton, V., Hoover, V., & Ketchen, D. J., Jr. (2006). Has strategic management shed the normal science straightjacket: Revisiting Bettis’ (1991) critiques. Journal of Managerial Issues, 18(3), 409–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, M. A., Shook, C. L., & Payne, G. T. (2007). The past, present, and future of entrepreneurship research: Data analytic trends and training. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31, 601–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dimov, D., Shepherd, D., & Sutcliffe, K. (2007). Requisite expertise, firm reputation, and status in venture capital investment allocation decisions. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(4), 481–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, T. D., & Ketchen, D. J. (1999). Organizational configurations and performance: The role of statistical power in extant research. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 385–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gartner, W. B. (2001). Is there an elephant in entrepreneurship? Blind assumptions in theory development. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(4), 27–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinkin, T. R. (1998). A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods, 1, 104–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ireland, R. D., Reutzel, C. R., & Webb, J. W. (2005a). Entrepreneurship research in AMJ: What has been published, and what might the future hold. Academy of Management Journal, 48(4), 556–564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ireland, R. D., Webb, J. W., & Coombs, J. E. (2005b). Theory and methodology in entrepreneurship research. In D. J. Ketchen & D. D. Bergh (Eds.), Research Methodology in Strategy and Management. Volume II (pp. 111–141). San Diego: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerlinger, F. N. (1986). Foundations of Behavioral Research (3rd ed.). Orlando: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ketchen, D. J., Jr. (2003). From the Special Issue Editor: Past accomplishments and future challenges. Journal of Management, 29(3), 281–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. M., Chang, D., & Lim, S. B. (2005). Impact of entrepreneurship education. A comparative study of U.S. and Korea. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 1, 27–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Low, M. B. (2001). The adolescence of entrepreneurship research: Specification of purpose. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(4), 17–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozgen, E., & Baron, R. A. (2007). Social sources of information in opportunity recognition: Effects of mentors, industry networks, and professional forums. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(2), 174–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reuber, A. R., & Fischer, E. (2007). Don’t rest on your laurels: Reputational change and young technology-based ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(3), 363–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, D. (1999). Research Methods for Organizational Studies. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 13–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shook, C. L., Ketchen, D. J., Jr., Hult, G. T. M., & Kacmar, K. M. (2004). An assessment of the use of structural equation modeling in strategic management research. Strategic Management Journal, 25, 397–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, D. W., & Williams, R. H. (1986). Note on the reliability of experimental measures and the power of significance tests. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 123–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful for the help of Paul Harvey.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Russell Crook.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Crook, T.R., Shook, C.L., Madden, T.M. et al. A review of current construct measurement in entrepreneurship. Int Entrep Manag J 6, 387–398 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-009-0114-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-009-0114-7

Keywords

Navigation