Abstract
Construct measurement practices lay at the foundation of empirical research. They are central considerations for entrepreneurship researchers and for consumers of entrepreneurship-related research findings. Yet, little is known about the extent to which entrepreneurship researchers currently take into account these considerations. In this study, we assess the current state of measurement practices in entrepreneurship by content analyzing recent empirical research published in several leading journals. Our findings indicate that, in general, extant research relies far too heavily on measures that do not allow for the assessment of reliability. We offer important implications and provide ways to help surmount these challenges.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boyd, B. K., Gove, S., & Hitt, M. A. (2005a). Construct measurement in strategic management research: Illusion or reality? Strategic Management Journal, 36, 239–257.
Boyd, B. K., Gove, S., & Hitt, M. A. (2005b). Consequences of measurement problems in strategic management research: The case of Ahimud and Lev. Strategic Management Journal, 36, 367–375.
Busenitz, L. W. (1996). Research on entrepreneurial alertness: Sampling, measurement, and theoretical issues. Journal of Small Business Management, 34, 35–44.
Busenitz, L. W., West, G. P., III, Shepherd, D., Nelson, T., Chandler, G. N., & Zacharakis, A. (2003). Entrepreneurship research in emergence: Past trends and future directions. Journal of Management, 29, 285–308.
Chandler, G. N., & Lyon, D. W. (2001). Issues of research design and construct measurement in entrepreneurship research: The past decade. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25, 101–113.
Cohen, J. (1988). Power Analysis. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Corbett, A. (2007). Learning asymmetries and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(1), 97–118.
Cote, J., & Buckley, R. (1987). Estimating trait, method, and error variance: Generalizing across 70 construct validation studies. Journal of Marketing Research, 14, 315–318.
Coviello, N., & Jones, M. (2004). Methodological issues in international entrepreneurship research. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(4), 485–508.
Crook, T. R., Bratton, V., Hoover, V., & Ketchen, D. J., Jr. (2006). Has strategic management shed the normal science straightjacket: Revisiting Bettis’ (1991) critiques. Journal of Managerial Issues, 18(3), 409–423.
Dean, M. A., Shook, C. L., & Payne, G. T. (2007). The past, present, and future of entrepreneurship research: Data analytic trends and training. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31, 601–618.
Dimov, D., Shepherd, D., & Sutcliffe, K. (2007). Requisite expertise, firm reputation, and status in venture capital investment allocation decisions. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(4), 481–502.
Ferguson, T. D., & Ketchen, D. J. (1999). Organizational configurations and performance: The role of statistical power in extant research. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 385–395.
Gartner, W. B. (2001). Is there an elephant in entrepreneurship? Blind assumptions in theory development. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(4), 27–39.
Hinkin, T. R. (1998). A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods, 1, 104–121.
Ireland, R. D., Reutzel, C. R., & Webb, J. W. (2005a). Entrepreneurship research in AMJ: What has been published, and what might the future hold. Academy of Management Journal, 48(4), 556–564.
Ireland, R. D., Webb, J. W., & Coombs, J. E. (2005b). Theory and methodology in entrepreneurship research. In D. J. Ketchen & D. D. Bergh (Eds.), Research Methodology in Strategy and Management. Volume II (pp. 111–141). San Diego: Elsevier.
Kerlinger, F. N. (1986). Foundations of Behavioral Research (3rd ed.). Orlando: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Ketchen, D. J., Jr. (2003). From the Special Issue Editor: Past accomplishments and future challenges. Journal of Management, 29(3), 281–283.
Kuhn, T. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lee, S. M., Chang, D., & Lim, S. B. (2005). Impact of entrepreneurship education. A comparative study of U.S. and Korea. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 1, 27–43.
Low, M. B. (2001). The adolescence of entrepreneurship research: Specification of purpose. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(4), 17–25.
Ozgen, E., & Baron, R. A. (2007). Social sources of information in opportunity recognition: Effects of mentors, industry networks, and professional forums. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(2), 174–192.
Reuber, A. R., & Fischer, E. (2007). Don’t rest on your laurels: Reputational change and young technology-based ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(3), 363–387.
Schwab, D. (1999). Research Methods for Organizational Studies. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 13–17.
Shook, C. L., Ketchen, D. J., Jr., Hult, G. T. M., & Kacmar, K. M. (2004). An assessment of the use of structural equation modeling in strategic management research. Strategic Management Journal, 25, 397–404.
Zimmerman, D. W., & Williams, R. H. (1986). Note on the reliability of experimental measures and the power of significance tests. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 123–124.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful for the help of Paul Harvey.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Crook, T.R., Shook, C.L., Madden, T.M. et al. A review of current construct measurement in entrepreneurship. Int Entrep Manag J 6, 387–398 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-009-0114-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-009-0114-7