Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Impact of Entrepreneurship Education: A Comparative Study of the U.S. and Korea

  • Published:
The International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Over the last two decades, entrepreneurship has emerged as a mainstream business discipline in the United States. Even after the collapse of the dotcom phenomenon, the global explosion of e-business and new business opportunities created by advances in information and telecommunication technologies (ICT) have widely popularized entrepreneurship for new venture creation. But while entrepreneurship is becoming more prevalent throughout the world, its education by country differs according to cultural context. This paper presents the results of a study on the impact of entrepreneurship education in the U.S. and Korea.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brockaus, R.H. 1980a. The effect of job dissatisfaction on the decision to start a business. Journal of Small Business Management, 18(1): 37–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockaus, R.H. 1980b. Risk taking propensity of entrepreneurs. Academy of Management Journal, 23: 509–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrier, C. 1996. Intrapreneurship in small business: An exploratory study. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 21(1): 5–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, D. 2000. Impact of venture education on entrepreneurship: Focusing on comparison between university students and junior college students. Journal of the Korean Office Automation Society, 5(3): 171–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, D. & Hong, S. 2001. An empirical study on venture education effects between Korean female and male university students. Journal of Korean Association of Business Administration, 14(1): 105–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charney, A. & Libecap, G. 2000. Impact of entrepreneurship education, insight. A Kauffman Research Series. 1–8.

  • Cho, B. 1998. Study of the effective entrepreneurship education method and its process. Business Education Research, 2(1):27–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B.W., Davis, C. & Harnish, V. 1984. Do courses in entrepreneurship aid in new venture creation? Journal of Small Business Management, 22(2): 26–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. F. 1985. Innovation and entrepreneurship. New York: Haper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gartner, W.B. 1985. A conceptual framework for describing the phenomenon of new venture creation. Academy of Management Review, 10: 696–706.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gartner, W.B. 1989. Who is an entrepreneur? is the wrong question. American Journal of Small Business, 12(4): 11–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, J. & Lee, M. 1998. A study on the status of entrepreneurship education in Korea and its direction. Business Education Research, 2(2): 5–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S.M. & Peterson, S. 2000. Culture, entrepreneurial orientation, and global competitiveness. Journal of World Business, 35: 401–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKelvey, B. 1982. Organizational systematics—Taxonomy, evolution, classification. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, A. 1999. Entrepreneurship: What triggers it? International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 6(2): 59–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, C. 1993. A study on the status of entrepreneurship education in Korean college—Focusing on the contents of instruction. Small- and Medium- Size Companies Research, 15(2): 79–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J.A. 1934. The theory of economic development, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, G.T., Duffy, S. & Tarabishy, A. 2002. The state of entrepreneurship education in the United States: A nationwide survey and analysis. International Journal of Entrepreneurship Education. 1: 1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, G.T., Fernald, Jr. L. & Weaver, L. 1993. Trends in small business management and entrepreneurship in the United States: An update. International Council for Small Business, Proceedings, 38th World Conference, Las Vegas, Nevada, U.S.A., pp.~230–242.

  • Timmons, J.A. 1999. New venture creation: Entrepreneurship for 21st century (5th ed.). Homewood, Illinois: Irwin- McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, K., Hogarth-Scott, S. & Wilson, N. 1998. Small business start-ups: Success factors and support implications. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 4: 217–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S.A. 1999. The challenging rules of global competitiveness in the 21st century. Academy of Management Executive, 13: 36–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • http://entrepreneurship.mit.edu

  • http://www.kice.re.kr/english/eindex.htm

  • http://www.usnews.com/usnews/edu/college/rankings/business/topprogs.htm

  • http://www3.babson.edu/ESHIP/academics

  • Chosun Daily Newspaper, November 29, 2000

  • JoongAng Daily Newspaper, March 2, 1999

  • MunHwa Daily Newspaper, March 13, 1999

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sang M. Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, S.M., Chang, D. & Lim, Sb. Impact of Entrepreneurship Education: A Comparative Study of the U.S. and Korea. Entrepreneurship Mgt. 1, 27–43 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-005-6674-2

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-005-6674-2

Keywords

Navigation