Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Spatial co-localisation of firms and entrepreneurial dynamics

The combinatory system view

  • Published:
The International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this conceptual paper, I propose an interpretation of business dynamics in terms of the spatial co-localisation of firms—considered as an intelligent cognitive system—in a circumscribed area in order to form clusters of various types. I interpret clustering by adopting the methodology of multi-agent combinatory systems: that is, systems formed by collectivities of agents (firms) in which an internal feedback recombines the micro behaviours of the agents (localisation) in order to produce a macro effect (cluster) which, in turn, modifies the attractiveness of the area and conditions the subsequent localisations. I also present the idea that if a cluster has fitness advantages for new firms, then usually new entrepreneurs are formed within it and the cluster widens, due to the endogenous genesis of new firms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albu, M. (1997). Technological learning and innovation in industrial clusters in the South. SPRU, Electronic Working Papers Series, 7.

  • Amin, A. (1993). The globalization of the economy. In G. Grabher (Ed.), The embedded firm (pp. 278–295). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonelli, C. (1996). Localized knowledge percolation processes and information networks. Evolutionary Economics, 6, 281–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonelli, C. (1997). The economics of path-dependence in industrial organization. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 15, 643–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, W. B. (1994). Increasing returns and path dependence in the economy. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asheim, B. (1996). Industrial districts as ‘learning regions’: A condition for prosperity. European Planning Studies, 4, 379–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashworth, G., & James, P. (2001). Value based management. Delivering superior shareholder value. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, R. (1997). The complexity of cooperation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, S. (1979). The heart of enterprise. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, S. (1981). Brain of the firm (2nd ed.). London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellandi, M. (1996). On Entrepreneurship, region and the constitution of scale and scope economies. European Planning Studies, 4, 421–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belussi, F. (1999). Path dependency vs. industrial dynamics: An analysis of two heterogeneous districts. Grenoble, France: Comm. EMAEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergman, E. M., & Feser, E. J. (1999). Industry clusters: A methodology and framework for economic cooperation and development. Paris, France: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breschi, S., & Lissoni, F. (2001). Localised knowledge spillovers vs. innovative milieux: Knowledge “tacitness” reconsidered. Regional Science, 90, 255–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brusco, S. (1999). The rules of the game in industrial districts. In A. Grandori (Ed.), Interfirm networks: Organization and industrial competitiveness (pp. 17–40). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busch, M. L., & Reinhardt, E. R. (1998). Industrial location and protection: The political and economic geography of US. Nontariff barriers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association.

  • Camagni, R. (1991). Local ‘milieu’, uncertainty and innovation networks: Towards a new dynamic theory of economic space. In R. Camagni (Ed.), Innovation networks: Spatial perspectives (pp. 121–143). London: Belhaven Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler Jr., A. D. (1990). Scale and scope: The dynamics of industrial capitalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, L. J. (1992). The role of finance in national systems of innovation. In B. Å. Lundvall (Ed.), National systems of innovation, towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning (pp. 146–168). London: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornelius, I., & Davies, M. (1997). Shareholder value, financial times. London: Pearson Professional.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, M. S., & Pedersen, C. Ø. R. (2004). Knowledge flows through informal contacts in industrial clusters: Myth or reality? Research Policy, 33, 1673–1686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darrah, C. N. (1996). Community and collaboration in a “value-added” community. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Anthropological Association, San Francisco.

  • De Geus, A. (1997). The living company. Harvard Business Review, 75(2), 51–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, P. (2000). Value based marketing. Marketing strategies for corporate growth and shareholder value. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunford, M., Fernandes, A., Musyck, B., Sadowski, B., Cho, M., & Tsenkova, S. (1993). The organization of production and territory: Small firm systems. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 17, 132–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J. H. (1997). Effective interfirm collaboration: How firms minimize transaction costs and maximise transaction value. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 535–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R. (2000). Competing in the age of talent: Quality of place and the new economy. Paper presented at the R. K. Mellon Foundation, Heinz Endowments and Sustainable Pittsburgh. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: Carnegie Mellon University.

  • Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. London: Hamish Hamilton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, I. (1999). Internationalisation and urban competition. Urban Studies, 36, 1001–1016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hakansson, H., & Snehota, I. (1994). Developing relationships in business networks. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrigan, K. (1985). Vertical integration and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 397–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J. H. (1995). Hidden order: How adaptation builds complexity. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Perseus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, C. (1999). Towards a competence theory of the region. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 23, 151–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzoni, G., & Lazerson, M. H. (1999). The firms that feed industrial districts: A return to the Italian source. Industrial and corporate change, 8, 235–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzoni, G., & Lipparini, A. (1999). The leveraging of interfirm relationships as a distinctive organizational capability: A longitudinal study. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 317–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B. Å., & Johnson, B. (1994). The learning economy. Journal of Industry Studies, 1, 23–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maillat, D. (1998). Interaction between urban systems and localized productive systems: An approach to endogenous regional development in terms of innovative milieu. European Planning Studies, 6, 117–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maskell, P. (2001). Towards a knowledge-based theory of the geographic cluster. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10, 921–943.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. (1980). Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 42, Dordrecht, London: Reidel Publishing Co.

  • Mc Taggart, J., Kontes, P., & Mankins, M. (1994). The value imperative. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mella, P. (2000). Combinatory system theory. Retrieved 2000 from http://www.ea2000.it/cst.

  • Mella, P. (2005). Observing collectivities as simplex systems. The combinatory systems approach. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 9(2), 121–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingers, J. (1994). Self-producing systems: Implications and applications of autopoiesis. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. H. (1958). The cost of capital, corporation finance, and the theory of investment. American Economic Review, 3(XLVIII), 261–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R., & Winter, S. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nightingale, P. (1998). A cognitive model of innovation. Research Policy, 27, 689–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., & Konno, N. (1998). The concept of “ba”: Building a foundation for knowledge creation. California Management Review, 40(3), 40–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nooteboom, B. (1999). Innovation, learning and industrial organization. Cambridge Journal of economics, 23(2), 127–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pilotti, L. (1998). Evolutionary and adaptive local systems in north east Italy. Human System Management, 18, 87–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., & Sölvell, Ö. (1998). The role of geography in the process of innovation and the sustainable competitive advantage of firms. In A. D. Chandler, P. Hagström, & Ö. Sölvell (Eds.), The dynamic firm. The role of technology, strategy, organization, and regions (pp. 440–457). Oxford, Massachusetts: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W. W. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, 295–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, A. (1998). Creating shareholder value. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruefli, T. W, Collins, J. M., & Lacugna, J. R. (1999). Risk measures in strategic management research: Auld lang syne? Strategic Management Journal, 20, 167–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz, H. (1992). On the clustering of small firms. Institute of Development Studies, 23(3), 21–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, A. J. (1992). The role of large producers in industrial districts: A case study of high technology systems houses in Southern California. Regional Studies, 26, 265–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staber, U. (1998). Inter-firm co-operation and competition in industrial districts. Organization Studies, 19, 701–724.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sthör, W. B., & Taylor, D. R. F. (1988). Development from above or below? The dialectics of regional planning in developing countries. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorelli, H. B. (1986). Networks: Between markets and hierarchies. Strategic Management Journal, 7, 37–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1993). The evolving science of organization. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 149, 36–63.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dipartimento di Ricerche Aziendali, University of Pavia, Via San Felice, 5, 27100, Pavia, Italy

    Piero Mella

Authors
  1. Piero Mella
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Piero Mella.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mella, P. Spatial co-localisation of firms and entrepreneurial dynamics. Entrepreneurship Mgt. 2, 391–412 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-006-0001-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-006-0001-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation