Abstract
Due to its heterogeneous and complex nature, groundwater modeling needs great effort to quantify the aquifer, a crucial tool for policymakers and hydrogeologists to understand the variations in groundwater levels (GWL). This study proposed a set of supervised machine learning (ML) models to delineate the GWL changes in the Zarand-Saveh complex aquifer in Iran using 15-year (2005–2020) monthly dataset. The wavelet transform (WT) procedure was also used to improve the GWL prediction ability of ML models for 3-month horizons using input datasets of precipitation, evapotranspiration, temperature, and GWL. The four well-accepted standalone ML methods, i.e., artificial neural network (ANN), adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS), group method of data handling (GMDH), and least square support vector machine (LSSVM), were implemented and compared with the hybrid wavelet conjunction models. The methods were compared based on root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), correlation coefficient (R), and Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE). Comparison outcomes showed that the hybrid wavelet–ML considerably improved the standalone model results. The wavelet transform-least square support vector machine (WT-LSSVM) model was superior to other standalone and hybrid wavelet–ML methods to predict GWL. The best GWL predictions were acquired from the WT-LSSVM model with input scenario 5 involving all influential variables, and this model produced RMSE, MAE, R, and NSE as 0.05, 0.04, 0.99, and 0.99 for 1 month ahead of GWL prediction, while the corresponding values were obtained as 0.18, 0.14, 0.95, and 0.90 for 3 months ahead of GWL prediction, respectively.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All data are provided as tables and figures.
Abbreviations
- AI:
-
Artificial intelligence
- ANFIS :
-
Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system
- ANN :
-
Artificial neural network
- CEEMD :
-
Complementary ensemble empirical mode decomposition
- EEMD :
-
Ensemble empirical mode decomposition
- EMD :
-
Empirical mode decomposition
- FCM :
-
Fuzzy C-means clustering
- FT :
-
Fourier transform
- GEP:
-
Gene expression programming
- GMDH :
-
Group method of data handling
- GP :
-
Genetic programming
- GWL :
-
Groundwater level
- LM :
-
Levenberg–Marquardt
- LSSVM :
-
Least square support vector machine
- MAE :
-
Mean absolute error
- MF :
-
Membership functions
- ML :
-
Machine learning
- MLP :
-
Multi-layer perceptron
- MLR :
-
Multi-layer regression
- NSE :
-
Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency
- R :
-
Correlation coefficient
- RMSE :
-
Root mean square error
- SVR :
-
Support vector regression
- WA :
-
Whale algorithm
- WT :
-
Wavelet transform
- WT-ANFIS :
-
Wavelet transform-adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system
- WT-ANN :
-
Wavelet transform-artificial neural network
- WT-GMDH :
-
Wavelet transform-group method of data handling
- WT-LSSVM :
-
Wavelet transform-least square support vector machine
References
Adamowski J, Karapataki C (2010) Comparison of multivariate regression and artificial neural networks for peak urban water-demand forecasting: evaluation of different ANN learning algorithms. J Hydrol Eng 15(10):729–743. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000245
Adamowski J, Sun K (2010) Development of a coupled wavelet transform and neural network method for flow forecasting of non-perennial rivers in semi-arid watersheds. J Hydrol 390(1–2):85–91
Adedeji PA, Akinlabi S, Madushele N, Olatunji OO (2020) Wind turbine power output very short-term forecast: a comparative study of data clustering techniques in a PSO-ANFIS model. J Clean Prod 254:120135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120135
Afkhamifar S, Sarraf A (2020) Prediction of groundwater level in Urmia Plain aquifer using hybrid model of wavelet transform-extreme learning machine based on quantum particle swarm optimization. Watershed Eng Manag 12(2): 351–364. https://doi.org/10.22092/IJWMSE.2019.126515.1669
Afzaal H, Farooque AA, Abbas F, Acharya B, Esau T (2020) Groundwater estimation from major physical hydrology components using artificial neural networks and deep learning. Water 12(1):5. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12010005
F Ahmadi S Mehdizadeh V Nourani 2022 Improving the performance of random forest for estimating monthly reservoir inflow via complete ensemble empirical mode decomposition and wavelet analysis StochEnv Res Risk Assess :1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-021-02159-x
Ahmadianfar I, Jamei M, Chu X (2020) A novel hybrid wavelet-locally weighted linear regression (W-LWLR) model for electrical conductivity (EC) prediction in surface water. J Contam Hydrol 232:103641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2020.103641
Alcalá FJ, Martínez-Pagán P, Paz MC, Navarro M, Pérez-Cuevas J, Domingo F (2021) Combining of MASW and GPR imaging and hydrogeological surveys for the groundwater resource evaluation in a coastal urban area in southern Spain. Appl Sci 11(7):3154. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11073154
Ali M, Prasad R, Xiang Y, Yaseen ZM (2020) Complete ensemble empirical mode decomposition hybridized with random forest and kernel ridge regression model for monthly rainfall forecasts. J Hydrol 584:124647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124647
Almuhaylan MR, Ghumman AR, Al-Salamah IS, Ahmad A, Ghazaw YM, Haider H, Shafiquzzaman M (2020) Evaluating the impacts of pumping on aquifer depletion in arid regions using MODFLOW. ANFIS and ANN Water 12(8):2297. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12082297
Azizpour A, Izadbakhsh MA, Shabanlou S, Yosefvand F, Rajabi A (2022) Simulation of time-series groundwater parameters using a hybrid metaheuristic neuro-fuzzy model Environ Sci Pollut Res :1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17879-4
Bahmani R, Ouarda TB (2021) Groundwater level modeling with hybrid artificial intelligence techniques. J Hydrol 595:125659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125659
Banadkooki FB, Ehteram M, Ahmed AN, Teo FY, Fai CM, Afan HA, … El-Shafie A (2020) Enhancement of groundwater-level prediction using an integrated machine learning model optimized by whale algorithm Nat Resour Res 29(5):3233-3252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-020-09634-2
Band SS, Heggy E, Bateni SM, Karami H, Rabiee M, Samadianfard S … Mosavi A (2021) Groundwater level prediction in arid areas using wavelet analysis and Gaussian process regression Eng Appl Computat Fluid Mech 15(1):1147-1158. https://doi.org/10.1080/19942060.2021.1944913
Barzegar R, Fijani E, Moghaddam AA, Tziritis E (2017) Forecasting of groundwater level fluctuations using ensemble hybrid multi-wavelet neural network-based models. Sci Total Environ 599:20–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.04.189
Bezdek JC (2013) Pattern recognition with fuzzy objective function algorithms. Springer Science & Business Media
Bezdek J (1973) Cluster validity with fuzzy sets. J Cybern 3:58–73
Campozano L, Mendoza D, Mosquera G, Palacio-Baus K, Célleri R, Crespo P (2020) Wavelet analyses of neural networks based river discharge decomposition. Hydrol Process 34(11):2302–2312. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13726
Chakraborty S, Maity PK, Das S (2020) Investigation, simulation, identification and prediction of groundwater levels in coastal areas of Purba Midnapur, India, using MODFLOW. Environ Dev Sustain 22(4):3805–3837. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-019-00344-1
Chang CC, Lin CJ (2011) LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines. ACM Trans Intell Syst Technol (TIST) 2(3):1–27
Ciria TP, Chiogna G (2020) Intra-catchment comparison and classification of long-term streamflow variability in the Alps using wavelet analysis. J Hydrol 587:124927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124927
Ciria TP, Labat D, Chiogna G (2019) Detection and interpretation of recent and historical streamflow alterations caused by river damming and hydropower production in the Adige and Inn river basins using continuous, discrete and multiresolution wavelet analysis. J Hydrol 578:124021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124021
Cortes C, Vapnik V (1995) Support-Vector Networks Machine Learning 20(3):273–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00994018
Coulibaly P, Anctil F, Aravena R, Bobée B (2001) Artificial neural network modeling of water table depth fluctuations. Water Resour Res 37(4):885–896. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000WR900368
Ebrahimi H, Rajaee T (2017) Simulation of groundwater level variations using wavelet combined with neural network, linear regression and support vector machine. Global Planet Change 148:181–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2016.11.014
Gong X, Geng J, Sun Q, Gu C, Zhang W (2020) Experimental study on pumping-induced land subsidence and earth fissures: a case study in the Su-Xi-Chang region, China. Bull Eng Geol Env 79(9):4515–4525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-020-01864-1
Gordu F, Nachabe MH (2021) A physically constrained wavelet-aided statistical model for multi-decadal groundwater dynamics predictions. Hydrol Process 35(8):e14308. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14308
Graf R, Zhu S, Sivakumar B (2019) Forecasting river water temperature time series using a wavelet–neural network hybrid modelling approach. J Hydrol 578:124115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124115
Grossmann A, Morlet J (1984) Decomposition of Hardy functions into square integrable wavelets of constant shape. SIAM J Math Anal 15(4):723–736. https://doi.org/10.1137/0515056
Guzman SM, Paz JO, Tagert MLM, Mercer AE (2019) Evaluation of seasonally classified inputs for the prediction of daily groundwater levels: NARX networks vs support vector machines. Environ Model Assess 24(2):223–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-018-9639-x
Holman IP, Rivas-Casado M, Bloomfield JP, Gurdak JJ (2011) Identifying non-stationary groundwater level response to North Atlantic ocean-atmosphere teleconnection patterns using wavelet coherence. Hydrogeol J 19(6):1269–1278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-011-0755-9
Huang X, Gao L, Crosbie RS, Zhang N, Fu G, Doble R (2019) Groundwater recharge prediction using linear regression, multi-layer perception network, and deep learning. Water 11(9):1879. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11091879
Ivakhnenko AG (1968) The group method of data of handling; a rival of the method of stochastic approximation. Soviet Automatic Control 13:43–55
Ivakhnenko AG (1970) Heuristic self-organization in problems of engineering cybernetics. Automatica 6(2):207–219
Ivakhnenko AG (1971) Polynomial theory of complex systems. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 4:364–378. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.1971.4308320
Ivakhnenko AG, Ivakhnenko GA (2000) Problems of further development of the group method of data handling algorithms. Part I. Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis C/C Of Raspoznavaniye Obrazov I Analiz Izobrazhenii, 10(2):187–194
Jafari MM, Ojaghlou H, Zare M, Schumann GJP (2021) Application of a novel hybrid wavelet-ANFIS/fuzzy c-means clustering model to predict groundwater fluctuations. Atmosphere 12(1):9. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12010009
Jang JS (1993) ANFIS: adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 23(3):665–685. https://doi.org/10.1109/21.256541
Jiang Z, Yang S, Liu Z, Xu Y, Shen T, Qi S … Xu T (2022) Can ensemble machine learning be used to predict the groundwater level dynamics of farmland under future climate: a 10-year study on Huaibei Plain Environ SciPollut Res :1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-18809-8
Karandish F, Šimůnek J (2016) A comparison of numerical and machine-learning modeling of soil water content with limited input data. J Hydrol 543:892–909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.11.007
Karimi HS, Natarajan B, Ramsey CL, Henson J, Tedder JL, Kemper E (2019) Comparison of learning-based wastewater flow prediction methodologies for smart sewer management. J Hydrol 577:123977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.123977
Khaki M, Yusoff I, Islami N (2015) Simulation of groundwater level through artificial intelligence system. Environ Earth Sci 73(12):8357–8367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3997-8
Khedri A, Kalantari N, Vadiati M (2020) Comparison study of artificial intelligence method for short term groundwater level prediction in the northeast Gachsaran unconfined aquifer. Water Supply 20(3):909–921. https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2020.015
Kim Y, Shin HS, Plummer JD (2014) A wavelet-based autoregressive fuzzy model for forecasting algal blooms. Environ Model Softw 62:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.08.014
Kişi Ö (2009) Neural networks and wavelet conjunction model for intermittent streamflow forecasting. J Hydrol Eng 14(8):773–782. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000053
Krishna B, Satyaji Rao YR, Vijaya T (2008) Modelling groundwater levels in an urban coastal aquifer using artificial neural networks. Hydrol Process Intl J 22(8):1180–1188. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6686
Liu J, Gu J, Li H, Carlson KH (2020) Machine learning and transport simulations for groundwater anomaly detection. J Comput Appl Math 380:112982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2020.112982
Malekzadeh M, Kardar S, Shabanlou S (2019) Simulation of groundwater level using MODFLOW, extreme learning machine and wavelet-extreme learning machine models. Groundw Sustain Dev 9:100279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2019.100279
Malekzadeh M, Kardar S, Saeb K, Shabanlou S, Taghavi L (2019b) A novel approach for prediction of monthly ground water level using a hybrid wavelet and non-tuned self-adaptive machine learning model. Water Resour Manage 33(4):1609–1628. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-019-2193-8
Mathworks (2019) 9.6. 0.1072779 (R2019a). The MathWorks Inc.: Natick
McClelland DC (1987) Human motivation. Cup Archive
McClelland JL, Rumelhart DE, PDP Research Group (1987) Parallel distributed processing, volume 2: explorations in the microstructure of cognition: psychological and biological models (Vol. 2). MIT press
McCulloch WS, Pitts W (1943) A logical calculus of Ideas immanent in nervous activity Bull Math Biophys 5. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02478259
Mehdizadeh S, Ahmadi F, Mehr AD, Safari MJS (2020) Drought modeling using classic time series and hybrid wavelet-gene expression programming models. J Hydrol 587:125017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125017
Miraki S, Zanganeh SH, Chapi K, Singh VP, Shirzadi A, Shahabi H, Pham BT (2019) Mapping groundwater potential using a novel hybrid intelligence approach. Water Resour Manage 33(1):281–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-018-2102-6
Mirarabi A, Nassery HR, Nakhaei M, Adamowski J, Akbarzadeh AH, Alijani F (2019) Evaluation of data-driven models (SVR and ANN) for groundwater level prediction in confined and unconfined systems. Environ Earth Sci 78(15):489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-019-8474-y
Moeeni H, Bonakdari H, Ebtehaj I (2017a) Integrated SARIMA with neuro-fuzzy systems and neural networks for monthly inflow prediction. Water Resour Manag 31(7):2141–2156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1632-7
Moeeni H, Bonakdari H, Fatemi SE (2017b) Stochastic model stationarization by eliminating the periodic term and its effect on time series prediction. J Hydrol 547:348–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.02.012
Moghaddam HK, Kivi ZR, Bahreinimotlagh M, Alizadeh MJ (2019) Developing comparative mathematic models, BN and ANN for forecasting of groundwater levels. Groundw Sustain Dev 9:100237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2019.100237
Moosavi V, Mahjoobi J, Hayatzadeh M (2021) Combining group method of data handling with signal processing approaches to improve accuracy of groundwater level modeling. Nat Resour Res 30(2):1735–1754. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-020-09799-w
Moosavi V, Vafakhah M, Shirmohammadi B, Behnia N (2013) A wavelet-ANFIS hybrid model for groundwater level forecasting for different prediction periods. Water Resour Manag 27(5):1301–1321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-012-0239-2
Moosavi V, Vafakhah M, Shirmohammadi B, Ranjbar M (2014) Optimization of wavelet-ANFIS and wavelet-ANN hybrid models by Taguchi method for groundwater level forecasting. Arab J Sci Eng 39(3):1785–1796. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-013-0762-3
Moriasi DN, Gitau MW, Pai N, Daggupati P (2015) Hydrologic and water quality models: performance measures and evaluation criteria. Trans Asabe, 58(6):1763–1785. https://doi.org/10.13031/trans.58.10715
Mouatadid S, Adamowski JF, Tiwari MK, Quilty JM (2019) Coupling the maximum overlap discrete wavelet transform and long short-term memory networks for irrigation flow forecasting. Agric Water Manag 219:72–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2019.03.045
Nadiri AA, Gharekhani M, Khatibi R, Sadeghfam S, Moghaddam AA (2017) Groundwater vulnerability indices conditioned by supervised intelligence committee machine (SICM). Sci Total Environ 574:691–706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.093
Najafzadeh M, Lim SY (2015) Application of improved neuro-fuzzy GMDH to predict scour depth at sluice gates. Earth Sci Inf 8(1):187–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-014-0144-8
Nariman-Zadeh N, Darvizeh A, Darvizeh M, Gharababaei H (2002) Modelling of explosive cutting process of plates using GMDH-type neural network and singular value decomposition. J Mater Process Technol 128(1–3):80–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(02)00264-9
Natarajan N, Sudheer C (2020) Groundwater level forecasting using soft computing techniques. Neural Comput Appl 32(12):7691–7708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-019-04234-5
Nguyen HT, Prasad NR, Walker CL, Walker EA (2002) A first course in fuzzy and neural control CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420035520
Niu WJ, Feng ZK (2021) Evaluating the performances of several artificial intelligence methods in forecasting daily streamflow time series for sustainable water resources management. Sustain Cities Soc 64:102562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102562
Nourani V, Mousavi S (2016) Spatiotemporal groundwater level modeling using hybrid artificial intelligence meshless method. J Hydrol 536:10–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.02.030
Nourani V, Alami MT, Vousoughi FD (2015) Wavelet-entropy data preprocessing approach for ANN-based groundwater level modeling. J Hydrol 524:255–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.02.048
Nourani V, Baghanam AH, Adamowski J, Kisi O (2014) Applications of hybrid wavelet–artificial intelligence models in hydrology: a review. J Hydrol 514:358–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.03.057
Nourani V, Tajbakhsh AD, Molajou A (2019) Data mining based on wavelet and decision tree for rainfall-runoff simulation. Hydrol Res 50(1):75–84. https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2018.049
O’Reilly AM, Holt RM, Davidson GR, Patton AC, Rigby JR (2020) A dynamic water balance/nonlinear reservoir model of a perched phreatic aquifer–river system with hydrogeologic threshold effects. Water Resour Res 56(6):e2019WR025382. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR025382
Partal T, Kişi Ö (2007) Wavelet and neuro-fuzzy conjunction model for precipitation forecasting. J Hydrol 342(1–2):199–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.05.026
Platt JC (1999) Fast training of support vector machines using sequential minimal optimization, advances in kernel methods. Support Vector Learning, 185–208. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISKE.2008.4731075
Quilty J, Adamowski J (2018) Addressing the incorrect usage of wavelet-based hydrological and water resources forecasting models for real-world applications with best practices and a new forecasting framework. J Hydrol 563:336–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.05.003
Rahbar A, Mirarabi A, Nakhaei M, Talkhabi M, Jamali M (2022) A comparative analysis of data-driven models (SVR, ANFIS, and ANNs) for daily karst spring discharge prediction Water Resour Manag :1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-021-03041-9
Rahman AS, Hosono T, Quilty JM, Das J, Basak A (2020) Multiscale groundwater level forecasting: coupling new machine learning approaches with wavelet transforms. Adv Water Resour 141:103595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2020.103595
Rajaee T, Ebrahimi H, Nourani V (2019) A review of the artificial intelligence methods in groundwater level modeling. J Hydrol 572:336–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.12.037
Rezaei M, Mousavi SF, Moridi A, Gordji ME, Karami H (2021) A new hybrid framework based on integration of optimization algorithms and numerical method for estimating monthly groundwater level. Arab J Geosci 14(11):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-07349-z
Roshni T, Jha MK, Drisya J (2020) Neural network modeling for groundwater-level forecasting in coastal aquifers Neural Comput Appl :1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-04722-z
Roshni T, Jha MK, Deo RC, Vandana A (2019) Development and evaluation of hybrid artificial neural network architectures for modeling spatio-temporal groundwater fluctuations in a complex aquifer system. Water Resour Manage 33(7):2381–2397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-019-02253-4
Sabo M (2012) How to analyze time series with wavelet transform. Acta Hydrologica Slovaca 13(1):233–241
Sahoo M, Das T, Kumari K, Dhar A (2017) Space–time forecasting of groundwater level using a hybrid soft computing model. Hydrol Sci J 62(4):561–574. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2016.1252986
Sahoo S, Jha MK (2013) Groundwater-level prediction using multiple linear regression and artificial neural network techniques: a comparative assessment. Hydrogeol J 21(8):1865–1887. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-013-1029-5
Samadianfard S, Asadi E, Jarhan S, Kazemi H, Kheshtgar S, Kisi O … Manaf AA (2018) Wavelet neural networks and gene expression programming models to predict short-term soil temperature at different depths Soil Tillage Res 175:37-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2017.08.012
Samani S, Vadiati M, Azizi F, Zamani E, Kisi O (2022) Groundwater level simulation using soft computing methods with emphasis on major meteorological components Water Resour Manag :1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-022-03217-x
See L, Openshaw S (1999) Applying soft computing approaches to river level forecasting. Hydrol Sci J 44(5):763–778. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626669909492272
Sen Z (2001) Fuzzy logic and foundation Publisher, IstabulBilgeKulturSanat, 172
Shiri J, Kisi O (2011) Comparison of genetic programming with neuro-fuzzy systems for predicting short-term water table depth fluctuations. Comput Geosci 37(10):1692–1701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2010.11.010
Sleziak P, Hlavcova K, Szolgay J (2015) Advantages of a time series analysis using wavelet transform as compared with a Fourier analysis. Slovak J Civil Eng 23(2):30. https://doi.org/10.1515/sjce-2015-0010
Solgi A, Pourhaghi A, Bahmani R, Zarei H (2017) Preprocessing data using wavelet transform and PCA based on support vector regression and gene expression programming for river flow simulation. J Earth Syst Sci 126(5):1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-017-0850-y
Sridharam S, Sahoo A, Samantaray S, Ghose DK (2021) Estimation of water table depth using wavelet-ANFIS: a case study. In Communication Software and Networks (pp. 747–754). Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5397-4_76
Su Z, Wu J, He X, Elumalai V (2020) Temporal changes of groundwater quality within the groundwater depression cone and prediction of confined groundwater salinity using Grey Markov model in Yinchuan area of northwest China. Expos Health 12(3):447–468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12403-020-00355-8
Suryanarayana C, Sudheer C, Mahammood V, Panigrahi BK (2014) An integrated wavelet-support vector machine for groundwater level prediction in Visakhapatnam, India. Neurocomputing 145:324–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2014.05.026
Suykens JA, Vandewalle J (1999) Least squares support vector machine classifiers. Neural Process Lett 9(3):293–300. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018628609742
Tang Y, Zang C, Wei Y, Jiang M (2019) Data-driven modeling of groundwater level with least-square support vector machine and spatial–temporal analysis. Geotech Geol Eng 37(3):1661–1670. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-018-0713-6
Tao H, Hameed MM, Marhoon HA, Zounemat-Kermani M, Salim H, Sungwon K, ... Yaseen ZM (2022) Groundwater level prediction using machine learning models: a comprehensive review. Neurocomputing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2022.03.014
Vaidhehi V (2014) The role of dataset in training ANFIS System for Course Advisor. Intl J Innov Res Adv Eng (IJIRAE) 1(6):249–253
Wang H, Hu D (2005) Comparison of SVM and LS-SVM for regression. In 2005 International conference on neural networks and brain (Vol. 1, pp. 279–283). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNNB.2005.1614615
Wen X, Feng Q, Deo RC, Wu M, Si J (2017) Wavelet analysis–artificial neural network conjunction models for multiscale monthly groundwater level predicting multiscale in land river basin, northwestern China. Hydrol Res 48(6):1710–1729. https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2016.396
Wu C, Zhang X, Wang W, Lu C, Zhang Y, Qin W … Shu L (2021) Groundwater level modeling framework by combining the wavelet transform with a long short-term memory data-driven model Sci Total Environ 783:146948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146948
Yaseen ZM, Sulaiman SO, Deo RC, Chau KW (2019) An enhanced extreme learning machine model for river flow forecasting: state-of-the-art, practical applications in water resource engineering area and future research direction. J Hydrol 569:387–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.11.069
Yin J, Medellín-Azuara J, Escriva-Bou A, Liu Z (2021) Bayesian machine learning ensemble approach to quantify model uncertainty in predicting groundwater storage change. Sci Total Environ 769:144715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144715
Yosefvand F, Shabanlou S (2020) Optimization of ANFIS model using wavelet transform for simulating groundwater level variations. J Appl Res Water Wastew 7(1):23–29. https://doi.org/10.22126/ARWW.2020.4150.1123
Yu H, Wen X, Feng Q, Deo RC, Si J, Wu M (2018) Comparative study of hybrid-wavelet artificial intelligence models for monthly groundwater depth forecasting in extreme arid regions, Northwest China. Water Resour Manag 32(1):301–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1811-6
Yu Z, Yang K, Luo Y, Shang C (2020) Spatial-temporal process simulation and prediction of chlorophyll-a concentration in Dianchi Lake based on wavelet analysis and long-short term memory network. J Hydrol 582:124488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124488
Zadeh LA (1995) Fuzzy sets. In Fuzzy sets, fuzzy logic, and fuzzy systems: selected papers by Lotfi A Zadeh (pp. 394–432)
Zare M, Koch M (2018) Groundwater level fluctuations simulation and prediction by ANFIS-and hybrid wavelet-ANFIS/fuzzy C-means (FCM) clustering models: application to the Miandarband plain. J Hydro Environ Res 18:63–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jher.2017.11.004
Zeinolabedini Rezaabad M, Ghazanfari S, Salajegheh M (2020) ANFIS modeling with ICA, BBO, TLBO, and IWO optimization algorithms and sensitivity analysis for predicting daily reference evapotranspiration. J Hydrol Eng 25(8):04020038. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001963
Zerouali B, Chettih M, Alwetaishi M, Abda Z, Elbeltagi A, Santos AG, C., & E. Hussein, E. (2021) Evaluation of Karst spring discharge response using time-scale-based methods for a Mediterranean Basin of Northern Algeria. Water 13(21):2946. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13212946
Zhang J, Zhang X, Niu J, Hu BX, Soltanian MR, Qiu H, Yang L (2019) Prediction of groundwater level in seashore reclaimed land using wavelet and artificial neural network-based hybrid model. J Hydrol 577:123948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.123948
Zhou F, Liu B, Duan K (2020) Coupling wavelet transform and artificial neural network for forecasting estuarine salinity. J Hydrol 588:125127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125127
Zhou T, Wang F, Yang Z (2017) Comparative analysis of ANN and SVM models combined with wavelet preprocess for groundwater depth prediction. Water 9(10):781. https://doi.org/10.3390/w9100781
Zhu S, Ptak M, Yaseen ZM, Dai J, Sivakumar B (2020) Forecasting surface water temperature in lakes: a comparison of approaches. J Hydrol 585:124809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124809
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
S. Samani and M. Vadiati analyzed and interpreted data and contributed to writing the manuscript. Z. Nejatijahromi and b. Etebari collected data and had contributed to drafting manuscript preparation. O. Kisi was involved in revising the manuscript critically for important intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Marcus Schulz
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Highlights
• Performance of machine learning models, ANN, ANFIS, GMDH, and LSSVM, was investigated in GWL prediction.
• ML models were compared with wavelet conjunction models.
• Wavelet transform noticeably enhances standalone ML models’ accuracy.
• ML’s performance was improved by using WT for 2 and 3 months ahead of GWL prediction.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Samani, S., Vadiati, M., Nejatijahromi, Z. et al. Groundwater level response identification by hybrid wavelet–machine learning conjunction models using meteorological data. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 22863–22884 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23686-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23686-2