Abstract
There is strong scientific evidence to suggest that carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions are one of the key drivers of global warming. Rising CO2 emissions across the globe have been traced back to increasing global trade and rapid industrial development powered by fossil fuels. High CO2 emissions have had an adverse effect on the quality of life and economic growth of communities across the globe. In this study, the Granger causality approach is used to examine scientifically some causal relationships between energy consumption, CO2 emissions, economic growth, and key macroeconomic variables (trade openness and foreign direct investment) in the panel of Financial Action Task Force (FATF) countries. FATF countries are signatories to agreements to adhere to good financial practices to ensure sustainable development of their economies. The empirical analysis was conducted for the period 1980 to 2020. Results indicate a strong endogenous relationship between the variables in the short and long run. The analysis suggests that careful co-curation of economic, trade, energy, foreign direct investment, and environmental management policies is needed to ensure sustainable economic development in the FATF countries. Global trade and foreign direct investment policies must foster new environmental-friendly industries and greater use of clean renewable energy among these countries.
Graphical abstract
Note: Arrows indicate direction of possible causal links between the variables.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and materials
This paper has no attachment to data and materials.
Notes
This is one of the most severe challenges faced throughout the world today. Consequently, the phenomenon is studied and analysed by academics, environmentalists, and policymakers. Climate change has been attributed to greenhouse gases, to which carbon emissions contribute significantly (see, for instance, Uzar 2020; Chien et al. 2021; Sun et al. 2021; Sun et al. 2022; Sohail et al. 2022; Wangzhou et al. 2022).
The FATF includes various jurisdictions and regional organisations (the Gulf Cooperation Council and the European Commission). The countries included in our analysis are Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, China, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hong Kong, Iceland, India, Ireland, Italy, Japan, the Republic of Korea, Luxembourg, Malaysia, Mexico, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Portugal, the Russian Federation, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, the UK, and the USA.
The use of more efficient technologies may be one reason that some studies do not find the inverted U-curve.
Rapid socio-economic development can increase the demand for energy, which in turn raises CO2 emissions (Yu et al. 2014).
The studies mentioned appear to indicate a strong positive nexus between energy consumption and CO2. Their results support the argument that cities with high energy consumption have higher carbon emissions (see, for example, Salahuddin and Gow, 2014). When cities have high carbon emissions, governments react by attempting to implement regulatory measures to discourage fuel consumption and reduce carbon emissions. One such measure is to impose strong restrictions on energy consumption. Such policies are implemented by various means, for example, by raising the price of fossil fuels (natural gas, coal, and oil), imposing tolls on private vehicles (particularly, through high tolls during business hours), encouraging public transport, and introducing alternates such as electrical vehicles. Governments may not impose restrictions on energy consumption or implement any of these policies if a country does not have unacceptably high carbon emissions. This then implies strong causality between energy consumption and emissions, leading to significant consequences for and actions in an economy.
Trade openness (OPE) refers to the ratio between imports and exports (exports + imports) over real GDP. This measure captures a country’s trade flows. There are some limitations to using this measure to capture trade openness, but the other measures proposed in the literature all display other disadvantages and weaknesses, such as data limitations and difficulties in expanding data series over a reasonable timespan (Gräbner et al. 2021). In other words, there is no consensus on the best measure to capture trade openness. Therefore, we selected the most commonly used measure in the literature, namely the abovementioned trade flow variable, as a proxy for trade openness, as our study requires a readily available data for a long time span.
The advantages of our chosen methodology are that it is designed to establish the long-run relationship and joint behaviour between these variables, and it takes care of the “endogeneity issue” between the variables analysed. The disadvantage of the technique is that it cannot capture possible non-linear relationships between the variables.
Granger causality results depend on the number of chosen lags. In common with many papers reporting on temporal causality investigations, we determined the number of lags optimally using the Akaike Information Criterion (see, for example, Auffhammer and Carson, 2008 for discussion).
The reported results follow the Arellano-Bond dynamic panel data estimation procedure, which we believe to be a valid procedure to identify energy consumption in the sample countries. Normal panel methods could pose a problem because of country-specific impacts in a sample comprising many different countries, such as our sample. We employ the twin specification tests developed by Arellano and Bond (1991). The first test is a Hansen J-statistic, which identifies conditions that test the validity of the instruments. The second test checks that the residuals are not serially correlated. It shows that GMM can be deployed either in a one-step or in a two-step process. A two-step process uses residuals derived from the first-step process to build a weighted variance–covariance (VC) matrix when homoscedasticity to the parameters is absent (Arellano and Bond, 1991). In this work, and in line with most papers in the academic literature, a two-step GMM estimator is used.
Institutional quality seems to play a considerable role in the use of natural resources and the sustainability of the environment (Abdala, 2008).
Information and communication technologies (ICT) infrastructure can help to identify advanced, more efficient ways to use energy. ICTs make it possible to find new channels to reduce environmental pollution and promote investment in new and cleaner technologies (Andlib and Khan, 2021).
Financial development (particularly banking and insurance activities) offers effective means to reduce carbon emissions from the environment to improve air quality in various economies (Tan et al. 2021).
Technology plays a crucial role in reducing emanations and to achieve energy conservation targets (Chien et al. 2021).
References
Abdala MA (2008) Governance of competitive transmission investment in weak institutional systems. Energy Econ 30(4):1306–1320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2007.12.009
Acheampong AO (2018) Economic growth, CO2 emissions and energy consumption: what causes what and where? Energy Econ 74(C):677–692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.07.022
Acheampong AO, Boateng E, Amponsah M, Dzator J (2021) Revisiting the economic growth–energy consumption nexus: does globalization matter? Energy Econ 102:105472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105472
Adom PK, Agradi M, Vezzulli A (2021) Energy efficiency-economic growth nexus: what is the role of income inequality? J Clean Prod 310:127382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127382
Agboola MO, Bekun FV, Joshua U (2021) Pathway to environmental sustainability: nexus between economic growth, energy consumption, CO2 emission, oil rent and total natural resources rent in Saudi Arabia. Resour Policy 74:102380
Aïssa MSB, Jebli MB, Youssef SB (2014) Output, renewable energy consumption and trade in Africa. Energy Policy 66:11–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.11.023
Akadiri SS, Alola AA, Olasehinde-Williams G, Etokakpan M (2020) The role of electricity consumption, globalization and economic growth in carbon dioxide emissions and its implications for environmental sustainability targets. Sci Tot Environ 708:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134653
Akin CS (2014) The impact of foreign trade, energy consumption and income on CO2 emissions. Int J Energy Econ Policy 4(3):465–475. https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep/article/view/861
Alola AA (2019a) Carbon emissions and the trilemma of trade policy, migration policy and health care in the US. Carbon Manag 10(2):209–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2019.1577180
Alola AA (2019b) The trilemma of trade, monetary and immigration policies in the United States: accounting for environmental sustainability. Sci Tot Environ 658:260–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.212
Andlib Z, Khan A (2021) The role of information and communication technologies (ICT) in environmental quality: an empirical analysis for South Asian economies. Int J Econ Environ Geol 12 (2):80–86. https://doi.org/10.46660/ijeeg.Vol12.Iss2.2021.591
Ang JB (2007) CO2 emissions, energy consumption and output in France. Energy Policy 35(10):4772–4778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.03.032
Antweiler W, Copeland BR, Taylor MS (2001) Is free trade good for the environment? Am Econ Rev 91(4):877–908. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.4.877
Apergis N, Payne JE (2012) Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption-growth nexus: evidence from a panel error correction model. Energy Econ 34(3):733–738
Apergis N, Payne JE (2014) Renewable energy, output, CO2 emissions, and fossil fuel prices in Central America: evidence from a nonlinear panel smooth transition vector error correction model. Energy Econ 42(C):226–232
Arellano M, Bond S (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence with an application for employment equation. Rev Econ Stud 58:277–297
Arvin MB, Pradhan RP, Norman NR (2015) Transportation intensity, urbanization, economic growth, and CO2 emissions in the G-20 countries. Util Policy 35(C):50–66
Arvin MB, Pradhan RP, Nair M (2021) Uncovering interlinks among ICT connectivity and penetration, trade openness, foreign direct investment, and economic growth: the case of the G-20 countries. Telematics Inform 60:1–25
Auffhammer M, Carson RT (2008) Forecasting the path of China’s CO2 emissions using province-level information. J Environ Econ Manag 55:229–247
Azam M, Khan AQ, Bakhtyar B, Emirullah C (2015) The causal relationship between energy consumption and economic growth in the ASEAN-5 countries. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 47(C):732–745
Baek J, Cho Y, Koo WW (2009) The environmental consequences of globalization: a country-specific time-series analysis. Ecol Econ 68(8–9):2255–2264
Bekun FV, Alola AA, Sarkodie SA (2019a) Toward a sustainable environment: nexus between CO2 emissions, resource rent, renewable and non-renewable energy in 16-EU countries. Sci Total Environ 657:1023–1029
Bekun FV, Emir F, Sarkodie SA (2019b) Another look at the relationship between energy consumption, carbon dioxide emissions, and economic growth in South Africa. Sci Total Environ 655:759–765
Boutabba MA, Diaw D, Lessoua A (2018) Environment-energy-growth nexus in Sub-Saharan Africa: the role of intermediate goods. International Economics 156:254–267
Cai Y, Sam CY, Chang T (2018) Nexus between clean energy consumption, economic growth and CO2 emissions. J Clean Prod 182:1001e1011
Callan T, Lyons S, Scott S, Tol RSJ, Verde S (2009) The distributional implications of a carbon tax in Ireland. Energy Policy 37(2):407–412
Carfora A, Pansini RV, Scandurra G (2019) The causal relationship between energy consumption, energy prices and economic growth in Asian developing countries: a replication. Energ Strat Rev 23:81–85
Chen L, Huang J, Ma Q, Hänninen H, Tremblay F, Yves B (2019) Long-term changes in the impacts of global warming on leaf phenology of four temperate tree species. Glob Change Biol 25(3):997–1004
Chien F, Ajaz T, Andlib Z, Chau KY, Ahmad P, Sharif A (2021) The role of technology innovation, renewable energy and globalization in reducing environmental degradation in Pakistan: a step towards sustainable environment. Renewable Energy 177:308–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.05.101
Chien FS, Hsu C, Andlib Z, Shah MI, Ajaz T, Genie MG (2022) The role of solar energy and eco-innovation in reducing environmental degradation in China: evidence from QARDL approach. Integr Environ Assess Manag 18(2):555–571. https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4500
Chow WW, Fung MK (2011) Financial development and growth: a clustering and causality analysis. J Int Trade Econ Dev 35(3):1–24
Cole MA (2006) Does trade liberalization increase national energy use? Econ Lett 92(1):108–112
Criado CO, Valente S, Stengos T (2011) Growth and pollution convergence: theory and evidence. J Environ Econ Manag 62:199–214
Dai A (2013) Increasing drought under global warming in observations and models. Nat Clim Chang 3(1):52–58
Darmstadter J, Dunkerley J, Alterman J (1979) How industrial societies use energy: a comparative analysis. John Hopkins University Press, Washington DC
De Sario M, Katsouyanni K, Michelozzi P (2013) Climate change, extreme weather, air pollution and respiratory health in Europe. Eur Respir J 42(3):826–843
Dinda S (2004) Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: a survey. Ecol Econ 49(4):431–455
Dögl C, Behnam M (2015) Environmentally sustainable development through stakeholder engagement in developed and emerging countries. Bus Strateg Environ 24(6):583–600. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1839
Doytch N, Uctum M (2016) Globalization and the environmental impact of sectoral FDI. Econ Syst 40(4):582–594
Edwards S (2017) Developed countries “exporting pollution” by trading second-hand vehicles to poorer countries, experts say’. Devex: International Development News 26
Ekwurzel B, Boneham J, Dalton MW, Heede R, Mera RJ, Allen MR, Frumhoff PC (2017) The rise in global atmospheric CO 2, surface temperature, and sea level from emissions traced to major carbon producers. Clim Change 144(4):579–590
El-Karimi M, El-Houjjaji H (2022) Economic growth and renewable energy consumption nexus in G7 countries: symmetric and asymmetric causality analysis in frequency domain. J Clean Prod 342:130618
European Commission (2019a) ‘Greenhouse gas emission statistics – carbon footprints.’ In: Eurostat, statistics explained. <https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Carbon_dioxide_emissions_from_final_use_of_products>
European Commission (2019b) ‘Renewable energy statistics.’ In: Eurostat: statistics explained. <https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Renewable_energy_statistics#Consumption_of_renewable_energy_more_than_doubled_between_2004_and_2017>
Findlay R (1978) Relative backwardness, direct foreign investment, and the transfer of technology: a simple dynamic model. Quart J Econ 92(1):1–16
Giles J, Williams CL (2000) Export-led growth: part 1. J Int Trade Econ Dev 9(3):261–337
GML (Global Monitoring Laboratory) (2021) https://gml.noaa.gov/aggi/aggi.html
Gräbner C, Heimberger P, Kapeller J, Springholz F (2021) Understanding economic openness: a review of existing measures. Rev World Econ 157:80–120
Gries T, Kraft M, Meierrieks D (2009) Linkages between financial deepening, trade openness, and economic development: causality evidence from sub-Saharan Africa. World Dev 37(12):1849–1860
Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1991) Environmental impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement. NBER Working Paper No. 3914 Cambridge MA
Halicioglu F (2009) An econometric study of CO2 emissions, energy consumption, income and foreign trade in Turkey. Energy Policy 37(3):1156–1164
Hao Y, Guo Y, Guo Y, Wu H, Ren S (2020) Does outward foreign direct investment (OFDI) affect the home country’s environmental quality? The case of China. Struct Chang Econ Dyn 52:109–119
Harbaugh WT, Levinson A, Wilson DM (2002) Reexamining the empirical evidence for an environmental Kuznets curve. Rev Econ Stat 84(3):541–551
Hossain MS (2011) Panel estimation for CO2 emissions, energy consumption, economic growth, trade openness and urbanization of newly industrialized countries. Energy Policy 39(11):6991–6999
Huchet-Bourdon M, Mouel CL, Vijil M (2018) The relationship between trade openness and economic growth: some new insights on the openness measurement issue. The World Economy 41:59–76
Huh K (2011) Steel consumption and economic growth in Korea: long-term and short-term evidence. Resour Policy 36(2):107–113
IEA (International Energy Agency) (2019a) Global energy and CO2 status report. (IEA). https://www.iea.org/geco/emissions/
IEA (International Energy Agency) (2019b) Global energy. International Energy Agency (IEA). https://www.iea.org/countries/Turkey/
İnal V, Addi HM, Çakmak EE, Torusdağ M, Çalışkan M (2022) The nexus between renewable energy, CO2 emissions, and economic growth: empirical evidence from African oil-producing countries. Energy Rep 8:1634–1643
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (1996) Climate change 1995: the science of climate change. Contribution of Working Group I to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), JT Houghton, LG Meira, Filho BA Callander, N Harris, A Kattenberg, K Maskell (eds) Cambridge CUP
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2006) IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories, (5 vols.). In: S Eggelston, L Buendia, K Miwa, T Ngara and K Tanabe (eds). Hyama, Japan: Institute of Global Environmental Strategies
Ito K (2017) CO2 emissions, renewable and non-renewable energy consumption, and economic growth. Int Econ 151:1–6
Jafari Y, Othman J, Nor AHSM (2012) Energy consumption, economic growth and environmental pollutants in Indonesia. J Policy Model 34(6):879–889
Jain M, Nagpal A (2019) Relationship between environmental sustainability and human development index: a case study of selected South Asian nations. Vision 23:125–133
Jena PR, Grote U (2008) Growth-trade-environment nexus in India. In: Proceedings of the German Development Economics Conference, Zurich 2008. Zurich: Ausschuss für Entwicklungsländer, Verein für Socialpolitik
Kais S, Ben Mbarek M (2017) Dynamic relationship between CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in three North African countries. Int J Sustain Energ 36(9):840–854
Kaya Y, Yokobori K (eds) (1997) Environment, energy, and economy: strategies for sustainability. United Nations University Press, Tokyo, pp 16–26
Khan MI, Teng JZ, Khan MK (2020) The impact of macroeconomic and financial development on carbon dioxide emissions in Pakistan: evidence with a novel dynamic simulated ARDL approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(31):39560–39571
Khan A, Chenggang Y, Hussain J, Bano S, Nawaz A (2021) Natural resources, tourism development, and energy-growth-CO2 emission nexus: a simultaneity modeling analysis of BRI countries. Resour Policy 68:101751
Khan MA, Rehan R, Chhapra IU, Bai A (2022) Inspecting energy consumption, capital formation and economic growth nexus in Pakistan. Sustain Energy Technol Assess 50:101845
Kraft J, Kraft A (1978) On the relationship between energy and GNP. J Energy Dev 3(2):401–403
Kugler P (1991) Growth, exports and cointegration: an empirical investigation. Rev World Econ 127(1):73–82
Le T, Quah E (2018) Income level and the emissions, energy, and growth nexus: evidence from Asia and the Pacific. Int Econ 156:193–205
Le T, Boubaker S, Nguyen CP (2021) The energy-growth nexus revisited: an analysis of different types of energy. J Environ Manage 297:113351
Li G, Zakari A, Tawiah V (2020a) Energy resource melioration and CO2 emissions in China and Nigeria: efficiency and trade perspectives. Resour Policy 68:101769
Li X, Ozturk I, Ullah S, Andlib Z, Hafeez M (2022) Can top-pollutant economies shift some burden through insurance sector development for sustainable development? Econ Anal Policy 74:326–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2022.02.006
Li Y, Wu H, Shen K, Hao Y, Zhang P (2020b) Is environmental pressure distributed equally in China? Empirical evidence from provincial and industrial panel data analysis. Sci Total Environ 718:1–15.
Lin B, Raza MY (2019) Analysis of energy related CO2 emissions in Pakistan. J Clean Prod 219:981–993
Macias J, Aguilar A, Schmid G, Francke E (2013) Policy handbook for the regulation of imported second-hand vehicles. Global Fuel Economy Initiative Working Paper 7 Mexico: CTSEMBARQ
Maddala GS, Wu S (1999) A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and a new simple test. Oxford Bull Econ Stat 61(S1):631–652
Managi S, Hibik A, Tsurumi T (2009) Does trade openness improve environmental quality? J Environ Econ Manag 58(3):346–363
Mardani A, Streimikiene D, Cavallaro F, Loganathan N, Khoshnoudi M (2019) Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and economic growth: a systematic review of two decades of research from 1995 to 2017. Sci Total Environ 649:31–49
Martinho VJPD (2016) Energy consumption across European Union farms: efficiency in terms of farming output and utilized agricultural area. Energy 103:543–556
McIntosh A, Pontius J (2017) Air quality and atmospheric science, science and the global environment: case studies integrating science global environment. Elsevier, Amsterdam
McMichael AJ, Powles JW, Butler CD, Uauy R (2006) Food, livestock production, energy, climate change, and health. Lancet 370:1253–1263
Menyah K, Nazlioglu S, Wolde-Rufael Y (2014) Financial development, trade openness and economic growth in African countries: new insights from a panel causality approach. Econ Model 37(2):386–394
Nair M, Arvin MB, Pradhan RP, Bahmani S (2021) Is higher economic growth possible through better institutional quality and a lower carbon footprint? Evidence from Developing Countries. Renewable Energy 167:132–145
Nakano S, Okamura A, Sakurai N, Suzuki M, Tojo Y, Yamano N (2009) The measurement of CO2 embodiments in international trade. OECD Science, Technology, and Industry Working Papers 2009/3:41 Paris: OECD
Narayan PK, Smyth R (2009) Multivariate Granger causality between electricity consumption, exports and GDP: evidence from a panel of Middle Eastern countries. Energy Policy 37(1):229–236
Nasreen S, Anwar S (2014) Causal relationship between trade openness, economic growth and energy consumption: a panel data analysis of Asian countries. Energy Policy 69(C):82–91
NBS (2018) Government strategies to decrease the production of carbon emissions, by Jodie Carson. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: National Building Specification (NBS)
NOAA (2019) Trends in atmospheric carbon dioxide. ESRL's Global Monitoring Laboratory (GML) of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), USA. https://gml.noaa.gov/ccgg/trends/global.html
Omri A, Nguyen DK, Rault C (2014) Causal interactions between CO2 emissions, FDI, and economic growth: evidence from dynamic simultaneous-equation models. Econ Model 42:382–389
Omri A, Daly S, Rault C, Chaibi A (2015) Financial development, environmental quality, trade and economic growth: what causes what in MENA countries. Energy Econ 48:242–252
Pao H, Chen C (2019) Decoupling strategies: CO2 emissions, energy resources, and economic growth in the Group of Twenty. J Clean Prod 206:907–919
Pesaran M (2007) A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. J Appl Economet 22(2):265–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.951
Pesaran M (2003) A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross section dependence, Cambridge Working Papers in Economics no 1, University of Cambridge
Pradhan RP, Arvin MB, Norman NR (2015) A quantitative assessment of the trade openness–economic growth nexus in India. Int J Commer Manag 25(3):267–293. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCoMA-08-2013-0075
Pradhan RP, Arvin MB, Hall JH, Nair M (2016) Trade openness, foreign direct investment, and finance-growth nexus in the Eurozone countries. J Int Trade Econ Dev 26(3):336–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2016.1249392
Pradhan RP, Arvin MB, Hall JH (2017a) The nexus between economic growth, stock market depth, trade openness, and foreign direct investment: the case of ASEAN countries. Singap Econ Rev 64(3):461–493. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217590817500175
Pradhan RP, Arvin MB, Hall JH, Bennett SE, Bahmani S (2017b) Financial depth and the trade openness-economic growth nexus: evidence from cross-country panel data. J Econ Adm Sci 33(1):20–45. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEAS-06-2016-0015
Pradhan RP, Arvin MB, Nair M, Bennett SE, Hall JH (2018) The dynamics between energy consumption patterns, financial sector development and economic growth in Financial Action Task Force (FATF) countries. Energy 159:42–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.06.094
Pradhan RP, Arvin MB, Nair M, Hall JH (2021) Public debt, economic openness, and sustainable economic growth in Europe: a dynamic panel causal analysis. J Econ Dev (forthcoming)
Putman WM, Ott L, Darmenov A, DaSilva A (2016) A global perspective of atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations. Parallel Comput 55:2–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parco.2016.03.001
Radmehr R, Henneberry SR, Shayanmehr S (2021) Renewable energy consumption, CO2 emissions, and economic growth nexus: a simultaneity spatial modeling analysis of EU countries. Struct Chang Econ Dyn 57:13–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2021.01.006
Roberts D, Nord S (1985) Causality test and functional form sensitivity. Appl Econ 17:135–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036848500000011
Rosenberg N (1998) The role of electricity in industrial development. Energy J 19:7–24. https://doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol19-No2-2
Sadorsky P (2011) Trade and energy consumption in the Middle East. Energy Econ 33(5):739–749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2010.12.012
Sadorsky P (2012) Information communication technology and electricity consumption in emerging economies. Energy Policy 48:130–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.064
Safdar S, Khan A, Andlib Z (2022) Impact of good governance and natural resource rent on economic and environmental sustainability: an empirical analysis for South Asian economies. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21401-9
Saidi S, Badri R, Hammami S (2017) The impact of transport and foreign direct investment on energy consumption: recent evidence from high, middle and low income countries. Int J Glob Energy Issues 40:294–319. https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ids:ijgeni:v:40:y:2017:i:5:p:294-319
Sakyi D, Villaverde J, Maza A (2014) Trade openness, income levels, and economic growth: the case of developing countries, 1970–2009. J Int Trade Econ Dev 23(8):1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2014.971422
Salahuddin M, Gow J (2014) Economic growth, energy consumption and CO2 emissions in Gulf Cooperation Council countries. Energy 73(C):44–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.05.054
Shabani ZD, Shahnazi R (2019) Energy consumption, carbon dioxide emissions, information and communications technology, and gross domestic product in Iranian economic sectors: a panel causality analysis. Energy 169:1064–1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.11.062
Shahbaz M, Khan S, Tahir MI (2013) The dynamic links between energy consumption, economic growth, financial development and trade in China: fresh evidence from multivariate framework analysis. Energy Econ 40(1):8–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2013.06.006
Śmiech S, Papież M (2014) Energy consumption and economic growth in the light of meeting the targets of energy policy in the EU: the bootstrap panel Granger causality approach. Energy Policy 71(C):118–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.04.005
Sohail MT, Majeed MT, Shaikh PA, Andlib Z (2022) Environmental costs of political instability in Pakistan: policy options for clean energy consumption and environment. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 29(17):25184–25193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17646-5
Stern DI (2000) A multivariate cointegration analysis of the role of energy in the US macroeconomy. Energy Econ 22:267–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-9883(99)00028-6
Stern N (2007) Impacts of climate change on growth and development. The economics of climate change: the Stern Review (Part II). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 63–64
Sun Y, Yesilada F, Andlib Z, Ajaz T (2021) The role of eco-innovation and globalization towards carbon neutrality in the USA. J Environ Manage 299:113568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113568
Sun Y, Li H, Andlib Z, Genie MG (2022) How do renewable energy and urbanization cause carbon emissions? Evidence from advanced panel estimation techniques. Renewable Energy 185:996–1005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.12.112
Tan Z, Koondhar MA, Nawaz K, Malik MN, Khan ZA, Koondhar MA (2021) Foreign direct investment, financial development, energy consumption, and air quality: a way for carbon neutrality in China. J Environ Manage 299(1 Dec):113572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113572
Tang CF, Tan BW (2014) The linkages among energy consumption, economic growth, relative price, foreign direct investment, and financial development in Malaysia. Qual Quant 48(2):781–797. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-012-9802-4
UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme) (2017) Renewable energy and energy efficiency in developing countries: contributions to reducing global emissions. https://www.unep.org/resources/report/renewable-energy-and-energy-efficiency-developing-countries-contributions-0
Uzar U (2020) Political economy of renewable energy: does institutional quality make a difference in renewable energy consumption? Renewable Energy 155:591–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.03.172
Wang SS, Zhou DQ, Zhou P, Wang QW (2011) CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in China: a panel data analysis. Energy Policy 39(9):4870–4875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.06.032
Wang SJ, Fang CL, Guan XL, Pang B, Ma H (2014) Urbanisation, energy consumption and carbon dioxide emissions in China: a panel data analysis of China’s provinces. Appl Energy 136:738–749
Wang S, Li Q, Fang C, Zhou C (2016) The relationship between economic growth, energy consumption, and CO2 emissions: empirical evidence from China. Sci Total Environ. 542(A):360–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.10.027
Wang JY (1990) Growth, technology transfer, and the long-run theory of international capital movements. J Int Econ 9 (3–4):255–271. https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:inecon:v:29:y:1990:i:3-4:p:255-271
Wangzhou K, Wen JJ, Wang Z, Wang H, Hao C, Andlib Z (2022) Revealing the nexus between tourism development and CO2 emissions in Asia: does asymmetry matter? Environ Sci Pollut Res Int (forthcoming).
World Economic Forum (2019) The global risks report. 14th ed. https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Global_Risks_Report_2019.pdf
Wu X, Chen G (2017) Energy use by Chinese economy: a systems cross-scale input-output analysis. Energy Policy 108:81–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.05.048
Wu H, Xu L, Ren S, Hao Y, Yan G (2020) How do energy consumption and environmental regulation affect carbon emissions in China? New evidence from a dynamic threshold panel model. Resour Policy 67:101678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101678
Yeh J, Liao C (2017) Impact of population and economic growth on carbon emissions in Taiwan using an analytic tool STIRPAT. Sustain Environ Res 27:41–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.serj.2016.10.001
Yu S, Wei YM, Wang K (2014) Provincial allocation of carbon emission reduction targets in China: an approach based on improved fuzzy cluster and Shapley value decomposition. Energy Policy 66:630–644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.11.025
Zhang X, Cheng X (2009) Energy consumption, carbon emissions, and economic growth in China. Ecol Econ 68:2706–2712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.05.011
Zhu L, Hao Y, Lu ZN, Wu H, Ran Q (2019) Do economic activities cause air pollution? Evidence from China’s major cities. Sust Cities Soc 49:101593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101593
Acknowledgements
Revisions in this paper have benefited from comments from three anonymous reviewers of this journal. The authors thank the reviewers for their helpful insights.
Credit author statement
Rudra Prakash Pradhan: conceptualization, writing—reviewing and editing.
Mak Arvin: conceptualization, writing—reviewing and editing.
Mahendhiran Sanggaran Nair: conceptualization, writing—reviewing and editing.
Sara Bennett: conceptualization, writing—reviewing and editing.
John Henry Hall: conceptualization, writing—reviewing and editing.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors have equal credit with reference to conceptualization and writing—reviewing and editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
We declare that authors have no conflict of interest with respect to funding source declaration, author agreement, and permission note.
Consent to participate
All authors give consent to this paper to participate for publication.
Consent to publish
All authors give consent to this paper to consider for publication.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Arshian Sharif
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix 1. Definition of variables
Table 5
Appendix 2. Flow chart of the analysis
To assist the reader, we present a flow chart of the analysis. Given our finding that the chosen variables are cointegrated, we follow the left-hand route towards the end of the flow chart, thus proceeding with a Vector Error-Correction Model (VECM) deployment in place of a Vector Autoregression (VAR) model analysis. Following the VECM analysis to establish causality, several other tests are performed, as discussed in the ‘Robustness and stability of results’ section.
Appendix 3. FMOLS and DOLS estimation results
Table 6
Appendix 4. Mixed effects generalised methods of moments (GMM) estimation results
Table 7
Appendix 5. Variance decomposition analysis (VDA) results
Appendix 6. Generalised impulse response functions (GIRFs) results
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Pradhan, R.P., Arvin, M., Nair, M.S. et al. Interface between energy consumption, CO2 emissions, economic growth, and macroeconomic openness in financial action task force countries through the lens of a causality approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 24256–24283 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23641-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23641-1
Keywords
- CO2 emissions
- Energy consumption
- Foreign direct investment
- Financial Action Task Force countries
- Openness to trade