Skip to main content
Log in

RETRACTED ARTICLE: Trade openness and CO2 emanations: a heterogeneous analysis on the developing eight (D8) countries

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This article was retracted on 14 March 2024

This article has been updated

Abstract

The focus of this exploration was to examine the linkage between trade openness and CO2 effusions in the developing eight (D8) countries. An unbalanced panel dataset spanning the period 1990 to 2016 was employed for the study’s analysis. From the results, the studied panel was heterogeneous and cross-sectionally correlated. Also, all the series gained stationarity after first difference and were materially cointegrated in the long run. The elastic effects of the input variables on the output variable were explored through the DCCEMG estimator, with the support of the AMG and the CCEMG estimators. From the results, trade openness increased CO2 emanations in the D8. Also, economic growth, energy consumption, and financial development promoted CO2 secretions in the nations; however, foreign direct investments mitigated the excretion of CO2 in the countries. On the causal connections amid the series, there was a bidirectional causality between trade openness and CO2 emanations. Also, a one-way causal movement from energy consumption, foreign direct investments, and financial development to CO2 effluents was discovered. Based on the findings, it was recommended among others that effective trade policies that could enhance the transfer of cleaner technologies to the countries should be formulated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Change history

Abbreviations

TO:

Trade openness

GDP:

Economic growth

EC:

Energy consumption

FDI:

Foreign direct investments

FD:

Financial development

CO2 emissions:

Carbon emissions

D8:

Developing eight

DCCEMG:

Dynamic common correlated effects mean group

AMG:

Augmented mean group

CCEMG:

Common correlated effects mean

CD:

Cross-sectional dependence

XADF:

Cross-sectionally augmented Dickey-Fuller

CIPS:

Cross-sectional Im, Pesaran and Shin

GMM:

Generalized method of moment

TSLS:

Two-staged least squares

NICs:

Newly industrialized countries

EU:

European Union

SSA:

Sub-Saharan Africa

UAE:

United Arab Emirates

VIF:

Variance inflation factor

RMSE:

Root mean square error

CIS:

Commonwealth of Independent States

References

  • Adamu TM, Haq I, Shafiq M (2019) Analyzing the impact of energy, export variety, and FDI on environmental degradation in the context of environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: a case study of India. Energies 12:1076. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12061076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Afawubo K, Nguedam NC (2016) Are urbanization, industrialization and CO2 emissions cointegrated. In 65th Annual meeting of the French Association

  • Ahmad M, Khattak SI, Khan A, Rahman ZU (2020) Innovation, foreign direct investment (FDI), and the energy–pollution–growth nexus in OECD region: a simultaneous equation modeling approach. Environ Ecol Stat 27:203–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-020-00442-8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Akin CS (2014) The impact of foreign trade, energy consumption and income on CO2 emissions. Int J Energy Econ Policy 4:465–475

    Google Scholar 

  • Al Mamun M, Sohag K, Mia MAH, Uddin GS, Ozturk I (2014) Regional differences in the dynamic linkage between CO2 emissions, sectoral output and economic growth. Renew Sust Energ Rev 38:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alotaibi AR, Mishra AV (2014) Determinants of international financial integration of GCC markets. Emerg Markets Glob Econ 749–771. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-411549-1.00031-4

  • Ameer A, Munir K (2016) Effect of economic growth, trade openness, urbanization, and technology on environment of selected Asian countries. MPRA Paper 74571, University Library of Munich, Germany

  • Andrew A, Yusheng K, Twum AK, Ayamba EC, Kongkuah M, Musah M (2021) Trend and relationship between environmental accounting disclosure and environmental performance for mining companies listed in China. Environ Dev Sustain. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-01164-4

  • Ansari MA, Khan NA, Ganaie AA (2019) Does foreign direct investment impede environmental quality in Asian countries? A panel data analysis. OPEC Energ Rev 43:109–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ansari MA, Haider S, Khan NA (2020) Does trade openness affects global carbon dioxide emissions evidence from the top CO2 emitters. Manage Environ Quality: Int J 31(1):32–53. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-12-2018-0205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antonakakisa N, Chatziantoniou I, Filis G (2017) Energy consumption, CO2 emissions, and economic growth: an ethical dilemma. Renew Sust Energ Rev 68:808–824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Appiah M, Li F, Korankye B (2021) Modelling the linkages among CO2 emissions, energy consumption and industrialization in Sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12412-z

  • Asane-Otoo E (2015) Carbon footprint and emission determinants in Africa. Energy 82:426–435

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Asumadu-Sarkodie S, Owusu PA (2017) A multivariate analysis of carbon dioxide emissions, electricity consumption, economic growth, financial development, industrialization, and urbanization in Senegal. Energy Sources, Part B: Econ Plan Policy 12(1):77–84

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ayeche MB, Barhoumi M, Hammas MA (2016) Causal linkage between economic growth, financial development, trade openness and CO2 emissions in European countries. Am J Environ Eng 6(4):110–122. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.ajee.20160604.02

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balsalobre-Lorente D, Gokmenoglu KK, Taspinar N, Cantos-Cantos JM (2019) An approach to the pollution haven and pollution halo hypotheses in MINT countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(22):23010–23026. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05446-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bombardini M, Li B (2016) Trade, pollution and mortality in China (NBER Working Papers No. w22804). National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

  • Boutabba MA (2014) The impact of financial development, income, energy and trade on carbon emissions: Evidence from the Indian economy. Econ Model 40:33–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breusch T, Pagan AR (1980) The Lagrange multiplier test and its application to model specifications in econometrics. Rev Econ Stud 47:239–253

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Cetin MA, Bakirtas I (2020) The long-run environmental impacts of economic growth, financial development, and energy consumption: evidence from emerging markets. Energy Environ 31:634–655. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305X19882373

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cetin M, Ecevit E, Yucel AG (2018) The impact of economic growth, energy consumption, trade openness, and financial development on carbon emissions: empirical evidence from Turkey. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:36589–36603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3526-5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Charfeddine L, Ben Khediri K (2016) Financial development and environmental quality in UAE: cointegration with structural breaks. Renew Sust Energ Rev 55:1322–1335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Wang Z, Zhong Z (2019) CO2 emissions, economic growth, renewable and non-renewable energy production and foreign trade in China. Renew Energy 131:208–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.07.047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chudik A, Pesaran MH (2015) Common correlated effects estimation of heterogeneous dynamic panel data models with weakly exogenous regressors. J Econ 188(2):393–420

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke KA (2005) The phantom menace: omitted variable bias in econometric research. Confl Manag Peace Sci 22(4):341–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/07388940500339183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dedeoğlu M, Koçak E, Uucak ZŞ (2021) The impact of immigration on human capital and carbon dioxide emissions in the USA: an empirical investigation. Air Qual Atmos Health. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-020-00973-w

  • Demena BA, Afesorgbor SK (2020) The effect of FDI on environmental emissions: evidence from a meta-analysis. Energy Policy 138:111192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhrifi A, Jaziri R, Alnahdi S (2020) Does foreign direct investment and environmental degradation matter for poverty? Evidence from developing countries. Struct Chang Econ Dyn 52:13–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2019.09.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dogan E, Turkekul B (2016) CO2 emissions, real output, energy consumption, trade, urbanization and financial development: testing the EKC hypothesis for USA. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23(2):1203–1213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dumitrescu EI, Hurlin C (2012) Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Econ Model 29:1450–1460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erdogan S, Yıldırım S, Yıldırım DÇ, Gedikli A (2020) The effects of innovation on sectoral carbon emissions: evidence from G20 countries. J Environ Manag 267:110637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110637

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eyuboglu K, Uzar U (2020) Examining the roles of renewable energy consumption and agriculture CO2 emission in lucky-seven countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:45031–45040. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10374-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gokmenoglu KK, Sadeghieh M (2019) Financial development, CO2 emissions, fossil fuel consumption and economic growth: the case of Turkey. Strat Plan Energ Environ 38(4):7–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gronewold N (2011) Chicago climate exchange closes nation’s first cap-and-trade system but keeps eye to the future. New York Times: E&E Publishing

  • Grossman GM Krueger AB (1991) Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement (No. w3914). National Bureau of Economic Research

  • Hasan H, Masoumeh P, Shiva K (2016) Investigating the relationship among economic growth, environmental pollution, financial development, and trade openness in 8 large Muslim countries. J Environ Stud 42(3):649–667

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho S-Y, Iyke BN (2019) Trade openness and carbon emissions: evidence from Central and Eastern European countries. Rev Econ 70(1):41–67. https://doi.org/10.1515/roe-2018-0001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang Y, Chen X, Zhu H, Huang C, Tian Z (2019) The heterogeneous effects of FDI and foreign trade on CO2 emissions: evidence from China. Math Probl Eng 2019:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9612492

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jamel L, Maktouf S (2017) The nexus between economic growth, financial development, trade openness, and CO2 emissions in European countries. Cogent Econ Fin 5:1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2017.1341456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jebli MB, Youssef SB, Ozturk I (2016) Testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: the role of renewable and nonrenewable energy consumption and trade in OECD countries. Ecol Indic 60:824–831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karasoy A, Akçay S (2019) Effects of renewable energy consumption and trade on environmental pollution: the Turkish case. Manag Environ Qual: Int J 30:437–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li K, Musah M, Kong Y, Mensah IA, Antwi SK, Bawuah J, Donkor M, Coffie CPK, Andrew OA (2020a) Liquidity and firms’ financial performance nexus: panel evidence from non-financial firms listed on the Ghana Stock Exchange. SAGE Open 10(3):215824402095036. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020950363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li K, Hu E, Xu C, Musah M, Yusheng K, Mensah IA, Zu J, Jiang W, Su Y (2020b) A heterogeneous analysis of the nexus between energy consumption, economic growth and carbon emissions: evidence from the group of twenty (G20) countries. Energy Explor Exploit:014459872098019. https://doi.org/10.1177/0144598720980198

  • Liverman DM (2008) Conventions of climate change: constructions of danger and the dispossession of the atmosphere. J Hist Geogr 35(2):279–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhg.2008.08.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmooda H, Alkhateeba TTY, Al-Qahtanic MMZ, Allama Z, Ahmadd N, Furqane M (2020) Energy consumption, economic growth and pollution in Saudi Arabia. Manag Sci Lett 10(5):979–984. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2019.11.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mensah IA, Sun M, Gao C, Omari-Sasu AY, Zhu D, Ampimah BC, Quarcoo A (2019) Analysis on the nexus of economic growth, fossil fuel energy consumption, CO2 emissions and oil price in Africa based on a PMG panel ARDL approach. J Clean Prod 228:161–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2019.04.281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mensah IA, Sun M, Gao C, Omari-Sasu AY, Sun H, Ampimah BC, QuarcooA (2020) Investigation on key contributors of energy consumption in dynamic heterogeneous panel data (DHPD) model for African countries: fresh evidence from dynamic common correlated effect (DCCE) approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:38674–38694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09880-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minh NN (2020) Foreign direct investment and carbon dioxide emissions: evidence from capital of Vietnam. Int J Energy Econ Policy 10(3):76–83. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.9023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirza FM, Kanwal A (2017) Energy consumption, carbon emissions and economic growth in Pakistan: dynamic causality analysis. Renew Sust Energ Rev 72:1233–1240

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moghadam HE, Dehbashi V (2018) The impact of financial development and trade on environmental quality in Iran. Empir Econ 54(4):1777–1799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musah M, Kong Y, Mensah IA, Stephen KA, Mary D (2020a) The link between carbon emissions, renewable energy consumption, and economic growth: a heterogeneous panel evidence from West Africa. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:28867–28889. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08488-8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Musah M, Kong Y, Xuan VV (2020b) Predictors of carbon emissions: an empirical evidence from NAFTA countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:11205–11223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11197-x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Musah M, Kong Y, Mensah IA, Antwi SK, Donkor M (2020c) The connection between urbanization and carbon emissions: a panel evidence from West Africa. Environ Dev Sustain. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-01124-y

  • Musah M, Kong Y, Mensah IA, Antwi SK, Osei AA, Donkor M (2021) Modelling the connection between energy consumption and carbon emissions in North Africa: evidence from panel models robust to cross-sectional dependence and slope heterogeneity. Environ Dev Sustain. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01294-3

  • Mutascu M (2018) A time-frequency analysis of trade openness and CO2 emissions in France. Energy Policy 115:443–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.01.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mutascu M, Sokic A (2020) Trade openness-CO2 emissions nexus: a wavelet evidence from EU. Environ Model Assess 25:411–428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-020-09689-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nosheen M, Iqbal J, Hassan SA (2019) Economic growth, financial development, and trade in nexuses of CO2 emissions for Southeast Asia. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(36):36274–36286

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ozturk I, Acaravci A (2013) The long-run and causal analysis of energy, growth, openness and financial development on carbon emissions in Turkey. Energy Econ 36:262–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozturk I, Al-Mulali U (2015) Investigating the validity of the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Cambodia. Ecol Indic 57:324–330

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran MH (2004) General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. Cambridge Work Pap in Econ 0435 3:1–39

  • Pesaran H, Smith R (1995) Estimating long-run relationships from dynamic heterogeneous panels. J Econ 68(1):79–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01644-F

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran MH, Yamaga T (2008) Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. J Econ 142:50–93

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Phale K, Li F, Adjei Mensah I, Omari-Sasu AY, Musah M (2021) Knowledge-based economy capacity building for developing countries: a panel analysis in southern African development community. Sustainability 13:2890. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman ZU, Cai H, Khattak SI, Hasan MM (2019) Energy production-income-carbon emissions nexus in the perspective of N.A.F.T.A. and B.R.I.C. nations: a dynamic panel data approach. Econ Res-Ekonomska Istraživanja 32:3378–3391. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2019.1660201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salahuddin M, Alam K, Ozturk I, Sohag K (2018) The effects of electricity consumption, economic growth, financial development and foreign direct investment on CO2 emissions in Kuwait. Renew Sust Energ Rev 81:2002–2010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salehnia N, Alavijeh NK, Salehnia N (2020) Testing Porter and pollution haven hypothesis via economic variables and CO2 emissions: a cross-country review with panel quantile regression method. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:31527–31542. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09302-1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkodie SA, Strezov V (2019) Effect of foreign direct investments, economic development and energy consumption on greenhouse gas emissions in developing countries. Sci Total Environ 646:862–871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.365

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saud S, Chen S, Haseeb A, Khan K, Imran M (2019) The nexus between financial development, income level, and environment in Central and Eastern European countries: A perspective on Belt and Road Initiative. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:16053–16075. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05004-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seetanah B, Fauzel S (2019) Investigating the impact of climate change on the tourism sector: evidence from a sample of island economies. Tourism Rev 74(2), 194-203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaz M, Hye QMA, Tiwari AK, Leitão NC (2013) Economic growth, energy consumption, financial development, international trade and CO2 emissions in Indonesia. Renew Sust Energ Rev 25:109–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaz M, Nasreen S, Ahmed K, Hammoudeh S (2016) Trade openness–carbon emissions nexus: the importance of turning points of trade openness for country panels. Energy Econ 61:221–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2016.11.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaz M, Raghutla C, Song M, Zameer H, Jiao Z (2020) Public-private partnerships investment in energy as new determinant of CO2 emissions: the role of technological innovations in China. Energy Econ 86(104664):104664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahzad SJH, Kumar RR, Zakaria M, Hurr M (2017) Carbon emission, energy consumption, trade openness and financial development in Pakistan: a revisit. Renew Sust Energ Rev 70:185–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma SS (2011) Determinants of carbon dioxide emissions: empirical evidence from 69 countries. Appl Energy 88:376–382

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shoaib HM, Rafique MZ, Nadeem AM, Huang S (2020) Impact of financial development on CO2 emissions: a comparative analysis of developing countries (D8) and developed countries (G8). Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(11):12461–12475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06680-z

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Solarin AA, Al-Mulali U (2018) Influence of foreign direct investment on indicators of environmental degradation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:24845–24859. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2562-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ssali MW, Du J, Mensah IA, Hongo DO (2019) Investigating the nexus among environmental pollution, economic growth, energy use, and foreign direct investment in 6 selected sub-Saharan African countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(11):11245–11260

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sun J, Shi J, Shen B, Li S, Wang Y (2018) Nexus among energy consumption, economic growth, urbanization and carbon emissions: heterogeneous panel evidence considering China’s regional differences. Sustainability 10:2383. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072383

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sun H, Clottey SA, Geng Y, Fang K, Amissah JCK (2019) Trade openness and carbon emissions: evidence from Belt and Road countries. Sustainability 11:2682. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun H, Enna L, Monney A, Tran DK, Rasoulinezhad E, Taghizadeh-Hesary F (2020) The long-run effects of trade openness on carbon emissions in sub-Saharan African countries. Energies 13:5295. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13205295

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sun D, Addae EA, Jemmali H, Mensah IA, Musah M, Claudia NM, Appiah-Twum F (2021) Examining the determinants of water resources availability in sub-Sahara Africa: a panel-based econometrics analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-12256-z

  • To AH, Ha DT-T, Nguyen HM, Vo DH (2019) The impact of foreign direct investment on environment degradation: evidence from emerging markets in Asia. Int J Environ Res Public Health 16:1636. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16091636

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Udemba EN, Agha CO (2020) Abatement of pollutant emissions in Nigeria: a task before multinational corporations. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:26714–26724. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08908-9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ullah I, Ali S, Shah MH, Yasim F, Rehman A, Al-Ghazali BM (2019) Linkages between trade, CO2 emissions and healthcare spending in China. Int J Environ Res Public Health 16:4298. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16214298

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Zhao T (2015) Impacts of energy-related CO2 emissions: evidence from under developed, developing and highly developed regions in China. Ecol Indic 50:186–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westerlund J, Edgerton DL (2007) A panel bootstrap cointegration test. Econ Lett 97:185–190

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • World Development Indicators (2020). https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators

  • Yang B, Ali M, Hashmi SH, Shabir M (2020) Income inequality and CO2 emissions in developing countries: the moderating role of financial instability. Sustainability 12(17):6810. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12176810

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yu C, Nataliia D, Yoo S-J, Hwang Y-S (2019) Does trade openness convey a positive impact for the environmental quality? Evidence from a panel of CIS countries. Eurasian Geogr Econ 60(3):333–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/15387216.2019.1670087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuxiang K, Chen Z (2011) Resource abundance and financial development: Evidence from China. Resour Pol 36(1):72–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2010.05.002

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zafar MW, Mirza FM, Zaidi SAH, Hou F (2019) The nexus of renewable and nonrenewable energy consumption, trade openness, and CO2 emissions in the framework of EKC: evidence from emerging economies. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/sl1356-019-Q4912-w

  •  Zaidi SAH, Danish, Hou F,  Mirza FM (2019) The role of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption in CO2 emissions: a disaggregate analysis of Pakistan. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 25 (31):31616-31629

  • Zhang S (2018) Is trade openness good for environment in South Korea? The role of non-fossil electricity consumption. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:9510–9522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang S, Liu X, Bae J (2017) Does trade openness affect CO2 emissions: evidence from ten newly industrialized countries? Environ Sci Pollut Res 24(21):17616–17625

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by the Nature Fund 2020 (Project Approval Number: 71973054).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MM conceptualized and wrote the final manuscript. YK supervised the study. IAM analyzed the data and aided in discussions. KL aided in analysis and discussions. XVV helped in analysis and discussions. JB contributed data and helped in analysis and discussions. JKA aided in drafting the original manuscript. SKA helped in analysis and discussions. MD contributed data and helped in analysis and discussions. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammed Musah.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Nicholas Apergis

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article has been retracted. Please see the retraction notice for more detail: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-32895-w"

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Musah, M., Kong, Y., Mensah, I.A. et al. RETRACTED ARTICLE: Trade openness and CO2 emanations: a heterogeneous analysis on the developing eight (D8) countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 44200–44215 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13816-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13816-7

Keywords

Navigation