Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Performance comparison of solar still with inbuilt condenser and agitator over conventional solar still with energy and exergy analysis

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Demand for fresh water increases day by day. Solar desalination is one of the promising technologies to meet this demand in an economical fashion which uses solar still. For the current study, single-basin single-slope conventional solar still and a modified single-basin single-slope solar still with inbuilt condenser and agitator were designed and fabricated. Both the stills were tested under the same ambient conditions to compare the performance. Through experimental results, it was found that modified still with inbuilt condenser and agitator had 98.69% more productivity than conventional solar still. Modified still productivity was recorded as 4.856 L/m2/day and that of conventional still was 2.44 L/m2/day. The agitation effect caused by the agitator in the modified still led to an increase in the rate of evaporation. The increase in condensing area for the same evaporation area of the modified still improved the condensation rate. These two synergized effects resulted in an overall performance improvement of the modified still over the conventional still. An energy analysis revealed that modified still is 24.42% more efficient than its counterpart. The energy efficiency of modified and conventional stills was calculated as 4.82% and 2.04% respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

m w :

Hourly distillate yield (kg)

τg :

Transmittance of the glass cover

τw :

Transmittance of the saline water

αb :

Absorptivity of the basin

αw :

Absorptivity of saline water

αg :

Absorptivity of glass cover

Ta :

Ambient Temperature (K)

Ts :

Temperature of Sun (K)

Tb :

Basin Temperature (K)

Tg :

Glass Cover Temperature (K)

It :

Solar Intensity (W/m2)

hw :

Convective heat transfer coefficient between basin and saline water (W/m2 K)

hb :

Convective heat transfer coefficient between basin and atmosphere (W/m2 K)

he,w-g :

Evaporative heat transfer coefficient between water and inner glass cover (W/m2 K)

hc,w-g :

Convective heat transfer coefficient between water and inner glass cover (W/m2 K)

hr,w-g :

Radiative heat transfer coefficient between water and inner glass cover (W/m2 K)

hc,g-a :

Convective heat transfer coefficient between glass cover and atmosphere (W/m2 K)

hr,g-a :

Radiative heat transfer coefficient between glass cover and atmosphere (W/m2 K)

References

  • Abdullah AS, Essa FA, Omara ZM, Rashid Y, Hadj-Taieb L, Abdelaziz GB, Kabeel AE (2019) Rotating-drum solar still with enhanced evaporation and condensation techniques: Comprehensive study. Energ Convers Manage 199:112024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akkala SR, Kaviti AK (2022) Advanced design techniques in passive and active tubular solar stills: A review. Environ Sci Polut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20664-6

  • Amiri H, Aminy M, Lotfi M, Jafarbeglo B (2021) Energy and exergy analysis of a new solar still composed of parabolic trough collector with built-in solar still. Renew Energy 163:465–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Attia MEH, Driss Z, Kabeel AE et al (2021a) Phosphate bags as energy storage materials for enhancement of solar still performance. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:21540–21552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-12018-x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Attia MEH, Kabeel AE, Bellila A et al (2021b) A comparative energy and exergy efficiency study of hemispherical and single-slope solar stills. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:35649–35659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13161-9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Balachandran GB, David PW, Alexander AB et al (2021a) A relative study on energy and exergy analysis between conventional single slope and novel stepped absorbable plate solar stills. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:57602–57618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14640-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balachandran GB, David PW, Radhakrishnan V et al (2021b) Investigation on the performance enhancement of single-slope solar still using green fibre insulation derived from Artocarpus heterophyllus rags reinforced with Azadirachta indica gum. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:32879–32890. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13062-x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bhargva M, Yadav A (2021) Factors affecting the performance of a solar still and productivity enhancement methods: a review. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:54383–54402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhivagar R, Mohanraj M, Deepanraj B et al (2021) Assessment of single slope solar still using block and disc magnets via productivity, economic and enviro-economic perspectives: A comparative study. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15565-z

  • Diab MR, Essa FA, Abou-Taleb FS, Omara ZM (2021) Solar still with rotating parts: a review. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:54260–54281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubey M, Mishra DR (2021) Experimental analysis of double slope solar still augmented with dye, pebbles and metal chips. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:22077–22090. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11869-8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dumka P, Jain A, Mishra DR (2020) Energy, exergy and economic analysis of single slope conventional solar still augmented with an ultrasonic fogger and a cotton cloth. J Energy Storage 30:101541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dumka P, Mishra DR (2018) Energy and exergy analysis of conventional and modified solar still integrated with sand bed earth: study of heat and mass transfer. Desalination 437:15–25

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • El-Samadony YAF, Kabeel AE (2014) Theoretical estimation of the optimum glass cover water film cooling parameters combinations of a stepped solar still. Energy 68:744–750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Essa FA, Abdullah AS, Omara ZM (2020) Rotating discs solar still: New mechanism of desalination. J Clean Prod 275:123200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gnanaraj SJP, Ramachandran S (2022) Identification of operational parameter levels that optimize the production in solar stills with plain, corrugated, and compartmental basin. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:7096–7116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iqbal A, Mahmoud MS, Sayed ET, Elsaid K, Abdelkareem MA, Alawadhi H, Olabi AG (2021) Evaluation of the nanofluid-assisted desalination through solar stills in the last decade. J Environ Manag 277:111415

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jobrane M, Kopmeier A, Kahn A, Cauchie H-M, Kharroubi A, Penny C (2021) Internal and external improvements of wick type solar stills in different configurations for drinking water production—a review. Groundwater for Sustainable Development 100519

  • Kabeel AE, Abdelaziz GB, El-Said EMS (2019) Experimental investigation of a solar still with composite material heat storage: Energy, exergy and economic analysis. J Clean Prod 231:21–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kabeel AE, Abdelgaied M (2017) Observational study of modified solar still coupled with oil serpentine loop from cylindrical parabolic concentrator and phase changing material under basin. Sol Energy 144:71–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2017.01.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar RA, Esakkimuthu G, Murugavel KK (2016) Performance enhancement of a single basin single slope solar still using agitation effect and external condenser. Desalination 399:198–202

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Manokar AM, Murugavel KM, Esakkimuthu G (2014) Different parameters affecting the rate of evaporation and condensation on passive solar still—a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 38:309–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mevada D, Panchal H, Ahmadein M, et al., (2021) Investigation and performance analysis of solar still with energy storage materials: an energy-exergy efficiency analysis. Case Studies in Therm Eng 101687

  • Mohiuddin SA, Kaviti AK, Rao TS, Sikarwar VS (2022) Historic review and recent progress in internal design modification in solar stills. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19527-x

  • Mohsenzadeh M, Aye L, Christopher P (2021) A review on various designs for performance improvement of passive solar stills for remote areas. Sol Energy 228:594–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muftah AF, Alghoul MA, Fudholi A, Abdul-Majeed M, Sopian K (2014) Factors affecting basin type solar still productivity: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 32:430–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Natarajan SK, Suraparaju SK, Elavarasan RM et al (2021) An experimental study on eco-friendly and cost-effective natural materials for productivity enhancement of single slope solar still. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15764-8

  • Nayi KH, Modi KV (2018) Pyramid solar still: a comprehensive review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 81:136–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Omara ZM, Abdullah AS, Dakrory T (2017) Improving the productivity of solar still by using water fan and wind turbine. Sol Energy 147:181–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patel SK, Modi KV (2020) Techniques to improve the performance of enhanced condensation area solar still: A critical review. J Clean Prod 268:122260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prakash P, Velmurugan V (2015) Parameters influencing the productivity of solar stills—a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 49:585–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabhi K, Nciri R, Nasri F, Ali C, Bacha HB (2017) Experimental performance analysis of a modified single-basin single-slope solar still with pin fins absorber and condenser. Desalination 416:86–93

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rafeek MTM, Muthu V, Athikesavan MM, Sathymurthy R, Kabeel AE (2022) Experimental investigation of an active inclined solar panel absorber solar still—energy and exergy analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:14005–14018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sathyamurthy R, El-Agouz SA, Dharmaraj V (2015) Experimental analysis of a portable solar still with evaporation and condensation chambers. Desalination 367:180–185

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sharshir SW, Eltawil MA, Algazzar AM, Sathyamurthy R, Kandeal AW (2020) Performance enhancement of stepped double slope solar still by using nanoparticles and linen wicks: Energy, exergy and economic analysis. Appl Therm Eng 174:115278

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sharshir SW, Peng G, Elsheikh AH, Edreis EMA, Eltawil MA, Abdelhamid T, Kabeel AE, Zang J, Yang N (2018) Energy and exergy analysis of solar stills with micro/nano particles: a comparative study. Energ Convers Manage 177:363–375

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sharshir SW, Yang N, Peng G, Kabeel AE (2016) Factors affecting solar stills productivity and improvement techniques: a detailed review. Appl Therm Eng 100:267–284

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shinde M, Navthar R, Shinde SM (2020) Review on the types of solar stills. Int J Ambient Energy 0:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/01430750.2019.1707114

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shoeibi S, Rahbar N, Esfahlani AA, Kargarsharifabad H (2021) A review of techniques for simultaneous enhancement of evaporation and condensation rates in solar stills. Sol Energy 225:666–693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh SK, Kaushik SC, Tyagi VV, Tyagi SK (2021) Comparative performance and parametric study of solar still: a review. Sustain Energy Technol Assess 47:101541

    Google Scholar 

  • Suraparaju SK, Dhanusuraman R, Natarajan SK (2021a) Performance evaluation of single slope solar still with novel pond fibres. Process Saf Environ Prot 154:142–154

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Suraparaju SK, Natarajan SK (2020) Performance analysis of single slope solar desalination setup with natural fiber. Desalin Water Treat 193:64–71

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Suraparaju SK, Natarajan SK (2021a) Experimental investigation of single-basin solar still using solid staggered fins inserted in paraffin wax PCM bed for enhancing productivity. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28: 20330–20343En

  • Suraparaju SK, Natarajan SK (2021b) Augmentation of freshwater productivity in single slope solar still using Luffa acutangula fibres. Water Sci Technol 84(10-11):2943–2957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suraparaju SK, Natarajan SK (2021c) Productivity enhancement of single-slope solar still with novel bottom finned absorber basin inserted in phase change material (PCM): techno-economic and enviro-economic analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:45985–46006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suraparaju SK, Ramasamy D, Natarajan SK (2021b) Augmentation of freshwater productivity in a single slope solar still using ball marbles. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15117-5

  • Suraparaju SK, Sampathkumar A, Natarjan SK (2021c) Experimental and economic analysis of energy storage-based single-slope solar still with hollow-finned absorber basin. Heat Transfer 1 – 22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/htj.22136

  • Toosi SSA, Goshayeshi HR, Heris SZ (2021) Experimental investigation of stepped solar still with phase change material and external condenser. J Energy Storage 40:102681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaithilingam S, Muthu V, Athikesavan MM, Afsal A, Sathyamurthy R (2022) Energy and exergy analysis of conventional acrylic solar still with and without copper fins. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16124-2

  • Younis M, Habchi C, Ahmad MN, Ghali K (2020) Optimization of the performance of a solar still assisted by a rotating drum with a rough surface. Sol Energy 211:847–865

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yousef MS, Hassan H, Ahmed M, Ookawara S (2017) Energy and exergy analysis of single slope passive solar still under Egyptian climate conditions. Enrgy Proced 141:18–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Not applicable. The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Arun Kumar carried out the experimentation for evaluating the performance of the system and prepared the first draft of the manuscript. Kalidasa Murugavel contributed to the designing of system and experimentation and reviewed and prepared the final draft of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kalidasa Murugavel Kulandaivelu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rajasekaran, A.K., Murugavel Kulandaivelu, K. Performance comparison of solar still with inbuilt condenser and agitator over conventional solar still with energy and exergy analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 83378–83388 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21466-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21466-6

Keywords

Navigation