Abstract
Climate change has generated intense concerns from public authorities and international institutions with regard to shaping the behavior of companies, consumers, investors, and other stakeholders so as to manage this challenge as efficiently as possible. In order to address the climate emergency in the post-pandemic era, recovery plans need to trigger decarbonization, and a green transition, including specific investments and providing a more adaptive structure of the sources of energy in different regions, able to meet the need for a systemic shift towards a more sustainable economy that works for both people and the planet. The main measurable effect of energy production and consumption is by far represented by carbon emissions. In the present paper, we aim to identify the statistical significance of several factors influencing the carbon dioxide emission per capita in the European countries—level of economic development, level of globalization, trade openness, and the intensity of energy transition measured by the share of renewable energy in total energy consumption. The results show an increased interest of the experts in energy consumption model shift through green energy increased share, with relatively high differences among the 42 European countries analyzed. The analysis was conducted for the period 1990–2018 and policy differences depending on variables (GDP/capita, globalization index, trade openness, and renewable energy share in total energy consumption) were identified. The results showed that the carbon dioxide emission per capita evaluation designed model is representative of the European countries. The fact that the targets set by European non-EU member states for reducing CO2 emissions are lower than for the EU is influencing the dynamics of the energy transition, with implications for the size and destination of funds to finance the development of renewable energy.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and materials
Data used are public information.
References
Adebayo TS, Rjoub H, Akinsola GD, Oladipupo SD (2021) The asymmetric effects of renewable energy consumption and trade openness on carbon emissions in Sweden: new evidence from quantile-on-quantile regression approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 1–12
Ahmed Z, Le HP (2021) Linking information communication technology, trade globalization index, and CO2 emissions: evidence from advanced panel techniques. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:8770–8781. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11205-0
Andoura S, d’Oultremont C (2012) Energy transition by 2050: a multifaceted challenge for Europe. Eur. Policy Brief
Andrei J, Andreea IR (2018) A trade-off between economics and environment requirements on energy crops vs. food crops in Romanian agriculture. Custos E Agronegocio On Line, 14(3), 61–82.
Armeanu DS, Joldes CC, Gherghina SC, Andrei JV (2021) Understanding the multidimensional linkages among renewable energy, pollution, economic growth and urbanization in contemporary economies: quantitative assessments across different income countries’ groups. Renew Sust Energ Rev 110818
Armeanu D, Vintilă G, Andrei JV, Gherghina ŞC, Drăgoi MC, Teodor C (2018) Exploring the link between environmental pollution and economic growth in EU-28 countries: is there an environmental Kuznets curve? PLoS ONE 13(5):e0195708
Asiedu BA, Hassan AA, Bein MA (2021) Renewable energy, non-renewable energy, and economic growth: evidence from 26 European countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(9):11119–11128
Balsalobre-Lorente D, Shahbaz M, Roubaud D, Farhani S (2018) How economic growth, renewable electricity and natural resources contribute to CO2 emissions? Energy Policy 113:356–367
Balsalobre-Lorente D, Ibáñez-Luzón L, Usman M, Shahbaz M (2022) The environmental Kuznets curve, based on the economic complexity, and the pollution haven hypothesis in PIIGS countries. Renewable Energy 185:1441–1455
Baltagi B (2005) Econometric Analysis of Panel Data, 3rd edn. JohnWiley&Sons, West Sussex
Baltagi BH, Egger P, Pfaffermayr M (2013) A generalized spatial panel data model with random effects. Economet Rev 32(5–6):650–685
Bell A, Fairbrother M, Jones K (2019) Fixed and random effects models: making an informed choice. Qual Quant 53(2):1051–1074
Bildirici ME (2013) Economic growth and biomass energy. Biomass Bioenergy 50:19–24
Bilgili F, Ozturk I (2015) Biomass energy and economic growth nexus in G7 countries: evidence from dynamic panel data, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), 132–138.
Blazquez J, Fuentes R, Manzano B (2020) On some economic principles of the energy transition. Energy Policy 147:111807
Bompard E, Botterud A, Corgnati S, Huang T, Jafari M, Leone P, Profumo F (2020) An electricity triangle for energy transition: application to Italy. Appl Energy 277:115525
Ch AR, Semenoh AY (2017) Non-bank financial institutions activity in the context of economic growth: cross-country comparisons. Financ Mark Inst Risks 1:39–49
Chen F, Jiang G, Kitila GM (2021) Trade openness and CO2 emissions: the heterogeneous and mediating effects for the Belt and Road Countries. Sustainability 13:1958. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041958
Cheng G, Zhao C, Iqbal N, Gülmez Ö, Işik H, Kirikkaleli D (2021) Does energy productivity and public-private investment in energy achieve carbon neutrality target of China? J Environ Manage 298:113464
Chudy-Laskowska K, Pisula T, Liana M, Vasa L (2020) Taxonomic analysis of the diversity in the level of wind energy development in European Union countries. Energies 13(17):4371
Chunling L, Memon JA, Thanh TL, Ali M, Kirikkaleli D (2021) The impact of public-private partnership investment in energy and technological innovation on ecological footprint: the case of Pakistan. Sustainability 13(18):10085
Chygryn O (2016) The mechanism of the resource-saving activity at joint stock companies: the theory and implementation features. Int J Ecol Dev 31:42–59
Cristea M, Dobrota CE (2014) Green energy for sustainable development in Romania’s economy. Romania 2000:8
Daim TU, Rueda G, Martin H, Gerdsri P (2006) Forecasting emerging technologies: use of bibliometrics and patent analysis. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 73(8):981–1012
D’Orazio P, Löwenstein P (2020) Mobilising investments in renewable energy in Germany: which role for public investment banks?. J Sustain Finance Invest 1–24
De Wachter S, Harris RD, Tzavalis E (2007) Panel data unit roots tests: the role of serial correlation and the time dimension. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 137(1):230–244
Dogan E, Turkekul B (2016) CO2 emissions, real output, energy consumption, trade, urbanization and financial development: testing the EKC hypothesis for the USA. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:1203–1213
Dong F, Li Y, Gao Y, Zhu J, Qin C, Zhang X (2022) Energy transition and carbon neutrality: exploring the non-linear impact of renewable energy development on carbon emission efficiency in developed countries. Resour Conserv Recycl 177:106002
Druică E, Goschin Z, Ianole-Călin R (2019) Energy poverty and life satisfaction: structural mechanisms and their implications. Energies 12(20):3988
Garfield E (1979) Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool? Scientometrics 1(4):359–375
Garfield E (1955) Citation indexes for science. Science 122(3159):108–111. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.122.3159.108
EC- 2019- The European Green Deal, COM (2019) 640 final, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=1588580774040&uri=CELEX:52019DC0640
Eurostat 2020- The EU in the world – energy, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=The_EU_in_the_world_-_energy#Energy_intensity
Glänzel W (2003) Bibliometrics as a research field: a course on theory and application of bibliometric indicators. Available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242406991_Bibliometrics_as_a_research_field_A_course_on_theory_and_application_of_bibliometric_indicators (accessed on 12 June 2021)
Greene WH (2003) Econometric Analysis, 5th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA
Gujarati DN, Porter DC (2009) Basic Econometrics, 5th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA
Gurtu A, Searcy C, Jaber MY (2016) A framework for reducing global manufacturing emissions. The Journal of Environment & Development 25(2):159–190
Gyamfi BA, Adebayo TS, Bekun FV, Agyekum EB, Kumar NM, Alhelou HH, Al-Hinai A (2021) Beyond environmental Kuznets curve and policy implications to promote sustainable development in Mediterranean. Energy Rep 7:6119–6129
Haug AA, Ucal M (2019) The role of trade and FDI for CO2 emissions in Turkey: nonlinear relationships. Energy Economics 81:297–307
Hausman JA (1978) Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 1251–1271
Headey DD (2013) Developmental drivers of nutritional change: a cross-country analysis. World Dev 42:76–88
Ho SY, Iyke BN (2019) Trade openness and carbon emissions: evidence from central and eastern European Countries. Review of Economics 70(1):41–67
Im KS, Persaran MH, Shin Y (2003) Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. J Econom 115:pp. 53–74
IRENA (2021) World Energy Transitions Outlook: 1.5°C Pathway, International Renewable Energy Agency, Abu Dhabi, www.irena.org/publications
IRENA (2022) https://www.irena.org/Statistics
Isik C, Radulescu M (2017) Investigation of the relationship between renewable energy, tourism receipts and economic growth in Europe. Statistika-Statistics and Economy Journal 97(2):85–94
Jacobs D (2016) Renewable energy policy convergence in the EU: the evolution of feed-in tariffs in Germany, Spain and France. Routledge, London. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315605340
Jahanger A, Usman M, Murshed M, Mahmood H, Balsalobre-Lorente D (2022) The linkages between natural resources, human capital, globalization, economic growth, financial development, and ecological footprint: the moderating role of technological innovations. Resour Policy 76:102569
Jaroslava H, Martin W (2005) The performance of panel unit root and stationarity tests: results from a large scale simulation study. Working Paper, 5. European University Institute, Department of Economics.
Ji X, Chen X, Mirza N, Umar M (2021) Sustainable energy goals and investment premium: evidence from renewable and conventional equity mutual funds in the Euro zone. Resour Policy 74:102387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102387
Jiang Y, Khaskheli A, Raza SA, Qureshi MA, Ahmed M (2021) Threshold non-linear relationship between globalization, renewable energy consumption, and environmental degradation: evidence from smooth transition models. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(11):13323–13339
Jiang T, Yu Y, Jahanger A, Balsalobre-Lorente D (2022) Structural emissions reduction of China’s power and heating industry under the goal of “double carbon”: a perspective from input-output analysis. Sustainable Production and Consumption 31:346–356
Johnson I (2015) Can we finance the energy transition?. Cadmus. Cadmus » Can we Finance the Energy Transition? (newwelfare.org)
Kasperowicz R, Pinczyn ́ski M, Khabdullin A, (2017) Modeling the power of renewable energy sources in the context of classical electricity system transformation. J Int Stud 10:264–272
Khan MB, Saleem H, Shabbir MS, Huobao X (2021a) The effects of globalization, energy consumption and economic growth on carbon dioxide emissions in South Asian countries. Energy & Environment.
Khan SAR, Ponce P, Yu Z (2021b) Technological innovation and environmental taxes toward a carbon-free economy: an empirical study in the context of COP-21. J Environ Manage 298:113418
Khan SAR, Yu Z, Belhadi A, Mardani A (2020) Investigating the effects of renewable energy on international trade and environmental quality. J Environ Manage 272:111089
Khan SAR, Zaman K, Zhang Y (2016) The relationship between energy-resource depletion, climate change, health resources and the environmental Kuznets curve: evidence from the panel of selected developed countries. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 62:468–477
Kharlamova G, Nate S, Chernyak O (2016) Renewable energy and security for Ukraine: challenge or smart way?
Khaskheli A, Jiang Y, Raza SA, Khan KA, Qureshi MA (2021) Financial development, international trade, and environmental degradation: a nonlinear threshold model based on panel smooth transition regression. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(21):26449–26460
Kirikkaleli D, Adebayo TS (2021) Do public-private partnerships in energy and renewable energy consumption matter for consumption-based carbon dioxide emissions in India?. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 1–14.
Levin A, Lin CF, Chu CS (2002) Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties. J Econom 108:1–24
Liu M, Xiaohang Ren X, Cheng C, Zhen Wang Z (2020) The role of globalization in CO2 emissions: a semi-parametric panel data analysis for G7, Science of The Total Environment, Volume 718. ISSN 137379:0048–9697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137379
Macfarlane L, Kumar C (2021) GREENING PUBLIC FINANCE. Microsoft Word - NEF_Greening-public-finance_fordesign.docx (neweconomics.org)
Managi S, Hibiki A, Tsurumi T (2009) Does trade openness improve environmental quality? J Environ Econ Manag 58(3):346–363
Marinaș MC, Dinu M, Socol AG, Socol C (2018) Renewable energy consumption and economic growth. Causality relationship in Central and Eastern European countries. PloS one, 13(10), e0202951.
Masharsky, A., Azarenkova, G., Oryekhova, K., & Yavorsky, S. (2018). Anti-crisis financial management on energy enterprises as a precondition of innovative conversion of the energy industry: case of Ukraine.
Menegaki AN, Ozturk I (2016) Renewable energy, rents and GDP growth in MENA countries. Energy Sources Part B Econ. Plan. Policy 2016, 11, 824–829.
Mohamed SAE, Mohamed Y (2015) Mahmood Asad Moh’d Ali (2020) Using a panel data approach to determining the key factors of Islamic banks’ profitability in Bahrain, Cogent panel data. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 49:132–138
Neacsa A, Panait M, Muresan JD, Voica MC (2020) Energy poverty in European Union: assessment difficulties, effects on the quality of life, mitigation measures. some evidences from Romania. Sustainability, 12(10), 4036.
Norton MJ (2001) Introductory Concepts in Information Science, New Jersey
Ozturk I, Acaravci A (2013) The long-run and causal analysis of energy, growth, openness and financial development on carbon emissions in Turkey. Energy Economics 36:262–267
Panait M, Voica MC, Rădulescu I (2019) Approaches regarding environmental Kuznets curve in the European Union from the perspective of sustainable development. Appl Ecol Environ Res 17(3):6801–6820
Pesaran MH, Ullah A, Yamagata T (2008) A Bias-Adjusted LM Test of Error Cross-Section Independence. Econom J 11:105–127
Peseran MH (2007) A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependency. J Appl Econom 22:265–312
Petrović P, Arsić M, Nojković A (2021) Increasing public investment can be an effective policy in bad times: evidence from emerging EU economies. Econ Model 94:580–597
Pianta M, Lucchese M (2020) Rethinking the European Green Deal: an industrial policy for a just transition in Europe. Review of Radical Political Economics 52(4):633–641
Polzin F, Sanders M (2020) How to finance the transition to low-carbon energy in Europe? Energy Policy 147:111863
Ponce P, Khan SAR (2021) A causal link between renewable energy, energy efficiency, property rights, and CO2 emissions in developed countries: a road map for environmental sustainability. Environ Sci Pollut Res 1–14
Popescu GH, Mieila M, Nica E, Andrei JV (2018) The emergence of the effects and determinants of the energy paradigm changes on European Union economy. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 81:768–774
Radulescu Irina G, Popescu C (2015) Renewable energy strategies: where European Union headed? Annals of’Constantin Brancusi’University of Targu-Jiu, Economy Series
Raza SA, Shah SH, Yousufi SQ (2021) The impact of public-private partnerships investment in energy on carbon emissions: evidence from nonparametric causality-in-quantiles. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(18):23182–23192
Rehman A, Radulescu M, Ma H, Dagar V, Hussain I, Khan MK (2021) The impact of globalization, energy use, and trade on ecological footprint in Pakistan: does environmental sustainability exist? Energies 14(17):5234
Remenyik B, László V, Lóránt D, Imre V (2020) Liquid biofuels: sustainable development analysis. Eurasian Econ Rev 4(58)
Slusarczyk B, Baryn ́M, Kot S. (2016) Tire industry products as an alternative fuel. Pol J Environ Stud 25:1263–1270
Shahbaz M, Nasreen S, Ahmed K, Hammoudeh S (2017) Trade openness–carbon emissions nexus: the importance of turning points of trade openness for country panels. Energy Economics 61:221–232
Shahbaz M, Raghutla C, Song M, Zameer H, Jiao Z (2020) Public-private partnerships investment in energy as new determinant of CO2 emissions: the role of technological innovations in China. Energy Economics 86:104664
Shahzad U, Radulescu M, Rahim S, Isik C, Yousaf Z, Ionescu SA (2021) Do environment-related policy instruments and technologies facilitate renewable energy generation? Exploring the Contextual Evidence from Developed Economies. Energies 14(3):690
Simionescu M, Bilan Y, Krajňáková E, Streimikiene D, Gędek S (2019) Renewable energy in the electricity sector and GDP per capita in the European Union. Energies 12(13):2520
Simionescu M, Păuna CB, Diaconescu T (2020) Renewable Energy and economic performance in the context of the European Green Deal. Energies 13(23):6440
Šinca ̄ns E, Ignatjeva S, Tvaronavicˇiene M, (2016) Issues of Latvian energy supply security: evaluation of criminal offences in Latvia’s electricity market. Econ Sociol 2016(9):322–335
Sinha A, Shahbaz M, Balsalobre D (2020a) N-shaped environmental Kuznets curve: a note on validation and falsification (No. 99313). University Library of Munich, Germany
Sinha A, Driha OM, Balsalobre-Lorente D, Cantos-Cantos JM (2020b) Impact of energy use segregation on carbon emissions: the role of FDI in net importing and net exporting countries. In Econometrics of green energy handbook, Springer, Cham
Solorio I, Jörgens H (2017) A guide to EU renewable energy policy: comparing Europeanization and domestic policy change in EU member states. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781783471560
Tachie AK, Xingle L, Dauda L, Mensah CN, Appiah-Twum F, Mensah IA (2020) The influence of trade openness on environmental pollution in EU-18 countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(28):35535–35555
Taghizadeh-Hesary F, Rasoulinezhad E, Yoshino N, Sarker T, Mirza N (2021) Determinants of the Russia and Asia-Pacific energy trade. Energ Strat Rev 38:100681
Tang CF, Tan BW (2015) The impact of energy consumption, income and foreign direct investment on carbon dioxide emissions in Vietnam. Energy 79:447–454
Umar M, Ji X, Mirza N, Naqvi B (2021) Carbon neutrality, bank lending, and credit risk: evidence from the Eurozone. J Environ Manage 296:113156
Usman M, Balsalobre-Lorente D (2022) Environmental concern in the era of industrialization: can financial development, renewable energy and natural resources alleviate some load? Energy Policy 162:112780
UN-Climate Change (2021) - COP26 presidency outcomes-the climate pact, https://ukcop26.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/COP26-Presidency-Outcomes-The-Climate-Pact.pdf , https://ukcop26.org/the-conference/cop26-outcomes/
Vasylyeva TA, Pryymenko SA (2014) Environmental economic assessment of energy resources in the context of Ukraine’s energy security. Actual Probl Econ 160:252–260
Vlahinic ́Lenz N, Fajdetic ́ B, (2021) Globalization and GHG emissions in the EU: do we need a new development paradigm? Sustainability 13:9936. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179936
Voicu-Dorobanțu R, Volintiru C, Popescu MF, Nerău V, Ștefan G (2021) Tackling complexity of the just transition in the EU: evidence from Romania. Energies 14(5):1509
Wang R, Mirza N, Vasbieva DG, Abbas Q, Xiong D (2020) The nexus of carbon emissions, financial development, renewable energy consumption, and technological innovation: what should be the priorities in light of COP 21 Agreements? J Environ Manage 271:111027
Wooldridge JM (2002) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data; MIT Press: Cambridge. MA, USA, p 2002
Youssef Ben Jebli M, Ben S (2013) Combustible renewables and waste consumption, exports and economic growth: evidence from panel for selected MENA countries. Available online: https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/47767.html. Accessed on 12 Jan 2019
Zhou J, Liu Z, Grigorescu A, Condrea E (2018) Changing of energy of consuming to achieve an industrial growth: comparison to China and east Europe. Glorep 2018 final, 305
Zhou J, Mao Y, Grigorescu A, Condrea E (2020) Industrial growth and change of energy consumption behaviour in Eastern European Countries, Austria and China. J Environ Prot Ecol 21(3):1107–1116
Zulfikar R (2019) Estimation model and selection method of panel data regression: an overview of common effect, fixed effect, and random effect model
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study’s conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by Simona-Andreea Apostu, Mirela Panait, and Valentina Vasile. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Simona-Andreea Apostu, Mirela Panait, and Valentina Vasile, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Roula Inglesi-Lotz
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Annex
Annex
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Apostu, S.A., Panait, M. & Vasile, V. The energy transition in Europe—a solution for net zero carbon?. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 71358–71379 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20730-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20730-z