Abstract
Previous studies consider ICT a two-edged sword that can harm or benefit the environment. In recent years, ICT penetration has considerably increased in the ASEAN-6 countries and the leaders of ASEAN are willing to bring a digital revolution by increasing ICT infrastructure and reducing trade barriers in the region under the Master Plan of ASEAN Connectivity-2025. Hence, this paper explores the effect of ICT and the recently developed trade globalization index on CO2 emissions in ASEAN-6 countries. The study relies on advanced panel econometric approaches, including Westerlund (2007, 2008) and Pedroni cointegration tests, CUP-FM long-run method, and panel DH causality approach. The results suggest cointegration among variables. The results of CUP-FM indicate that ICT contributes to improving environmental quality by mitigating CO2 emissions. Similarly, trade globalization is also sustainable in the region as it reduces emissions. The results are also confirmed by using the CUP-BC estimator. The findings from the DH causality test unfold causality from ICT and trade globalization index to CO2 emissions. Besides, the long-run estimates reveal the detrimental effect of energy consumption on emissions and the U-shaped association between GDP and emissions. Moreover, unidirectional causality from ICT to trade globalization index and energy consumption indicates that ICT influences trade globalization and energy consumption. Finally, environmental policies in the context of ASEAN are extensively discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
https://asean.org/asean/about-asean/history/ (Accessed July, 2020)
https://webstore.iea.org/co2-emissions-from-fuel-combustion-2019-highlights (Accessed April-2020)
https://www.bp.com/statisticalreview (Accessed April-2020)
References
Adeleye N, Eboagu C (2019) Evaluation of ICT development and economic growth in Africa. NETNOMICS Econ Res Electron Netw 20:31–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11066-019-09131-6
Afzal MNI, Gow J (2016) Electricity consumption and information and communication technology in the next eleven emerging economies. Int J Energy Econ Policy 6:381–388
Ahmed Z, Ali S, Saud S, Shahzad SJH (2020a) Transport CO2 emissions, drivers, and mitigation: an empirical investigation in India. Air Qual Atmos Health. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-020-00891-x Transport
Ahmed Z, Asghar MM, Malik MN, Nawaz K (2020b) Moving towards a sustainable environment: The dynamic linkage between natural resources, human capital, urbanization, economic growth, and ecological footprint in China. Res Policy 67:101677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101677
Ahmed Z, Wang Z, Mahmood F, Hafeez M, Ali N (2019) Does globalization increase the ecological footprint? Empirical evidence from Malaysia. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:18565–18582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05224-9
Ahmed Z, Zafar MW, Ali S, Danish (2020c) Linking urbanization, human capital, and the ecological footprint in G7 countries: An empirical analysis. Sustain Cities Soc 55:102064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102064
Ahmed Z, Zhang B, Cary M (2021) Linking economic globalization, economic growth, financial development, and ecological footprint: Evidence from symmetric and asymmetric ARDL. Ecol Indic 121:107060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107060
Al-Mulali U, Sheau-Ting L, Ozturk I (2015) The global move toward Internet shopping and its influence on pollution: an empirical analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:9717–9727. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-4142-2
Amri F, Ben ZY, Ben LB (2019) ICT, total factor productivity, and carbon dioxide emissions in Tunisia. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 146:212–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.05.028
Añón Higón D, Gholami R, Shirazi F (2017) ICT and environmental sustainability: a global perspective. Telemat Informatics 34:85–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.01.001
ASEANS (2016) The Association of Southeast Asian Nations.MASTER PLAN ON ASEAN CONNECTIVITY 2025.https://asean.org/asean/asean-connectivity-2/ (Accessed July-2020)
Asongu SA (2018) ICT, openness and CO2 emissions in Africa. Environ Sci Pollut Res 8:176–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1239-4
Asongu SA, Le Roux S, Biekpe N (2018) Enhancing ICT for environmental sustainability in sub-Saharan Africa. Technol Forecast Soc Change 127:209–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.09.022
Avom D, Nkengfack H, Fotio HK, Totouom A (2020) ICT and environmental quality in Sub-Saharan Africa: effects and transmission channels. Technol Forecast Soc Change 155:120028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120028
Baek J (2016) A new look at the FDI-income-energy-environment nexus: dynamic panel data analysis of ASEAN. Energy Policy 91:22–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.12.045
Bai J, Kao C, Ng S (2009) Panel cointegration with global stochastic trends. J Econ 149:82–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2008.10.012
Can M, Dogan B, Saboori B (2020) Does trade matter for environmental degradation in developing countries? New evidence in the context of export product diversification. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:14702–14710. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08000-2
Chen X, Gong X, Li D, Zhang J (2019) Can information and communication technology reduce CO2 emission? A quantile regression analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:32977–32992. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06380-8
Danish (2019) Effects of information and communication technology and real income on CO2 emissions: The experience of countries along Belt and Road. Telemat Informatics 45:101300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2019.101300
Danish KN, Baloch MA et al (2018) The effect of ICT on CO2 emissions in emerging economies: does the level of income matters? Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:22850–22860. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2379-2
Dinda S (2004) Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis: a survey. Ecol Econ 49:431–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.02.011
Doğan B, Driha OM, Balsalobre Lorente D, Shahzad U (2020) The mitigating effects of economic complexity and renewable energy on carbon emissions in developed countries. Sustain Dev. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2125
Dogan B, Madaleno M, Tiwari AK, Hammoudeh S (2020) Impacts of export quality on environmental degradation: does income matter? Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:13735–13772. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-07371-5
Doğan B, Saboori B, Can M (2019) Does economic complexity matter for environmental degradation? An empirical analysis for different stages of development. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:31900–31912. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06333-1
Dreher A (2006) Does globalization affect growth? Evidence from a new index of globalization. Appl Econ 38:1091–1110. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840500392078
Dumitrescu EI, Hurlin C (2012) Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Econ Model 29:1450–1460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2012.02.014
Gygli S, Haelg F, Potrafke N, Sturm JE (2019) The KOF Globalisation Index – revisited. Rev Int Organ 14:543–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-019-09344-2
Haftu GG (2019) Information communications technology and economic growth in Sub-Saharan Africa: a panel data approach. Telecommun Policy 43:88–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2018.03.010
Haseeb A, Xia E, Saud S, Ahmad A, Khurshid H (2019) Does information and communication technologies improve environmental quality in the era of globalization? An empirical analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:8594–8608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04296-x
Hu G, Can M, Paramati SR, Doğan B, Fang J (2020) The effect of import product diversification on carbon emissions: New evidence for sustainable economic policies. Econ Anal Policy 65:198–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2020.01.004
IEA (2019) CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion 2019 Highlights. https://webstore.iea.org/co2-emissions-from-fuel-combustion-2019-highlights. Accessed 5 Jan 2020
IEA (2015) Southeast Asia Energy Outlook - World Energy Outlook Special Report 2015.World Energy Outlook 1–135. https://webstore.iea.org/weo-2015-special-report-southeast-asia-energy-outlook. World Energy Outlook
Ito K (2017) CO2 emissions, renewable and non-renewable energy consumption, and economic growth: Evidence from panel data for developing countries. Int Econ 151:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inteco.2017.02.001
Jorisch D, Mallin C, Accurso M, et al (2018) Technology for climate action in Latin America and the Caribbean. How ICT and Mobile Solutions Contributes to a Sustainabile Low-Carbon Future. GSMA. South Pole
Latif Z, Mengke Y, Danish et al (2018) The dynamics of ICT, foreign direct investment, globalization and economic growth: panel estimation robust to heterogeneity and cross-sectional dependence. Telemat Inform 35:318–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.12.006
Le HP, Ozturk I (2020) The impacts of globalization, financial development, government expenditures, and institutional quality on CO2 emissions in the presence of environmental Kuznets curve. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:22680–22697. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08812-2
Lee JW, Brahmasrene T (2014) ICT, CO2 Emissions and economic growth: evidence from a panel of ASEAN. Glob Econ Rev 43:93–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/1226508X.2014.917803
Malik MY, Latif K, Khan Z, Butt HD, Hussain M, Nadeem MA (2020) Symmetric and asymmetric impact of oil price, FDI and economic growth on carbon emission in Pakistan: evidence from ARDL and non-linear ARDL approach. Sci Total Environ 110669:138421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138421
Matteucci N, Mahony MO, Robinson C, Zwick T (2005) Productivity, workplace performance and ict: industry and firm-level evidence for Europe and the US. Scott J Polit Econ 52:359–386
Nathaniel S, Anyanwu O, Shah M (2020) Renewable energy, urbanization, and ecological footprint in the Middle East and North Africa region. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:14601–14613. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08017-7
Nathaniel S, Khan SAR (2020) The nexus between urbanization, renewable energy, trade, and ecological footprint in ASEAN countries. J Clean Prod 272:122709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122709
Niebel T (2018) ICT and economic growth – Comparing developing, emerging and developed countries. World Dev 104:197–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.11.024
O’Mahony M, Vecchi M (2005) Quantifying the impact of ICT capital on output growth: a heterogeneous dynamic panel approach. Economica 72:615–633. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0335.2005.0435.x
Park Y, Meng F, Baloch MA (2018) The effect of ICT, financial development, growth, and trade openness on CO2 emissions: an empirical analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:30708–30719. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3108-6
Pedroni P (1999) Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 61:653–670. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0084.61.s1.14
Pesaran MH (2007) A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross section dependence. J Appl Econ 47:265–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae
Phong LH (2019) Globalization, financial development, and environmental degradation in the presence of environmental Kuznets curve: Evidence from ASEAN-5 countries. Int J Energy Econ Policy 9:40–50. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.7290
Raheem ID, Tiwari AK, Balsalobre-Lorente D (2020) The role of ICT and financial development in CO2 emissions and economic growth. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:1912–1922. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06590-0
Salahuddin M, Alam K, Ozturk I (2016) The effects of Internet usage and economic growth on CO2 emissions in OECD countries: A panel investigation. Renew Sust Energ Rev 62:1226–1235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.04.018
Shabani ZD, Shahnazi R (2019) Energy consumption, carbon dioxide emissions, information and communications technology, and gross domestic product in Iranian economic sectors: A panel causality analysis. Energy 169:1064–1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.11.062
Ulucak R, Bilgili F (2018) A reinvestigation of EKC model by ecological footprint measurement for high, middle and low income countries. J Clean Prod 188:144–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.191
Ulucak R, Danish, Khan SUD (2020) Does information and communication technology affect CO2 mitigation under the pathway of sustainable development during the mode of globalization? Sustain Dev 28:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2041
Wang Z, Ahmed Z, Zhang B, Wang B (2019) The nexus between urbanization, road infrastructure, and transport energy demand: empirical evidence from Pakistan. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:34884–34895. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06542-8
Westerlund J (2007) Testing for error correction in panel data. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 69:709–748. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2007.00477.x
Westerlund J (2008) Panel cointegration tests of the Fisher effect. J Appl Econ 23:193–233. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.967
Zhang C, Liu C (2015) The impact of ICT industry on CO2 emissions: a regional analysis in China. Renew Sust Energ Rev 44:12–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.12.011
Zhu H, Duan L, Guo Y, Yu K (2016) The effects of FDI, economic growth and energy consumption on carbon emissions in ASEAN-5: evidence from panel quantile regression. Econ Model 58:237–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2016.05.003
Zoundi Z (2017) CO2 emissions, renewable energy and the Environmental Kuznets Curve, a panel cointegration approach. Renew Sust Energ Rev 72:1067–1075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.10.018
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
ZA conceived the idea, wrote the introduction, analyzed the data, and discussed the results. HL collected data, wrote the literature, methodology, and conclusion. Both authors revised the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent to publish
Not applicable.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ahmed, Z., Le, H.P. Linking Information Communication Technology, trade globalization index, and CO2 emissions: evidence from advanced panel techniques. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 8770–8781 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11205-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11205-0