Skip to main content
Log in

Modeling and multi-objective optimization of commercial ethylene oxide reactor to strike a delicate balance between profit and negative environmental impact

  • Water, Bioenergy and Environmental Sustainability
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present work emphasizes the development of a generic methodology that addresses the core issue of any running chemical plant, i.e., how to maintain a delicate balance between profit and environmental impact. Here, ethylene oxide (EO) production plant has been taken as a case study. The production of EO takes place in a multiphase catalytic reactor, the reliable first principle-based model of which is still not available in the literature. Artificial neural network (ANN) was therefore applied to develop a data-driven model of the complex reactor with the help of actual industrial data. The model successfully built up a correlation between the catalyst selectivity and other operational parameters. This model was used to establish two objective functions, profit and environmental impact. In this paper, the negative environmental impact has been designated by Eco-indicator 99, which considers all the negative health and environmental impacts of a certain product. A recently developed metaheuristic optimization technique, namely multi-objective firefly (MOF) algorithm, was used to develop Pareto diagram of profit vs. Eco-99. The Pareto diagram will help the plant engineers to make strategy on what operating conditions to be maintained to make a delicate balance between profit and environmental impact. It was also found that by applying this modeling and optimization technique, for a 130 kTA EO plant, approximately 7048 t/year of carbon dioxide can be saved from emission into the atmosphere.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The calculated datasets and codes in the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request but the original datasets received from industry are not available for sharing as per the secrecy agreement.

Abbreviations

f 1 :

hidden layer activation function

f 2 :

output layer activation function

\( {w}_{pq}^o\kern0.5em \) :

output layer weights

\( {w}_{np}^H\kern0.5em \) :

hidden layer weights

b p :

hidden layer biases

b q :

output layer biases

r :

distance between two fireflies

β 0 :

brightness at r = 0

γ :

coefficient of absorption

ψ(x):

weighted combination of the two objective functions

w 1 and w 2 :

weights

\( P{\mathrm{best}}_{\ast}^t \) :

The best solution in multi-objective firefly algorithm

R 2 :

coefficient of determination

AEP:

average error percentage

RMSE:

root mean square error

y pred,i :

predicted output derived from model

y exp,i :

actual output

N :

total number of datasets

∆Eco:

change of Eco-99 per dollar change of profit

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Sandip Kumar Lahiri: conceptualization, supervision. Somnath Chowdhury: analysis, writing, Abhiram Hens: validation. Kartik Chandra Ghanta: review, editing

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandip Kumar Lahiri.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Authors hereby declare that the work has not been published anywhere else.

Consent to participate

Authors hereby give their consent that they have taken participation in the research work.

Consent to publish

Authors hereby give their consent to publish the research work.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lahiri, S.K., Chowdhury, S., Hens, A. et al. Modeling and multi-objective optimization of commercial ethylene oxide reactor to strike a delicate balance between profit and negative environmental impact. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 20035–20047 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12504-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12504-w

Keywords

Navigation