Skip to main content
Log in

ICT, openness and CO2 emissions in Africa

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigates how information and communication technology (ICT) complements globalisation in order to influence CO2 emissions in 44 Sub-Saharan African countries over the period 2000–2012. ICT is measured with internet penetration and mobile phone penetration whereas globalisation is designated in terms of trade and financial openness. The empirical evidence is based on the generalised method of moments. The findings broadly show that ICT can be employed to dampen the potentially negative effect of globalisation on environmental degradation like CO2 emissions. Practical, policy and theoretical implications are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. According to the EKC hypothesis, in the long term, there is an inverted U-shaped relationship between per capita income and environmental degradation. It is important to note that, the paragraph highlighting the extant literature involves some grouping of it on “CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth” into two main strands. Literature on the EKC is categorised in one of the strands. This categorisation which is based on broader literature than the EKC scope is not exhaustive and does not negate the fact that there are two main branches of the literature on the EKC.

  2. The positioning of the study departs from recent African literature on the employment of ICT development purposes (Kuada 2009, 2014, 2015; Afutu-Kotey et al. 2017) and social change (Tony and Kwan 2015; Gosavi 2017; Minkoua Nzie et al. 2017).

  3. The 44 countries are: Angola, Benin, Botswana, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cameroon, Cape Verde, Central African Republic, Chad, Comoros, Congo Democratic. Republic., Congo Republic, Cote d’Ivoire, Djibouti, Ethiopia, Gabon, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Kenya, Lesotho, Liberia, Madagascar, Malawi, Mali, Mauritania, Mauritius, Mozambique, Namibia, Niger, Nigeria, Rwanda, Sao Tome & Principe, Senegal, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Sudan, Swaziland, Tanzania, Togo, Uganda and Zambia.

  4. Hence, the procedure for treating ivstyle (years) is ‘iv (years, eq(diff))’ whereas the gmmstyle is employed for predetermined variables.

  5. “First, the null hypothesis of the second-order Arellano and Bond autocorrelation test (AR [2]) in difference for the absence of autocorrelation in the residuals should not be rejected. Second, the Sargan and Hansen overidentification restrictions (OIR) tests should not be significant because their null hypotheses are the positions that instruments are valid or not correlated with the error terms. In essence, while the Sargan OIR test is not robust but not weakened by instruments, the Hansen OIR is robust but weakened by instruments. In order to restrict identification or limit the proliferation of instruments, we have ensured that instruments are lower than the number of cross-sections in most specifications. Third, the difference in Hansen test (DHT) for exogeneity of instruments is also employed to assess the validity of results from the Hansen OIR test. Fourth, a Fischer test for the joint validity of estimated coefficients is also provided” (Asongu and De Moor 2017, p.200).

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author is indebted to the editor and referees for constructive comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simplice A. Asongu.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues

Appendix

Appendix

Table 2 Variable definitions
Table 3 Summary statistics (2000–2012)
Table 4 Correlation matrix (uniform sample size: 155)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Asongu, S.A. ICT, openness and CO2 emissions in Africa. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25, 9351–9359 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1239-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1239-4

Keywords

JEL classification

Navigation