Abstract
China is a rising power of the twenty-first century with its brilliant economic performance as a result of the transition to the free market economy model. However, China’s economic development process has caused high environmental costs. For the past decade, China has been the leading country responsible for global carbon dioxide emissions (CO2). Therefore, determining the dynamics that have a reducing effect on CO2 emissions in China is very important for the development of sustainable environmental policies. This paper aims to examine the impacts of the institutional structure on environmental sustainability in China. To this end, the study follows the method of cointegration with multiple breaks that produce robust econometric results and consider structural changes. According to the results, (i) the validity of an N-shaped EKC relationship is supported between economic growth and environmental pollution. (ii) Industrialization and trade have an increasing impact on environmental pollution. (iii) Political rights and civil liberties have a reducing effect on environmental pollution. Consequently, this study implies that political rights and civil liberties can make an important contribution to achieving sustainability goals in China.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The turning point formula for a cubic EKC model is as follows (Lorente and Alvarez-Herranz 2016):
Yj = \( \frac{\beta 2\pm \sqrt{\beta {2}^2-3\beta 1\beta 3}}{3\beta 3} \), j = 1,2.
Y1 and Y2 are the first and second turning points, respectively. Exp (Y *) is used to calculate the monetary value of the turning points.
References
Abid M (2016) Impact of economic, financial, and institutional factors on CO2 emissions: evidence from sub-Saharan Africa economies. Util Policy 41:85–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2016.06.009
Acemoglu D, Naidu S, Restrepo P, Robinson JA (2019) Democracy does cause growth. J Polit Econ 127:47–100. https://doi.org/10.1086/700936
Adams S, Acheampong AO (2019) Reducing carbon emissions: the role of renewable energy and democracy. J Clean Prod 240:118245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118245
Adams S, Klobodu EKM (2017) Urbanization, democracy, bureaucratic quality, and environmental degradation. J Policy Model 39:1035–1051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2017.04.006
Adams S, Klobodu EKM (2018) Financial development and environmental degradation: does political regime matter? J Clean Prod 197:1472–1479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.252
Bai Y, Deng X, Jiang S, Zhao Z, Miao Y (2019) Relationship between climate change and low-carbon agricultural production: a case study in Hebei Province, China. Ecol Indic 105:438–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.04.003
Balsalobre D, Álvarez A, Cantos JM (2015) Public budgets for energy RD&D and the effects on energy intensity and pollution levels. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:4881–4892. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3121-3
Bernauer T, Koubi V (2009). Effects of political institutions on air quality. Ecol Econ 68(5):1355–1365
Bhattarai M, Hammig M (2001) Institutions and the environmental Kuznets curve for deforestation: a crosscountry analysis for Latin America, Africa and Asia. World Dev 29:995–1010. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00019-5
Bilgili F (2012) The impact of biomass consumption on CO2 emissions: cointegration analyses with regime shifts. Renew Sust Energ Rev 16:5349–5354. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2012.04.021
Bilgili F, Koçak E, Bulut Ü (2016) The dynamic impact of renewable energy consumption on CO2 emissions: a revisited environmental Kuznets curve approach. Renew Sust Energ Rev 54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.080
Buitenzorgy M, Mol APJ et al (2011) Does democracy lead to a better environment? Deforestation and the democratic transition peak. Environ Resour Econ 48:59–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-010-9397-y
Charfeddine L, Mrabet Z (2017) The impact of economic development and social-political factors on ecological footprint: a panel data analysis for 15 MENA countries. Renew Sust Energ Rev 76:138–154
Chen J, Yuan H, Tian X, Zhang Y, Shi F (2019) What determines the diversity of CO2 emission patterns in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region of China? An analysis focusing on industrial structure change. J Clean Prod 228:1088–1098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.267
Chou M (2015) The rise of China and the decline of democracy in Australia? Aust J Int Aff 69:637–644. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2015.1081146
Congleton R (1992) Political institutions and pollution control. https://doi.org/10.2307/2109485
Culas RJ (2007) Deforestation and the environmental Kuznets curve: An institutional perspective. Ecological Economics 61(2–3): 429–437
Danish (2019) Moving toward sustainable development: the relationship between water productivity, natural resource rent, international trade, and carbon dioxide emissions. Sustain Dev sd 2007. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2007
Danish UR, Khan SU et al (2019) Mitigation pathways toward sustainable development: is there any trade-off between environmental regulation and carbon emissions reduction? Sustain Dev sd 2032. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2032
Dasgupta P, Mäler KG (1995) Chapter 39 poverty, institutions, and the environmental resource-base. Handb Dev Econ 3:2371–2463
Deacon RT (2000) The political economy of environmentdevelopment relationships: A preliminary framework Nota di Lavoro No. 3. 2000, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM), Milano
Dernberger RF (1999) The People’s Republic of China at 50: the economy. The China Quarterly 159: 606–615
Desai U (1998) Environment, economic growth, and government in developing countries. In: Desai U (ed) Ecological policy abd politics in developing countries: economic growth, democracy and environment, Primera edn. State University of New York Press, Albany, pp 1–45
Dickey DA, Fuller WA (1981) Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econometrica 49:1057. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912517
Dogan E, Ulucak R, Kocak E, Isik C (2020) The use of ecological footprint in estimating the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for BRICST by considering cross-section dependence and heterogeneity. Sci Total Environ 723:138063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138063
Doucouliagos H, Ulubaşoğlu MA (2008) Democracy and economic growth: a meta-analysis. Am J Polit Sci 52:61–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00299.x
Dryzek JS (1987) Rational ecology: environment and political economy. Ration Ecol Environ Polit Econ 18:70. https://doi.org/10.2307/2071946
Engle RF, Granger CWJ (1987) Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica 55:251. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913236
Euchi J, Omri A, Al-Tit A (2018) The pillars of economic diversification in Saudi Arabia. World Rev Sci Technol Sustain Dev 14:330–343. https://doi.org/10.1504/WRSTSD.2018.095719
Farhani S, Balsalobre-Lorente D (2020) Comparing the role of coal to other energy resources in the environmental Kuznets curve of three large economies. Chin Econ 53:82–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/10971475.2019.1625519
Farzin YH, Bond CA (2006) Democracy and environmental quality. Journal of Development Economics 81(1): 213–235.
Foa RS (2018) Modernization and authoritarianism. J Democr 29:129–140. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2018.0050
Freedom House (2018) https://freedomhouse.org/country/china/freedom-world/2018 date of access: September 29, 2019
Gallagher KP, Thacker SC (2008) Democracy, income, and environmental quality PERI Working Papers 124
Gregory AW, Hansen BE (1996) Residual-based tests for cointegration in models with regime shifts. J Econ 70:99–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(69)41685-7
Hajko V, Sebri M, Al-Saidi M, Balsalobre-Lorente D (2018) The energy-growth nexus: history, development, and new challenges. In The economics andeconometrics of the energy-growth nexus. Academic Press, Cambridge, p 1–46
Haque F, Ntim CG (2018) Environmental policy, sustainable development, governance mechanisms and environmental performance. Bus Strateg Environ 27:415–435. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2007
Hasan I, Wachtel P, Zhou M (2009) Institutional development, financial deepening and economic growth: evidence from China. J Bank Financ 33:157–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2007.11.016
Hasegawa T, Fujimori S, Takahashi K, Yokohata T, Masui T (2016) Economic implications of climate change impacts on human health through undernourishment. Clim Chang 136:189–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1606-4
Hassan ST, Danish KSU-D et al (2019) Role of institutions in correcting environmental pollution: an empirical investigation. Sustain Cities Soc 53:101901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101901
Hatemi-J A (2008) Tests for cointegration with two unknown regime shifts with an application to financial market integration. Empir Econ 35:497–505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-007-0175-9
Hatunoğlu H;Yılmaz GS (2018) SİYASET, EKONOMİ ve YÖNETİM ARAŞTIRMALARI DERGİSİ
Hosseini, HM, Kaneko S (2013) Can environmental quality spread through institutions? Energy Policy 56:312–321
International Energy Agency (IEA) (2018) World energy outlook
IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014: synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II, and III to the fifth assesment report of the intergovernmental panel on the climate change. Geneva, Switzerland
Jiang B, Bai Y, Wong CP, Xu X, Alatalo JM (2019) China’s ecological civilization program–implementing ecological redline policy. Land Use Policy 81:111–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.10.031
Johansen S (1988) Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. J Econ Dyn Control 12:231–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1889(88)90041-3
Johansen S, Juselius K (1990) Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration—with applications to the demand for money. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 52:169–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.1990.mp52002003.x
Joshi P, Beck K (2018) Democracy and carbon dioxide emissions: assessing the interactions of political and economic freedom and the environmental Kuznets curve. Energy Res Soc Sci 39:46–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.020
Kim S, Baek J, Heo E (2019) A new look at the democracy-environment nexus: evidence from panel data for high- and low-income countries. Sustain 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11082353
Kinda SR (2016) Democratic institutions and environmental quality: effects and transmission channels. SSRN Electron J. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2714300
Koçak E, Şarkgüneşi A (2018) The impact of foreign direct investment on CO2 emissions in Turkey: new evidence from cointegration and bootstrap causality analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:790–804. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0468-2
Koçak E, Ulucak ZŞ (2019) The effect of energy R&D expenditures on CO2 emission reduction: estimation of the STIRPAT model for OECD countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:14328–14338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04712-2
Koçak E, Uzay N (2018) Democracy, economic freedoms and economic growth: an investigation on the role of institutions. Sosyoekonomi 81–102. https://doi.org/10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2018.02.05
Koçak E, Ulucak R, Dedeoğlu M, Ulucak ZŞ (2019) Is there a trade-off between sustainable society targets in sub-Saharan Africa? Sustain Cities Soc 51:101705. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCS.2019.101705
Lægreid OM, Povitkina M (2018) Do political institutions moderate the GDP-CO 2 relationship? Ecol Econ 145:441–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.11.014
Le HP, Ozturk I (2020) The impacts of globalization, financial development, government expenditures, and institutional quality on CO2 emissions in the presence of environmental Kuznets curve. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08812-2
Li Q, Reuveny R (2006) Democracy and environmental degradation. Int Stud Q 50:935–956. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2006.00432.x
Lorente DB, Alvarez-Herranz A (2016) An approach to the effect of energy innovation on environmental Kuznets curve: an introduction to inflection point the anthropogenic effect of energy, tourism and agricultural consumption view project 2012. El estado actual de la reforma laboral:historia, economía y treinta años de relaciones laborales View project
Lo K (2015) How authoritarian is the environmental governance of China? Environ Sci Pol 54:152–159
Lu W, Lu W (2019) Industrial water-use technical efficiency and potential reduction of CO 2 emissions : evidence from industry-level data of CO 2 emissions : evidence from industry-level data. Carbon Manag 10:513–522. https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2019.1661733
Lv Z (2017) The effect of democracy on CO2 emissions in emerging countries: does the level of income matter? Renew Sust Energ Rev 72:900–906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.096
Mak Arvin B, Lew B (2011) Does democracy affect environmental quality in developing countries? Appl Econ 43:1151–1160. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840802600277
Maki D (2012) Tests for cointegration allowing for an unknown number of breaks. Econ Model 29:2011–2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECONMOD.2012.04.022
Mamipour S, Yahoo M, Jalalvandi S (2019) An empirical analysis of the relationship between the environment, economy, and society: results of a PCA-VAR model for Iran. Ecol Indic 102:760–769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.03.039
Marinelli M (2018) How to build a ‘Beautiful China’ in the Anthropocene. The political discourse and the intellectual debate on ecological civilization. J Chinese Polit Sci 23:365–386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-018-9538-7
Mele M, Randazzo L (2019) A causal investigation on the determinants of CO2 in China. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol 26:665–671. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2019.1641567
Neumayer E (2002) Do democracies exhibit stronger international environmental commitment? A cross-country analysis. J Peace Res 39:139–164. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343302039002001
Omri A, Euchi J, Hasaballah AH, Al-Tit A (2019) Determinants of environmental sustainability: evidence from Saudi Arabia. Sci Total Environ 657:1592–1601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.111
Panayotou T (1997) Demystifying the environmental Kuznets curve: turning a black box into a policy tool. Environment and development economics 465–484.
Park JY (1992) Canonical cointegrating regressions. Econometrica 60:119. https://doi.org/10.2307/2951679
Payne RA (1995) Freedom and the environment. J Democr 6:41–55. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1995.0053
Pesaran MH, Shin Y, Smith RJ (2001) Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. J Appl Econ 16:289–326. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.616
Phillips PCB, Hansen BE (1990) Statistical inference in instrumental variables regression with I(1) processes. Rev Econ Stud 57:99. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297545
Phillips PCB, Perron P (1988) Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika 75:335–346. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/75.2.335
Povitkina M (2018) The limits of democracy in tackling climate change. Env Polit 27:411–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2018.1444723
Sarkodie SA, Strezov V (2019) A review on environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis using bibliometric and meta-analysis. Sci Total Environ 649:128–145
Schultz CB, Crockett TR (1990) Economic development, democratization, and environmental protection in Eastern Europe. Bost Coll Environ Aff Law Rev 18:53
Scott CA, Pierce SA, Pasqualetti MJ, Jones AL, Montz BE, Hoover JH (2011) Policy and institutional dimensions of the water-energy nexus. Energy Policy 39:6622–6630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.08.013
Sinha A, Shahbaz M, Balsalobre D (2017) Exploring the relationship between energy usage segregation and environmental degradation in N-11 countries. J Clean Prod 168:1217–1229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.071
Sinha A, Shahbaz M, Balsalobre D (2019) Data selection and environmental Kuznets curve models-environmental Kuznets curve models, data choice, data sources, missing data, balanced and unbalanced panels. In Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) Academic Press, Cambridge, p 65–83
Stock JH, Watson MW (1993) A simple estimator of cointegrating vectors in higher order integrated systems. Econometrica 61:783. https://doi.org/10.2307/2951763
Sulemana I, James HS, Rikoon JS (2017) Environmental Kuznets curves for air pollution in African and developed countries: exploring turning point incomes and the role of democracy. J Environ Econ Policy 6:134–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/21606544.2016.1231635
Teets J (2018) The power of policy networks in authoritarian regimes: changing environmental policy in China. Governance 31(1):125–141
Torras M, Boyce JK (1998) Income, inequality, and pollution: a reassessment of the environmental Kuznets curve. Ecol Econ 25:147–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00177-8
Ulucak R, Yücel AG, Koçak E (2019) The process of sustainability: from past to present. In Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) Academic Press, Cambridge, p 37–53
Ulucak R, Koçak E, Erdoğan S, Kassouri Y (2020) Investigating the non-linear effects of globalization on material consumption in the EU countries: evidence from PSTR estimation. Res Policy 67:101667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101667
Ur Rahman Z, Chongbo W, Ahmad M (2019) An (a)symmetric analysis of the pollution haven hypothesis in the context of Pakistan: a non-linear approach. Carbon Manag 10:227–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2019.1577179
Usman O, Iorember PT, Olanipekun IO (2019) Revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis in India: the effects of energy consumption and democracy. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:13390–13400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04696-z
Usman O, Olanipekun IO, Iorember PT, Abu-Goodman M (2020) Modelling environmental degradation in South Africa: the effects of energy consumption, democracy, and globalization using innovation accounting tests. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:8334–8349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06687-6
Wang N, Zhu H, Guo Y, Peng C (2018) The heterogeneous effect of democracy, political globalization, and urbanization on PM2.5 concentrations in G20 countries: evidence from panel quantile regression. J Clean Prod 194:54–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.092
Wang R, Qi R, Cheng J, Zhu Y, Lu P (2020) The behavior and cognition of ecological civilization among Chinese university students. J Clean Prod 243:118464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118464
Yang H, Zhao D (2015) Performance legitimacy, state autonomy and China’s economic miracle. J Contemp China 24:64–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2014.918403
Yılmaz B, Bonaparte N (2018) Why has China succeeded? Does China’s success contradict Acemoğlu and Robinson’s thesis in “Why nations fail?” “Let China sleep, for when China wakes, she will shake the world”. IPC Working paper. https://ipc.sabanciuniv.edu/Content/Images/CKeditorImages/20200310-14032708.pdf. Accessed 26 Feb 2020
You WH, Zhu HM, Yu K, Peng C (2015) Democracy, financial openness, and global carbon dioxide emissions: heterogeneity across existing emission levels. World Dev 66:189–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.08.013
Zelli F, van Asselt H (2013) The institutional fragmentation of global environmental governance: causes, consequences, and responses. Glob Environ Polit 13:1–13
Zhang Y, Chen X, Wu Y et al (2019) Peaks of transportation CO 2 emissions of 119 countries for sustainable development: results from carbon Kuznets curve. Sustain Dev sd 2008. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2008
Zhu H, Xia H, Guo Y, Peng C (2018) The heterogeneous effects of urbanization and income inequality on CO2 emissions in BRICS economies: evidence from panel quantile regression. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:17176–17193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1900-y
Zmami M, Ben-Salha O (2020) An empirical analysis of the determinants of CO2 emissions in GCC countries. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2020.1715508
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Lotfi Aleya
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Koçak, E., Kızılkaya, O. Towards sustainable development in China: do political rights and civil liberties matter for environmental quality?. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27, 35488–35500 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09813-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09813-x