Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluating the effects of campaign-style environmental governance: evidence from Environmental Protection Interview in China

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Campaign-style governance is one of the political methods adopted by the Communist Party of China and the Chinese government, which is usually used to make up for shortcomings when regular governance policies fail because the defined tasks are incompatible with other policy goals, especially in the field of environmental governance. An “Environmental Protection Interview (EPI)” is one of the campaign-style environmental governance methods that target local officials. In this paper, the causal relationship between the implementation of EPI and pollutant emission reduction was confirmed using the method of Time-Varying Difference-in-difference (Time-Varying DID) to compensate for endogeneity problem and ensure that the results are still valid after several robustness checks. Our regional heterogeneous analysis shows that the policy effects of EPI decrease from east to west in China and that they have different emission reduction effects on various types of pollutants. Unfortunately, the results also suggest that policy implementation only temporarily affects pollutant emission reduction, which could be attributed to the governance approaches of campaign-style enforcement according to the impact mechanism analysis. This paper implies that the EPI should be continued to be implemented in the future with some improvements on pollutant reduction mechanisms to ensure effective adoption.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The 2016 China Water Resources Bullet is available at: http://www.mwr.gov.cn/sj/tjgb/szygb/201707/t20170711955305.html

  2. The 2016 China Land Resources Bullet is available at: http://www.mnr.gov.cn/sj/tjgb/201807/P020180704391918680508.pdf

  3. This news report is available in: https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1636204082501808209&wfr=spider&for=pc.

  4. Luna Lin, “Will China’s new premier Li Keqiang improve the environment?”, China Dialogue, February 4, 2013, https://www.chinadialogue.net/article/show/single/en/5847-Will-China-s-new-premier-Li-Keqiang-improve-the-environment-.

  5. The homepage of SEDAC is: https://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/data/set/sdei-global-annual-gwr-pm2-5-modis-misr-seawifs-aod/data-download.

References

  • Aken TV (2015) Commentary: actions speak louder than words: a political economic take on campaign-style enforcement. Public Adm Rev 75(1):96–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Brals D, Aderibigbe SA, Wit FW (2017) The effect of health insurance and health facility-upgrades on hospital deliveries in rural Nigeria: a controlled interrupted time-series study. Health Policy Plan 32(7):990–1001

    Google Scholar 

  • Callaway B, Sant’Anna PH (2019) Difference-in-differences with multiple time periods and an application on the minimum wage and employment. SSRN Electron J 3148250

  • Chen T, Kung KS (2019) Busting the ‘Princelings’: the campaign against corruption in China’s primary land market. Q J Econ 134(1):185–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Ebenstein A, Greenstone M (2013) Evidence on the impact of sustained exposure to air pollution on life expectancy from China’s Huai River policy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110(32):12936–12941

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Li P, Lu Y (2018) Career concerns and multitasking local bureaucrats: evidence of a target-based performance evaluation system in China. J Dev Econ 133:84–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Coria J (2009) Environmental policy, fuel prices and the switching to natural gas in Santiago, Chile. Ecol Econ 68(11):2877–2884

    Google Scholar 

  • Coria J, Sterner T (2010) To trade or not to trade: firm-level analysis of emissions trading in Santiago, Chile. J Environ Manag 91(11):2126–2133

    Google Scholar 

  • Duflo E, Greenstone M, Pande R, Ryan N (2013) Truth-telling by third-party auditors and the response of polluting firms: experimental evidence from India. Q J Econ 128(4):1499–1545

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebenstein A, Fan M, Greenstone M (2017) New evidence on the impact of sustained exposure to air pollution on life expectancy from China’s Huai River Policy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114(39):10384–10389

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eskeland GS, Feyzioglu T (1997) Rationing can backfire: the “Day without a car” in Mexico City. World Bank Econ Rev 11(3):383–408

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan Z, Zhao R (2019) Does rule of law promote pollution control? Evidence from the establishment of the environmental court. Econ Res 54(3):31–37 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujii H, Managi S (2013) Determinants of eco-efficiency in the Chinese industrial sector. J Environ Sci 25:20–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenstone M (2004) Did the Clean Air Act cause the remarkable decline in sulfur dioxide concentrations? J Environ Econ Manag 47(3):585–611

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenstone M, Hanna R (2014) Environmental regulations, air and water pollution, and infant mortality in India. Am Econ Rev 104(10):3028–2072

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausmann R, Hwang J, Rodrik D (2005) What you export matters. NBER Working Paper No.11905

  • Heyman F, Sjoholm F, Tingvall PG (2007) Is there really a foreign ownership wage premium? Evidence from matched employer-employee data. J Int Econ 73(2):355–376

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang X, Li X, He L, Feng N, Hu M, Niu Y, Zeng L (2010) 5-Year study of rainwater chemistry in a coastal mega-city in South China. Atmos Res 97(1-2):185–193

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jere EG (1988) Drug regulation: Quo Vadis? J Am Med Assoc 260(20):3052–3053

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin Y, Lin L (2014) China’s provincial industrial pollution: the role of technical efficiency, pollution levy and pollution quantity control. Environ Dev Econ 19(1):111–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Konisky DM (2008) Regulator attitudes and the environmental race to the bottom argument. J Publ Adm Res Theor 18(2):321–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Laporte A, Windmeijer F (2005) Estimation of panel data models with binary indicators when treatment effects are not constant over time. Econ Lett 88(3):389–396

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu NN, Lo WH, Zhan X, Wang W (2015) Campaign-style enforcement and regulatory compliance. Public Adm Rev 75(1):85–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Matland RE (1995) Synthesizing the implementation literature: the ambiguity-conflict model of policy implementation. J Publ Adm Res Theor 5(2):145–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Montero JP, Sanchez JM, Katz R (2002) A market-based environmental policy experiment in Chile. J Law Econ 45(1):267–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Newig J, Koontz TM (2014) Multi-level governance, policy implementation and participation: the EU’s mandated participatory planning approach to implementing environmental policy. J Eur Public Policy 21(2):248–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Ni X, Yuan C (2014) How local government campaign-style governance become routinized? A case study for special action. Aust J Public Adm 7(2):70–96 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nie H, Jiang M, Wang X (2013) The impact of political cycle: evidence from coalmine accidents in China. J Comp Econ 41(4):995–1011

    Google Scholar 

  • North DW, Stern PC, Webler T, Field P (2014) Public and stakeholder participation for managing and reducing the risks of shale gas development. Environ Sci Technol 48(15):8388–8396

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ren H, Folmer H, Vlist AJ (2018) The impact of home ownership on life satisfaction in urban China: a propensity score matching analysis. J Happiness Stud 19(2):397–422

    Google Scholar 

  • Song Y, Yang T, Zhang M (2019) Research on the impact of environmental regulation on enterprise technology innovation—an empirical analysis based on Chinese provincial panel data. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(1):21835–21848

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun Y, Guo J (2017) The operation process and genetic mechanism of Chinese campaign-style governance model: The case study of “APEC Blue”. Am J Ind Bus Manag 7:372–385

    Google Scholar 

  • Tao M, Chen L, Xiong X, Zhang M, Ma P, Tao J, Wang Z (2014) Formation process of the widespread extreme haze pollution over northern China in January 2013: implications for regional air quality and climate. Atmos Environ 98:417–425

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tietenberg T (1998) Disclosure strategies for pollution control. Environ Resour Econ 11:587–602

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Wheeler D (2005) Financial incentives and endogenous enforcement in China’s pollution levy system. J Environ Econ Manag 49(1):174–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Yang J, Ge C, Cao D, Schreifels J (2004) Controlling sulfur dioxide in China: will emission trading work? Environ Sci Policy Sustain Dev 46(5):28–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Zhao L, Xie Y, Hu Q (2016) “APEC blue”—The effects and implications of joint pollution prevention and control program. Sci Total Environ 553:429–438

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang K, Yin H, Chen Y (2019) The effect of environmental regulation on air quality: a study of new ambient air quality standards in China. J Clean Prod 4:268–279

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2007) Cost of pollution in China: economic estimates of physical damages

  • Wu J, Wang R (2019) Have the talk with local officials about environmental protection promoted the efficiency of local government environmental governance? Empirical analysis based on Difference in Differences method. J Public Manag 1:54–65 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, Xu M, Zhang P (2018) The impact of governmental performance assessment policy and citizen participation on improving environmental performance across Chinese provinces. J Clean Prod 194:227–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang R, Chen W (2019) Spatial correlation, influencing factors and environmental supervision mechanism construction of atmospheric pollution: an empirical study on SO2 emissions in China. Sustainability 11:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhan JV, Qin S (2017) The art of political ambiguity: top-down intergovernmental information asymmetry in China. J Chin Govern 2(2):149–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang P, Wu J (2018) Impact of mandatory targets on PM2.5, concentration control in Chinese cities. J Clean Prod 197:323–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Zhang X, Chen X (2017) Happiness in the air: how does a dirty sky affect mental health and subjective well-being? J Environ Econ Manag 85:81–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao X, Ortolano L (2010) Implementing China’s national energy conservation policies at state-owned electric power generation plants. Energ Policy 38(10):6293–6306

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We want to thank Prof. Ying Fang for his comments and suggestions on this paper. We also want to thank the anonymous referees for their constructive suggestions on the earlier draft of our paper, upon which we have improved the content.

Funding

This paper was funded by the National Social Science Foundation of China (14BGL161).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu Wang.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Eyup Dogan

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, Y., Zhang, X. & Wang, Y. Evaluating the effects of campaign-style environmental governance: evidence from Environmental Protection Interview in China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27, 28333–28347 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09243-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09243-9

Keywords

Navigation