Abstract
The inefficient enforcement of environmental policies cannot address global environmental challenges. As a result, China's government has implemented the Central Environmental Protection Inspection (CEPI) to overcome the policy-implementation gap between higher and lower levels of government. The existing literature has examined the positive effects of CEPI on environmental pollution, but has not explained the mechanisms for its success. To examine these mechanisms, this article uses a series of regression analyses on an empirical data set of 282 prefecture-level cities from 2010 to 2018. The results identify the mechanism for the effective implementation of CEPI, from the perspective of the campaign-style governance of local officials at local levels. This study also shows the heterogeneity of the campaign-style governance behavior of local officials, including position types and professional and cultural backgrounds. And finally, this study demonstrates that the campaign-style governance behavior of local officials has a moderating effect on the relationship between environmental pollution and local officials’ promotion. Ultimately the article proposes that higher government levels should adopt the effective incentives policy to address gaps between environmental policy and implementation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
See, “Environmental Protection Law of the people's republic of China”: 1–2.
The State Environmental Protection Administration of China (SEPA).SEPA of China had changed name and administrative level for several times over the past decade. In 2018, the name was changed to the Ministry of Ecology and Environment. To avoid confusion, SPEA is used throughout this article.
SEPA issued the “Establishing Plans for Inspection Centers for Environmental Protection” in 2006, and established six regional inspection centers in East China, South China, Northwest China, Southwest China, Northeast China, and North China.
References
Blanchard O, Shleifer A (2001) Federalism with and without political centralization: China versus Russia. IMF Econ Rev 48(1):171–179
Bo Z (2004) The 16th Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party: formal institutions and factional groups. J Contemp Chin 13(39):223–256
Cai H, Treisman D (2005) Does competition for capital discipline governments? Decentralization, globalization, and public policy. Am Econ Rev 95(3):817–830
Chen J, Luo D, She G, Ying Q (2017) Incentive or selection? A new investigation of local leaders’ political turnover in China. Soc Sci Q 98:341–359
Chen ZF, Zhang XY, Chen FL (2021) Have driving restrictions reduced air pollution: evidence from prefecture-level cities of China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:3106–3120
Cheng TJ, Tsai CM (2009) Powering rent seeking in the electricity industry. Rent Seek China:117–144
Feng GF, Dong M, Wen J, Chang CP (2018) The impacts of environmental governance on political turnover of municipal party secretary in China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:24668–24681
Gao Q, Lei P (2016) Does the industrial upgrading based on resource and environmental conservation help official promotion? Ecol Econ 32(7):29–33
Hodler R, Raschky PA (2014) Regional favoritism. Q J Econ 129:995–1033
Hsu A (2013) Environmental reviews and case studies: limitations and challenges of provincial environmental protection bureaus in China’s environmental data monitoring, reporting and verification. Environ Pract 15(03):280–292
Jia K, Chen S (2019) Could campaign-style enforcement improve environmental performance? Evidence from China's central environmental protection inspection. J Environ Manag 245:282–290
Kamp DSVD (2017) Clean air at what cost? The rise of blunt force regulation in China. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley
Kostka G (2014) Barriers to the implementation of environmental policies at the local level in China. Policy Research Working Paper; No. 7016. World Bank Group, © World Bank, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-7016
Kostka G, Nahm J (2017) Central-local relations: Recentralization and environmental governance in China. China Q 231:567–582
Kostka G, Zhang C (2018) Tightening the grip: environmental governance under Xi Jinping. Environ Polit 27:769–781
Kung JK, Ma C (2014) Can cultural norms reduce conflicts? Confucianism and peasant rebellions in Qing China. J Dev Econ 111:132–149
Landry PF, Lü X, Duan H (2018) Does performance matter? Evaluating political selection along the Chinese administrative ladder. Comp Polit Stud 51(8):1074–1105
Lazear E, Sherwin R (1981) Rank-ordered tournaments as optimal labor contracts. J Polit Econ 89:841–864
Li H, Zhou LA (2005) Political turnover and economic performance: the incentive role of personnel control in China. J Public Econ 89:1743–1762
Liu EM, Meng J, Wang JT (2014) Confucianism and preferences: evidence from lab experiments in Taiwan and China. J Econ Behav Organ 104:106–122
Liu NN, Lo CWH, Zhan X (2015) Campaign-style enforcement and regulatory compliance. Public Adm Rev 75:85–95
Mao WX, Wang WP, Sun HF, Luo D (2020) Barriers to implementing the strictest environmental protection institution: a multi-stakeholder perspective from China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:39375–39390
March (1994) A primer on decision making: how decisions happen. Free Press, New York
Maskin E, Qian Y, Xu C (2000) Incentives, information and organizational form. Rev Econ Stud 67(2):359–378
Migrom P, Roberts, Economics J (1992) Organization and management. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs
Pu Z, Fu J (2018) Economic growth, environmental sustainability and China mayors' promotion. J Clean Prod 172:454–465
Ran R (2013) Perverse incentive structure and policy implementation gap in China's local environmental politics. J Environ Policy Plan 15:17–39
Ran R (2017) Understanding blame politics in China's decentralized system of environmental governance: actors, strategies and context. China Q 231:634–661
Seligsohn D, Liu M, Zhang B (2018) The sound of one hand clapping: transparency without accountability. Environ Polit 27:804–829. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2018.1452522
Shin K (2018) Environmental policy innovations in China: a critical analysis from a low-carbon city. Environ Polit 27:830–851
UNEP (2019) Environmental rule of law: first global report. United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi
Van Rooij B (2006) Implementation of Chinese environmental law: regular enforcement and political campaigns. Dev Chang 37(1):57–74
Van Rooij B (2010) The people vs. pollution: understanding citizen action against pollution in China. J Contemp China 19(63):55–79
Van Rooij B, Stern R, FüRst K (2016) The Authoritarian logic of regulatory pluralism: understanding China’s new environmental actors. Regul Govern 10(1):3–13
Van Rooij B, Zhu Q, Na L, Qiliang W (2017) Centralizing trends and pollution law enforcement in China. China Q 231:583–606
Wang AL (2013) The search for sustainable legitimacy: environmental law and bureaucracy in China. Harv Envtl L Rev 37(2):365–440
Wang H, Di WH(2002) The determinants of government environmental performance: an empirical analysis of Chinese townships. Policy Research Working Paper; No.2937. World Bank Group, © World Bank, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-2937
Wang L, Liu XF, Xiong Y (2019) Central environmental protection inspector and air pollution governance: an empirical analysis based on micro-panel data of prefecture-level cities. China Industr Econ 10:5–22 (in Chinese)
Wong C, Valerie J K (2017) China’s war on air pollution: can existing governance structures support new ambitions? China Q 231:662–684. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741017000947
Wu J, Deng Y, Huang J, Morck R, Yeung B (2014) Incentives and outcomes: China’s environmental policy. Capitalism & Society 9(1):1–41
Xing F (1995) The Chinese cultural system: implications for cross-cultural management. SAM Adv Manag J 60(1):14–20
Yang B (2012) Confucianism, socialism, and capitalism: a comparison of cultural ideologies and implied managerial philosophies and practices in the P. R. China. Hum Resour Manag Rev 22:165–178
Zhang X (2017) Implementation of pollution control targets in China: has a centralized enforcement approach worked? China Q 231:749–774
Zhang B, Chen X, Guo H (2018) Does central supervision enhance local environmental enforcement? Quasi-experimental evidence from China. J Public Econ 164:70–90
Zhao C, Qu X, Luo S (2019) Impact of the InnoCom program on corporate innovation performance in China: evidence from Shanghai. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 146:103–118
Zheng S, Kahn ME, Sun W, Luo D (2014) Incentivizing china's urban mayors to mitigate pollution externalities: the role of the central government and public environmentalism. Soc Sci Electron Publ 47:61–71
Acknowledgments
Not applicable.
Funding
This research is funded by Research on the Relevance of the National Self-Technology Fund Project, Institutional Arrangement and the Owner’s Organizational Governance Ability—Based on a Multidimensional Analysis of Institutional Elements (71774107); Shanghai University of Finance and Economics Innovation Fund of Graduate Student “Government Environmental Governance and Citizen Participation Based on the Perspective of Happiness Research” (CXJJ-2019-369).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Min Wang who completed all the work of the paper is responsible for the paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Yes
Consent for publication
Yes
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible editor: Baojing Gu
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, M. Environmental governance as a new runway of promotion tournaments: campaign-style governance and policy implementation in China’s environmental laws. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 34924–34936 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13100-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13100-8