Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Occurrence and removal of triclosan in Canadian wastewater systems

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Triclosan (TCS) is an antimicrobial agent used in many personal care and cleaning products. It has been detected in most environmental compartments and the main entry pathway is wastewater effluents and biosolids. TCS was analyzed in 300 samples of raw influent, final effluent, and biosolids from 13 wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) across Canada representing five types of typical wastewater treatment systems. TCS was almost always detected in influent (median 1480 ng/L), effluent (median 107 ng/L), and biosolids (median 8000 ng/g dry weight) samples. Removals of TCS from lagoons as well as secondary and advanced treatment facilities were significantly higher than primary treatment facilities (p < 0.001). TCS removal was strongly correlated with organic nitrogen removal. TCS removals at most lagoons and plants that use biological treatment were higher during summer compared with winter. However, no seasonal or temperature effects were observed at the two primary facilities, likely due to the absence of biological activity. Aerobically digested solids contained the lowest levels (median 555 ng/g) while anaerobically digested primary solids contained the highest levels of TCS (median 22,700 ng/g). The results of this large comprehensive study demonstrate that TCS is consistently present in wastewater and biosolids at relatively high concentrations and that removal from wastewater and levels in biosolids are strongly influenced by the wastewater and solids treatment types.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allmyr M, Adolfsson-Erici M, McLachlan MS, Sandborgh-Englund G (2006) Triclosan in plasma and milk from Swedish nursing mothers and their exposure via personal care products. Sci Total Environ 372(1):87–93

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • American Public Health Association (2012) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrade NA, Lozano N, McConnell LL, Torrents A, Rice CP, Ramirez M (2015) Long-term trends of PBDEs, triclosan, and triclocarban in biosolids from a wastewater treatment plant in the mid-Atlantic region of the US. J Hazard Mater 282:68–74

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Antoniou CV, Koukouraki EE, Diamadopoulos E (2009) Analysis of selected pharmaceutical compounds and endocrine disruptors in municipal wastewater using solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography. Water Res 81(7):664–669

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong DL, Rice CP, Ramirez M, Torrents A (2017) Influence of thermal hydrolysis-anaerobic digestion treatment of wastewater solids on concentrations of triclosan, triclocarban, and their transformation products in biosolids. Chemosphere 171:609–616

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aryal N, Reinhold DM (2011) Phytoaccumulation of antimicrobials from biosolids: impacts on environmental fate and relevance to human exposure. Water Res 45(17):5545–5552

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baalbaki Z, Sultana T, Maere T, Vanrolleghem PA, Metcalfe CD, Yargeau V (2016) Fate and mass balance of contaminants of emerging concern during wastewater treatment determined using the fractionated approach. Sci Total Environ 573:1147–1158

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Batt AL, Kim S, Aga DS (2006) Enhanced biodegradation of iopromide and trimethoprim in nitrifying activated sludge. Environ Sci Technol 40(23):7367–7373

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bedoux G, Roig B, Thomas O, Dupont V, Le Bot B (2012) Occurrence and toxicity of antimicrobial triclosan and by-products in the environment. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 19(4):1044–1065

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Benjamini Y, Yekutieli D (2001) The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency. Ann Stat 29(4):1165–1188

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock M, Lyndall J, Barber T, Fuchsman P, Perruchon E, Capdevielle M (2010) Probabilistic application of a fugacity model to predict triclosan fate during wastewater treatment. Integr Environ Assess Manag 6(4):393–404

    Google Scholar 

  • Braga O, Smythe GA, Schäfer AI, Feitz AJ (2005) Fate of steroid estrogens in Australian inland and coastal wastewater treatment plants. Environ Sci Technol 39(9):3351–3358

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Calafat AM, Ye X, Wong L-Y, Reidy JA, Needham LL (2008) Urinary concentrations of triclosan in the U.S. population: 2003–2004. Environ Health Perspect 116(3):303–307

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chalew TEA, Halden RU (2009) Environmental exposure of aquatic and terrestrial biota to triclosan and triclocarban. J Am Water Resour Assoc 45(1):4–13

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen X, Nielsen JL, Furgal K, Liu Y, Lolas IB, Bester K (2011) Biodegradation of triclosan and formation of methyl-triclosan in activated sludge under aerobic conditions. Chemosphere 84(4):452–456

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen F, Ying G-G, Ma Y-B, Chen Z-F, Lai H-J, Peng F-J (2014) Field dissipation and risk assessment of typical personal care products TCC, TCS, AHTN and HHCB in biosolid-amended soils. Sci Total Environ 470-471:1078–1086

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coogan MA, Edziyie RE, La Point TW, Venables BJ (2007) Algal bioaccumulation of triclocarban, triclosan, and methyl-triclosan in a North Texas wastewater treatment plant receiving stream. Chemosphere 67(10):1911–1918

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Deo RP, Halden RU (2010a) Effect of sample filtration on the quality of monitoring data reported for organic compounds during wastewater treatment. J Environ Monit 12(2):478–483

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Deo RP, Halden RU (2010b) Comment on “the removal of pharmaceuticals, personal care products, endocrine disruptors and illicit drugs during wastewater treatment and its impact on the quality of receiving waters” by Barbara Kasprzyk-Hordern, Richard M. Dinsdale, and Alan J Guwy. Water Res 44(8):2685–2687

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dhillon G, Kaur S, Pulicharla R, Brar S, Cledón M, Verma M, Surampalli R (2015) Triclosan: current status, occurrence, environmental risks and bioaccumulation potential. Int J Environ Res Public Health 12(5):5657–5684

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Di Toro DM, McGrath JA (2000) Technical basis for narcotic chemicals and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon criteria. II Mixtures and sediments. Environ Toxicol Chem 19(8):1971–1982

    Google Scholar 

  • ECCC and HC (2016) Assessment report: Triclosan. 978-0-660-05976-1, Environment and Climate Change Canada and Health Canada http://www.ec.gc.ca/ese-ees/65584A12-2B7D-4273-9F7A-38EDF916ECAF/EN%20FSAR%20Triclosan%20with%20ISBN.pdf. Accessed Sept 2019

  • ECHA (2017) Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment - chapter R.11: PBT/vPvB assessment, European chemicals agency https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/13632/information_requirements_r11_en.pdf. Accessed Sept 2019

  • Gottschall N, Topp E, Metcalfe C, Edwards M, Payne M, Kleywegt S, Russell P, Lapen DR (2012) Pharmaceutical and personal care products in groundwater, subsurface drainage, soil, and wheat grain, following a high single application of municipal biosolids to a field. Chemosphere 87(2):194–203

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Government of Canada (2018) Proposed notice requiring the preparation and implementation of pollution prevention plans with respect to triclosan in certain products. Canada Gazette Part I, vol 152, No 47

  • Guerra P, Kim M, Shah A, Alaee M, Smyth SA (2014) Occurrence and fate of antibiotic, analgesic/anti-inflammatory, and antifungal compounds in five wastewater treatment processes. Sci Total Environ 473:235–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo J-H, Li X-H, Cao X-L, Li Y, Wang X-Z, Xu X-B (2009) Determination of triclosan, triclocarban and methyl-triclosan in aqueous samples by dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction combined with rapid liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr A 1216(15):3038–3043

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hedgespeth ML, Sapozhnikova Y, Pennington P, Clum A, Fairey A, Wirth E (2012) Pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) in treated wastewater discharges into Charleston Harbor, South Carolina. Sci Total Environ 437:1–9

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heidler J, Halden RU (2007) Mass balance assessment of triclosan removal during conventional sewage treatment. Chemosphere 66(2):362–369

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks KA, Fuzzen MLM, McCann EK, Arlos MJ, Bragg LM, Kleywegt S, Tetreault GR, McMaster ME, Servos MR (2017) Reduction of intersex in a wild fish population in response to major municipal wastewater treatment plant upgrades. Environ Sci Technol 51(3):1811–1819

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kantiani L, Farré M, Asperger D, Rubio F, González S, López de Alda MJ, Petrović M, Shelver WL, Barceló D (2008) Triclosan and methyl-triclosan monitoring study in the northeast of Spain using a magnetic particle enzyme immunoassay and confirmatory analysis by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. J Hydrol 361(1):1–9

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim J-W, Ramaswamy BR, Chang K-H, Isobe T, Tanabe S (2011) Multiresidue analytical method for the determination of antimicrobials, preservatives, benzotriazole UV stabilizers, flame retardants and plasticizers in fish using ultra high performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 1218(22):3511–3520

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim M, Guerra P, Theocharides M, Barclay K, Smyth SA, Alaee M (2013) Parameters affecting the occurrence and removal of polybrominated diphenyl ethers in twenty Canadian wastewater treatment plants. Water Res 47(7):2213–2221

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kookana RS, Ying G-G, Waller NJ (2011) Triclosan: its occurrence, fate and effects in the Australian environment. Water Sci Technol 63(4):598–604

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar KS, Priya SM, Peck AM, Sajwan KS (2010) Mass loadings of triclosan and triclocarbon from four wastewater treatment plants to three rivers and landfill in Savannah, Georgia, USA. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 58(2):275–285

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lalonde B, Garron C, Dove A, Struger J, Farmer K, Sekela M, Gledhill M, Backus S (2019) Investigation of spatial distributions and temporal trends of triclosan in Canadian surface waters. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 76(2):231–245

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Latch DE, Packer JL, Arnold WA, McNeill K (2003) Photochemical conversion of triclosan to 2,8-dichlorodibenzo-p-dioxin in aqueous solution. J Photochem Photobiol A 158(1):63–66

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee H-B, Kohli J, Peart TE, Nguyen N (2014) Selected chloro and bromo derivatives of triclosan—syntheses and their occurrence in Canadian sewage and biosolid samples. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 21(1):314–324

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lishman L, Smyth SA, Sarafin K, Kleywegt S, Toito J, Peart T, Lee B, Servos M, Beland M, Seto P (2006) Occurrence and reductions of pharmaceuticals and personal care products and estrogens by municipal wastewater treatment plants in Ontario, Canada. Sci Total Environ 367(2):544–558

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lozano N, Rice CP, Ramirez M, Torrents A (2010) Fate of triclosan in agricultural soils after biosolid applications. Chemosphere 78(6):760–766

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lozano N, Rice CP, Ramirez M, Torrents A (2012) Fate of triclosan and methyltriclosan in soil from biosolids application. Environ Pollut 160:103–108

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lozano N, Rice CP, Ramirez M, Torrents A (2013) Fate of triclocarban, triclosan and methyltriclosan during wastewater and biosolids treatment processes. Water Res 47(13):4519–4527

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McAvoy DC, Schatowitz B, Jacob M, Hauk A, Eckhoff WS (2002) Measurement of triclosan in wastewater treatment systems. Environ Toxicol Chem 21(7):1323–1329

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McNamara PJ, LaPara TM, Novak PJ (2014) The impacts of triclosan on anaerobic community structures, function, and antimicrobial resistance. Environ Sci Technol 48(13):7393–7400

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalf & Eddy (2003) Wastewater engineering, treatment and reuse, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mezcua M, Gómez MJ, Ferrer I, Aguera A, Hernando MD, Fernández-Alba AR (2004) Evidence of 2,7/2,8-dibenzodichloro-p-dioxin as a photodegradation product of triclosan in water and wastewater samples. Anal Chim Acta 524(1):241–247

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nieto A, Borrull F, Marcé RM, Pocurull E (2009) Determination of personal care products in sewage sludge by pressurized liquid extraction and ultra high performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 1216(30):5619–5625

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ort C, Lawrence MG, Reungoat J, Mueller JF (2010a) Sampling for PPCPs in wastewater systems: comparison of different sampling modes and optimization strategies. Environ Sci Technol 44(16):6289–6296

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ort C, Lawrence MG, Rieckermann J, Joss A (2010b) Sampling for pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) and illicit drugs in wastewater systems: are your conclusions valid? A critical review. Environ Sci Technol 44(16):6024–6035

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pape J, Woudneh MB, Grace R, Ronald MacGillivray A, Fikslin T, Cosgrove JR (2013) Fate of triclosan in tertiary wastewater treatment: chlorination. Water Qual Res J Can 48(4):333–343

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pothitou P, Voutsa D (2008) Endocrine disrupting compounds in municipal and industrial wastewater treatment plants in northern Greece. Chemosphere 73(11):1716–1723

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Regueiro J, Becerril E, Garcia-Jares C, Llompart M (2009) Trace analysis of parabens, triclosan and related chlorophenols in water by headspace solid-phase microextraction with in situ derivatization and gas chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 1216(23):4693–4702

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzenbach RP, Gschwend PM, Imboden DM (2003) Environmental organic chemistry. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Servos MR, Bennie DT, Burnison BK, Jurkovic A, McInnis R, Neheli T, Schnell A, Seto P, Smyth SA, Ternes TA (2005) Distribution of estrogens, 17β-estradiol and estrone, in Canadian municipal wastewater treatment plants. Sci Total Envion 336(1):155–170

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smyth SA, Lishman LA, McBean EA, Kleywegt S, Yang JJ, Svoboda LM, Lee HB, Seto P (2008) Seasonal occurrence and removal of polycyclic and nitro musks from wastewater treatment plants in Ontario, Canada. J Environ Eng Sci 7(4):299–317

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tohidi F, Cai Z (2017) Fate and mass balance of triclosan and its degradation products: comparison of three different types of wastewater treatments and aerobic/anaerobic sludge digestion. J Hazard Mater 323:329–340

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tran NH, Reinhard M, Gin KY-H (2018) Occurrence and fate of emerging contaminants in municipal wastewater treatment plants from different geographical regions-a review. Water Res 133:182–207

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Trinh T, van den Akker B, Coleman HM, Stuetz RM, Drewes JE, Le-Clech P, Khan SJ (2016) Seasonal variations in fate and removal of trace organic chemical contaminants while operating a full-scale membrane bioreactor. Sci Total Envion 550:176–183

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • USEPA (2007) Method 1694: pharmaceuticals and personal care products in water, soil, sediment, and biosolids by HPLC/MS/MS. EPA-821-R-08-002. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-10/documents/method_1694_2007.pdf. Accessed Sept 2019

  • USEPA (2009) Targeted national sewage sludge survey statistical analysis report. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi/P1003RNO.PDF?Dockey=P1003RNO.PDF. Accessed Sept 2019

  • Wells MJM (2006) Log DOW: key to understanding and regulating wastewater-derived contaminants. Environ Chem 3(6):439–449

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ying G-G, Kookana RS (2007) Triclosan in wastewaters and biosolids from Australian wastewater treatment plants. Environ Int 33(2):199–205

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yu C-P, Chu K-H (2009) Occurrence of pharmaceuticals and personal care products along the west prong little Pigeon River in East Tennessee, USA. Chemosphere 75(10):1281–1286

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was undertaken in support of the Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC) and Health Canada risk assessment of triclosan. Thanks are due to the Canadian municipal WWTPs that granted access for sampling, and to Scott Dunlop, Sam Dith, Mehrzad Parsa, Scott Alexander, and Julian Torres for completion of field sampling.

Funding

Funding was provided by the Chemicals Management Plan (CMP).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shirley Anne Smyth.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Ester Heath

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 67 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guerra, P., Teslic, S., Shah, A. et al. Occurrence and removal of triclosan in Canadian wastewater systems. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26, 31873–31886 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06338-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06338-w

Keywords

Navigation