Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Groundwater vulnerability assessment using the GALDIT model and the improved DRASTIC model: a case in Weibei Plain, China

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study employed a modified DRASTIC model (AHP-DRASTIC model) and GALDIT model to evaluate the inherent vulnerability of shallow groundwater in Weibei Plain in Shandong Province of China and its vulnerability to seawater intrusion. The AHP-DRASTIC model uses the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to determine the weight of each parameter and reduces the subjectivity of evaluation. The vulnerability map generated by the AHP-DRASTIC model shows four types of vulnerability: high (25.0%), higher (28.0%), moderate (29.7%), and low (17.3%), and the high-vulnerability areas are mainly distributed in the area north of Qingxiang Town and south of Changyi County. The distribution of high-vulnerability areas mainly related to the depth of groundwater table is 4–8 m, and the recharge of rainfall is 100–175 mm/year. The vulnerability map generated by the GALDIT model shows four types of vulnerability: high (33.5%), higher (23.4%), moderate (22.1%), and low (21.0%), and the high-vulnerability areas are mainly distributed in the coastal areas of Hanting District-Zhuli Town, the areas north of Linqu County, and the areas south of Shouguang County. The distribution of high-vulnerability areas mainly related to the distance between these areas and the coast is < 2.5 km, with aquifer thickness > 15 m. Total dissolved solid, NO3, Cl, and SO42− are used to verify the accuracy of the DRASTIC model, the AHP-DRASTIC model, and the GALDIT model. The results show that the AHP-DRASTIC model is more suitable for the assessment of inherent vulnerability of shallow groundwater in the study area than the DRASTIC model, and human activities have a major impact on the verification of vulnerability and should be considered when conducting groundwater vulnerability verification. The results of this study can provide grounds for groundwater management and protection and land use planning in the study area and provide new ideas for groundwater vulnerability assessment in coastal areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Abadi AM, Al-Shamma’a AM, Aljabbari MH (2017) A GIS-based DRASTIC model for assessing intrinsic groundwater vulnerability in northeastern Missan governorate, southern Iraq. Appl Water Sci 7(1):89–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aller, L., Bennett, T., Lehr, J., et al., 1987. DRASTIC: a standardized system for evaluating groundwater pollution potential using hydrogeologic settings. EPA, Washington, EPA-600/2-87-035.

  • Almasri MN (2008) Assessment of intrinsic vulnerability to contamination for Gaza coastal aquifer, Palestine. J Environ Manag 88(4):577–593

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Alsharifa HM (2017) Assessing the groundwater vulnerability in the upper aquifers of Zarqa River Basin, Jordan using DRASTIC, SINTACS and GOD methods. Int J Water Res Environ Engineering 9(2):44–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antonakos AK, Lambrakis NJ (2007) Development and testing of three hybrid methods for the assessment of aquifer vulnerability to nitrates, based on the drastic model, an example from NE Korinthia, Greece. J Hydrol 333(2–4):288–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayed B, Jmal I, Sahal S et al (2017) Assessment of groundwater vulnerability using a specific vulnerability method: case of Maritime Djeffara shallow aquifer (southeastern Tunisia). Arab J Geosci 10(12):261–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baki S, Hilali M, Kacimi I, Kassou N, Nouiyti N, Bahassi A (2017) Assessment of groundwater intrinsic vulnerability to pollution in the pre-Saharan areas—the case of the Tafilalet plain (Southeast Morocco). Procedia Earth Planetary Sci 17:590–593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chachadi AG, Lobo-Ferreira JP (2001) Seawater intrusion vulnerability mapping of aquifers using the GALDIT method. COASTIN 4:7–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Chachadi, A.G., Lobo-Ferreira, J.P., 2005. Assessing aquifer vulnerability to sea-water intrusion using GALDIT method: part 2-GALDIT indicators description, Fourth Inter-Celtic Colloquium on Hydrogeology and Management of Water Resources, Portugal, 11–14, July 2005, CD of Proceedings

  • Chen, G., 2010. Risk assessment of seawater intrusion disaster in the Laizhou Bay based on GIS. Master’s thesis, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, China (in Chinese)

  • Chen, G., 2013. Mechanisms underlying of seawaterintrusion and evaluation of early warningsystems in the Laizhou Bay area. Doctor’s thesis, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China (in Chinese)

  • Diao W, Feng Z, Liu X et al (2017) Optimal allocation of water resource in north of Weifang based on visual MODFLOW. Water Res Power 35(4):25–28 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng A, Gu D, Xia D (2006) Developments and causes of seawater intrusion on the south coast of Laizhou Bay. Cost Engineering 25:7–13 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamza SM, Ahsan A, Imteaz MA et al (2017) Assessment of spatial relationship between groundwater pollution vulnerability and quality indices in Kano, Nigeria. Arab J Geosci 10(7):167–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han D, Kohfahl C, Song X, Xiao G, Yang J (2011) Geochemical and isotopic evidence for palaeo-seawater intrusion into the south coast aquifer of Laizhou Bay, China. Appl Geochem 26(5):863–883

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Han DM, Song XF, Currell MJ, Yang JL, Xiao GQ (2014) Chemical and isotopic constraints on evolution of groundwater salinization in the coastal plain aquifer of Laizhou Bay, China. J Hydrol 508:12–27

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Han M (1996) Relationship between seawater intrusion and landforms in Laizhou Bay. Oceanologia Et Limnologia Sinica 27(4):414–420 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • He Z, Ma C, Zhou A, Qi H, Liu C, Cai H, Zhu H (2018) Using hydrochemical and stable isotopic (δ2H, δ18O, δ11B, and δ37Cl) data to understand groundwater evolution in an unconsolidated aquifer system in the southern coastal area of Laizhou Bay, China. Appl Geochemistry 90:129–141

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keita S, Tang Z (2017) A novel method of sensitivity analysis testing by applying the DRASTIC and fuzzy optimization methods to assess groundwater vulnerability to pollution: the case of the Senegal River basin in Mali. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 17(8):1375–1392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang Y (2015) Vulnerability assessment of pore groundwater in the plain area of Shanxi Province, China. Shanxi Water Res, 5:17–18

  • Liao M, Yan Y, Zheng Q et al (2016) Study on specific vulnerability of nitrate in shallow groundwaterin Huai River plain area. J Nanjing University (Natural Sci) 52(1):86–95 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Z., 2015. The relationship between sea water intrusion and underground brine water in South Laizhou Bay. Master’s thesis, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin, China (in Chinese)

  • Liu L, Zhou Q, Li C (2017a) Evaluation of groundwater vulnerability in wudang district of Guiyang—an improved DRASTIC model based on AHP. Guizhou Sci 35(1):34–37 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu S, Tang Z, Gao M et al (2017b) Evolutionary process of saline-water intrusion in Holocene and Late Pleistocene groundwater in southern Laizhou Bay. Sci Total Environ (607-608):586–599

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Yang Q, Xiao Z (2016) Vulnerability assessment of shallow groundwater in Kunming Basin. J Groundwater 38(1):53–55 (in Chinese)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meng G, Han Y, Wang S (1997) Types of seawater intrusion and its subarea on the south bank of Laizhou Bay. J Oceanography Huanghai Bohai Seas 15(2):25–32 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Meng Y, Fu J, Wang Z et al (2014) The characteristics and current situation of sea/salt water intrusion in the north of Weifang. Shandong Land Res 30(6):62–64 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mfumu Kihumba A, Vanclooster M, Ndembo Longo J (2017) Assessing groundwater vulnerability in the Kinshasa region, DR Congo, using a calibrated DRASTIC model. J Afr Earth Sci 126:13–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mogaji KA, Lim HS (2017) Development of a GIS-based catastrophe theory model (modified DRASTIC model) for groundwater vulnerability assessment. Earth Sci Inf 10(3):339–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nobre RCM, Rotunno Filho OC, Mansur WJ, Nobre MMM, Cosenza CAN (2007) Groundwater vulnerability and risk mapping using GIS, modeling and a fuzzy logic tool. J Contam Hydrol 94(3–4):277–292

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shrestha S, Kafle R, Pandey VP (2017) Evaluation of index-overlay methods for groundwater vulnerability and risk assessment in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. Sci Total Environ 575:779–790

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sun Y, Zhang A, Wang Q (2011) Effects of human activities on the geomorphology and seawater intrusion on the south bank of Laizhou Bay in the recent 30 years. Marine Geology Quaternary Geology 31(5):43–50 (in Chinese)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vrba, J., Zaporozec, A., 1994. Guidebook on mapping groundwater vulnerability. International contributions to hydrogeology, 16

  • Wang J, Yu Q, Li P (2015a) Groundwater vulnerability assessment in Minqin Basin based on DRASTIC model and GIS technology. J Lanzhou University (Natural Sci) 51(6):882–887 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Feng G, Wang L (2015b) Groundwater vulnerability assessment in plain area of Hainan Province. South-to-North Water Transfer Water Sci Technol 13(3):548–552 (in Chinese)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Worrall F, Besien T (2005) The vulnerability of groundwater to pesticide contamination estimated directly from observations of presence or absence in wells. J Hydrol 303(1–4):92–107

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Worrall F, Besien T, Kolpin DW (2002) Groundwater vulnerability: interactions of chemical and site properties. Sci Total Environ 299(1):131–143

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wu X, Li B, Ma C (2018) Assessment of groundwater vulnerability by applying the modified DRASTIC model in Beihai City, China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(13):12713–12727

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xie C (2016) Groundwater vulnerability assessment method based on DRASTIC model and its application—taking Jingquan fault block as an example. West Res, 1:32–34 (in Chinese)

  • Yang J, Tang Z, Jiao T et al (2017) Combining AHP and genetic algorithms approaches to modify DRASTIC model to assess groundwater vulnerability: a case study from Jianghan Plain, China. Environ Earth Sci 76(12):425–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Q, Luan MT, Chong JZ (1999) Application of DRASTIC parameter system method in groundwater vulnerability assessment in Dalian. J Polytechnic University 39(5):684–688 (in Chinese)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H, Hu B, Ma Z (2017) Numerical simulation of seawater intrusion in Weihe River estuary of Laizhou Bay. Environ Sci Technol 40(S1):110–118 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Funding for this project was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41572212).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chuanming Ma.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Marcus Schulz

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hu, X., Ma, C., Qi, H. et al. Groundwater vulnerability assessment using the GALDIT model and the improved DRASTIC model: a case in Weibei Plain, China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25, 32524–32539 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3196-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3196-3

Keywords

Navigation