Skip to main content
Log in

Biochar amendment immobilizes arsenic in farmland and reduces its bioavailability

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aimed to determine effects of biochar derived from wheat straw at 500 °C on arsenic immobilization in a soil-Brassica campestris L system. When the soils amended with 4% modified biochar (MBC), 0.5% Fe grit as zero-valent iron (ZVI), 0.5% Fe grit + 4% MBC (ZMBC), 0.5% ZVI + 4% biochar (ZBC), 4% biochar (BC), and control (without amendments), it confirmed that available arsenic concentration in soils occurred in the following order: ZMBC < MBC < ZVI < ZBC < Control < BC. Water-soluble As (WSAs) was reduced by 89.74% and 92.30% in MBC- and ZMBC-amended soils, respectively, compared to the control. When MBC applied into soil, As uptake of shoot and root decreased by 44.55% and 45.40%, respectively, and ZMBC resulted in 74.92% and 71.80% reduction in shoot and root As of Brassica campestris L. Immobilization effect of As in ZBC was also observed though BC elevated plant As uptake significantly. The immobilization effect of MBC was mainly attributed to Fe2O3 impregnation illustrated by x-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images through sorption, precipitation, and coprecipitation. Such Fe containing complexes might impede As translocation from root to shoot and subsequently reduce As accumulation in the plant with modified biochar amendment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agrafioti E, Kalderis D, Diamadopoulos E et al (2014) Ca and Fe modified biochars as adsorbents of arsenic and chromium in aqueous solutions. J Environ Manag 146:444–450

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aredes S, Klein B, Pawlik M (2012) The removal of arsenic from water using natural iron oxide minerals. J Clean Prod 29:208–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argos M, Pierce BL, van Geen A et al (2010) Arsenic exposure from drinking water and mortality in Bangladesh Reply. LANCET 376(9753):1642

  • Aricibar OJA, Josue DBJ, Rios HJC et al (2014) Influence of iron content, surface area and charge distribution in the arsenic removal by activated carbons. Chem Eng J 249:201–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakshi S, Banik C, Rathke SJ, Laird DA (2018) Arsenic sorption on zero-valent iron-biochar complexes. Water Res 137:153–163

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beesley L, Marmiroli M, Pagano L et al (2013) Biochar addition to an arsenic contaminated soil increases arsenic concentrations in the pore water but reduces uptake to tomato plants (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Sci Total Environ 454–455:598–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casado M, Anawar HM, Carcia-sanchez A et al (2007) Arsenic bioavailability in polluted mining soils and uptake by tolerant plants (EI Cabaco mine, Spain). Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 79(1):29

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen BL, Chen ZM, Lv SF (2011) A novel magnetic biochar efficiently sorbs organic pollutants and phosphate. Bioresour Technol 102(2):716–723

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Z, Wang YP, Xia D, Jiang X, Fu D, Shen L, Wang H, Li QB (2016) Enhanced bioreduction of iron and arsenic in sediment by biochar amendment influencing microbial community composition and dissolved organic matter content and composition. J Hazard Mater 311:20–29

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ciopec M, Negrea A, Lupa L, Davidescu C, Negrea P (2014) Studies regarding As(V) adsorption from underground water by Fe-XAD-DEHPA impregnated resin. Equilibrium sorption and fixed-bed column tests. Molecules 19:16082–16101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clemente R, Pardo T, Madejón P, Madejón E, Bernal MP (2015) Food byproducts as amendments in trace elements contaminated soils. Food Res Int 73:176–189

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Debiec K, Rzepa G, Bajda T, Zych L, Krzysztoforski J, Sklodowska A, Drewniak L (2017) The influence of thermal treatment on bioweathering and arsenic sorption capacity of a natural iron (oxyhydr) oxide-based adsorbent. Chemosphere 188:99–109

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dermont G, Bergeron M, Mercier G, Richer-Laflèche M (2008) Soil washing for metal removal: a review of physical/chemical technologies and field applications. J Hazard Mater 152(1):1–31

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dixit S, Hering JG (2003) Comparison of arsenic (V) and arsenic (III) sorption onto iron oxide minerals: implications for arsenic mobility. Environ Sci Technol 37(18):4182–4189

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dou XM, Li R, Zhao B, Liang W (2010) Arsenate removal from water by zero valent iron/activated carbon galvanic couples. J Hazard Mater 182:108–114

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Duan XH, Zhang CC, Srinivasakannan C, Wang X (2017) Waste walnut shell valorization to iron loaded biochar and its application to arsenic removal. Resource-Efficient Technol 3:29–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrow EM, Wang J, Burken JG, Shi H, Yan W, Yang J, Hua B, Deng B (2015) Reducing arsenic accumulation in rice grain through iron oxide amendment. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 118:55–61

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hale JR, Foos A, Zubrow JS, Cook J (1997) Better characterization of arsenic and chromium in soils: a field-scale example. J Soil Contam 6:371–389

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hanaoka, Okumura (2014) Effect of metal content on CO2 gasification behavior of K- and Fe-loaded bio-chars. J THERM SCI TECH-JPN 9(2):6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartley W, Lepp NW (2008) Remediation of arsenic contaminated soils by iron-oxide application, evaluated in terms of plant productivity, arsenic and phytotoxic metal uptake. Sci Total Environ 390:35–44

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • He RZ, Peng ZY, Huang H et al (2018) Synthesis and characterization of an iron-impregnated biochar for aqueous arsenic removal. Sci Total Environ 612:1177–1186

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klüpfel L, Keiluweit M, Kleber M, Sander M (2014) Redox properties of plant biomass-derived black carbon (biochar). Environ Sci Technol 48:5601–5611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Komárek M, Vaněk A, Ettler V (2013) Chemical stabilization of metals and arsenic in contaminated soils using oxides—a review. Environ Pollut 172:9–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumpiene J, Lagerkvist A, Maurice C (2008) Stabilization of As, Cr, Cu, Pb and Zn in soil using amendments - a review. Waste Manag 28:215–225

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laird D, Fleming P, Wang B, Horton R, Karlen D (2010) Biochar impact on nutrient leaching from a Midwestern agricultural soil. Geoderma 158:436–442

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee SH, Kim EY, Park H, Yun J, Kim JG (2011) In situ stabilization of arsenic and metal-contaminated agricultural soil using industrial by-products. Geoderma 161:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li LF, Zeng XB, Bai LY et al (2009) Cadmium accumulation in vegetable plantation land soils under protected cultivation: a case study. Commun Soil Sci Plan 40:2169–2184

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li L-F, Zeng X-B, Bai L-Y et al (2010) Soil arsenic content and its health risk assessment for agricultural products in the region surrounding Shimen arsenic sulphide mine. Chin Appl Ecol 21(11):2946–2951 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Li LF, Zeng XB, Su SM, Wu CX, Wang YL (2014) Arsenic content and the bioavailability in farmland soils affected by mining activities of a realgar ore, South China. Adv Mater Res 955-959:3645–3654

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li YL, Zhang BG, Cheng M et al (2016) Spontaneous arsenic (III) oxidation with bioelectricity generation insingle-chamber microbial fuel cells. J Hazard MaterJ Hazard Mater 306:8–12

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li JS, Bei YJZ, Tsang DCW et al (2017a) Arsenic-containing soil from geogenic source in Hong Kong: leaching characteristics and stabilization/solidification. Chemosphere 182:31–39

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li H, Dong X, Silva D et al (2017b) Mechanisms of metal sorption by biochars: biochar characteristics and modifications. Chemosphere 178:466–478

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liao XY, Chen TB, Xie H, Liu YR (2005) Soil As contamination and its risk assessment in areas near the industrial districts of Chenzhou City, Southern China. Environ Int 31(6):791–798

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu HY, Probst A, Liao BH (2005) Metal contamination of soils and crops affected by the Chenzhou lead/zinc mine spill (Hunan, China). Sci Total Environ 339:153–166

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu ZY, Yang W, Xu W et al (2018) Removal of elemental mercury by bio-chars derived from seaweed impregnated with potassium iodine. Chem Eng J 339:468–478

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lu RK (1999) The analysis method of soil agricultural chemistry. China agricultural science and Technology Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Madeira AC, Varennes AD, Abreu MM et al (2012) Tomato and parsley growth, arsenic uptake and translocation in a contaminated amended soil. J Geochem Explor 123:114–121

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Manninen PKG, Pantsar-Kallio M (1997) Speciation of mobile arsenic in soil samples as a function of Ph. Sci Total Environ 204:193–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miretzky P, Cirelli AF (2010) Remediation of arsenic-contaminated soils by iron amendments: a review. Crit Rev Env Sci Tec 40(2):93–115

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno JE, Esteban E, Penalosa JM (2012) The fate of arsenic in the soil–plant system. In: Whitacre DM (ed) Reviews of environmental contamination and toxicology. Springer, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno JE, Sepǘlveda R, Esteban E et al (2017) Efficiency of organic and mineral based amendments to reduce metal[loid]mobility and uptake (Lolium perenne) from a pyrite-waste contaminated soil. J Geochem Explor 174:46–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niazi NK, Burton ED (2016) Arsenic sorption to nanoparticulate mackinawite (FeS): an examination of phosphate competition. Environ Pollut 218:111–117

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Niazi NK, Bibi I, Shahid M, Ok YS, Burton ED, Wang H, Shaheen SM, Rinklebe J, Lüttge A (2018a) Arsenic removal by perilla leaf biochar in aqueous solutions and groundwater: an integrated spectroscopic and microscopic examination. Environ Pollut 232:31–41

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Niazi NK, Bibi I, Shahid M, Ok YS, Shaheen SM, Rinklebe J, Wang H, Murtaza B, Islam E, Farrakh Nawaz M, Lüttge A (2018b) Arsenic removal by Japanese oak wood biochar in aqueous solutions and well water: investigating arsenic fate using integrated spectroscopic and microscopic techniques. Sci Total Environ 621:1642–1651

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rillig MC, Wagner M, Salem M, Antunes PM, George C, Ramke HG, Titirici MM, Antonietti M (2010) Material derived from hydrothermal carbonization: effects on plant growth and arbuscular mycorrhiza. Appl Soil Ecol 45:238–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shakoor MB, Niazi NK, Bibi I, Murtaza G, Kunhikrishnan A, Seshadri B, Shahid M, Ali S, Bolan NS, Ok YS, Abid M, Ali F (2016) Remediation of arsenic-contaminated water using agricultural wastes as biosorbents. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 46:467–499

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shi WY, Shao HB, Li H, Shao MA, du S (2009) Progress in the remediation of hazardous heavy metal-polluted soils by natural zeolite. J Hazard Mater 170:1–6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smebye A, Alling V, Vogt RD, Gadmar TC, Mulder J, Cornelissen G, Hale SE (2016) Biochar amendment to soil changes dissolved organic matter content and composition. Chemosphere 142:100–105

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sneath HE, Hutchings TR, Leij F (2013) Assessment of biochar and iron filing amendments for the remediation of a metal, arsenic and phenanthrene co-contaminated soil. Environ Pollut 178:361–366

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sun Y, Lei C, Khan E, Chen SS, Tsang DCW, Ok YS, Lin D, Feng Y, Li XD (2017) Nanoscale zero valent iron for metal/metalloid removal from model hydraulic fracturing wastewater. Chemosphere 176:315–323

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Taghizadeh TA, Clough TJ, Sherlock RR et al (2012) Biochar adsorbed ammonia is bioavailable. Plant Soil 350:57–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trakal L, Michálková Z, Beesley L, Vítková M, Ouředníček P, Barceló AP, Ettler V, Číhalová S, Komárek M (2018) AMOchar: amorphous manganese oxide coating of biochar improves its efficiency at removing metal(loid)s from aqueous solutions. Sci Total Environ 625:71–78

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Venegas A, Rigol A, Vidal M (2015) Viability of organic wastes and biochars as amendments for the remediation of heavy metal-contaminated soils. Chemosphere 119:190–198

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang N, Xue XM, Juhasz AL, Chang ZZ, Li HB (2017) Biochar increases arsenic release from an anaerobic paddy soil due to enhanced microbial reduction of iron and arsenic. Environ Pollut 220:514–522

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wenzel WW, Kirchbaumer N, Prohaska T, Stingeder G, Lombi E, Adriano DC (2001) Arsenic fractionation in soils using an improved sequential extraction procedure. Anal Chim Acta 436:309–332

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Woolson E A,et al. 1971. Correlation between available soil arsenic, estimated by six methods and response of corn[J]. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 35:101–105

  • Xiu W, Guo HM, Liu Q, Liu Z, Zou Y’, Zhang B (2015) Arsenic removal and transformation by Pseudomonas sp. Strain GE-1-induced ferrihydrite: co-precipitation versus adsorption. Water Air Soil Pollut 226:167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin DX, Wang X, Peng B et al (2017) Effect of biochar and Fe-biochar on Cd and As mobility and transfer in soil-rice system. Chemosphere 186:928–937

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yu ZH, Qiu WW, Wang F, Lei M, Wang D, Song Z (2017) Effects of manganese oxide-modified biochar composites on arsenic speciation and accumulation in an indica rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivar. Chemosphere 168:341–349

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng X-B, Li L-F, Bai L-Y et al (2007) Arsenic accumulation in different agricultural soils in Shouguang of Shandong Province. Chin Appl Ecol 18(2):310–316 (in Chinese)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang M, Gao B, Varnoosfaderani S, Hebard A, Yao Y, Inyang M (2013) Preparation and characterization of a novel magnetic biochar for arsenic removal. Bioresour Technol 130:457–462

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang F, Wang X, Xionghui J, Ma L (2016) Efficient arsenate removal by magnetite-modified water hyacinth biochar. Environ Pollut 216:575–583

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao YY, Fang XL, Mu YH, Cheng Y, Ma Q, Nian H, Yang C (2014) Metal pollution (Cd, Pb, Zn, and As) in agricultural soils and soybean, glycine max, in southern China. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 92:427–432

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu YG, Williams PN, Meharg AA (2008) Exposure to inorganic arsenic from rice: a global health issue? Environ Pollut 154:169–171

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study received support from the National Twelve-Five Year Science and Technology Support Program of China (2015BAD05B01) and the Science and Technology Innovation Project of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (2016–2020).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lianfang Li.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Zhihong Xu

Highlight

1. This study revealed that the inhibition of As uptake by Brassica campestris L. after amended with modified biochar singly and the complex with zero-valent iron.

2. The available As and water-soluble As in soils all decreased in MBC and ZMBC, while BC induced the improvement of As availability.

3. Modified biochar was effective at reducing As bioavailability, and immobilization effect of As in MBC can be strengthened by Fe(0), indicating potential for remediation of As-contaminated soil.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, L., Zhu, C., Liu, X. et al. Biochar amendment immobilizes arsenic in farmland and reduces its bioavailability. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25, 34091–34102 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3021-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3021-z

Keywords

Navigation