Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clean application of magnetic biomaterial for the removal of As (III) from water

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Magnetite-coated pine cone biomass was successfully synthesized, characterized, and its interaction with As (III) in water evaluated in order to apply it as an efficient adsorbent. Transmission electron microscope, scanning electron microscope, and imaging studies revealed that spherical magnetite particles were evenly distributed over the pine cone surface. Adsorption studies showed that the optimum pH of As (III) adsorption was 8 and that Fe (III) leaching was negligible at this pH. The optimum Fe3O4:pine cone ratio for As (III) removal was 2.0 g Fe3O4:1.5 g pine cone with adsorption capacity of 13.86 mg/g. The pseudo-second-order model best fitted the kinetic data with activation energy of adsorption was calculated to be 23.78 kJ/mol. The Langmuir isotherm described the equilibrium data best while the values of Dubinin–Radushkevich mean free energy suggests anion-exchange process. Increasing ionic strength slightly increased As (III) capacity of MNP-PCP from 13.86 to 17.82 mg/g at optimum solution pH of 8, but As (III) adsorption reduced by \( {\mathrm{PO}}_4^{3-} \)anions and humic acid due to competition. Adsorption mechanism was confirmed with evidence from FTIR, XPS, pHPZC, and \( {\mathrm{NO}}_3^{-} \) replacement by As (III) adsorption onto the \( {\mathrm{NO}}_3^{-} \)-loaded composite.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaron DR, Macalady DL, Ahmann D (2002) Natural Organic Matter Affects Arsenic Speciation and Sorption onto Hematite. Environ Sci Technol 36:2889–2896

  • Amin MN, Kaneco S, Kitagawa T, Begum A, Katsumata H, Suzuki T, Ohta K (2006) Removal of arsenic in aqueous solutions by adsorption onto waste rice husk. Ind Eng Chem Res 45:8105–8110

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ansone L, Klavins M, Viksna A (2013) Arsenic removal using natural biomaterial-based sorbents. Environ Geochem Health 35:633–642

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aryal M, Ziagova M, Liakopoulou-Kyriakides M (2010) Study on arsenic biosorption using Fe (III)-treated biomass of Staphylococcus xylosus. Chem Eng J 162:178–185

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee S, Chattopadhyaya M (2017) Adsorption characteristics for the removal of a toxic dye, tartrazine from aqueous solutions by a low cost agricultural by-product. Arab J Chem 10:S1629–S1638

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Biswas BK, Inoue J-i, Inoue K, Ghimire KN, Harada H, Ohto K, Kawakita H (2008) Adsorptive removal of As (V) and As (III) from water by a Zr (IV)-loaded orange waste gel. J Hazard Mater 154:1066–1074

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burton ED, Bush RT, Johnston SG, Watling KM, Hocking RK, Sullivan LA, Parker GK (2009) Sorption of arsenic (V) and arsenic (III) to schwertmannite. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43:9202–9207

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chang F, Qu J, Liu H, Liu R, Zhao X (2009) Fe–Mn binary oxide incorporated into diatomite as an adsorbent for arsenite removal: preparation and evaluation. J Colloid Interface Sci 338:353–358

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chung J-Y, Yu S-D, Hong Y-S (2014) Environmental source of arsenic exposure. J Prev Medi Public Health 47:253–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cumbal L, SenGupta AK (2005) Arsenic removal using polymer-supported hydrated iron (III) oxide nanoparticles: role of Donnan membrane effect. Environ Sci Technol 39:6508–6515

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fang L, Ghimire KN, Kuriyama M, Inoue K, Makino K (2003) Removal of fluoride using some lanthanum (III)-loaded adsorbents with different functional groups and polymer matrices. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 78:1038–1047

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Giasuddin ABM, Kanel SR, Choi H (2007) Adsorption of Humic Acid onto Nanoscale Zerovalent Iron and Its Effect on Arsenic Removal. Environ Sci Technol 41:2022–2027

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg S, Johnston CT (2001) Mechanisms of arsenic adsorption on amorphous oxides evaluated using macroscopic measurements, vibrational spectroscopy, and surface complexation modeling. J Colloid Interface Sci 234:204–216

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg S (2002) Competitive adsorption of arsenate and arsenite on oxides and clay minerals. Soil Sci Soc Am J 66:413–421

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goswami A, Raul P, Purkait M (2012) Arsenic adsorption using copper (II) oxide nanoparticles. Chem Eng Res Des 90:1387–1396

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta V, Nayak A (2012a) Cadmium removal and recovery from aqueous solutions by novel adsorbents prepared from orange peel and Fe2O3 nanoparticles. Chem Eng J 180:81–90

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta V, Nayak A (2012b) Cadmium removal and recovery from aqueous solutions by novel adsorbents prepared from orange peel and Fe2O3 nanoparticles. Chem Eng J 180:81–90

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hao L, Ouyang T, Lai L, Liu Y-X, Chen S, Hu H, Chang C-T, Wang J-J (2014) Temperature effects on arsenate adsorption onto goethite and its preliminary application to arsenate removal from simulative geothermal water. RSC Adv 4:51984–51990

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hua M, Yang B, Shan C, Zhang W, He S, Lv L, Pan B (2017) Simultaneous removal of As (V) and Cr (VI) from water by macroporous anion exchanger supported nanoscale hydrous ferric oxide composite. Chemosphere 171:126–133

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kamala C, Chu K, Chary N, Pandey P, Ramesh S, Sastry A, Sekhar KC (2005) Removal of arsenic (III) from aqueous solutions using fresh and immobilized plant biomass. Water Res 39:2815–2826

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kanel SR, Greneche JM, Choi H (2006) Removal of arsenic (III) from groudwater using nano scale zero-valent iron. Environ Sci Technol 39:1291–1298

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karthick K, Namasivayam C, Pragasan LA (2017) Removal of direct red 12B from aqueous medium by ZnCl2 activated Jatropha husk carbon: adsorption dynamics and equilibrium studies. Indian J Chem Technol 24:73–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar E, Bhatnagar A, Hogland W, Marques M, Sillanpää M (2014) Interaction of inorganic anions with iron-mineral adsorbents in aqueous media—a review. Adv Colloid Interf Sci 203:11–21

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lakshmipathiraj P, Narasimhan B, Prabhakar S, Raju GB (2006) Adsorption studies of arsenic on Mn-substituted iron oxyhydroxide. J Colloid Interface Sci 304:317–322

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lien H-L, Zhang W-X (2007) Nanoscale Pd/Fe bimetallic particles: catalytic effects of palladium on hydrodechlorination. Appl Catal B Environ 77:110–116

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J-F, Zhao Z-S, Jiang G-B (2008) Coating Fe3 O4 Magnetic Nanoparticles with Humic Acid for High Efficient Removal of Heavy Metals in Water. Environ Sci Technol 42:6949–6954

  • Lunge S, Singh S, Sinha A (2014) Magnetic iron oxide (Fe3O4) nanoparticles from tea waste for arsenic removal. J Magn Magn Mater 356:21–31

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mahanta N, Chen JP (2013) A novel route to the engineering of zirconium immobilized nano-scale carbon for arsenate removal from water. J Mater Chem A 1:8636–8644

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meng F, Yang B, Wang B, Duan S, Chen Z, Ma W (2017) Novel Dendrimerlike magnetic biosorbent based on modified orange peel waste: adsorption–reduction behavior of arsenic. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 5:9692–9700

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meng X, Korfiatis G, Jing C, Christodoulatos C (2001) Redox transformations of arsenic and Iron in water treatment, sludge during aging and TCLP extraction. Environ Sci Technol 35:3476–3481

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mittal A, Kurup L, Mittal J (2007) Freundlich and Langmuir adsorption isotherms and kinetics for the removal of Tartrazine from aqueous solutions using hen feathers. J Hazard Mater 146:243–248

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nashine A, Tembhurkar A (2016) Equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamic studies for adsorption of As (III) on coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) fiber. J Environ Chem Eng 4:3267–3273

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ofomaja AE, Naidoo EB, Modise SJ (2009) Removal of copper (II) from aqueous solution by pine and base modified pine cone powder as biosorbent. J Hazard Mater 168:909–917

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pena M, Meng X, Korfiatis GP, Jing C (2006) Adsorption mechanism of arsenic on nanocrystalline titanium dioxide. Environ Sci Technol 40:1257–1262

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peter KT, Johns AJ, Myung NV, Cwiertny DM (2017) Functionalized polymer-iron oxide hybrid nanofibers: electrospun filtration devices for metal oxyanion removal. Water Res 117:207–217

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ranjan D, Talat M, Hasan S (2009) Biosorption of arsenic from aqueous solution using agricultural residue ‘rice polish’. J Hazard Mater 166:1050–1059

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Renkou X, Yong W, Tiwari D, Houyan W (2009) Effect of ionic strength on adsorption of As (III) and As (V) on variable charge soils. J Environ Sci 21:927–932

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reza RA, Ahmaruzzaman M (2015) A novel synthesis of Fe 2 O 3@ activated carbon composite and its exploitation for the elimination of carcinogenic textile dye from an aqueous phase. RSC Adv 5:10575–10586

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sahu UK, Sahu S, Mahapatra SS, Patel RK (2017) Cigarette soot activated carbon modified with Fe3O4 nanoparticles as an effective adsorbent for As (III) and As (V): material preparation, characterization and adsorption mechanism study. J Mol Liq 243:395–405

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Santra D, Sarkar M (2016) Optimization of process variables and mechanism of arsenic (V) adsorption onto cellulose nanocomposite. J Mol. Liq 224:290–302

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Setyono D, Valiyaveettil S (2014) Chemically modified sawdust as renewable adsorbent for arsenic removal from water. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 2:2722–2729

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Subramanian K, Kumar PS, Jeyapal P, Venkatesh N (2005) Characterization of ligno-cellulosic seed fibre from Wrightia Tinctoria plant for textile applications—an exploratory investigation. Eur Polym J 41:853–861

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tian Y, Wu M, Lin X, Huang P, Huang Y (2011) Synthesis of magnetic wheat straw for arsenic adsorption. J Hazard Mater 193:10–16

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van Vinh N, Zafar M, Behera S, Park H-S (2015) Arsenic (III) removal from aqueous solution by raw and zinc-loaded pine cone biochar: equilibrium, kinetics, and thermodynamics studies. Int J Environ Sci Technol 12:1283–1294

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesan G, Narayanan SL (2018) Synthesis of Fe2O3-coated and HCl-treated bauxite ore waste for the adsorption of arsenic (III) from aqueous solution: isotherm and kinetic models. Chem Eng Commun 205:34–46

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weber WJ, Morris JC (1963) Kinetics of adsorption on carbon from solution. J Sanit Eng Div 89:31–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson D, Langell M (2014) XPS analysis of oleylamine/oleic acid capped Fe3O4 nanoparticles as a function of temperature. Appl Surf Sci 303:6–13

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wu K, Liu R, Li T, Liu H, Peng J, Qu J (2013) Removal of arsenic (III) from aqueous solution using a low-cost by-product in Fe-removal plants—Fe-based backwashing sludge. Chem Eng J 226:393–401

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yoon Y, Zheng M, Ahn Y-T, Park WK, Yang WS, Kang J-W (2017) Synthesis of magnetite/non-oxidative graphene composites and their application for arsenic removal. Sep Purif Technol 178:40–48

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yoshida I (1981) Adsorption of arsenic (III) ion on various ion exchange resins loaded with iron (III) and zirconium (IV). Bull Chem Soc Jpn 3:379–384

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu F, Sun S, Ma J, Han S (2015) Enhanced removal performance of arsenate and arsenite by magnetic graphene oxide with high iron oxide loading. Phys Chem Chem Phys 17:4388–4397

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yu X, Tong S, Ge M, Zuo J, Cao C, Song W (2013) One-step synthesis of magnetic composites of cellulose@ iron oxide nanoparticles for arsenic removal. J Mater Chem A 1:959–965

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang S, Li X-y, Chen JP (2010) An XPS study for mechanisms of arsenate adsorption onto a magnetite-doped activated carbon fiber. J Colloid Interface Sci 343:232–238

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang W, Zheng J, Zheng P, Tsang DC, Qiu R (2015) Sludge-derived biochar for arsenic (III) immobilization: effects of solution chemistry on sorption behavior. J Environ Qual 44:1119–1126

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Z, Jia Y, Xu L, Zhao S (2011) Adsorption and heterogeneous oxidation of As (III) on ferrihydrite. Water Res 45:6496–6504

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou S, Wang D, Sun H, Chen J, Wu S, Na P (2014) Synthesis, characterization, and adsorptive properties of magnetic cellulose nanocomposites for arsenic removal. Water Air Soil Pollut 225:1945

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Augustine E. Ofomaja.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Tito Roberto Cadaval Jr

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 37.8 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pholosi, A., Naidoo, B.E. & Ofomaja, A.E. Clean application of magnetic biomaterial for the removal of As (III) from water. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25, 30348–30365 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2990-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2990-2

Keywords

Navigation