Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Farm-level economics of innovative tillage technologies: the case of no-till in the Altai Krai in Russian Siberia

  • Facing to real sustainability - Conservation agricultural practices around the world
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the agricultural Altai Krai in Russian Siberia, soil degradation problems are prevalent. Agronomists recommend “reduced tillage systems,” especially no-till, as a sustainable way to cultivate land that is threatened by soil degradation. In the Altai Krai, less is known about the technologies in practice. In this paper, we provide information on plant cultivation technologies used in the Altai Krai and on selected factors preventing farm managers in this region from adopting no-till technology based on our own quantitative survey conducted across 107 farms in 2015 and 2016. The results of the quantitative survey show that farm managers have high uncertainty regarding the use of no-till technology including its economics. To close this gap, we provide systematic analysis of factors influencing the economy of the plant production systems by using a farm optimization model (linear programming) for a real farm, together with expert estimations. The farm-specific results of the optimization model show that under optimal management and climatic conditions, the expert Modern Canadian no-till technology outperforms the farm min-till technology, but this is not the case for suboptimal conditions with lower yields.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The farmer starts to collect peas on the August 5, wheat on the August 15, and soya beans on the October 15. In total, the harvest takes 45 days.

References

  • Alary V, Corbeels M, Affholder F, Alvarez S, Soria A, Xavier JV, Macena F, Scopel E (2016) Economic assessment of conservation agriculture options in mixed crop-livestock systems in Brazil using farm modelling. Agric Syst 144:33–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baudron F, Corbeels M, Andersson JA, Sibanda M, Giller KE (2011) Delineating the drivers of waning wildlife habitat: the predominance of cotton farming on the fringe of protected areas in the Zambezi Valley, Zimbabwe. Biol Conserv 144(5):1481–1493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black AW, Reeve I (1993) Participation in landcare groups: the relative importance of attitudinal and situational factors. J Environ Manag 39:51–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandes W (1974) How do I analyze and plan my business? Parey, Hamburg (in German)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan-Halbrendt C, Reed B, Halbrendt J, Roul P (2016) Measuring the economic impact of conservation agriculture adoption in rural India using linear programming and economic surplus analysis. https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/handle/10919/70119. Accessed 14 September 2016

  • D’Emden FH, Llewellyn RS, Burton MP (2008) Factors influencing adoption of conservation tillage in Australian cropping regions. Aust J Agric Resour Econ 52(2):169–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dammann S, Meinel T, Beljaev VI, Fruehauf M (2011) Effect of various soil cultivation technologies at the soil water balance and crop production in dry areas. Hallesches Jahrbuch für Geowissenschaften 32(33):33–48 (in German)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dantzig GB (1963) Linear programming and extensions. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Defrancesco E, Gatto P, Runge F, Trestini S (2008) Factors affecting farmers’ participation in agri-environmental measures: a northern Italian perspective. J Agric Econ 59(1):114–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Dent JB, Harrison SR, Woodford KB (1986) Farm planning with linear programming: concept and practice. Butterworths, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Fileccia T, Jumabayeva A (2012) Advancement and impact of conservation agriculture/no-till technology adoption in Kazakhstan. Information note. FAO investment centre

  • Fowler R, Rockstrom J (2001) Conservation tillage for sustainable agriculture: an agrarian revolution gathers momentum in Africa. Soil Tillage Res 61(1):93–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fruehauf M (2013) KULUNDA—how to prevent the next »Global Dust Bowl«? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1E3kpFIQTWA. Accessed 5 August 2013

  • Giller KE, Witter E, Corbeels M, Tittonell P (2009) Conservation agriculture and smallholder farming in Africa: the heretics’ view. Field Crop Res 114(1):23–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray RS, Taylor JS, Brown WJ (1996) Economic factors contributing to the adoption of reduced tillage technologies in central Saskatchewan. Can J Plant Sci 76(4):661–668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardaker JB, Huirne RBM, Anderson JR, Lien G (2004) Coping with risk in agriculture, second edn. CAB International, Wallingford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Heady EO, Candler W (1958) Linear programming methods. Iowa State University Press, Ames

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernanz JL, Giro’n VS, Cerisola C (1995) Long-term energy use and economic evaluation of three tillage systems for cereal and legume production in central Spain. Soil Tillage Res 35(4):183–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jelinek L, Bavorová M (2015) Why do farmers have a low propensity to adopt soil conservation technologies on the degraded steppe land in south Russia? The next horizon of technology assessment. Proceedings from the Pacita 2015 conference in Berlin. Technology Centre ASCR, Prague, p 301–310

  • Karakulev VV, Bakirov FG, Vibe VD (2004) Efficiency of resource-saving systems of the basic soil treatment in the cultivation of spring wheat. News of Orenburskogo State Agrarian University 4:14–16 (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowler D, Bradshaw B (2007) Farmers’ adoption of conservation agriculture: a review and synthesis of recent research. Food Policy 32(1):25–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Llewellyn RS (2007) Information quality and effectiveness for more rapid adoption decisions by farmers. Field Crop Res 104(1):148–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Llewellyn RS, D’Emden FH, Kuehne G (2012) Extensive use of no-tillage in grain growing regions of Australia. Field Crop Res 132:204–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López MV, Sabre M, Gracia R, Arrúe JL, Gomes L (1998) Tillage effects on soil surface conditions and dust emission by wind erosion in semi-arid Aragón (NE Spain). Soil Tillage Res 45:91–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markovskaya GK, Yudina V (2009) Influence of different ways of the basic soil cultivation on its biological activity in the conditions of forest-steppe zone in the Samara region. Achiev Sci Technol APK 3:21–23 (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Meinel T (2002) The geo-ecological consequences of steppe cultivation change in western Siberia in the 50th. A contribution for future concepts under the consideration of wind erosion. Dissertation. Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (in German)

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer-Aurich A, Janovicek K, Deen W, Weersink A (2006) Impact of tillage and rotation on yield and economic performance in corn-based cropping systems. Agron J 98(5):1204–1212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mußhoff O, Hirschauer N (2007) What benefits are to be derived from improved farm program planning approaches?—the role of time series models and stochastic optimization. Agric Syst 95(1–3):11–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozpinar S, Ozpinar A (2011) Influence of tillage and crop rotation systems on economy and weed density in semi-arid region. J Agric Sci Technol 13:769–784

    Google Scholar 

  • Pannell DJ, Llewellyn RS, Corbeels M (2014) The farm-level economics of conservation agriculture for resource-poor farmers. Agric Ecosyst Environ 187:52–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paudel B, Chan C, Halbrendt J, Crow SE, Radovich TJK, Norton G (2016) Bioeconomic optimization of conservation agriculture production systems (CAPS) for smallholder tribal farmers in the hill region of Nepal. J Soil Water Conserv 71(2):103–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polyanskaya NA (2012) Improving the efficiency of grain production on the basis of resource-saving technologies. Herald NGIEI 5:77–93 (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pykhtin IG, Gostev AV (2012) Current problems in the application of different systems and in the main tillage methods. Achiev Sci Technol APK 1:3–5 (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rae AN (1994) Agricultural management economics: activity analysis and decision-making. CAB International, Wallingford

    Google Scholar 

  • Raper RL, Reeves EW, Burt EC, Torbert HA (1994) Conservation tillage and traffic effects on soil conditions. Trans ASAE 37(3):763–768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shamxalov FI, Shetinin MP (2012) Economic encyclopedia of Russian regions. Mir, Altai region, p 26 (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer JW, Chase CA, Kohler KA (2010) Profitability of cropping systems featuring tillage and compost. Agron J 102(2):450–456

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smart JR, Bradford JM (1999) Conservation tillage corn production for a semiarid, subtropical environment. Agron J 91(1):116–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas GA, Titmarsh GW, Freebairn DM, Radford BJ (2007) No-tillage and conservation farming practices in grain growing areas of Queensland—a review of 40 years of development. Anim Prod Sci 47(8):887–898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorne ME, Young FL, Pan WL, Bafus R, Alldredge JR (2003) No-till spring cereal cropping systems reduce wind erosion susceptibility in the wheat/fallow region of the Pacific Northwest. J Soil Water Conserv 58(5):250–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanslembrouck I, Van Huylenbroeck G, Verbeke W (2002) Determinants of the willingness of Belgian farmers to participate in agri-environmental measures. J Agric Econ 53(3):489–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zentner RP, Lafond GP, Derksen DA, Campbell CA (2002) Economics of crop diversification and soil tillage opportunities in the Canadian prairies. Agron J 94(2):216–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the KULUNDA project, part of the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) research program “Sustainable Land Management,” which allowed this research to be completed.

The authors would like to thank Dr. Tobias Meinel (from the agricultural machinery manufacturer Amazone in Kazakhstan and Russia) as well as Prof. Belayev (from the Farm Mechanization Department at the Agrarian University in Barnaul) for their valuable estimations. Without their knowledge input, this analysis would not have been possible. Furthermore, we would like to thank the farmer who was always cooperative and who provided us with detailed information about his farm.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miroslava Bavorova.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Zhihong Xu

Appendices

Appendix 1

Table 16 Scientific experts’ estimations of parameters of production activities, Kulunda forest steppe, the Altai Krai, Russia, 2013

Appendix 2

Table 17 Average yields of spring wheat, soya beans, and peas in Kalmanskiy rayon and Altai Krai, Russia

Appendix 3

Table 18 Farmer’s estimations of parameters of production activities for spring wheat, Kulunda forest steppe, the Altai Krai, Russia 2014

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bavorova, M., Imamverdiyev, N. & Ponkina, E. Farm-level economics of innovative tillage technologies: the case of no-till in the Altai Krai in Russian Siberia. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25, 1016–1032 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9268-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9268-y

Keywords

Navigation